Would witches with archetypical powers of women (sex, manipulation, cunning) completelly dominate a generic fantasy society? I can't imagine how would men/standard RPG witchunters have any chance against them. I think witchhunters would be females exclusively.
thoughts, Veeky Forums?
Christopher Phillips
>archetypical powers of women (sex, manipulation, cunning) This thread will be good.
Zachary Watson
>being sexy and manipulative makes you invincible Get a load of this beta.
Camden Torres
>I can't imagine how would men/standard RPG witchunters have any chance against them.
"I'm gay."
Jaxon Fisher
Fuck, this is good. But a minuscule part of population is gay. It's hard to do something when half of population (male half) is against you.
Jacob Ramirez
>But a minuscule part of population is gay.
Well, presumably witches with archetypal powers of women (sex, manipulation, and cunning) with a desire to dominate a generic fantasy setting aren't that common, either.
The gay witch hunter doesn't have to beat ALL women, just the witches who are being bitches.
Brandon Martinez
Well, this thread is headed places. Might as well dig into the controversial ideas.
So, who thinks prostitution and soldiery are basically equivalent?
They're both about doing something commonly seen as immoral (recreational sex, murder) for profit. Historically, both have involved young people being forced into them and taken advantage of, occasionally even children. Both can be options that people with no other work enter into to support themselves, and both can permanently ruin the lives of those they employ. When practiced without proper professional precaution and care, both can result in terribly physical illness or psychological injury. At the same time, there are a rare few individuals who find them empowering and enjoyable professions.
The main differences are that prostitution is about providing pleasure rather than injury, and that soldiers are more useful to the state than whores are. If one nation has soldiers, all the others need them too, which isn't the case with prostitution. I'd contend that that's the only reason war is seen as a more respectable profession than sex.
Anyone agree or disagree?
Joseph Cruz
Weebs. Lolicon obsessed, 2D loving weebs. Train them in wizardry and swordplay. Basically an army of angry magical pedophiles. Stop that with your cleavage and honeyed words, you 3D wench.
Ethan Rogers
That's a pretty big assumption OP. Why would all of the men help that one magic bitch that keeps tricking them into painting houses and lifting things?
And what about warlocks, who would -in turn- have the archetypical powers of men (will, money, stabbing things)?
Jack James
who do you think will start flinging shit first, /pol/ or tumblr?
Camden Reed
Elitist gays would be nobility
Angel Long
Impossible to say, the false-flagging tactic is low-hanging fruit.
I will however bet that the phrase "nu-male" appears at least twice (not counting this post) before the thread gets deleted.
Jackson Rivera
I think, mythologically speaking, demon summoning, prophecy and healing are also archetypical woman powers. There are a lot of different archetypes, though, depending on what culture you're talking about.
As for your question of whether they would dominate, well, any setting in which ONLY female witches have magic, of whatever kind, would result in them dominating. What magic do men get? What are the "archetypical powers" for warlocks?
Bentley Williams
>will, money, stabbing things This, I guess.
Owen Nelson
This is now a Luis Royo thread. Post what you got boys!
Levi Gutierrez
>I can't imagine how would BIG THROBBING COCKS EJACULATING MONEY AND ATTENTION have any chance against them
You seem to lack a substantial insight to the female psyche, even for a fa/tg/uy
Sebastian Kelly
Would that mean that sluts and warriors are equivalent? Both are not really disciplined and professional about it, might be doing it out of necessity or even because it's fun.
Easton Baker
...
Carson Flores
...
Cameron Fisher
>"nu-male" 'Fraid I'll have to fill half the quota by asking what in tarnation that is supposed to be now.
Joshua Rivera
Conjuring in general if we go with western mythology as a group concept, not just demons, but yeah. Women were the ones who could summon shit, see the future and fix your nonsense. Male magicians are generally sinister tricksters or feminine guys who do women's magic, and those homomen are the ones who typically sexualize the shit out of it (outside of the Germanic and Norse practitioners of Seithr, but those also had a lot of dudes and fucking Odin was in charge of that shit).
Alexander Peterson
...
David Reed
...
Wyatt Gutierrez
>I think witch hunters would be females exclusively.
Eunuchs.
Christian Baker
>Would witchhunters with archetypical powers of men (murder, domination, cunning) completelly dominate a generic fantasy society? I can't imagine how would women/standard RPG witches have any chance against them. I think mages would be males exclusively.
>thoughts, Veeky Forums?
Chase Carter
The witchhunters just need to make sure they have a wank before they go fight the sex witch. Problem solved.
Joshua Lee
...
Henry Nelson
...
Grayson Phillips
>not defeating and punishing the witches with the power of hateboner
Aiden Nguyen
...
Colton Cooper
...
Levi Williams
>that gif good taste man
What about witches who have been brought up under male dominance?
Isaiah James
...
Austin Ross
I'm pretty sure this is a blue board user.
Justin Sullivan
...
James Bell
...
Angel Edwards
>a minuscule part of population is gay A minuscule part of population becomes witch hunters. Coincidence?
Hunter Allen
>I can't imagine how would men/standard RPG witchunters have any chance against them.
Gay witchhunters?
Carter Peterson
Soldiers are not paid to kill people. The objective of any professional soldier today, and at most points in history, is to protect things from people who want to destroy them. Sometimes that my involve killing, but murder is not sanctioned by any military on the planet.
Kevin Rogers
By the way, not all men think with their dicks. Just letting you know.
Daniel Torres
Lel good one.
Luis Anderson
>Would witches with archetypical powers of women (sex, manipulation, cunning) completelly dominate a generic fantasy society? I can't imagine how would men/standard RPG witchunters have any chance against them.
You know what else is archetypical about women? They fucking hate each other.
The moment any witch would gain the upper hand, all the other witches are going to manipulate everyone else against her.
It's basically a self policing system of passive aggressiveness.
Matthew Scott
Permavirgin detected.
Bentley Bennett
...
Bentley Bailey
Smart. I like it.
Levi Gonzalez
I can't not post this now.
shame he had to die later
Caleb Edwards
There's a short show on Netflix called Salem. Watch it.
Landon Hall
...
Leo Turner
IK, I would make this a Druuna thread if that was not the case
Adam Myers
Well, I see a couple of tits there, not even concealed by a spoiler.
You might get a ban.
Parker Williams
Wouldn't be the first time
Aiden Nelson
If smite evil can be performed with an unarmed attack how much damage could a Paladin do to this witch with a pelvic thrust?
Ryder Perez
>I'm not murdering anyone, I'm just following orders. >I'm not murdering anyone, I'm just giving orders.
It really is a perfect system.
Gavin Parker
>lolbercuck memes Look, ace, murder is a specific kind of unsanctioned killing. Soldiers do not murder when they defend themselves from aggression, nor do they murder when they attack enemy combatants. Not all killing is equal and not all killing is bad or unnecessary.
Mason Parker
If they control society, there are no witchhunters, you moron. It's that simple.
Justin Evans
So droning durkas and theri kids&women = not murder?
Nice LE alignment you got there buddy
Sebastian Cook
Depends on feat selection and stats. But I'd say Base 1d3 +3 str + 3cha So about seven damage assuming 16's in strength and charisma and he didn't take improved unarmed strike.
Liam Lee
Bait deluxe in a bait thread...
Jonathan Hughes
Geneva conventions are nice and civilized thing for sure, but let's be honest here - first world soldiers only play by them when there's a chance journalists will show up on the scene, second world soldiers only play by then when journalists actually are on the scene and third world soldiers just kill journalists first.
Elijah Jenkins
I hate to say it fella, but like mister so kindly said. What in the sam hell is a nu-male?
Lincoln Barnes
>sand niggers >people
Colton Scott
Depends on the setting.
Ryan James
It's clearly not murder, as murder has a specific legal definition and air strikes on civilians in another country certainly don't come close to matching it. Some may argue that it constitutes a war crime, but overall I'm inclined to agree with >le let's get real :DDD That's completely false, and shows you know as much about contemporary conflict as a fucking high school civics student.
Levi Myers
Yes user, all soldiers are horrible, horrible monsters and you should never talk to one or it will eat your soul.
Ryan Brown
No you asshat.
Whores can and have ruined families, moral society, and is the general side effect of a seedier, more criminal land.
Soldiers are the product of a nation or state that is upholding either their laws, or protecting their interests. This could be aggressive combat, or defensive maneuvers.
Now take you'd dumb ass back to the whore house you were surely born from.
Luke Moore
>It's clearly not murder >murder has a specific legal definition
Uh-huh.
So, as long as it's not legally defined as murder, killing another human being is better than having sex for money?
Christopher Butler
>waaaah, big mean soldiers are so mean :( Fuck off.
Jason Ward
>Whores can and have ruined families, moral society, and is the general side effect of a seedier, more criminal land.
And none of that has ever applied to soldiers in human history, has it?
I'm also sure prostitution could NEVER avoid those negative qualities even if it was subject to competent government regulation and accommodated as something respectable in a society's culture, could it?
David Scott
I'm not hearing a yes or no, user.
Anthony Myers
That's because I give not the slightest shit for your question and am telling you to fuck off.
Grayson Peterson
I don't think I've ever seen a more tumblr picture than that
Caleb Gray
Yet you care enough to actually tell me to fuck off, rather than just leaving without answering. You clearly do give some shit.
So, user. Yes or no. Is killing another human being, for which you will be paid, under someone else's order, morally better than having sex for money?
Dominic White
I haven't said shit about whores. I've just been telling you that soldiers are not murderers, and that they don't get paid to kill.
Ian Murphy
Witch hunters? You need Will to resist, money to bribe or buy equipment and the stabbing things is part of the job.
Landon Walker
>wah wah wah, I'm a whiny little baby because I'm naive enough to believe that every human life has value, and I'm going to go around annoying everyone with my poorly informed opinions Just fuck off already.
Justin Cooper
Spoken as true burger
#Buildawalll "MakeMurricaFatAgain
Nolan Cox
Not even an American, faggot.
Gabriel Morales
It's time to stop posting, user.
Elijah Ortiz
You're right, you didn't say shit about whores. But in the context of this thread and how the discussion started, there was a heavy implication, don't you think?
Not that I agree with "soldiers don't get paid to kill". That's a question of definitions. A soldier is paid to do a variety of things, which includes killing. A soldier would have to be an idiot to sign up in the expectation that they won't have to kill someone at some point. There's no box on the recruitment papers that you can check labeled "no killing please". If you agree to be a soldier you are willfully acquiescing to the possibility that you will be required to kill someone, and that you will have to obey such a requirement or lose your job.
Saying a soldier isn't paid to kill is like saying a policeman isn't paid to catch criminals. Catching criminals isn't the whole of the job, they can direct traffic or act as guards or assist citizens in non-criminal affairs, so you COULD say "a policeman isn't paid to catch criminals". Technically. But it's one of the things they get paid for.
Noah Morgan
You don't seem to be having trouble giving your opinion, user. You're very heavily implying what your answer is without actually stating it. Why not just answer? Yes or no.
You also seem to be implying that not every human life has value. Are you saying that there are human beings whose existence is absolutely without worth, and for whom no consideration need be given as to whether to end it or not? Beings capable of thought, emotion, self-reflection and adaptation, who can feel pleasure and pain, who have entirely no worth?
Again, yes or no will do.
Easton Jackson
MAXIMUM HOLY DICK BUILD
Suli Paladin 20
Str 26 +8 Wis 26
Elemental fury racial ability +1d6 fire to unarmed attacks
dick damage 8d10+18+8+2d6+2d6+1d6+5+2d6+8+20 averaging 101.5 damage
aura of justice allows rogue buddy to do it from behind. "It" being SMITE with his dick.
Jaxon Morgan
You want my opinion? I'll tell you my opinion: it depends on who's getting shot and who's getting fucked. Happy now, crybaby?
Cameron Gomez
yes or no will do
Brayden Ortiz
The question is inherently context sensitive. I can't give you a yes or no answer if you don't give me a context.
Grayson Richardson
yes or no will do
Henry Roberts
>But in the context of this thread and how the discussion started, there was a heavy implication, don't you think? No, not at all. I only replied to your post to correct your misunderstanding of what soldiers do.
>A soldier is paid to do a variety of things, which includes killing. A soldier is paid to follow the orders of the state. In the first place, a state very rarely orders soldiers to kill people, as that typically constitutes a war crime. In the second, when a soldier kills, it is almost always in defense of himself or his comrades. When it can be avoided, militaries strongly prefer to capture the enemy rather than kill them, for a variety of reasons.
Dominic Carter
No context, no answer.
Caleb Evans
Resounding Blow 1D6 & staggered Forceful Strike +10d4 and bullrush Weapon of Awe +2 Divine Favor +3 Litany of Righteousness evil creature takes double damage
Correction with spells make that 207 damage in one mighty cock thrust.
Charles Adams
Not the dude you're arguing with, but if i remember correctly we actually did try to legalize prostitution during the civil war. Least along the Mississippi. The problem was it was way to much work to regulate and make sure that all the girls were using proper protection and getting tested regularly. And all it takes is one or two working lady to spread the clap to half a town. Now you could argue "but that's just improper regulation, we could do it better today" which may be true. It would still probably be just as hard though. And all we're getting from it is hookers with out aids. The armed forces at least teach you other skills besides killing.
Joseph Morris
>Literally destroyed pussy.
Oliver Collins
Why not? If it makes for a good game, it doesn't matter how things might work out in real life. I myself have been toying with the idea of a yuri game where two basic rules state that 1) everyone who matters is a female and 2) is either lesbian or can discover that they're one.
Grayson Green
I think there's another interesting parallel that you haven't drawn - many young men join the military to get a sense of freedom and adventure, and enjoy the benefits for a year or two. Prostitution actually initially gives a women a lot of freedom as well, especially in earlier times where most women would've been confined to the household or stuck in factories otherwise. But in both cases, an extended period of time in either profession will cause it to be less great, problems will arise and they'll regret joining, and after their service is done, they can have difficulty rejoining society and may face scorn.
But I think it's wrong to see soldiering as a more useful profession. In the defense of a country and maintaining order, that's all well and good. But prostitutes help maintain social cohesion, and aside from taboos and a chance of disease (that can be mitigated with the right precautions), there's no real downside to having prostitutes, where soldiers can riot if they're not properly paid, start revolutions, and occasionally wield more power than the actual government, such as in the case of WW2 era Japan.
Benjamin Watson
And the force of your dick smash stuns her, deafens her, staggers her, throws her across the room, and terrifies her.
Ian Roberts
>Would witches with archetypical powers of women (sex, manipulation, cunning) completelly dominate a generic fantasy society? I can't imagine how would men/standard RPG witchunters have any chance against them. >I think witchhunters would be females exclusively. Just like in my fetishfuel then.
Anthony Gray
...
Liam Morgan
>fetishfuel tvtropes pls go
Wyatt Adams
No, you see, they have the supernatural archetypical masculine power of stabbing things.
This isn't your average, every day kind of stabbing. This is special magical stabbing.
Because penises.
Asher Scott
God, what would have happened if we came inside. Probably would have killed the poor thing. Or whatever, she's evil right?
Jame Bond then? Or some bard that likes to use magic on his dick before going to bed.
Carson Edwards
If they're proper witches, they wouldn't dominate much of anything. Too busy tromping through the rain to go deliver babies or keeping vigil over dying old folks or trying to herd goats. Or herd people, which are like goats, except dumber.
I mean look at that broad in your pic, OP. That's no witch. Where's her hat? Where are her boots? Where's her goats? That's some damp tart with a sword, not a witch.
Mason Thompson
Go away Pratchett, witches are weird old women who've made pacts with the Devil.