Have you ever seen shit get way too real at the table, particularly between two girls?

Underrated comment.

That pic is infinitely more interesting than anything OP had to say. Focus on the quality Veeky Forums.

There's such a thing as four-card poker, but it's apparently a casino exclusive.

>shooter has 2 aces
>dead chick has 3 aces, 2 of which are the same fucking aces as the shooter
I blow her head off too, cheating skank

>Casino exclusive
What, are they gonna come beat you up if you play it at home?

No, I meant as in it's not played 'professionally' and there aren't, say, video games put out for the variant.

Sadly enough, yes.

The TL;DR of it is: only invite people that want to play the game at the table.

No, worse. Last time I checked Las Vegas was run by the Mormons so just expect a shit ton of those guys to come by your door and badger you about the word of God endlessly till you pay up to make them go away.

>The Mormon mob
>They never attack anyone, but they never, ever, shut the fuck up
>Admission to casinos makes you legally targetable for phone calls and e-mail prompts to join the faith
>Music over the speakers shifts from gambling music to tracts about John Smith
>Las Vegas is slowly turned into a dry city

>nothing to do with traditional games
>shitposting
>OP's virginity obnoxiously obvious

I could go on

But if what is saying is true, then it's something that would be totally legal since casinos always use multiple decks at once to prevent card counting and such.

>hooking a crawler like that
>hq

That's not bait, user. It's just fish food.

I remember requesting that image. Always feels good when I see it come up.

Why did they kill her?

No, but I've seen shit get way too real at the table, almost entirely between two or more men.

I'm going to assume this is because they were males, and not because of any actual reason outside of that.

How's that not common sense?

Sounds like it does bother you.

Reddit is around the corner to the left, have fun kiddo!

>defending shitposting
>mfw

You see the issue I take with this isn't the bait because I don't think that's the issue. It's not even with the misogyny, I'm pretty much neutral on that issue.

It's with the fact that your issues are so deep that you're unapologetically shitting up our board with them. Go waddle off a bridge if dem wimmins piss you off so bad you fucking joke.

>Men and women are exactly the same
>Men and women don't handle conflict differently
>This difference in conflict strategy doesn't make it more likely for women to start drama through a game as a proxy

Get a load of this faggot and his denial of evolution.

> being b8
> not ignoring it

No user, you are the reddit.

Who even makes these threads.

> women are useless and incompetent
I'm gonna say nah on this one.

> women are prone to indirect conflict
This is closer to the mark.

The issue I'm taking with this is I have played tabletop for about ten years and have had multiple instances of multi-girl tables and I can think of only once that anything happened but it was mostly outside of it

I do however loathe the genuine autists, nobody has ruined more games for me than those heaps of brainfucked rainman-ass useless trash

>tg white knighting this hard
>all this projecting ad hominem
He's right you know

Women are generally useless and incompetent because they don't need to offer anything but sexual attractiveness to be valued as people. If you get given free food every day of your life just for existing what incentive do you have to become a farmer and learn to grow your own food? You don't and that's how the vast majority of women work. They're baby incubators and that's all they will ever be because they're not forced to be anything else to get attention and have people care about them.

> one right after the other

Nice, must be under 30 seconds at this point OP. I'm not actually gonna bother biting anymore because you're not a person that can be argued with because in your mind you've already won.

I'm not OP faggot.

Nice to see you have no argument though. I just put forward an argument for why women would never experience the evolutionary pressure of being useful and competent and your response is to surrender. Nice to see you won't argue against the truth.

>I gave up the argument without even bothering to say anything beyond n insult, I'll just take the moral high ground and accuse samefag

Obsessive /tg9k/ fuck heads that have one purpose in life and that is to deal with their virginity and bitterness by trashing women on the internet

I'm a solid 6 on the misogynist meter don't get me wrong, but that's because I can be. This is just sad. These guys are not better then women, because they're not better than anyone.

>haha they're just virgin losers who can't get a girl
Are you projecting ? Why can nobody bring an argument to the statements?

Five aces.

>initially disagreed with OP
>saw that one side, the one defending women, was just shitflinging
>the one against them did it rationally with thought
welp, I side with the best then.

Can you fucking redpillers keep it to yourselves around here? Jesus.

>I have been told that women are useless and use sex to manipulate men and get what they want and that this is the basis of society.

>I'm on to you women, you're not getting any sex from this fa/tg/uy, my perfect animu wives shield me from your sticky embrace.

>I must spend time spreading the word to the uninitiated on Veeky Forums

>Please guys, send me more made up stories or stuff you heard in thatguy threads so that I can compile more evidence against the females.

I
Want
An
Argument
Say something, anything , of substance.

>all women are attractive
Have you ever been, you know, outside?
It's even more hilarious, because you're most likely American and thus 90% of your women are fugly.

>ad homimem
Ok, now it's getting kind of sad.

You don't need anecdotes when there are legitimate scientific fields that are studying this. In any era but this one it would of been common sense.

Never said all women are attractive and that doesn't change the evolutionary challenges women faced as opposed to men. An ugly woman would still have value in her vagina and could trade it for wealth. An ugly man has no value except that which he creates himself, which is again the reason why men and women are not equal.

Keep in mind that all OP wanted were some fun greentexts and maybe some drawfaggotry.

Whiteknights and robots take it upon themselves to shit up a potentially interesting thread

>An ugly woman would still have value in her vagina and could trade it for wealth.
AHahahahahahaaa!

>An ugly man has no value except that which he creates himself, which is again the reason why men and women are not equal.
An ugly guy's penis has just as much value as an ugly woman's vagina. Deal with it.

Coming from you that's kind of funny.

Yeah I've seen stuff like that happen. My group has 2 semi regulars who are fine on their own but when they're at the same table its a fucking disaster.

Nearly Everybody at the table is either agnostic or nominally RC/Anglican. These 2 are the odd ones out in that regard. One is a super devout Presbyterian(the least fun flavour of Protestantism) and the other is a Tumblr-Athiest.

If we play DnD, then the Presbyterian gets gets all pissy about none of the available gods reflecting her beliefs. Which then starts a row with tumblrina who makes it all about how that offensive to blah blah blah.

If we play something like Dark crusade then pressy is fine but tumblrina thinks 40k is sexist and pro christian and you can imagine how things devolve from there.

In either case it devolves to a lot of screaming, crying and not playing the fucking game.

The lesson here is that sometimes a few edgelords aren't the wort thing you can have at your table.

Because you want to argue. So we're just going to taunt you until you storm off in a huff, like the little boy you are.

OH come on
I think it's really sad the only defense women have is
>no way you stupid virgin loser
Like come on, it's an entire gender and you couldn't find one thing to argue for as a positive point? One thing. One.

This wasn't even supposed to be this kind of thread , white Knights started this argument by getting all touchy over this thread using the word women

If only we could prove other wise like how fat women still get laid if they go to bars or if we had ugly women married off to well off families because the younger siblings needed wives and it was one of the best ways to unite rival factions. We could even write fantasy stories based on this called.. Game of thrones or something. I bet that would be really popular too!

Once again the no nothing kids proceed to have no argument but put on their enameled armour and ride into battle.

That sounds a lot like what you're doing though

>I... I'm not mad!
>you're the one who's mad!
>I'M NOT CRYING!

>unironically using whiteknight

It's the easiest way to spot a mouthbreather

I mean, if you left I guess Wed have to continue the thread we wanted without your shit posting.

Tits or gtfo :^)

Wait, you think drunken sex and forced marriage didn't happen to ugly guys?

I'm just pointing out how it would lend credit to your woman-hating, if you had actually met one. Or have a basic grasp on reality unlike

Do you understand that once you start attacking your opponent by saying he's not "arguing" correctly you've already admitted you have nothing to say?

Or you could leave and stop trying to make every board into your personal vagina monologue.

Do you understand having nothing to say but insults is just admitting you have nothing to say.

Is there a point here

Do you understand that this is not /r9k/ and therefore not the "argue about wimminz" board?

>tfw not even a misogynist
>just extremely baffled nobody had anything positive to say about women
I'm willing to take the roll of bad guy here until someone can actually refute what was said

You're welcome to go back to r9k, man.

Women have slightly better colour recognition than men do.

There, I said it, I made the big reveal. Women are superior in the minor ways possible. Such as taste and vision.

See . Saying positive things is helping you get off. I'd rather cockblock you.

Huh that's interesting
But I guess women and men aren't equal after all.
Thread is closed then

This thread makes me want to throw up. You can't take any stance of moderation because then you're "not giving evidence" but if you give evidence then you're tumblr.

This thread is some infinitychan tier shit

Yes. It's "go back to /r9k/"

Did you just figure this out? It's basically miniature invasions.

I'm willing to bet money that everyone making a fuzz is a guy getting offended on behalf of women, the ones on the offensive are also guys since there is no such thing as a "fembot".

I wish we had some actual women on this board.

We might have some if people stop making shitty threads like this one.

The rampant misogyny in this thread probably wouldn't irritate me half as much if it didn't come off as the desparate excuses of sulking failures.

Thankfully, society continues to render these viewpoints increasingly less acceptable, so I can comfort myself with the knowledge that as you people increase in shrillness and frustration, you generally decrease in number.

>You don't and that's how the vast majority of women work
[citation needed]

Or everyone on this thread could shut the fuck up.

Not even /aosg/'s this bad, fucking Christ.

For a minute I was fooled, I thought you weren't the 'that girl'-user but it turns out that you in fact are that user. I'm still confused as to why you don't try to make your woman-hate threads on /r9k/; these kinds of threads are extremely popular on that board and there's always content for you to consume, real and made up. Why do you insist on trying to convert Veeky Forums? You should know that most people here aren't really down for open misogyny. It's just not part of the board's culture.

If you want a woman-hate thread that's more about the role-playing hobbies you can just expand your thread's scope to include RPGs and post the 'women ruin hobbies' pasta image that floats around that board. If you want it to mostly be about 40k, PF, D&D etc then you should create some greentexts to give the other anons a hint of what you'd like to see. I'm just not understanding why you refuse to help yourself get the content you want to consume.

I'm gonna bring down this bait,
>dramaticpause.gif
And everyone in it

>
>Men are generally useless and incompetent because they don't need to offer anything but rape to achieve their life goal. If you can steal other people's food and force them to have sex with you what incentive do you have to become a farmer and learn to grow your own food? You don't and that's how the vast majority of men work. They're just rapists and that's all they will ever be because they're not forced to be anything else to propagate their genes.

Why? It'll just go over your head like Jihad Joe.

>Women will suddenly change their interests if we just pander to them

That isn't how things work. Women don't magically start liking something because you start pandering to them, that's actually one of the worst ways to attract women. Push overs aren't going to defend their women, so women aren't attracted to groups of push overs except to leech resources off of which is easier done in places other than D&D tables.

Evolutionary psychology is a scientific field you can look into yourself. They do some really interested studies like how male sided great/grandparents buy much cheaper gifts for their grandkids because they don't know if the kid is actually theirs. It's a weird little quirk we have and don't even notice in order to protect our resources going to other people's offspring.

Nice logical argument you made there. I can support my stance with logic. Your stance I can debunk with "Who are the garbage men who stop you dying from unhygienic living conditions?" :) Society cannot function without men doing the vast majority of work.

Wow what
What evidence
So you never had one

Because he wants to spread his gospel. There's no use preaching to the believers - he needs to enlighten us unwashed heathens, and convert us to the cause.

Yeah, two girls sitting next to each other. They were holding hands.

It's just an argument , the fact the the thread has progressed this far is your fault.

If you ever play with more than zero girls, you're not living your life correctly.

This is CM3D2, right?

Don't blame OP, blame the retards that turn the thread into whiteknights vs robotfrogs

No, it's the fact that you wanted to pick a fight about women on the traditional gaming board. Garbage in garbage out.

That's not what the thread was about.

>Have you ever seen shit get way too real at the table, particularly between two girls?

Op is making a THAT GUY thread, but doing so asking if there were any women who did it especially. We often hear about guys doing it but not women. He wasn't picking a fight with women, the white knight brigade picked a fight with someone asking about people's bad gaming experiences.

>whiteknights vs robotfrogs
>École Polytechnique managed to use the remains of Napoleon to recreate a software equivalent to Napoleon's mind
>All hail Robopoleon, eternal mechanical emperor of France
>Europe is rapidly conquered, all other nations of the world fall one by one before this robotic onslaught
>Only the brave elite warriors of Argentina can stop this robotic menace

Will you play a robotic French murderhobo or a human >white murderhobo?

Evopsych is one of the most contested sciences, if not the most contested science, due to issues of reproducible results, lack of empirical evidence, and its use of an increasingly outdated neurological model.

>inb4 IT'S ONLY CONTESTED BECAUSE YOU CULTURAL MARXISTS CAN'T HANDLE LOGIC

Not him but how about you provide a citation on every single segment of that argument of yours? That'd be swell.
Also >implying most of those grievances can't be directed at psychology as a whole
Are you going to argue for the abolition of psychology as a science because it's in its infancy?

I can't tell if Americans assholes stay up really late to shit the board or if wannabe European oldfags are the actual problem.

I think the exchange between and is emblematic of why you're wrong. It would be trivial to say "we usually hear stories about guys," but instead the response is designed to pick a fight. OP knew what he was doing.

Kk. Stop it then.

Which is why like any field you have to read shit yourself and not just take people's word for it. It's a new field and it has it's issues as any new field would but it's a step in the right direction.

Cultural Marxists can't handle logic but there is no need to strawman shit. We know people react poorly to women being made to look bad, no matter how good the field is we'll always have sir Cheetos defending women against the evidence. That doesn't change that there is a logical evolutionary reason why men are superior to women, it's a different breeding environment for them and as such they evolved differently.

I'm the guy he's responding to. I would argue for abolishing psychology and replacing it with neuroscience. Mental illnesses are defects in the meat processor. We figure out the meat processor and get rid of psychology. Only issue is figuring out that processor takes a lot of work and it's very... unethical to do live tests.

CLEAR baitpost

Fucking Slaaneshi trash.