How can you make a campaign risqué, without going overboard and making it magical realm?

He's not gonna

Plus, 80% of this board doesn't actively play.

Mature players.

I've played straight-faced rape/breeding/drug/slavery/murder/blackmailing games where appearance, status and even sexuality all had impact.

All without constant gags, all without endless off-topic banter. All without awkward mails to me (DM) about how player X feels uncomfortable.

Mature group.

Get a whole new group if you need it. Have each person be vetted thoroughly. If they're not capable of writing a bio they're out.

It's MUCH easier than you think. Just drop the idea that you can just play with any brodude you've been hanging with for the last 20 years.

These guys know what they're talking about.

Everyone else, your shit's all fucked up and you talk like a fag.

The One Shot podcast's Monsterhearts episode was a good example of how to do this right

oh Jab

god bless that man

......did anybody else read that bottle as saying "pop" at first?

No.

>>>/the American South/

Bawdy ballads.

Female DMs can be just as creepily sexual as men, user.

#feminism

Austin Powers it.

You have to know something about how casual sex and relationships work in reality. The players will see the truth in what you depict even if they haven't experienced it, and as a result they won't be offended or disgusted by it
Or, you have to have a really good understanding of what titillates warm-blooded, heterosexual, normie men and women even if you don't have a lot of firsthand experience. This is the George RR Martin method

goddamn, I didn't realize we had this many shitposters here.

Yep, mods gave 'em their way, and now they'll never leave.

Truly, we are in the age of the shitpost.

>you have to have a really good understanding of what titillates warm-blooded, heterosexual, normie men and women even if you don't have a lot of firsthand experience
Take out the "normie" and that's basically how I write my smut. People seem to like it.

For that matter, take out the "men and", too. But I've sorta gotten the sense that I overthink male sexuality.

It's simply not possible

I was actually serious about sending him to Pathfinder. They're pretty solid in that regard. It's basically /d/-lite. Not to mention the three REP campaigns they're running, one of which features towergirls.

I go there and I don't even play. As long as it's fantasy and erotic, you're good.

Source?

Whatever you say, shitpost-chan.

It's only a bad magical realm if your players are aren't having fun

Having a member of the party get carried away by a Giantess for fade to black SNUSNU and giving him a physical penalty the next day is a lighthearted example if you or the player want to cuddle irl Amazons

First post best post.

Yeah, he sort of nailed it right out of the start.

But sadly Veeky Forums is laboured with the sort of prudish moral conservatives who see any form of sexual expression as unhealthy regardless of context or consent. Then again, they're irritatingly common basically everywhere despite all the social progress of the last few decades. It's fucking depressing.

Play Monster Hearts with adults.

>But I've sorta gotten the sense that I overthink male sexuality.
For the most part that's probably true, but (and this is where the "normie" distinction is important) men have stronger fixational tendencies than women which is why bizarre and *compulsive* fetishes are almost exclusively confined to men, whereas 90% of female fetish is BDSM and rape (I'm talking about strong fetish as opposed to just curiosity)
So for men without strong fetishes you probably overthink it, but there are complex directions you can go if you're trying to titillate specific groups of male fetishists

I just mean sometimes I ask guys "but why do you find X attractive?" and most of the time the answer is "it's soft and I can squeeze it".

Though a foot fetishist did once give me a surprisingly insightful view into why he loved feet. I think that's what I keep expecting.

I also mean that in my non-smut writing I'm generally not great at writing men--in particular, conversations between men (it just comes off sounding like Ping Pong Girl)--which I thought would be distracting in my smut writing, as well. But it ain't.

Every NPC of note is well under the age of consent. PCs are not. Should they lose their way even for a moment, CIA falls everyone dies.

This user knows what's up

It seems almost hypocritical to do that when as GM you've made the deliberate choice to center your "risqué" campaign on a world of little girls and boys. Also, what if the PCs get frisky with each other?

>I just mean sometimes I ask guys "but why do you find X attractive?" and most of the time the answer is "it's soft and I can squeeze it".
>Though a foot fetishist did once give me a surprisingly insightful view into why he loved feet. I think that's what I keep expecting.
Exactly. Fetishists will be able to discuss their kink in detail because it's a fusion of cold, linear, male mental fixation and ideation with raw sexuality. Guys who just want to fuck women are simply following a pleasure-pattern handed down to them from evolution, similar to eating. "Why does it taste good?" "I dunno. It's savory?"

You're a moron.

These guys get it.

sauce

so...
where did you crop that from?

Ahh, and here we have a stupid moral conservative as a perfect example of the attitudes which perpetuate the unhealthy paradox of obsession with and repression of sex in western society.

OP ask how I can make it. It's the honest answer.
>Also, what if the PCs get frisky with each other?
A booming voice descends from the heaven exclaiming "Gayyy."

>I do not understand terms but will use them anyway

That makes a sort of sense.

If your (admittedly unproveable) hypothesis is correct, that's why there are a dozen generals on /soc/ for women to post various body parts or articles of clothing and, at least as of the last time I looked, only one for men to do the same. Among other reasons, obviously.

The artist is gen'en

Or you can just look up minotaurs on your preferred booru

They are truly a treasure trove of great tokens

>the name has an apostraphe
Goddamnit user that makes it impossible to find

through alternative means I found it though
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2783490

>If your (admittedly unproveable) hypothesis is correct, that's why there are a dozen generals on /soc/ for women to post various body parts or articles of clothing and, at least as of the last time I looked, only one for men to do the same
Yup, and it's likely that the latter general is patronized primarily by gay men, unless it's just a general "hot men" general (in which case they simply make up less of the market share than in "male dick" or "male ass" threads)

Artist name for that one?

I'm only helping you because you're too stupid to search by yourself.
gen'en_(sioherashi)

The artist is Ban

It's the male hands/arms/neck general, and it is actually mostly women requesters.

The dick rate threads are where the gay men congregate.

Very carefully and with great difficulty.

I appreciate it thoroughly, though I've already found it.

Look up "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum".

Then look up the genre "sex comedy".

Presumably there would be "sex tragedies", but no one wants to hear about how you lost your virginity, OP.

Depends what you mean by risqué. Do you want a game centered around getting a harem as large and racially diverse as possible, or do you want a normal campaign, but with heavy sexual RP? The latter is very easy, just make sure everyone is onboard, and explain that sex is very commonplace in this setting as a tool for bartering, as everyone is very open about it. You'll often see people just fucking on the streets, sometimes even with a small crowd around them jerking off.
The former would likely require its own system.

There's a reason we chose a word which previously had spiritual connotations to describe such kinks.

Lets go through all my fetishes and sexual preferences and see if I can explain them
>pre-op trans women/traps
likely a sense of firmiliarity as far as their genitailia is conserned. Also that it's just something I can grab, and it feels good for them. Also also the sense that they'll more than likely be a sub as they have chosen to pursue famininity. Also also also I like butt stuff, which undoubtly they'd be fine with.
>butt stuff
Firmiliarity as well as the knowledge that i have little to fear from not using protection (provided I know the person, which I would). Also muffs often look pretty gross, but anooses usually look pretty generic. That said, muffs CAN look better than anooses, they just often don't.
>being dominant
It's pretty normal for men, but for me, at least, it's likely because I'm so passive and chill normally, I like to let out my masculinity and even anger.
>short
I like to feel dominant, them being light and small only helps that. It also makes me just feel larger in comparison, again, helping the dom thing.
>voyeurism
In pronz people are acting, even just when people know they are being recorded, they act. I like seeing people being natural;their real actions reactions.

For me, traps are all about people who blur the line between genders. I find myself attracted to traps, tomboys and (in fictional contexts) hermaphrodites roughly equally for mostly the same reasons. That sense of transgression is appealing for some reason.

I mean, those are all pretty pedestrian, as far as kinks go, arguably minus the first.

>Also also also I like butt stuff, which undoubtly they'd be fine with.
Not all trans women are, actually.

What's the point of being a woman if you're not going to be penetrated? Serious question

That is very odd. Do they just not have sex than, or are you talking about the outlier dom trans women?

Well, first of all, a disproportionate number of trans people are gay or bisexual.

Second, many do enjoy giving oral sex.

Third, anal can hurt. I'm lucky in that I do derive pleasure from it, but many people do not, and even for people like me anal is not an everyday thing.

Fourth, there are lots of non-penetrative sex options. I myself happen to enjoy thighfucking owing to a very sensitive errogenous zone on my upper thighs.

Fifth--and by far the most important--gender identity is not about sexuality. It's about who you are as a person, and most people spend the vast, vast majority of their time not having sex.

Huh. I've done butt stuff to myself, and it just felt wierd. It didn't hurt, nor did it feel pleasurable. I can see how some may find it pleasurable, but hurt? Really? Sure, without any prep, of course it would, but all the time? I find that hard to believe.

I find it odd that, considering a vastly overwelming amount of cisgender people are hetero, such a large amount of trans people are homo or bi (unless by homo you mean the same biological sex, i.e. a transwomen attracted to men).

Also, are we talking about transpeople who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, or are we talking about the hundreds of thousands of special snowflakes that think there are 10 billion genders and they change which one they identify as daily? Cause I'm not having sex with a "bunkind" anytime soon.

I was actually just earlier looking over a metastudy which was specifically focused on transgender suicide rates, but which referenced other demographic information in doing so.

Everyone is different. Just like different people get different amounts of pleasure from butt stuff, different people feel different amounts of pain.

>79%

79% what? You mean not straight?

Yeah, that's pretty fucking skewed

You can't tell me gender identity is not about sexuality when you have two different posts (one of them in the same post) where "a disproportionate number of trans people are gay or bisexual". Clearly there's some kind of connection.

Funny enough, there's a movement among some LGBT activists to include "what is your sexuality?" and similar questions on the census, because we actually don't really know what the makeup of the general population is.

But you're right, it is skewed. There's still a lot we're learning about the biology behind sexuality and gender.

As a matter of fact I can. Correlation is not causation, and it doesn't change the fact that they're not, by any means, one and the same.

Well it's objectively a mental illness so...

It hasn't been categorized as a mental illness for years.

It's always good to be up-to-date on your medical and psychological terminology.

Purely the product of intimidation, subversion and death threats.

Yes, exactly. Gender dysphoria--which replaced gender identity disorder--is often caused by the intimidation, subversion, and even death threats that trans people receive all too regularly.

Fuck no it isn't.

Even in the most tolerant liberal hellholes like San Francisco and Portland where everybody encourages and supports them their dysphoria is still there

How do you initiate intimidation of a trans person for being trans if you didn't know they were trans to begin with, and supposedly weren't trans until you intimidated them?

So what you're saying is that if we treat them nicely, they'll go away?

Weird how "people don't regularly encourage strangers to commit suicide" registers as a "hellhole" to you. And there's a sharp negative correlation between dysphoria and peer acceptance.

They're trans independent of being intimidated or rejected. But societal pressures acting on the individual to shame them for their gender identity, as well as anxiety regarding one's body, leads to stress, which is called "gender dysphoria".

Bullshit, it's influenced by external factors but ultimately it steems from the inside

Influenced HEAVILY by external factors. Dysphoria on its own is a psychological stress that typically affects transgender people, but it's highly treatable.

>but it's highly treatable
Is it really? Not just covering your ears and yelling while ignoring the outside world?
An actual treatment?

Does it not make sense that if a person is allowed to explore their identity without being alienated they are more likely to settle into a role that conforms more to societal norms?

If some mother fucker was constantly prying into my business, trying to find out if I liked eating mexican food, telling me I would go to hell if I ever touched refried beans, I would take tacos with me literally everywhere just to piss that guy off.

At the risk of joining a discussion I don't much feel like touching, I'll just say you conjured a fine image for me, user. Thanks.

I would say while possible attempting to keep a risqué tone for an entire campaign would likely lead to somebody at the table's magical realm.

Now an adventure or two throughout the campaign could work.
>A paladin contacts you with the request that you investigate a recently opened brothel where men are seen leaving in a euphoric state babbling about a regal lady in yellow.

Could play it like some old 70's/80's sex comedy like Porky's or even Animal House.

A lot of people think like that, which is why causes like trans acceptance inevitably provoke counter-movements who want to shout them down for their smugness, hypocrisy, self-righteousness, and other buzzwords.

>just covering your ears and yelling while ignoring the outside world
that's the symptom

Yes, really. If you don't feel anxiety over your gender identity, then you're not suffering from gender dysphoria.

>smugness
>self-righteousness
>hypocrisy
>but the religious right is blameless in all of these things

I'm just saying that people who hate being told what to do tend to accuse saner people of those things. I never said that the accusers weren't shameless hypocrites about them.

Neat story: there was an experiment done in Florida where a team of 500 people (some transgender, some not) went out to various people's houses and discusses transgender issues with them one-on-one. Nearly everyone they talked to who started the conversation anti-transgender ended it with a much more favorable view.

People just aren't willing to change their views in a public forum. We're conditioned to view it as a failure.

Nigga fuck your entire conversation that shit is a fascinating and probably easily abused brain bug.
I knew about the monkeysphere shit, but I hadn't realized door to door discussion had such an effect.
Can I get a link to that experiment so I can see what methods they use and how accurate they might be? I am sort of getting all hype about this, but I need to see if it's all retard style so I don't run off half cocked on fake science again.

I'll see if I can find it, but I don't know if I like the idea of you trying to use this to exploit people.

I am totally on the level and not a supervillain, user. Trust me.

>Mutants and masterminds

I'm going to trust you, because I believe in taking people at their word. Just know that if you DO use this for evil, I will be very, very disappointed in you, user. You will have let me down.

science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6282/220

Don't worry, I probably can't even use it for evil anyway unless I had some form of multinational organization of goons or minions.

Not either of those anons, and i really really want to stay out of this conversation, but speaking as an international relations professional that is actually a thing. A large part of our ability to dislike another group is based on the mental images we create of them. Meeting them in person makes it much harder to hate them, since they are no longer just this abstract concept, their actually a person we talked to and thought was halfway decent. We use this in international relations to attempt to bridge gaps between groups that have animosity towards one another by facilitating opportunities for members of those groups to meet. However this works best with younger individuals who are not as set in their opinions. The results are not as good with individuals who are older.

>you have to make an account to read full text
My one weaknessssss