Mfw he doesn't use quadratic programming to max gains, while minimizing risk

>not generalizing your models' statistical envelopes using Jacobian variety vector bundles to more efficiently use your computational resources

>he doesn't have access to a quantum computer utilizing topological cluster states to determine the scalability of contango-backwardation ratios for multiplexed predictive markets

>he does not base his prediction cumming on charts

>he needs a quantum computer to calculate the trivial monad price points of a first order elliptic curve

>he doesn't put crypto names on a grid, put a chicken on the grid, and go all-in on the square that the chicken shits on first

>he doesn't play chicken on the grid 2
>now with even more gains, and headless chickn
also japs. Fuckers like silly games. Oh well, good for them.

“I can calculate the movement of stars, but not the madness of men.”

sovereignman.com/finance/how-isaac-newton-went-flat-broke-chasing-a-stock-bubble-13268/

Derivatives certainly are enhanced with quantitative approaches. But, I find getting too mathsy-watsy about human behavior, in financial markets, to be overkill. Unless of course other people are doing roughly the same thing, in which case you can play on the self-fulfilling prophecy.

>he doesn‘t go all in on memes

>implying Sir Newton an idiot (geek/specialist)
you know kid, there is a reason that throughout history there always was the inventor and the entrepreneur. It's a dreamteam. Inventors on their own were left to starve with their brilliant (but unpractical) inventions, and as for the entrepreneur, the art of making shekkels out of thin air hasn't been perfected back then, and even now, a good invention makes things ever so easier.

there's a "wasn't" missing up there. Eh... you'll fiure it out by yourself.

But OP, it's so much funner to envision yourself as a General leading your soldiers (each individual dollar) into battle against the market. Forming alliances, backstabbing, deception. To approach it from a psychological manner is so much more interesting. Although, it's much harder to have variables and metrics to monitor, and measure, and compare with that approach. I get it :)

>First order elliptical

Get the fuck out of here you fucking casual bitch

>not being born with the warren buffet sharinga

>needing anything else

supreme pleb

>not having a self-learning A.I. digital identity linked through your full-body suit onahole-neural interface to proof read your thoughts posted for you.

>he doesn't use lyapunov functions with feedback linearization to implement passivity-based high-gain observers to stabilize integral control

Lmao it's like you hate money.

>not realizing that Eigenmatrix reduction across higher dimensional complex Riemannian manifolds was demonstrated to be a more efficient method of market analysis in 1973

even the pajeets begging for money here know this

>not implementing higher order functional design applied to the span of quaternion subtopological space whilst solving nonlinear concave programming

no wonder you're bleeding money even the chinks use this

I like this board

hi i was on wikipedia today! here are some cool words i saw!

if anything it shows there are some engineer/math students on Veeky Forums
you all deserve it brahs
we're all gonna make it

>implying math modelling isn't a buttload of fun
getting your hands dirty > reading the pedia jew

...

>not being on Wikipedia