Browses Veeky Forums

>browses Veeky Forums
>works his ass off in the gym and improves himself
>isn't a libertarian

Would you support a GAINZ tax that redistributes 50% of your gains to dyels and fatties? If not, why do you support socialist economic policies that effectively are doing the same thing but with your money instead?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=_wtMQmlAHMU
youtube.com/watch?v=LsB5vHs_83Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because any libertarian society will inevitably become a socialist one anyway. They weak screw ups will always gather together and dominate the strong and successful.

im not white

>weak screw ups dominate the strong and successful
wut??

im actually a feudal royalist so uh nice try sweetie

>Not realizing that the only way to smash the state is via 1488

Because national socialism is the real ideology of the Veeky Forumsizen

...

i'm open to the idea, tell me more?

I don't browse /pol/ very often

Who would win in a fight?
10 bloatlords
or
1000 soyboys

hopefully someone would just plant some C4 underneath a bridge or whatever they're fighting on top of

>implying the soyboys will fight

>Not just firing a tomahawk missile up their asses, NAP be damned, this is survival of the fittest and they're too weak to arm themselves

Not when you add a sufficient technological force multiplier

30 poor guys Vs 1 rich guy using weapons of the past and yerh you're screwed

In the present day though realistically only the rich guy will be able to afford bulletproof armour and a submachine gun and then the odds are entirely different

Plus you could have support agreements, like countries do; ie if any of your Poor's act up then all of our security forces will move in to eliminate them

>Not just paying one group of poorfags to kill another group of poorfags
No one in this thread can even into /McWarlord/

Wrong, this is collectivist trash for weak spybots afraid of the divine self

>implying libertarianism isn't a rebranded version of anarchy

>t. Sargon of Mossad

GULAG THE KIKES, CLASS WAR NOW
youtube.com/watch?v=_wtMQmlAHMU

i don't go to planet fitness

>not being natsoc
t. Low test lolberg cuckold

Your ideology is inherently fucked as you elevate the needs of the group above those of your own
You're literally the beta provider for a system that restricts your liberty

Absolutely disgusting

25 points in a nutshell
>Unify the country under one race, one nationality for the betterment of the country
>Disregard any unfair global treaties that have been placed upon your country
>Take back the land that was taken
>No ethnically foreign immigrants can become citizens
>Non citizens in-country are treated as aliens
>No public role of any kind can be taken by a foreigner
>All citizens must be provided a healthy living standard by the state. If impossible, expel the aliens
>Any ethnic foreigners who were citizens before the reich was formed must leave peacefully ASAP
>Equal rights and duties for all citizens
>All citizens are expected to do mental or physical work. Any work that offends or belittles a community should be abolished
>Unearned income outside of work is abolished.
>War profit is treason
>All trusts are nationalized
>Large industries share profits
>Senior citizens get larger pensions
>Create a larger and stronger middle class
>Absolish the leasing/speculation of land
>Any group/person working against the common good is met with swift death
>Reduce materialist law
>Higher education is available to all, and provided by the state for lower class citizens.
>National "folk" army.
>Any press must be written and edited by citizens. Foreign press must be approved by the state. Any dissent or lies in press is suppressed and punished.
>Freedom of religion, so long as the religion does not harm the state, such as with Jewish materialism
>Unconditional authority by the party.

So slavery to the state?

...

These gains are between me, God, and Her Majesty.

Coward detected

youtube.com/watch?v=LsB5vHs_83Q

You realize that bioshock MOCKED capitalism correct? It took aynn rands aesthetic and turned it corrupt to show than the free market is not sunshine and rainbows

you are correct.
sounds commie as fuck

You realize bioshock mocked those ideas badly, right? Andrew Ryan preferred building a pretty city over listening to engineers. John Galt would have never build a structurally unsound building or would let himself live in one. Also, Rand's characters would literally rather live in wooden huts in the middle of nowhere than surrounded by "normies" (?)
I'm not such a fan of Rand but bioshock really misrepresented the ideas

You need to complement it with a positive view for humanity.
Either Heinlein or Imperial Creed

Go call your fucking mother "coward"
I'd kill to defend the holy values of liberalism

For a video game it does convey the general concept of what it's trying to show very well. And if you played it, liked it, and still thought that it was about how capitalism is cool then you're a brainlet. Also Rands character are walking messages, there's no actual characterization in the books

>Holy values
>The holy value to shove shit up your ass
>The holy value of letting children choose their gender because thats what their mommy believes in.
>The holy value to die for the rights of some faggot provocateur to preach his caustic bullshit
>The holy right of DUDE WEED LMAO
>The holy right of corporations to ingrain them selves in the state, destroy the water ways, pay workers a slave wage and abandon them once they fall ill
>The holy right of "FEELS GOOD SO DO IT "

fucking lmao

>thought that it was about how capitalism is cool
I didn't think the game is how about capitalism is cool, I think it's try to show it's a poopy head by caricature, badly
>Also Rands character are walking messages,
agree
>there's no actual characterization in the books
Also agree
I read her books once, sort of had fun, but couldn't really stand reading them again.
Still had some interesting points

Be a Stirnerite Egoist

>Self Pride Worldwide
>Union of Egoists
>Milk shops
>So much self love you have love to share with others if you choose
>No longer chained to arbitrary bullshit holding you back from being the best you

10 bloatlords

>free markets don't wo-

utopianism is for fags

Dubs check'd. This is true.

The purpose of every state is group rights. Don't tell me you're dumb enough to fall for the SepticsTM tactical ancap ? Or are you actually a retarded ancap ?
This might blow your mind, but the collective empowers the individual. The collective grants him rights, a voice and protection. Your absurd atomized individual ideals only make sure that i have no way to defend myself when a racial collective of niggers isn't convinced by liberal values.

Name one fit libertarian and perhaps I will consider it.

>be liberfitarian
>50% of my gainz go to my boss
>spend another 25% on paying rent for my gym
>spend another 15% paying the McCoppas insurance company so they dont come around and break my windows when I'm at work

no thanks

If his your boss. As in not self employed you don’t deserve those ‘50%’ gains

>2 top threads on fit right now are political

i fucking hate this fucking site so much. i cant even discuss fucking fitness without politics worming its way in

we get it. this entire board are diehard conservatives, rich engineers who hate every minority group besides the whitest of white people and hate the idea of giving even a cent to anyone besides yourself. we get it. stop saying it every fucking day

>be born without capital
>haha you just arent strong enough

cucked af desu

>a large state ENHANCES individual rights

Another victim of public schools

IF there's someone willing to pay, it is perfectly ok according to the market. You can't cherrypick this.

yeah but it's slavery to whites, that's the good slavery

Wrong. Hierarchical structures take and proceed to grant "rights" to individuals as if they'd even need to be defined in a truly egalitarian society.

That's seriously all a right is unless you believe in the meme that God made them up. It's a privilege with a special name.

>50% of my gainz go to my boss

Categorically false. Your labor is worth what it is worth based on your skill set. If you have the skill set to succeed without someone doing the managerial work, do it yourself.

Read a squires trial it's a good intro to fascism.

You don't have a right to the fruits of another's labor. If you support the state doing anything aside from enforcing the nonaggression principle it's no different than a DYEL taking your gains because he's too lazy to workout himself.

Literally commie bullshit that starts with slavery and end with mass death. Veeky Forums weenies role playing as nazis are so, so embarrassing. Classic libertarian is THE Veeky Forums politic, suck on it geek

>exploitation doesn't exist

the jews got you good mate, I'm sure you could argue for your labours full value to zuckerkike and his hiring team

Because I believe in the right of every individual to chase success, three square meals, a roof over his or her head, and not having to fear death over inconsequential things?

Minus the vulnerability of the welfare system, I'm pretty happy living in the UK. The NHS is, outside of the incompetence of its management, a beautiful and enviable institution.

I don't understand what you're saying but if you're saying individuals in positions of power are privileged you're onto some truly groundbreaking stuff.

>he fell for Karl Marx, a Jew, labor theory of value

Embarrassing. Your labor is worth a certain amount depending on how in demand your skillset is. If you don't have any skills you're not being exploited you're just a subhuman.

>Because I believe in the right of every individual to chase success, three square meals, a roof over his or her head, and not having to fear death over inconsequential things?

So you'd be fine redistributing 50% of your gains weekly to a dyel fat piece of shit who doesn't go to the gym? It's only fair, you don't really NEED all those muscles.

Can't wait to see how you'll convince non-whites to respect liberal ideology. As an outsider there's nothing more pathetic than the pride you westerners take in your own extermination and the destruction of your societies. The end is coming and your diseased civilization is cheering it on.
When your laws no longer matter, your kin are hunted in the streets,your house is requisitioned for housing caliphate soldiers and your women are used for sexual emergancies you will be able to say "At least i was objective."

Hardly

They had literal superpowers and in one of the endings were shown to emerge from the sea to conquer the rest of the WORLD

later on Columbia would use their tech to once again dominate the world

yes good goy keep working so rasheed can live comfortably with his 8 children spreading shariah law

You're the one cowering in a group because you fear standing on your own feet and you need an external meaning to your life

Some Ubermensch you are, needing your life dictated to you by external forces

Yes, it all just works. Nobody with power would ever dare subvert my ideological points, no companies ever abused the workforce.

Nah randian atheism/objectivism

Literally all of the modern problems is because we're shackled to outdated concepts like empathy or equality

Like there's be no refugee problem if people just said 'yerh Syrians are dying but it's not happening to me so who cares'
We wouldn't have the issues with tranny acceptance or welfare or gun control of we simply stuck to rational cost benefit analysis and rational self interest instead of falling for these false gods

>if you have no moral values then nothing is wrong

genius

Low wages are a symptom of overpopulation which is enforced by welfare

In its absence oversupply of labour depresses wages below starvation level until enough people starve that labour becomes valuable lesson enough to survive on again

The market fixes itself

Nice buzzwords. Your arguments are pure emotion, using words like exploit and abuse. If a worker feels his skillset is more valuable than what he's being paid he's free to offer his skills elsewhere to a more suitable employer.

> if humans would only be "rational" everything would be peaches
When are the sheep going to stop falling for ideologies ? Why the hell do you enlightened individualists willingly shackle yourself to ideologies. Is it that hard to think for yourself instead of filtering every idea to see if it agrees with your talking points ?

>it's ok because the poor people will just starve

and increased living standards actually decrease overpopulation

>and increased living standards actually decrease overpopulation

Not when this leads to the mass importation of Syrians and niggers who want free welfare.

> haha my society may crumble but the free hand of the market will surely fix everything
No, i'm simply stating whether you like it or not that there is no such thing as a free market.
> haha i know these migrants are taking your jobs and ruining your cities but i guess you just have to leave europe and america

>there is no such thing as a free market.

Because retards like you keep voting to enlarge the state and increase taxes so Shaneekwa and Tyrone can keep popping out 10 future welfare collectors.

I work in the NHS and I despise it

It's making our obesity and old age problems worse by keeping these parasites alive and chained to us

Literal hopeless cases are kept latched onto the teat on life support forever
Some fat slob who's never worked a day in his life can spend years suctioning the price of chemo out of everyone else even though we derive no value by keeping him alive

Divorcing a service from the cost of that service always ends in disaster

'society' is a meme

What do I care if people who aren't me starve?

This is the opposite of ideology

I'm simply doing the maths
For every person out there that dies it means one less person competing for resources I could have
Therefore helping people who aren't me unless I gain some benefit is just cucking myself

>tfw you lose touch with the universal consciousness

a sad state

No, because we've had a free market and children were dying and getting mitilated in factories, the companies acted like small states treating their workforce as slave labour sending goons to beat them up if they didn't comply, giving them the bare minimum to live off of creating a massive lower class, companies engaged in gang like streetfights, shoot outs.
This is the very reason communism gained any traction because capitalism created the need for it funny enough.
No it's not, that's not how human society works, we're not an individualist species. We form large genetically similar groups to ensure our survival and selflesness is a big part of that.
Like i said, ideologue.

Unions are increased worker's living standards. Unions are not the government they are private organizations brainlet.

I was not talking about unions, i was talking about companies. But sure, unions aren't an answer either, sure at first they champion worker's rights, but after they're used to bully companies into submission to get things they don't deserve. Most jobs don't even have unions anymore besides underperforming life support ones like the teachers.
Also you're in a union so i guess we can't fire you.

>>Higher education is available to all, and provided by the state for lower class citizens.

that's awesome

>Be liberfitarian
>Put 10 effort into gym
>Get 10 gains out
>Realise your body is a free market

okay, I will thanks

That only happens in democratic societies. If you have a stateless society run entirely by private, free association, nobody who can't convince another person to fund them can survive without supporting themselves.

And as another user said, you can pay one group of poor people to fight another group of poor people.

>He doesn't know that national socialists are the loud minority leftists on Veeky Forums and that libertarians are the actual majority

>And as another user said, you can pay one group of poor people to fight another group of poor people
>larpers thinking theyre gonna be the ones on top when theyre cucks on an oyo canoe maintenance forum

>He thinks that by being anti-democratic you're automatically for a big government
Read up on anarchy, mate. Not that commie kind either, the real one. I recommend Hoppe.

>works his ass off
What do you mean? Lifting weights takes max 10 hours a week. You rest about 5 hours of that training time. Do you consider 5 hours of training a week "working his ass off"?

>improves himself
Not really. You get muscles, sure. But are you doing something productive? Something that benefits society and you something you get paid for? Not really.

Lifting is a hobby, for self-enjoyment. It is not self-improvement unless you are a personal trainer who tries to sell his services and market gym as something "important". It's not important. Work, family, and society is important.

>propertarians
>real anarchism

I wasnt talking about anyway government but whatever

>Communists
>Real anarchists

No it isn't you faggot, this is done via higher taxes you cuck

Libertarianism is doomed. It will not last, and it's efficiency is a great gamble.

Small government with numerous immovable checks on power is the way, just as the founders realized

>Communist anarchy
I mean, communism is only an ideology that necessitates big government to exist, but that doesn't mean we can't do an ANARKEY version of it... right?

because there are things in life you cant control and times in life you cant control things (education, health). There are also things which work best being controlled publically either for accountability or logistical reasons (police/ military and roads/utilites respectively).

Training in the gym isn't much at all about luck, a little bit sure because we all screw up very occasionally and risk injury. Real life includes significantly more uncontrollable risk so doing well isn't just about working hard it's also partly about being lucky. Because of this there's a moral obligation from people who work hard AND get lucky to support people who might work just as hard but who have been less lucky. Not wanting to do this just makes you a shit head, too stupid to get it or just ignorant of and not ready to accept reality. Lots of people fall into those 3.

Note there's nothing wrong with not wanting to support people who aren't willing to work hard and improve themselves and balancing helping those who genuinely deserve it rather than the malingerers is the issue, not whether any aid should be given.

They unironically believe that everybody is equal and can live together peacefully, each pulling exactly the same weight for their country. Hell, some even contradict themselves by stating the stronger will pull more weight to compensate for the weaker.

> implying ancaps don't deny human nature as well

Explain.

I mean that's just wrong. The biggest predictors of success are IQ and a hard work mentality.
Sure i don't mind giving aid to people that deserve it like kids that are too poor for college but otherwise have excellent grades.

> ancaps
> people are entirely selfish
> ancoms/communists
> people are entirely selfless
But it's also the idea of anarchism. People don't do anarchism. There will always be an enforced hierarchy because we are social animals. While the communists envisions society as a colony of ants anarcho-capitalists see it as some collection of atomized individuals who are beacons of individuality an example of which i can't even find for you in nature. Even cats are more statist than ancaps.

This
Reality is full of bitter truths that only the voluntary blind chose to deny