Have you ever played in (or ran) a campaign where a character was raped...

If Veeky Forums is to be believed, this is apparently fairly common, but I am certain that this is a mixture of wishful thinking and vocal legbeards. Most girls with "rape" fetishes either would never want to indulge it in any form because they think it's shameful, or they actually just mean they want forceful but not at all rough sex.

I once played an all evil campaign that we decided was going to go full bore torture porn pretty early on. We raped our fair share of people, our Blackguard who got kicked out of paladin school for being a pedophile especially.

One time, shortly after leading an army of northern savages and demons to raise a major holy city, we actually raped an angel.

Man you just don't understand what women like

Probably because you don't know anything about real life women user.
At this point it's fairly commonly known that rape is one of the most common fetishes among women as far as people are willing to report. A lot of folks has to do with sex being "bad" and thus rape being "guilt-free" because they weren't bad for choosing to initiate sex and so on combined with some fairly generic dominance fantasies.
Which isn't to say they want to be raped or anything, the kinds of rape fantasy stuff they have tends to resemble actual rape the way porn resembles actual sex, which is to say not even remotely.

Said player is kind of sexually repressed so her fantasies kinda got all pent up I'm guessing; she actually LIKES reading those Gor novels, yeesh.

Actually that picture doesn't do it justice at all

> just mean they want forceful but not at all rough sex

This is how pretty much everybody has a rape fetish.

It's not a Veeky Forums thing, it's just a fairly common fantasy.
psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201001/womens-rape-fantasies-how-common-what-do-they-mean
Mind you, rape fantasies are nothing like actual rape. They usually aren't even like men's rape fantasies honestly as far as I can tell. It's kinda like how we fantasize about porn but actual sex in real life doesn't happen because some super-hot babe in a thong shakes her ass in a huge house you randomly find yourself without saying a word before taking it up the butt; it's not real, it's fake fantasy shit that doesn't happen and the person fantasizing about is almost always aware of it unless they are hopeless naive.

Women don't want to be raped, they just have pretend fantasy rape scenarios in their head sometimes.
They also generally don't ask GM's to GM them on the tabletop, but I guess I lucked out...or something, I dunno what you want to call it.

Amber Diceless Roleplaying. The game for horrible people.

>I had a big, tough edgelord character. His introductory scene was a castle siege. The defenders were slaughtered, and the king and court were captured. He had the royal family placed in heavy heavy chains, and left in the shallows during low tide. They were arranged so the king would drown last, after seeing all of his loved ones perish.
>The rest of the court was raped to death by my soldiers.
>As this was Amber, neither event overly shocked the other players. They just remained leery around my character.

Yeah, I was running an after school game in the RPG club. The party had to get past a guard room, so the Dragon born rogue suggested she seduce them and have the party come in and kill them while they were distracted. They were like, "OK, that sounds fine." So she walk-in and seduced them. As she positioned them so the party could come in and gank them, they just walked on by and left her. Figured the bodies / mess / lack of guards would raise suspicion. No it wasn't terribly descriptive. I had him (dude was a twink and is now a trans girl so I don't even know anymore) just roll an endurance and willpower check for the outcome. She got roughed up a bit and was mighty pissed, but otherwise went through the rest of the campaign just fine.

The rest of the group thought this was funny as fuck, and laughed their asses off at it.

Dude what? Almost all girls have rape fantasies. Literally have never talked to a girl about that stuff who didn't.

>Mi'lord, should we rape the pets?
>Of course! The whole court I said!

It has been a while since that game. But, yeah. I would not put that beyond the realm of possibility.

Can confirm one of the girls in my group gas a rape fetish but would hate to actually be raped - even if you find it hot if you're a rational human being you know rape is bad. Anyone who claims otherwise is delusional or a rapist.

You know rape fetish is literally the most common fetish among women, right? And that quite a lot of women orgasm during rape? You'd almost start thinking forced copulation would be the natural status quo with humans, as it is with so many species, and men only labeled it "rape" out of moral/legal concerns.

>rape fantasies are nothing like actual rape
This is important. I've known women who were raped and still had rape fantasies. It's two completely different things.

Please explain us what's the point of this thread aside of being a cheap bait?

>It's not rape if they cum

Please don't let hentai be the basis of your legal knowledge. Men who are raped also often ejaculate. What the fuck does orgasming during rape have to do with whether or not it is rape?

Then again I've been here too damn long now and this may be a joking that I couldn't tell wasn't serious.

Just stop responding to the guy. It's a troll or /pol/lution

>It's not rape if they cum
Please point out where I said it. Fucking quote me, bitch.

It's kind of like male rape fantasies. Most guys don't like the idea of smashing a girl's face in to stop her from resisting and having it end with her in a bloody crying mess wetting herself or sick shit like that. They just like the idea of being on some level irresistible, so good at sex the woman enjoys herself despite being 'forced' into it, her resistance crumbling under his amazing sexual ability.

Women its kind of the same thing, the idea that they're irresistible and drive men into wild passion. Surprise sex they didn't know they wanted (except they did).

It's nothing like real life rape.

...

That's not what he said, though. He claims that historically and evolutionarily rape is the norm of sexual intercourse between humans.

Not that dude, but saying
>forced copulation would be the natural status quo with humans, as it is with so many species, and men only labeled it "rape" out of moral/legal concerns.
Makes it sound like you're advocating rape to be made a standard, legitimised way of reproduction instead of a crime.

see

>Makes it sound like you're advocating rape to be made a standard
You can't get an ought from an is, you double nigger.

>post obvious lies
>called the fuck out
>"b-bait"

Fuck you, faggot. You got called on your shit, no amount of damage control is going to change that.

To prove how awful Veeky Forums can get? Honestly after the role played magic duel in the commander thread, this thread doesn't feel as cringe inducing.

No, but getting "should" from "you would think that" is a very small step.

Storytime?

>No, but getting "should" from "you would think that" is a very small step.
Let's see the wider context of that "you would think that", right?

>You'd almost start thinking forced copulation would be the natural status quo with humans
>natural status quo
>NA
>TU
>RAL

For fucks sake, I know what the hell I'm saying. Stop trying to make it sound like I'm arguing in favor of rape because it makes your job easier and show at least a shred of intellectual integrity.

...

>the role played magic duel in the commander thread

This sounds way more awesome than cringe.

dont even bother. feminists literally live in an alternate dimension completely divorced from reality, where there feelings are truer than facts.

the user feels that you said it, and therefore think that you actually did, regardless what what actually happened in reality

i think a few NPCs got raped by orks one time. we killed the orcs

Of course you can. Example:
>A butter knife makes for a bad spoon
>Therefore, you ought to not use a butter knife as a spoon

No. Not Storytime.
It was already weird enough GMing her this stuff over the internet, especially since at the same time on another chat I was GMing someone else a backstory one shot for their character that had absolutely nothing sexual in it at all.

I mean if she wanted to sext someone she should just go ask out that guy she's always going on about already for fuck's sake; I'm her GM, not a phone sex line.

If that user is who I think he is, he doesn't believe in objective reality regardless.

>Therefore, you ought to not use a butter knife as a spoon
What does thsi "ought" mean in this context? That it's not a smart idea to use a spoon as a butter knife, or that it's morally wrong to use a spoon as a butter knife. Do you really think you'll have an inquisition all over your ass because you used a spoon to cut your butter?

Cool your jets, dude. You're expecting a reasoned dissection of your argument when I'm going directly off emotional context without any particular logic.

My reading of it, without any particular deep thought, was as follows:

>if it weren't for anti rape legislation you would think it would only be natural for rape to be standard. Most women orgasm from rape and it's their fetish too.

"Do your duty today: rape!"

Sounds like it could be from a "joys of forced copulation" leaflet.

I'd argue that morals can be derived the same way.

7/10.

You got me good, fucker. You chose a hot button and sensational topic, but you're trying too hard and it feels forced. I like the modicum of effort you're putting in though; that's rare these days. Approach it with slightly more subtelty and it'll be a 9/10.

your damage control is a miserable failure bro.
everyone can see it.
just leave.

>bait! it must be bait!

No, you just got blown the fuck out. Next time think before posting, and maybe your asshole won't sustain such immense damage.

You know this literally leads to Gulliver's Travels-esque morality about what side to break an egg open from, right? And not even as a metaphor for Catholocism and Protestantism, I mean LITERAL morality based around what side an egg should be cracked from.

That would depend on the which result one would want to achieve by cracking the egg.

And now we're in the realm of sophistry.

>god made chickens lay eggs with the pointed side crackable easily so therefore it's through god's will that eggs should be cracked from the top!

>fuck you, I like to cut eggs in two

>KILL THE HERETIC

10/10 good dm.

If you want two halfs of an egg it's entirely reasonable to cut it in two. I don't see where your percieved problem lies.

The perceived problem lies with people conflating facts with ideas on how to do things, because the people who do that are usually stupid and therefore come up with religious zeal to make their stupidity come about.

See: people suggesting eugenics due to darwinistic evolution, and people wanting some scientific thing not to happen because "it's not natural".

>people suggesting eugenics due to darwinistic evolution
Darwinistic evolution already handles the percieved 'problem' those people claim exists, provided that they are problems are at all.

>people wanting some scientific thing not to happen because "it's not natural"
Which is the opposite of what I'm saying. If a new technology is possible and would improve the lifes of people it ought to be made real.

There's nothing wrong with eugenics though. It's encouraging positive genes while discouraging negative ones (with positive and negative of course being judged by human standards) and nothing else. Eugenics could even help us eradicate horrible, incurable diseases.

It's the heresy.

The part where humans judge is the cock up.

>The part where humans judge is the cock up.
Very well. Go ahead and explain the positives of bone cancer, or children who are born both deaf and blind.

>The part where humans judge is the cock up.
Do you think Tay Sachs disease is good? What about Apert Syndrome? Do you think cancer is a good thing? Your posts certainly indicate so.

How DARE we humans judge that muscular dystrophy, Down's syndrome, and harlequin babies are a bad thing?

Two separate games I can recall, one where a human turned sort-of dragon male character was raped by a proper dragon, and another where a human female character was by a fellow human.

Both cases were somewhat descriptive, and weirdly everyone was more comfortable with the second case.

Yes. No, it ended the group. Yes, partly why it ended the group. Both male and females. Yes, the other reason the group ended.

/pols/ comin out the wood work again

>there are already laws regarding incest
>still against eugenics

In one game I played with my friends (note: our games tend to be very light-hearted, lots of teasing, screwing around, getting away with weird stuff, etc.) a pedophilic old archeologist took the gay gnome off to the side while everyone was waiting to see the oracle. Implied buttsex (we said that was what was happening- no descriptions or anything) while another character tried to steal a music-playing wand from breakdancing orcs. Everyone had a good laugh.

(That same gnome was legitimately set on fire by an ability later in the session. To this day, we still make jokes about the "flaming gnome.")

(Forgot- the gnome was an adult, the old guy just didn't understand that)

Because eugenics has totally never led to decisions that were really fucked up right? And if y'all don't understand the dangers in human institutions deciding who gets sterilized and who won't be born in the first place then y'all need some Jesus. But really guys go read some history.[\spoiler]

Let me clarify, then. Very, very carefully carried out eugenics is perfectly reasonable to attempt to remove terrible diseases from the gene pool.

People who hold up darwin's theory of natural selection as a reason why we need to genocide inferior races is a good example of why mistaking facts for moral imperative is no good.

You don't need to sterilize someone to keep them from reproducing.

There are people right now who have serious genetic disorders who have a very high chance of passing those disorders on to their children.

If they really want to have a child, they should just adopt instead of continuing a obviously flawed bloodline.

Even relatives of Hitler have decided to not have children to stop the perpetuation of that bloodline.

>Even relatives of Hitler have decided to not have children to stop the perpetuation of that bloodline.
Bullshit m8.

>run game with multiple parties
>Parties rarely directly interact, but this time we saw 2 parties on opposite sides of a pitched battle
>one side wins, and PC from winning side rapes a PC from losing side.

She was ok with it. I was heavily squicked out.

The only male living relative who had the Hitler name was his nephew Walter Patrick Hitler. He changed his name, and had four sons before he died in '87. One is already dead. None of them have children.

>having it end with her in a bloody crying mess wetting herself or sick shit like that.
Hm, that sounded a lot sexier than I would have thought.

Yes.

My character raped her older brother.

Admittedly she was possessed at the time.

Nope. That sort of thing doesn't happen in my settings/games.

A lot of men get an erection when they're being raped too.

Stimulation is stimulation, the body doesn't give a shit. That's why rape is traumatic - the berain keeps saying "no no no" and the body says "fuck off brain, I'm having a blast!"

Three girls I've played with have inserted their rape fantasies into games, two as players and one as DM (the latter designed a fully fleshed out, believable world... that also happened to be her magical realm where various beastmen races regularly stole other races' women and used them as breeding stock).

So yeah. I think everyone was as comfortable as possible, seeing as at least three members of my regular group were very obviously getting off on all this. Hilariously, I don't think I've ever seen a dude insert rape. Too shy, I'm guessing.

>Have you ever played in (or ran) a campaign where a character was raped?
Yes.
>Were you and the other players comfortable with it?
I wasn't since it was my character and, quite frankly, the whole situation was dumb as fuck. The others laughed about it, but I guess the age of players does make a difference - I was around 5 years older than anyone else at the table.
>Was it descriptive?
No, but the GM sure as hell would've like it that way. He can't describe things for shit though, and I guess he didn't have any rape pics since he doesn't go on Veeky Forums.
>Was it a female who got raped? A child?
Female, but no child - early to mid 20's if I remember correctly, it's been a few years.

As I said the whole situation was stupid. My character was downed in a heated firefight and was barely conscious. So far so good, it was a thrilling fight. However, another PC then raped her in the middle of combat, with bullets hissing about everywhere. The GM didn't even roll if he was hit, since it's "unrealistic" to shoot at someone who rapes a girl in the middle of combat who's completely out of cover.
[Spoiler]Yes I mad[/Spoiler]

Hey, leave /pol/ out of this, we are a board of peace.
Seriously though, this guy sounds like the kind of /r9k/ bitter cunts that I've seen on every fucking board I visit, including Veeky Forums...

ITT: Neckbeards glorify their willing acceptance of rape culture

"Rape her? Cor, we're not animals. Nar, we just made her eat leftover beet soup erry day."

>The part where humans judge is the cock up.
You're right, let's distribute semen to fertilize every egg in-vitro through some randomized process to guarantee an equal chance for everyone to have descendants. We wouldn't want stupid biased humans to judge who is allowed to breed, after all.

I have a hard time saying this wasn't rape... but have a read:

>VERY modified Kingmaker campaign in Pathfinder.
>Queen NPC is a real good queen.
>Acts with the nation's interests, respectable, PC's like her though they metagame about when she ousts the PC king and takes over...
>Demon possesses her.
>PC's begin to notice she's more erratic and emotional... but it slowly develops over real-life weeks and months.
>The king was a Dragonborn Bard.
>He did not start showing characteristics until after they were married.
>Possessed by this demon, she confides with the king's cousin - the PC party paladin.
>She does not want to give birth to a "monster" and have him taint their kingdom forever.
>He has voiced similar concerns (about having a mutating thing on the throne) and is not terribly difficult to persuade.
>As a player, he knows it's going to blow up in his face but decides, for drama's sake, to give in.
>They do the deed... she gets pregnant.
>They later learn about the possession... and deal with it.

The Paladin seeks to resign... and atone to his goddess. The queen tells him that atonement is between his and his goddess but asks him not to resign.

When he asks her how she could forgive him, she tells him that she can't think deeply on it because she might consider what he did "unthinkable"... but that she was willing to let the incident pass because they were both victims.

Interestingly, until then, no one considered that he was as much a victim as she was... everyone just looked at her as the victim.

There are also relatives of other high ranking nazis who actually underwent sterilization out of sheer guilt.

>Can confirm one of the girls in my group gas a rape fetish but would hate to actually be raped
Well, yeah. I mean, the vast majority of guys with rape fantasies don't actually want to rape girls either, so I don't know why people would find it that shocking for girls to have rape fantasies just because actually getting raped isn't a pleasant experience. I also have (non-sexual) fantasies where I'm taking on a group of terrorists, but that doesn't mean that I'm itching to do it in real life. Most of the shit I'm into porn-wise wouldn't translate well into real life, and it's not just that I'm sensible enough to appreciate that it get me in trouble, but that I really have no desire to degrade or abuse another human being because I care about their well-being seeing as I'm not a total dick. But fantasy-land is something different.

The characters were in a post-apocalyptic setting similar to stalker or fallout or metro 2033. They were on the surface when they found a group of bandits led by a woman. After killing a few of them they captured the leader and she killed one of the characters in an escape attempt. As a result one of the characters pinned her down and tried to rape her. I said okay roll +hard. He did and got a 10. I ruled that she was completely helpless as he pinned her to the ground in the gutted ruins of a parking garage, her cheek scraping bloodily against the ground as he brutally had his way with her. As a result he got +1 to Hx because we were using a homebrew playbook of fucked up post-apoc psychopaths called the Ravager. He and the others killed her and cooked pieces of her body and left the rest nailed to wooden signposts to show that this was their territory now. They ended up losing the wars against the other groups in the city and most of them died but at least it started out pretty fun. They probably lost because 3 people quit the group (it was originally 6 people plus the GM, me) because of the rape incident and we had to retcon that their characters decided to go home.

>Most guys don't like the idea of smashing a girl's face in to stop her from resisting and having it end with her in a bloody crying mess wetting herself or sick shit like that.

Guess I'm not most guys then. Maybe not the wetting herself thing, though. I would rather that happen in the post-ejaculatory beating.

This Dubsanon gets it

Not exactly, I did play a bandit that had raped a woman. I tried to play him as internally self loathing, and genuinely wanting to repent but externally as a boisterous guy who just loved drinking and fighting. Had issues looking women in the eyes when interacting with them.

>yes
>yes
>eh
>yes, but it was a goblin npc by a dwarf
>no

Fag

I once played a male orc raped by a female human.

like. imp leather jackets made of kids, or imp business suits made of kids. or did they just zip themselves up in their skin with no alterations like a flesh onesie. or did they just take random bits, tan them and make loincloths and stuff. i'm invested in the craftsmanship of these imps.

How? I understand female-on-rape happens (almost as often as the other way around actually) but human-on-orc? Orcs are rapetrucks, designed to rape.

Maybe the woman drugged his food or was a wizard or something.

But how do you rape those who are literally always willing? Is there even a second in his lifetime during which an orc doesn't desire rape?