ITT: post real life paladins

...

...

>Posts a Blackguard

The OP explicitly states to post real life paladins.

Pic related, King Richard the Lionheart.
Fought valiantly for God against demonic warmongering cultists.

Sorry for just sticking with the bible, but it's an easy source for this kind of thing

>Fought valiantly for God against demonic warmongering cultists
Isn't that exactly what Muslims believe Muhammad did? It was certainly one of the main justifications he gave for his conquests of the various pagans of Arabia.

This thread was doomed from the start. inb4 50 shitflinging posts of /pol/ vs Veeky Forums or whatever.

>Isn't that exactly what Muslims believe Muhammad did?
Yes it is. But we all know that its a common trope to have the followers of the BBEG to believe that they're doing good.

That's a fair point. In that case, I nominate Saladin as his replacement in this thread.

...

This.

Seriously? Nobody posted THE paladin yet?

You don't get to be a paladin by being a French whore and a self-confessed witch.

No, you get to be one by being a confirmed saint that promises to remove all Englishmen from France except those who die there, putting your money where your mouth is, being put on trial for heresy, dodging anything that could get you convicted for heresy and then making all Englishmen so butthurt they burn you on false charges and all get excommunicated.

And by making basementdwellers buttmad about England's most humiliating defeat at the hands of a teenage girl 400 years post facto.

Jeanne truly is best girl in any franchise, even the franchise that is real life.

Anyone in these three orders, except maybe the Teutonic Knights

But if there were any single person it would be Godfrey of Boullion

Shit taste.

>Teutons

>Not Dark Knights

Literally the perfect waifu. So good that she makes knightgirls ideal waifus despite what massive magnets for orc cock they are.

...

Assholy warrior

no love for this boy?

Seriously considered naming my kid Galahad even though I'm a secret fedora tipper

>Englishmen butthurt

She was burnt by Frenchmen and the idea that Joan single handedly won those victories is stupid and wanked mostly by Americans who for some reason are still obsessed about Britain.

...

> real life
> Galahad

Pick one.

>except maybe the Teutonic Knights
shit taste
>But if there were any single person it would be Godfrey of Boullion
good taste restored

...

more

>Recursive fanfiction character of an already historically innacurate narration.

>inb4 butthurt Turks, Saxons, and Corvinius fags

St Lazarus was zome obscure group no one cares about

the Teutonic knights killed far more Catholic Poles and Orthodox Russians than they did pagans or Muslims

get a load of this halfling

Posting yankees and still no lee, jackson, or stuart shame on you fa/tg/uys and ca/tg/irls
True patriots who fought for freedom, honor, and the cross
>inb4 das fuckin racis!
>inb4 bu..but theyre traitors

>True patriots who fought for freedom
> this is what Southerners actually believe

They fought for a continued economic and political dominance that was being eroded by the Industrial north, as well as to 'preserve their way of life' - a nice euphemism for the 'peculiar institution' of slavery.

The Confederates were traitors and rebels and they reaped what they sowed.

:_;7

>They fought for a continued economic and political dominance that was being eroded by the Industrial north
lel they fought to free themselves from the north not dominate it
>The Confederates were traitors and rebels
just like that evil traitor washington who fought against the rightful rule of King George
being this full of contradictions

also what is the right to self determination

Came here to post that.

>also what is the right to self determination
Something the South mostly gave up when they signed the Constitution, which outlines specifically how a state can secede.

They fought to keep slaves. That's all.

>lel they fought to free themselves from the north not dominate it
They had dominated the north politically and the US economically for generations. The advent of the Industrial revolution and the election of a presidential candidate that held 'anti-Southern' views was enough to foment secession even before Lincoln was sworn into office. The North had been forced to kow-tow to Southern sensibilities for generations previously (see: The Fugitive Slave Act) but the second the shoe was on the other foot, the South wanted out of the Union.

The Confederacy was an aristocratic pipe dream that a bunch of deluded poor men were tricked and drafted into fighting for, to continue the luxurious way of life the plantation owners had become accustomed to (plantation owners that did not have to fight, nor did the majority of slave owners).

The South was an abominable aristocratic hellhole, enamoured with the worst excesses of European culture with none of the prestige. They wanted their cake and they wanted too eat it too, and when the rest of the country said 'no' they started shooting over the issue instead of acting like civilized folk and using the avenues of diplomacy and political institutions that were available to them.

>except maybe the Teutonic Knights

I'll bet you're from the Baltic or Poland you heathen.

>They fought to keep slaves. That's all.
That was the crux of the issue, and anyone that says different is a damned liar.

The South fought to preserve slavery.

The North fought to preserve the Union.

...

>Fought valiantly for God against demonic warmongering cultists.

And also any other Christians along the way. Where'd that guy die, again?

>fundamentalist Christian Republican
>opposed to basic civil liberties
>"paladin"

Okay, bud.

*The South fought for autonomy against and increasingly centralized United States and viewed their secession as a continuation of the Independence War of 1776

ftfy

R E D D I T
E
D
D
I
T

The South is full of shit.

They were all for centralization within their own constitution and when it suited the ideals of the South.

>shoot dudes from a mile away
>honorable
u wot m8

>Orthodox Russians
>pagans
>Muslims

All were held in the same regard. 50% of the fighting against Poland was defensive. The other 50% is inexcusable, however. They got too big for their britches. Also note that whenever those pagans they were so great at slaughtering converted, suddenly the Germanic Order became much worse at fighting them.

>experiences horrors of war
>suffers from memories
>devotes the remainder of his life to helping those who have also suffered this way cope and heal from it
>dies for this noble cause

>in a holy order that people hate
>fought against people who hated him and his order
>bravely slaughtered a ton of them
>still felt bad

Pretty paladin to me.

...

>they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights
Thats not how rights work you cant just sign them over.
They exist independant of any goverments acknowledgement of them.

To say that the Civil War was only about slavery is silly many folks in the north owned slaves i.e. General Grant
It is best not to forget that the Emancipation Proclamation only freed slaves in the south not the north.
Slavery the only excuse the north could come up with to subjugate a newly formed nation.

>We have to rape and pillage across the south to stop all the horrible things they are doing
Literally the same argument Hiler used to invade Poland kek.

Much love for manlets

OP said post Paladins, not Warlocks.

Vlad is the only person who could say "up yours" to someone and really mean it.

a paladin setting up a secular nation is an interesting idea

>many folks in the north owned slaves i.e. General Grant
Only when he lived in the South, and they had been given to him by his Southern father-in-law.

As I said, the North fought to preserve the Union, not to free the slaves. Lincoln himself said that if he could keep the Union together without the need to free slaves he would, but the South had drawn blood on the issue of secession through firing upon Fort Sumter.

And for the South secession and the war was all about slavery. They seceded because of Lincoln's abolitionist views and the Cornerstone Address directly states slavery to be a fundamental reason for the departure of the South from the Union. For the South, the Civil War was all about the preservation of the Peculiar Institution. It's why slave owners were exempt from service, why colored Union troops and their white officers had a standing execution order held against them from the Confederate government, Southern politicians had in the recent past assaulted Northern colleagues in the fucking senate for espousing abolitionist beliefs. The Southern aristocracy had a radical fanaticism for slavery.

You're a deluded mother fucker if you refuse to accept that slavery was a key issue for the Confederates, and had been a contentious issue in the Union since the Revolution.

> Thats not how rights work you cant just sign them over.
> They exist independant of any goverments acknowledgement of them.

Unless they're a nigger apparently.

Oh yeah, because burning the poor alive inside of your castle after tricking them inside with promises of food is totally a noble and righteous thing to do.

Himmler was a pure idealist who was purging a whole race of warlocks and evil rogues, famalam

Polish-Lithuanian victory was by the will of the God himself!
The God almighty granted the Polish knights victory over corrupted black knights, that pretended to serve in His name.
If God would support the Teutonic Order they could not lose.

epic meme my friends
youtube.com/watch?v=eqEovnetLFo

Which is why he conducted all of those blasphemous Occult rituals amirite?

He's an inquisitorial paladin desu

>aryan occultism
>evil

FOR THE BETTERMENT OF HUMANITY, ALL OF THE HUMANITY.

>"obsessed about Britain." Jean D'Arc was French.
>"single-handedly won battles" No one was claiming that. They were saying she was a real life example of a paladin.

D-. Apply yourself.

What about the non 'aryans'

This, also this.

Oh white people. Never change with your racism and eagerness to pretend slavery wasn't a major thing in the South.

>The Greatest Paladin
>The Examplar of all he stands for.
>Of Truth, Justice, Rock And Roll

found the anglo

>Found the Gaul

Your leader professed the opinion that France should learn to accept and live with dead wives, dead children, dead loved ones. Your nation is craven, workshy and utterly contemptable to bravery, strength, truth and justice.

France never, nor can it ever have, produce a Paladin.

When a man asks you to take your hat off indoors you take your fucking hat off.

Humanity. Not sub humans.

...

>As I said, the North fought to preserve the Union, not to free the slaves.
So if the North fought to preserve the union and not end slavery then we agree they fought to keep the south from excersizing their right to self rule.

An example that comes to mind is
"The British just fought to preserve the British Empire not to tax them without representation."
I think the main problem here is I believe people have a right to decide who should rule themselves and you do not.

>the South had drawn blood on the issue of secession through firing upon Fort Sumter.
Fort Sumter was occupied Confederate soil any nation has the right to respond militarily to a violation of its sovereignty.

>And for the South secession and the war was all about slavery.
The south seceded because the north had made it clear that there interests were above the southern states, much like the British and the thirteen colonies. The north had made continuous attacks on the economic interests of the south in the preceeding years i.e. the nullification crisis. Attacking slavery was just a tool by some in the north to attempt to dominate the southern states which agricultural based economy was more dependant on slavery.

> Southern politicians had in the recent past assaulted Northern colleagues in the fucking senate for espousing abolitionist beliefs.
Charles Sumner got his ass whooped for insulting the brother of a representative from South Carolina who had just suffered a stroke.
Obviously this was a different time but matters of honor specifically in the south were taken very seriously.
The lesson to learn from this is "talk shit, get hit"

>Unless they're a nigger apparently
Since you already admitted that the north didn't fight the war to stop slavery.
Seems like a moot point as this was true in the north and the south.

Also do you think Robert E. Lee was not an irl paladin
>Prayed constantly
>Freed his own slaves
>Fought for his nation
>Ended war despite opposition

I'm pretty sure that someone as insane and cracked out as Himmer was the subhuman.

>to keep the south from excersizing their right to self rule.
The South had been freely violating the North's right to self-rule through the Fugitive Slave Act.

Cry more, Reb, your cause was without foundation from the outset. When economic times turned in favor of the North over King Cotton and the Southern Aristocracy, rather than try to build an economic and political solution, your rich plantation owning slavers cut and run to found their own little fiefdom, one based on hypocrisy and delusion, and it failed because of that nebulous foundation.

>Charles Sumner got his ass whooped for insulting the brother of a representative from South Carolina who had just suffered a stroke.

Andrew Butler and Preston Brooks were not brothers, they were second cousins. He bushwacked Sumner out of the blue while his thug of a friend (Kiett) prevented Sumner from being rescued by producing a pistol.

This occurred in the Senate, and was nothing short of thuggery, something common amongst the Southern gentry. Rule through brutality at home, and brutality was the only discourse they understood.

When it came time for Brooks to meet a Northern in a fair duel (a duel Brooks instigated no less), the gut coward slunk of in shame when he realized his opponent would accept.

Butler also had not suffered a stroke.

youtube.com/watch?v=pSOBeD1GC_Y

Secession was as much about slavery as 4th crusade was about Christianity.
It was jus a pretext, and a thing that opposing sides could use to rally people to their cause.
Reason was in growing conflict of interests between de facto feudal agrarian south and industrializing capitalist north.
If south agreed to ban slavery the conflict would probably start over something else.

Not to mention, saying that north have moral high ground is a mistake.
That is how world worked at time, there was slavery, serfdom, and inhumane exploitation by capitalists based that resulted in economical slavery. For extra points, modern "free world" endorse modern slavery of poor people, as long as it result in cheep consumer goods and is unseen.
North just wanted to change one type of servitude to another. As was pioneered in Duchy of Warsaw, when serfdom was abolished.

Simplifying conflict to "muh slavery" and "muh freedom" is retarded.

Only some Untermensch could claims such a thing.
You may want to consult your local SS chapter for a tax free purging.

youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4

The chief and most important goal for the leaders of the nation to go to war was slavery.

> Accepting that things are hard and are going to be hard instead of pretending that "It won't ever happen again, next time you will be safe".
> Not brave.
He basically pulled a "Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat" speech, I don't like the guy but I would say it's what you should say in such circumstances.

>He basically pulled a "Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat" speech
>Comparing a war veteran who would fight them on the beaches and with growing strength in the air to the limp-wristed capitulation to terrosim of France.

France has suffered more terrorist attacks in the last week then any Western nation outside of Sweden (Seriously, google Grenade attacks). Your leaders have failed you, your culture has failed you, your nation is a failure.

Instead of a show of force, the leader of your nation has told you to roll over and accept the inevitable, your children and women are going to be bombed, beaten, raped, beheaded and bled and regadless of what you do, it will always happen. His words:

>“The times have changed and France is going to have to live with terrorism.”

You've already lost. You capitulated in World War One, World War Two, Vietnam, Gult Wars and every other major and minor conflict in the history of the West, France has been cowardly, scared, unwilling and unable to shoulder a burden and forced another to do it for them.

>The South had been freely violating the North's right to self-rule through the Fugitive Slave Act.

First off this was agreed to in the United States senate therefore not a violation of the norths right to self rule as they were a constituate part of The united States of America and were involved in the Compromise of 1850 which led to the passing of the Fugitive Slave Act.

Second if the south was so bad and trampling on the norths rights in congress why didn't they just let them leave that would immediately solve the problem. Oh yeah because the war was not about the south oppresing the north it was about the north opressing the south. The north at any time could have let the south go and then guess what the mean old Confederates couldn't have oppressed them any longer. Instead the north decided to teach the south a lesson and destroy their country for the crime of wanting to be free.

>This occurred in the Senate, and was nothing short of thuggery, something common amongst the Southern gentry. Rule through brutality at home, and brutality was the only discourse they understood.
This is almost laughable when you look at all the war crimes comitted by the union including but not limited to burning down Randolph Tennessee, burning down houses along the Yazoo Valley Mississippi, pillaging jackson Mississippi, burning down settlements thoughout the Shenandoah Valley, and the March to the Sea. All these actions recieved the full support of Union and no reprimands were ever given for any of these. Your lack of insight and hypocrisy is astounding.

>Butler also had not suffered a stroke.
that is just blatantly false here is the text of Sumners speech in which he insults the crippled Preston Brooks.
[He] "touches nothing which he does not disfigure with error, sometimes of principle, sometimes of fact. He cannot open his mouth, but out there flies a blunder."
"with incoherent phrases [that] discharge the loose expectorations of his speech."

*crippled Andrew Butler

>Cowboy
>Policeman
>Soldier
>Mayor
>Senator
>President
>Writer
>Mathematician
>Body builder
>Hunter
>President

>Fuck you Republicans, banks don't get special treatment and neither do corporations.
>Fuck you Democrats, the US needs a strong military presence to dissuade aggression.
>Fuck you Mexico, because fuck Mexico.

There has never in the history of the United States been one person who came close to this.

Paladin of paladins.

Regardless of your political stance, everyone should agree that the Reconstruction was the worst civil rights violation in American history and set the stage for literally every racial and socio-economic disparity persisting in our country to this day.

What's suppoosed to be wrong about slavery again?

t. roosevelt

seriously though I want to dig this guy up, get his DNA, impregnate some bitch, and then raise the child in a perfect recreation of roosevelt's life in order to recreate another worthy president.

>fundamentalist Christian Republican
>opposed to basic civil liberties
>"paladin"

Yeah? That's a definition of a paladin.