>I can't believe you've been through 13 iterations of this card. That would drive me nuts.
I brainstorm a LOT. There are times I'll look at a card for a few minutes and come up with five ideas. Actually, something similar to that happened here >That said, I feel like you're going for that STARR Labs feel, so I'd suggest noncreature artifacts here.
Yeah, sounds fine. I'll have to play around with that. Maybe combine graveyard recursion (probably to hand) with damage.
>"grey goo"
Well, I can always make another card for that.
>think you tried that once before
Yeah. An older version made token copies of artifacts.
Now for your cards.
>CW02
Hmm, I'm kinda afraid that this could really slow down a game. Though on the other hand, you need cards, and White isn't the greatest at draw. Actually, it's the worst!
>CW04
Perhaps too much value at the cost, but I'd have to double-check to make sure. Maybe make it 3W and 2/3.
>CW05
Ah, off-color casting. Cool.
>CW06
Don't really get this one.
>CW07
Personally, I think Bushido is an OK keyword, and I wouldn't mind seeing it evergreen, or "deciduous" as Maro calls it. But it certainly needs a better name.
>CW08
I really like this one. Good job.
>CW09
Huh. Very odd effect, but I can't find anything wrong with it. That is, giving the enchanted creature something but only for a turn. Interesting. I really want to see what you do with this.
>CW10
>CW11
Nice. Though I have the sneaking suspicion that they might be too good. This might just be me though. Again, have to double-check.
Ones I don't comment on seem fine.
>CW12
Huh. OK.