Is there any scenario, whether you've played in it, GM'd in it or only hoping to do it...

Is there any scenario, whether you've played in it, GM'd in it or only hoping to do it, where you earnestly think that inserting fetish content would improve the quality of the game, open roleplaying hooks accessible to other people or add genuine depth to a character?
What kind of content would it be that would be clearly fetishistic in nature, but wouldn't be unfitting in the setting, cause group drama or unbalance the game?
Why do you think so? How would you implement it, and how far would you go?
This thread is also guaranteed to double as a feedback thread, because there will be someone to tell you that you're shit and should an hero.

>My fetishes are female knights, strong women in general and softcore femdom
I guess you can insert your fetishes as long as they're vanilla enough. If the king is married to a legendary female warrior who also happens to be five years older than him, there's nothing wrong with that as long as you don't start describing her rippling abs in detail (if her appearance comes up, just say that she's muscular yet feminine and describe any relevant scars she may or may not have) or start shoving "ara ara~" in every other sentence she says. I guess in this way I've put my fetish into campaigns without conciously thinking about it, because strong women do exist in my setting and by neccessity they don't all marry men stronger than themselves.

I guess that's a pretty decent general rule for Magical Realms: don't be grating. It also depends on the setting I guess, a lighthearted comedic campaign can more easily tolerate a forest of piss than a gritty, serious, epic survival-horror adventure. I guess in-game context also matters a lot. If you're playing a shadowrun game randomly inserting a flirtatious office lady waifu is kind-of-gay wish fulfillment. Have this same office lady be the main villain, and her flirtatious attitude could be interpreted as downright mocking the PCs. Especially when she for example tells one of the party members that she can offer him a "hands-on" function in her company when he's done pretending to be a hero. It's effective because
1. You know the player cannot take her up on her offer, as it would defeat the entire point of the game
2. Hurts his pride, the villain is right in front of him and she's not even taking him seriously as a threat. Like he's some child running around with a cape.

But that's just like, my opinion man.

As a GM, I used the tendency of one of my player to screw every barmaid/peasant ever (A fetish I suppose) to put him in a situation he raped a woman. As she was crying he felt really bad but continued anyway.

I suppose it added a bit of depth to his Don Juan character and he stopped trying to smash everything that move around.

I like guro and torture and that kind of thing. I could probably insert it into my campaigns easily with no one suspecting that I get off on that stuff (they think I'm asexual anyway).

But I actively avoid that kind of stuff because I don't think it's fair to use friends for sexual satisfaction.

I guess horror settings or creepy cult/evil shit.
Like the party walks in to a fucked up sex dungeon straight out of Seven, or maybe finds kidnapped kids in a shed like True Detective

>itt people who think "Magical Realm" means acknowledging sex or including something someone may interpret as sexual.

Reminder the point of the original comic was there was zero ambiguity, point, or benefit to what the GM was doing. He came out of left field and telegraphed his weird fetish to his players for no reason other than he was a giant weirdo. The players resented this, told him to stop, and promptly sucker-punched him when he refused.

is not magical realm because he's not throwing the players into a room full of naked muscle girls who demand snu-snu.

is not Magical Realm because there's nothing gross or fetishy about a horn-dog character (though it can get a little repetitive).

and are not Magical Realm because you're explicitly trying to horrify your players. That said, it toes the line when you go into excessive detail and your players might start getting annoyed with it.

>Terms never change their meaning with time
Its a silly phrase based on a silly comic, no need to pull out the dictionary over this kind of thing.

My rule with Magical Realms is such- Make sure the players have the final say in experiencing it, make sure to treat it like anything non-fetishy.

For example, say you're into BDSM.
A fine way of putting this in your game is having the dungeon of the week or whatever be a bunch of apocalypse kinksters. Just a simple "They're in leather and spiked chains and shit. You wonder if there's something more than looking cool..."
A bad way to do it is spend ten minutes describing then putting a girl in a rack and whipping her repeatedly.
A terrible, terrible thing to do is making that girl one of the PCs, and then straddling a half-elf who wears leather and calls the Wizard "Master" to the group for the rest of the game.

There's also the element of trust and respect. If your players know you like a little leather so what? They should respect that. In turn, you should respect that they DON'T like that kind of thing and don't force them into it.

My point is the exaggerations behind the term make people think there are only two extremes: puritanical no sex or anything someone could ever think is sexual ever, or ERP. Some of the replies are a good example. There's nothing really at all fetishy or offputting about lady knights.

Yes.

NTR. Always. Since it's a thinking-man's fetish, you can expect it to instantly insert drama. And since it's not inherently kinky but hurtful, it gives people motivation to do something about it.

Remember Bahamut Lagoon?

he didn't even use the term "magical realm," dingus.

more dinguses

why did you bump this

>why did you bump this
I like these threads. Why would I not?

There are a lot of people on here who don't agree with you.
There are even a fair amount of people who I've seen imply that playing anything else than a human male in a roleplaying game is an indicator of a clinical fetish disorder.
These are the people you're dealing with - the people who can do wish-fulfillment as long as they're self-inserting, but who call everything that's not self-inserting wish-fulfillment.

>he didn't even use the term "magical realm," dingus.

He used a panel from the Whizzard comic and talked about putting fetishes in the game. It's obvious what he meant, ya dingus.

A wizard goes mad/crazy/horny and turns a third of the population into horny, attractive kemonomimi girls. 1/3 of the women AND 1/3 of the men. The standard family unit is now a threesome composed of a man, a woman, and a cat/dog/wolf/bunny girl. The spell wears off after twenty years.

Get a trip, so I can filter you. It seems that simply filtering "magical realm" is not enough anymore.

Yes.
Depends on the setting.
Because I have opinions.
As far as is interesting and allowed, and implementation depends on type of setting and fetish.

My elves have the men hibernating and sleeping or meditating, occasionally performing their stud duties, and the women fighting.
My orcs are very diverse, since they are all men, and they fuck and impregnate any species, which gives birth to some freak orc.
Hilarity ensues as these two people border each other.

My fetish is true love so frankly any "you rescue the princess and then marry her" story is my magical realm

Honestly if you take the most depraved fringe fetishes, the vore, the piss, the dumpster all that stuff, you got a good way to make a succubi distrubing.

Intentionally going too far so it just ends up creepy works for things meant to unnerve, like slaaneshian cults. The trick is making it clear you are doing this and not trying to magic realms a game.

The big issue with fetishism in my belief isnt that its cringy when done badly (Everything sucks if you screw it up, you can make your cool super darklord seem like a edgy teenager mary sue) but that it makes players feel like a simple vehicle for your shitty porn. You have to make sure the players always feel like they have full agency and can walk out of the sex stuff without "My character shoots himself" and you leaving the game.

Choice actually makes people more daring. People are more willing to do things if they don't feel like they are forced into it.

I'm a completely different guy than your imaginary persecutor.
In fact, I have a habit of only posting these threads (of which I've posted about ten over the course of two years) when I see someone else doing them, because surprise, I don't think about it every moment of the day unlike your little headmate.
I do this because people like you make me feel better about myself - at least I'm not that petty, irascible and easy to rile into shrieking blood-rages over the fact that people have differing opinions.

>I take pride in shitposting about my fetishes on Veeky Forums

You're on the Internet.
Get used to it.

Get used to shitposting? Why should I? Very soon you'll go the road of quests.

Are you setting yourself up for this?
People have shitposted since the birth of the computer, on closed university intranet.
Practically all sites try to ban shitposters, but I've yet to see one that's succeeded.
If you really think that people who disagree with you will "soon disappear", you must be clinically mentally ill.
I'll stick around just for your sake, though.

>Other people shit up the board, so I'll do it too.
Here's hope that your friends kill themselves, so you will follow.

You do realize that you're just falling apart more and more for every post, don't you?
I'm not complaining, though - I'd have to pay real money for a circus ticket.
By the way, thin-skinned people like you are in the minority here, as you'd know if you hadn't just stepped off Facebook. Most people here prefer some light-hearted shitting around, and in fact one of the reasons Veeky Forums has always been so much about trolling for newfags, lurking moar and recycling old memes is that it keeps 9gag refugees with delusions of Internet fame like you assblasted.

If you recall, /qst/ and /wst/ removal was supposed to fix this problem.

WELL, CONGRATS, IT FUCKING DIDN'T DIPSHIT.

>40k Party stuck in a Slaaneshi Dominated Planet
>There's low tier kinks everywhere
>The only way to pass hordes upon hordes of Heretics is to say you have a stomping fetish and start running
>Slaanesh can't help but instigate this autistic pleasure seeking
>The Daemon Lord helps you escape by making his followers build bridges of themselves for you to step on
>Make it to the escape shuttle
>Leave the planet
>Never talk about this again

I don't know, user, you're the one who feels the need to write walls of text as a response to me. Every single time!

Fuck off, questfag, it was a vast improvement. Veeky Forums is still not perfect, though.

>walls of text
The only wall here is the one I'm talking to.

>front page taken up by generals and shitposts
Hasn't changed at all from what I see,.

That's funny, because you're about as smart as a brick.

>Campaign
>Sci-Fi setting
>Used World of Darkness for the system
>I'm a fag for lore in any setting I play in that way I can sort of figure out how much my character should reasonably know for what they do
>Ask DM about some of the different species
>Got a huge fetish for hermaphrodites
>Turns out a few of the species in the setting are either naturally hermaphroditic, or there's hermaphrodites in their sex pool (male, female, etc)
>The DM doesn't even sexualize them, its just mentioned in passing when discussing said species.
>During the sessions its the same thing. They're just described as female or a woman
>mfw I know there's a juicy cock in those pants most of the time
>mfw things would get lewd
I kind of want to ask the guy if he'd be willing to do a one-on-one lewd roleplay but I can't muster up the courage

Meant "I wish things would get lewd" on that last bullet. The DM never got lewd with stuff.

If you're not already romancing one of these beings then I would say no, you're obviously just trying to indulge your fetish either way but it's definitely less justified if you just want to fuck an alien once. Just go read a mass effect doujin or something.

>improvement
Now the board is just slower and people spam the same thread subjects over and over. Was it too much to ask that people who weren't interested in quests just ignore shit they don't like? Now /qst/ is filled with shit quests that won't die because it's too slow and good quests that will never get traffic, and Veeky Forums is filled with even more stupid same topic spamming. Your complaining has helped no one.

I'd play it.