What did google mean by this?

What did google mean by this?

Attached: IMG_9275.png (750x1334, 344K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/e9kti648U4g
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

search for "white couple" next and tell me what google meant by THAT

Attached: tenor (9).gif (268x176, 687K)

Jesus fuck, man

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-015509.png (1440x2880, 1.89M)

/thread

That's hilarious.

That one's pretty obvious. Nobody says "a white couple", but when it's a mixed race couple, it's either a "mixed race couple" or a "black and white couple" or a "black / white couple".

"White couple" will appear in common usage far more as part of "black and white couple" than on its own, because when it's a white / white couple, it's just a "couple"

Pic related

Attached: snip.png (1698x1247, 3.92M)

racism only has one place on Veeky Forums:
love knows no bounds, loser.

Beautiful :) Made for BBC.

Attached: 1481770078613.jpg (600x800, 53K)

Exactly, its a feedback loop, just look at this first result, which is a screenshot of the fucking search your searching. I'm 99% sure most racist shitposters are just psyop shills trying to embed thoughts into your head.

Will those help me to become a trap?

> cope

>Human
>Person
>Man
>Woman
>Couple
>Almost all white people
>WorkingAsIntended.jpg

>Search for a definition people don't generally use
>See black people
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE MANIPULATION, GOOGLE IS EVIL, IT'S THE (((JEWS))), THIS IS A CONSPIRACY

What about this one? There's no way African American inventor is put in more often than just American inventors.

Google has even admitted they were doing "research" into "other countries" on ways to prevent racism by adjusting search results.

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-052346.jpg (1413x516, 179K)

yeah but it's funnier when you just go with it
You do know what fun is.. right, user?

JIDF out in force tonight

Attached: (((google))).png (1356x772, 1.77M)

Similar reason.

You usually don't say "American Inventor" when you talk about them. Nobody writes "These American Inventors bla bla" when they talk about Edison etc. since everyone fucking knows they are American.

You are however likely to say African-American, if you want to specifically point out their ethnicity.

You got results for both, I don't see what the problem is.

Search 'European couple' and the first three were ahmed and blonde woman haha

Yeah you would definitely would use the term American inventors if you were looking for someone to study. Or if you were talking about science and technology in the states. Just like i would if I was searching French inventors

>white man and white woman
>not a single white man with a white woman
>i don't see the problem

Attached: we wuz european and shit.png (1355x729, 1.88M)

>TFW the jews are literally changing history in front of everyone
>some cucks are fine with it

What are your lifts, height, weight, and body fat %

lol no, you would totally use american inventor

>racism only has one place on Veeky Forums: muh /pol/
nigger how new are you?

leave and stay leave

Are you guys really not know how to google? It searches each term. Use quotes to search for a phrase. Fuck.

wait what the actual fuck
i tried googling it myself, and what the fucking fuck

Jesus fucking christ you are idiots. What you mean when you search makes no difference to Google. What Google's algorithm cares about is if the photos are tagged in a certain way. White American inventors aren't usually specified as being American because it's taken for granted. It's the default state, no need to specifically point it out. A computer program however does not know that. African-American is specifically tagged, so that's all Google has to go on. It's not perfect since but I understand why it happens and I don't see it as a god damn plot.

Only an agenda posting idiot will use terms like "European history", just like they say "African culture" or whatever blanket terms with no real meaning.

I'll get worried once i start to see black people at the top of country specific history searches where they really have no business being.

Attached: multi kulti.png (1275x660, 1.41M)

>i'll get worried once it is too late

I hope you are being dense on purpose.

Sure, only one match for what you actually wanted. 2 out of 5 are actually anywhere near the mark anyway.

Attached: how do i into search algorithms.png (825x338, 322K)

Enjoy your paranoia.

Heh

> still doesn't believe in blatant nigger worship
> over glorification of sports that blacks prodominantly play
> over glorified in music
> equally represented in film and awards isn't enough
> blacks allowed to appropriate European mythos and be gods and heroes in them
> doesn't realize blatant social engineering when a black hero invades European mythos and they keep the female counter part white
> fix results to show successful blacks so it's the first thing you see
> deny genetic clustering of ethnicities and conflate it to the subjectiveness of race so people are more willing to let their ethnicities be outbred.

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-055600~2.png (1440x1841, 417K)

Not true at all, it's intentional and you can tell it's intentional by changing your region/language. If you search American inventors using a German Google search, hell even an Australian one, it comes up with only white American inventors (ya know, the ones who actually invented shit). Google specifically curtails its algorithm to the region that is searching, so it's quite easy to check if you're being intentionally misled. It's the same reason you won't find many articles about Muslims if you're doing a search in Europe but will if you're in the US. Google intentionally shifts what results show up, based on region, to frame what information you're exposed to. It's propaganda plain and simple, controlling (or at the very least, selectively framing) what information people are exposed to.

This.

Attached: Screenshot_2018-03-15-20-10-14-1.png (720x1096, 434K)

Use DuckDuckGo

It’s useless trying to convince these paranoid faggots man. Everything in the world is because of THE JEWS and the blacks in their opinion. Everyone is out to “get us” lmao

>Get specifically told why adding "american" or "white" will affect the results
>Add quotation marks while still searching for the same things.
>Gets upset over getting same results.

And you guys wonder why nobody takes you seriously.

... are you actually telling me that if I search with my native language, I'll get different results than if I were to search for articles written in English?

You are fucking deluded if you think people don't search American inventors more often than specifically african american.

>white baby born to black mother

Attached: yakub.png (402x600, 165K)

>This is the level of intelligence you can expect from a /pol/tard

See, you have two red apples. One apple has the label "red" on it. Google searches for apples that are red but it needs to look at labels to determine if an apple is red. So it only gives you the result with the apple that has the label even though both apples are red.

You KNOW that both apples are red and get upset when google doesn't show you both apples. You try to search for "ALL THE RED APPLES" or "THE OTHER RED APPLE" or whatever but you still only get the one apple with the label.

Please do not breed.

whites are literally legally being democratically genocided as we speak in south africa

>enjoy your paranoia

hope it happens to you soon, i'm done with this world anyway, it's full of cunts, apathetic cucks, and you, you fucking rat jew

Attached: 1515563538044.webm (960x540, 2.97M)

at no point in this post do you make sense, google is only showing blacks for all of these different searches, not just sometimes, and not asian americans or indian americans, just blacks

Everyone who disagrees with my radical extremist views is a jew, nigger or an asian lmfao

Why buddy? Most white guys are moderates or lean right or left. You know that right? You’re the 0.1% who wants to kill and deport everyone not us

literally go outside right now, drive to the traintracks and lay your head on the cold steel rail

I can explain things but I can't make you understand them.

Go play with other kids now.

Attached: You_win_the_prize.jpg (523x349, 45K)

Kill yourself my dude.

Attached: 1496797167682.jpg (225x225, 14K)

Don't try to reason with right winger retards.

Next they'll google " NOT GAY PORN " on pornhub and be surprised they see men fuck each others, calling it a jewish scheme to destroy western civilization

Not everyone lives in cabins next to railroads you dumb redneck

>replying to yourself

How would you look up a list of American inventors? Just like you would put in French you would put French invemtors.

Here I just put in inventors. Black inventors was still plastered everywhere.

The que was black white black white black black

turn off your computer and kill yourself however you can, could be a knife that's fine

Pic

>

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-063754.jpg (1354x2091, 520K)

I'd look at the websites for one thing.

Attached: boom.png (772x803, 220K)

It's about exposure, that first glimpse will still have an effect on you and still more prone to click.

Heres your stupid theory about African always being put in with American. "African American" wasn't used till half way through the page

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-064945.jpg (1418x2359, 1006K)

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-070027.jpg (1435x1975, 455K)

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-070143.jpg (1440x1978, 439K)

Low test libtards,when will they learn.

>it's another /pol/ and /x/ thread

That's my point. Businessman isn't really a positive label.

0.1% lol you really underestimate our numbers really...

Pic didn't go through. Put in a negative role than american

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-070522.jpg (1401x1943, 444K)

This poster is correct
To prove it, here is how you get 100% white couples for your autistic needs when you search for them

All you need to do is put white couple in quotatio marks AND THEN remove the results you don't need by adding -wordYouDontWant

Your search should look like this: "white couple" -black
And when you do this there will be about 80% pics of white couple, with few other pics of black people whoose results countain "white couple" plus africa/african so you add -africa and -african

And there you go now you know how Google algorythm works and how to work around it.
Go tell this to the other /pol/tards so they don't embarrass themselves once again

Attached: IMG_20180315_120919.png (1080x1750, 1.31M)

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-071022.jpg (1433x2196, 887K)

>"white couple" doesn't show white couples
>calling some else a tard

Attached: b.jpg (960x659, 84K)

>that lack of reading comprehension
reread the post I replied to nice and slowly

Goggle's algorythm is not perfect and it never will be, that's why there are other options you can add to your searches so you can get your desired needs

Attached: 1.png (1090x1402, 272K)

Kill yourself.

Why if I put a negative word with American it's all non blacks?

I thought Google lumps African with American?

I keep messing up attaching pics. They rig it where positive attributes will be African Americans and negative will be random.

Attached: Screenshot_20180315-072221.jpg (1439x2307, 892K)

You're overloading them. Now if you start with intext and inurl they might get an aneurism.

Look at the pictures I posted. Any positive attribute you put next to American will result in African Americans being shown. Any negative they will not.

> American scientists
Black results
> American criminals
Whites
>american athletes
African Americans
> American killers
Whites
> obese Americans
Whites
> gay Americans
Whites
You're unbiased search query theory sure holds up

why don't you show the rest of the results
there are a lot of non whites especially if you dig further

Attached: IMG_20180315_123250.png (1080x1554, 2.06M)

You specifically said American would be grouped with african. There is no labels for African American there


I'm saying Google is biased to show blacks in a positive light

/leftypol/ needs to leave

Attached: tkU0ioM-1.jpg (1844x1210, 146K)

not in every single context you functional illiterate
and the fact that there are so many non whites in your search already proves you wrong

"Non whites" I'm specifically saying black.

Yes just believe The (((coincidence))) that African American shows up for positive attributes but scarce next to negative terms.

my sides indeed

funny thing is, i'm a mulatto.

racism is something, and pushing an agenda on people is something else.

I made no derogatory comments towards mixed people, I say this once again, but my ire was towards google for what they did with the search

This is the real "Russian" collusion boogyman demtards are using as cover. In silicon valley the 90lbs grass fed soy latte has you.

youtu.be/e9kti648U4g

Attached: 1518145144308.png (779x1206, 221K)

So you are still going to pretend there are no blacks in your search even on page 1?
alright then

>Basically a buzzfeed tier header for your search
This is so funny its painful in a "I'm cringing so hard because I feel bad for them and cant even take pleasure in their fallen state" kind of way..

Do you know what scarce means ?

I'm proving the point that African isn't grouped with American like you are trying to say it is. They rig the results African American won't be grouped if there is a negative term.

But keep believing your unbiased Google that would never ever try to socially program people to think a certain way.

this

Attached: 1519107993717.jpg (552x679, 49K)

Attached: DXybY2nWAAcOQi6.jpg (800x450, 24K)

I'm not making a case that they are weighting terms good/bad or indifferent because it were solely the product of such a process it would show more computational error or flawed/erroneous data.

I am making the case its overtly curated and disingenuously masquerades as the working of an algorithm.

Attached: racism_defined.jpg (638x569, 60K)

>/pol/tard internet argument tactics 101
>Post an argument
>Get replies from poster A
>Get BTFOd and ad-hominem poster A
>Move on to poster B, repeat same arguments that poster A already countered.
>Poster B repeats what Poster A said
>Ad-hominem and move on to poster C
>Repeat until they find someone who doesn't counter their argument
>"lol these fucking jew libtard sjw cucks can't even argue back, logic and facts win again"

>You usually don't say "American Inventor" when you talk about them.
What do you mean by "you"?

Attached: american inventor.png (1345x413, 281K)

It is caused by 'American' aligning with results for 'African American'. Search 'United States inventors' and it's all white people.

"You" being the average American who would write an article about Edison etc.
He wouldn't say "These American inventors" because he himself is American so to him it's really fucking obvious that these guys are American. It's the default state, therefor he doesn't instinctively point it out.

However if you are a black American who wants to draw attention to black american inventors, yes he sure as hell would say "African-American".

>That screencap

YOU ARE STILL SEARCHING IN ENGLISH YOU DUMB FUCK

This board's going to shit real quick

Blame /pol/, responsible for most bad things on this site.

>google
>respecting operators
nice disinfo campaign, larry

He literally said if you change your region the results will change too. He specifically cited getting different results after changing his region to Australia, an English speaking country. You just ignored most of his point dumbass

Imagine being this bluepillled. Keep lying to yourself.

>European history has no meaning.

Their idea of winning an argument is having the last reply
so they will keep replying and replying the same shit over and over again without coprehending anything you've said
Let them have it, most of them are kids who found about this site from social media

Asian here, don't lump us together with niggers and trash.

At this point I just hope that these aren't actually /pol/tards and instead they are shills trying to make /pol/ look bad because holy shit, how can people this dumb use internet unsupervised...

Did you actually TRY to change the region to Australia? Try it, results may surprise you. Go Incognito to make sure you're on a clean state, click on settings under the search bar, then search settings and set your region to Australia.

It has to be that someone’s flooded the internet with “black American or African American inventor” pages.

I just did an incognito google search for American inventors, got all blacks. Searched white American inventor. And went to image search and it’s 80% black ppl

My guess is someone spammed sites and searches enough to fuck with the search for people in general. Still doesn’t discredit the point that black American inventors are a huge minority of American inventors, yet are weirdly over represented. The thing that is throwing ppl off is the skewed representation on google vs reality

For immediately going full “omg pol is here” I’m gonna call you a faggot

American is a shitty descriptor, considering that Americas encompass all of South and North America. If you searched 'US Inventors' you would get the results you wanted. Do you really think that such a huge 'globalist conspiracy' would let you beat the system just by switching some words around? God damn brainlets