Link marine here

This youtuber is based as fuck.

He has been absolutely destroying linkies since day 1

The guy is retarded, smart contracts have not been implemented correctly yet. But when they do they will revolutionise industries. For how smart this autistic cunt says he is, he lacks any foresight to see farther then his latest trap Loli porn

Good, I'll be multi billionaire in 2 decades then

i want to believe you linkies and maybe buy some link

but there are ppl on this board that actually think BTC is good so idk

I saw that video before investing ans it was cringey as fuck

But what do I know? Kek

linkies are the smart part of Veeky Forums that knows dinosaurcoin has no future
join us, anonymous, now is a good time to buy

...

Posted this in another thread, but honestly if you find this dipshit's video remotely compelling you should sell LINK nad not buy back.

I'm 20 seconds in and this guy is questioning whether smart contracts will be a big deal in the future. Whether automating exchanges of value will be valuable. This is a very bad sign.

At 12.59 he says "It's basically an oracle for Ethereum". This guy doesn't even have a basic understanding of this project, in failing to understand that ChainLink works on Bitcoin,. Ethereum, Hyperledger, and will inevitably work on future smart contract platforms as well (NEO, QTUM, etc). I already think this FUDder is retarded, but I'll persevere.

His "anchor coin" idea around 13:57 he has just made up. "Let's say ChainLink works only on Ethereum (which it doesn't) and then try some half assed math based on that. This guy is a fucking retard. Then he looks at LINKs value relative to ETH as if CHainLink isn';t going to massively increase the value of eth by making smart contracts valuable.

God, honestly at times I don't even want to respond to this shit. Anyone who finds it convincing doesn't deserve to have a stake in this project.

I made it to 16:20. Dude is fucking retarded and doesn't even have the most basic whitepaper understanding of ChainLink. Not to mention he doesn't understand that market cap valuation is greater than transaction fee liquidity (ETH's market cap of $30B doesn't move $30B of gas around). Anyway, fuck this guy. Depressingly ignorant.

It pisses me off how many people on this board have such a limited understanding of what they're investing in that they would get shaken by something as amateur and inaccurate as this.

he's right though that the coin should be valued on a cash flow basis. so then we can back into cash flow projections based on what our estimate of value is. if you think otherwise i'd like to hear your opinion why and what your cash flow projections are supporting your valuation

Watch his other videos theyre literal shit. His monero video is cringey as fuck and I hold monero. He is trying to say monero will be big because churches will use it. fucking churches. like, wtf?

anyway, steve confirmed ChainLink will work with NEO too. I mean the writing is on the wall guys.

I invented the meme of "solves the oracle problem" shilling it.

The time to sell was so long ago before SIBOS, user. You are now in the middle of a long J-curve which may never come to fruition.

Is Ethereum's value equal to the trransactional quantity of gas moving through the network at any given moment? Is the value of any ecosystem the exact transactional value, or is it hfar higher because it incorporate illiquid and staked tokens? I shouldn't even have to answer this shit if people had done the most basic research.

ethereum is a currency not a utility token

I'm not sure if I'm not understanding or if you're just coming up with some irrelevant shit. Link is used to pay for in/out data providing. Cash flow what the fuck are you talking about. It's the built in currency of the ecosystem. It's pretty fucking simple. It's a genius system cause all the participants are interested in ever higher value for the token.

>Is the value of any ecosystem the exact transactional value, or is it far higher because it incorporate illiquid and staked tokens?

He just repeating what vitalik said
Hes wrong

i'm having a hard time formulating a rigorous argument but fundamentally shouldn't the value of the token have a close relationship to the total amount of transaction activity it will support?

Assuming every token is always performing transactions and that no proportion of the token pool is held, staked, or otherwise illiquid, then maybe. But that's not even remotely the case.

vitalik said something like "its hard to argue that an oracle is worth 32 million" thats because its WORTH MORE

Oh, a non retard on Veeky Forums, jesus this is actually refreshing to see.

That video was so misinformed, I don't know how you made it through 17 minutes.

jfc the deluded linkie meme is true

Transaction activity in where? Eth? Hyperledger? CL network? The value will be in some relation to the amount of off-chain data the CL network is asked to provide

aggregate, obviously. but even if you sum across all cryptos i'm not sure the numbers work

this guy's a fuckin character, subbed

So one of my hesitations on link is the team.

First of all, I think the tech is massive and very crucial. But the team? They have more or less ghosted. No communication or anything. It takes a second to just a quick tweet out. This makes me think that Link is setup for failure. Can't have a team that doesn't communicate.

And couldn't another coin with a better team just more or less copy the idea, create their own version of the coin.

I have a little link but would love some response to this cause I'm retarded and can't see otherwise

>be the one of the few coins that is reliant on enterprise adoption
>have the worst fanbase on the internet

half convinced the poor communication is to try to get Veeky Forums to dump to improve public image

Fundamental reason for using a token is because then the network doesn't work like one with transactions fees would. It's in no ones interest to drive the price down.

>Can't have a team that doesn't communicate.

They have communicated what they are working on. They are now working on it. They are not a team that gives constant updates, but they don't need to. Expect more communication closer to mainnet launch.

>And couldn't another coin with a better team just more or less copy the idea, create their own version of the coin.

They would need to educate and train a network of node operators, make connections with big business and industry, and write the middleware. ChainLink is literally years ahead on all of these fronts.

im full convinced that Sirgay doesnt fear any ndas. He is terrified that a big portion of biz has large quantities of Link. He want us too dump. I think in the bottom of his heart he wanted regular people to have a shot of getting a piece of the pie before the big money comes like a flood. And now he deeply regrets it but cannot say it directly.Tanking the price and radio silence is his only hope of getting us out of Link. But most of Biz is already deluded. During the Btc bullrun we lost sats but are on our way back to 30 cents.

why the fuck would he be "terrified" because we hold link? are we some kind of demons who'll enslave the world if we get enough money?

question: wont our LINK tokens be useless on other platforms? i thought LINK was needed to pay the oracles, but its only an ethereum token...

What coins does this faggot hold?