Are magical realms okay when they're played up for laughs?

what? its a really nice clock.
look how big it is.

oh and something not related to the thread, you cannot get blue eye in that style of eyes for the male villager
I'm very disappointed in Nintendo, but that is to be expected from them right now.
but yeah, sexual innuendos are fun as hell, especially when you play with fucking prudish people.

You can parody magical realms for laughs, but a real magical realm probably won't be funny.

>i tell dick jokes in mixed company
>because fuck your decorum
>that's still edgy, right?

Veeky Forums is 18+ only, kiddo.

Depends on how big the girlcocks are

To be fair my wife tells dick jokes in mixed company.

Did the group have fun with it? If so, then yes.

...

>women are cool and funny when they break taboos but men are edgy and creepy

Nobody brought gender into it until you did.

I'd get into that gender, if you know what I mean.

Yeah learn what "mixed company" means. Go on, look it it, then come back to the thread.

If it's played for laughs then it's not actually a magical realm.

huh?

It refers to the audience, not the speaker. "I make dick jokes in mixed company" doesn't indicate the gender of the speaker, nor does the original response of "That's childish." Gender of the speaker wasn't a factor until the "bawwww this is unfair to men'" comment.

>Nobody brought gender into it until you did.

Do you get some sort of validation from being a pedant who deliberately misses the point? Am I being rused by a shitposter?

>deliberately misses the point

The point was that posting "deliberately offending people is hella fun" was a juvenile sentiment - just like posting stories about pulling your Magical Realm out at someone's table. Adults have sex IRL, so we don't need to fantasize about it with a group of panting neckbeards - and when underageb& faggots try it, it's just creepy. So, no. Creepster faggotry is never okay. No matter how funny you think your dick is, you're wrong.

The point, idiot, is that the social taboos for "mixed company" are the social taboos for men around women. They don't apply to women, just like they apply regardless of how many men the "mixed" company has.

It doesn't bother you when she mentions your sex life like that?

If you have to ask, then the answer is no and you should go get a fucking girlfriend already.

On the other hand, doing it with someone who gets embarrassed but not offended is fucking hilarious.

Especially when you know they're blushing because they're really enjoying thinking about it, and that they turn into a total freak in the bedroom.

Man, dudes are really obsessed with dragging gender politics into everything.

Wow, sexist.

What if I play mine up for horror?

Actually, this guy brought up gender politics if you follow the reply chain.

Maybe when feminists all fuck off and die men will no longer be justified in doing so.

...

I thought it was. Turns out our GM is very, very depraved.

Does MR have to be sex-related? I make a lot of references to the Holocaust and WW2 whenever I'm running a game, and a lot of the time people don't even get it.

Seriously tough, the only requirement for it to be ok is if everyone is fine with it, regardless if it is serious or not

Wow, men really are bad at controlling their emotions. Try being a little more rational.

>a feminist telling someone else to be rational

I would say you can have political magical realm and one could even say sexual magical realm is a subset of political magical realm.

I got so damn tired for awhile of reading fiction because it seemed everything was the author's hot political opinions + views on sex. Not even political opinions and sexual views I particularly found disagreeable, just really patronizing.

However, references people don't get isn't magical realm. "The dire jew latches onto your money pouch, minus 12 gold points" may be magical realm however.

>not wanting submissive libertarian fiction

Fuck you, my grandmother, grandfather, girlfriend and I spent a good part of yesterday telling dick jokes to each other and it was good family fun

>I would say you can have political magical realm and one could even say sexual magical realm is a subset of political magical realm.

And since I feel this needs to be expanded: I suggest the default, sexual magical realm is ultimately political in nature, because it intrinsically involves the public affairs of the campaign setting being warped beyond probability to satisfy the peccadilloes of the author.

Basically the overriding theme is taking something that should be private, making it VERY public, and making people act VERY improbable to satisfy your private peccadilloes. Politics and sex both fit.

If taken out of context then D&D does look like a very deranged ancap fantasyland, though this is more due to what makes a good game than political views (gold is tangible, physical conflict is tangible, sneaking and traps are tangible, death is usually binary)

>kingdoms and empires and city-states
Get that statist shit out before calling it ancap!

The usual assumption does seem to be that they are useless, NPC kings etc. are useless; the only thing that matters are how rich the PCs are, and any taxation or prohibition on what weapons the PCs may buy means the state is automatically in the wrong.

Presumably, say, a commie oriented RPG would still have capitalists in it, they would just range from outright antagonists to obstructionist useless retards with regards to the PCs, ie the role of the existing 'statists' in most D&D campaigns.

Good point. Plus evil empires are the villains. And it's mere semantics between adventuring party and adventuring COMPANY

I usually use adventuring company, myself. Never really realized the possible crossover between military company and capitalist style company.

(in terms of the origins of the word)

Yeas

My fetish too.

Depends, are you saying it's played up for laughs when in reality you're trying to conceal your awful boner?

No?

Yes, you are.

It's bad.

It depends.

My magical realm is monster chicks, which is admittedly is one of the easier magical realms to insert into a fantasy game. I've got an NPC who constantly gets "kidnapped" by monster women, with the party being hired by his nobleman father to rescue him.

He's basically trying to get laid with something that will most likely either suck out his soul, eat him, or make him their slave for all eternity after they're done with him. So it's less that he's being kidnapped and more looking for monster pussy and getting into dangerous situations, but obviously the "kidnapped" explanation is the story the nobleman would rather put out.

Each of his escapades end up with him closer and closer to getting laid, but the party ends up "rescuing" him right before anything can happen, much to his dismay.

My group thinks it's hilarious, but your group might not. When doing something for humor, you have to think about what your group will find funny and acceptable. Obviously, you wouldn't make humor out of magical realm if you're playing with something like a church youth group, but when you're around like-minded perverts and degenerates, it's all in good fun.

thatsthejoke.jpg

Uh. I visit /d/ on occasion but that shit is slightly over the line i am used to.

Though i believe it could be OK in theory, i wouldnt want to be involved in such game.

>mfw my original point was Litterally do what has done in front of Mormon players.
>thread devolves in gender poltics.
People need to stop being so offended by dumb shit, I swear.

I mean, I do gebuibely believe that flavor of redpill fedora is pretty irrational, but you're right that the joke was just turning standard "ugh, women" complaints back on him. I gave up because he just kept rising to the bait so quickly it wasn't fun anymore.

If the players actually laugh an no one is uncomfortable, sure.

Gets depressing when you realize the other party actually takes it seriously, yes.

What if I play mine for screams instead?

Veeky Forums is incapable of talking about Mormons without going into an autistic shitfit.

Well, the terms in your post are so vague that answer loses a lot of its meaning.
>define magical realm
>define okay
and while you're at it explain why is not-played-for-laughs magical realm not okay.
Then maybe we'll have a thread that will nurture interesting dialogue.

If its non-intrusive, is not meant to be sexual, and the players are okay with it ahead of time, then it even be considered to be Magical Realm anymore?

Your players must love you

Once had a sex scene with a female DM who had a thing for minotaurs (playing a minotaur bard) front of the whole group. I didn't know these people, having taken the DMs number who was recruiting from a local game shop so I didn't care for them anyways. The line that started it all was some gnome bar lady offering us drink

Me
>baby you rolled a natural 20 on your seduction check and I don't have the will save to overcome it.

Pretty good game, the 3 other players were obviously u comfortable but who cates.

It's hard to discuss a religion in serious terms when your grandfather's grandfather was alive during the creation of their mythology.

See also: Scientology.

>retards from the bronze age are more credible than retards from 200 years ago.

Don't you know that repeating the same lie over and over again makes it magically real?

If everyone involved is fine with it it's not magical realm, despite what some parts of Veeky Forums may tell you.

Yes, absolutely. Magical realm is OK in general, until someone in the group says it's not.

>/d/
>over the line

Someone call the virgin police

I guess certain thing feel different in lonely darkness of my basement and in broad daylight and company of other people.

What are magical realms?

it could be western you know

That's indeed correct, fantasy doesn't equal to real sex and both can be enjoyable separately, and mixing them up doesn't always work out.

I fucking hate that show for wasting the potential of a viking vampire and his master, rooting out warewolf packs in the third reich.

It was such a fucking cocktease. all we got was one minute.

It's like knowing that something wasn't always around and just being raised with it and such a history of it you couldn't imagine it not being around.

The former lets you know that it's new and erases any idea that you might have that it's intrinsic, while the latter gives an illusion of hundreds of years of agreement. You can pass off anyone before that point as just not knowing enough to realize the truth anyway.

Also this. Magical realm, by its definition, is exclusive to the the GM and/or perhaps another player. It's something that's uncomfortable to force on the group.

If I took a group and promised them all sexy amazon women, and they all liked it, it's no longer magical realm.

Arguing with the wrong person, friendo. Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence. Still, it makes some internal sense why theists reject "young" religions while lending more credence to older traditions.

This. Some things are better kept secret and not looked at as more than a fetish or kink that you're slightly ashamed of. You might not even agree with all of it, or feel disgusted after the fap, or really like only certain specific details. /d/ can go crazy when you take a general topic and allow anything related in, across the spectrum.

Cuteness and vanilla sex, however, will stay attractive for a long time.

Putting shit you get off to into your games and making everyone else experience it.

If you are a DM that likes girls being sex slaves and you keep putting your party in situations with female sex slaves to get you off, it's a magical realm.

What matters is are the players ok with your magical realm shit.

I laughed so hard when I read that at first
>because that one player ended up refusing to have his characters head inserted into the woman's ass so that he could suck off the baby's dick when we reinserted it
FUCKING HELL

>Cuteness and vanilla sex, however, will stay attractive for a long time.

This man speaks the truth. Don't believe what some people may say: Enjoying vanilla isn't bad at all.

Minotaur bard... I've never seen one of those before.

What if I get off to my players enjoying the game?

No, it's not OK to laugh at my fetish.

I play a very adult game with my wife and our roommates who are dating. Very one takes turns dming every know and then. Always a few beers are involved and frequent petting. Shits pretty cash actually. Probably one of the best games I've ever played.

Then make an enjoyable game for them, I guess?

That's called swinging, user...

There is some swinging involved but it only takes place around the table.

What are the rules? Do you get points? How do you win?

As far as the rules goes it's just 3.5. Someone usually wins every game, adventures like brothels and bar wenches. Shit comes up and we play through it.

Did the "magical realm" joke come from the KC Green D&D piss joke?

>it's just 3.5

But user, in swinging wizards are nerfed

I have a fetish for fairies and minigirls, so my magical realms are pretty normal for D&D tables. Nobody hate fairies right?

Yes

It might be just a coincidence but everyone has gravitated towards charisma based classes. No wizard in the party. As much of a joke as it is we use feats and spells from the book of erotic fantasy. I thought the stuff in there wouldn't add anything to the game but our scorceress dropped a spell that strips a person of all non magical equipment including clothes. Surprisingly useful.