Does the creator god of a particular race have any obligations towards that race's own creations?

Does the creator god of a particular race have any obligations towards that race's own creations?

Does the creator god have any obligations towards that race to begin with? If so, it might see their works as extension of its own. You have to remember that gods in general are above obligations, worship is a one-way relationship.

Hey, look at that, he became as god.

His obligations is to exterminate it, for illegal creation.

Only if they have obligations towards that race's own creations.

Without followers the god ceases to be. So yea. Kinda do.

If it feels like it.

Really depends on the god and the creation, but, if they're ANY kind of professional or responsible being who gets their shit done and isn't cruising for a Deicide Me brand on their taint one day, they'll try to keep an eye on how their care and development comes, and let faith with ideological working purity decide how much each becomes obligated to the other.

You could have a whole game of a God's heart changing or opening to a greater sphere of concept as some race made or abandoned by the favored children of that God makes an entire racial life quest of appeasement and recognition before that God in an attempt to find a place of divinity and belonging in the order of life.

Take it a step further even, and you could have the slave race of some once great race gone Fallen Angel / Black Numenorean or whatever flavor on the world, their God having forsaken them, and the slave race taking it upon themselves to demand the God give them the strength to fix the mistake that he left to scourge the world.

Depends on the god.

No. It'd be as if asking does the Christian God have any obligation to robots or AI. In fact, I'd say it might be more of an insult to the creator God.

Is there anyone to tell them otherwise?

Does a parent feel obligated to play with his child's toys? Or does he merely curse and throw them in the trash when he comes home late at night and accidentally steps on them?

No one has any real obligations.

What you feel obliged to do is a result of your personal morality.

Gods construct morality, user, not the other way around.

>What you feel obliged to do is a result of your personal morality.

You are obligated in your own power to reduce suffering as much as you feasibly can in yourself and in others in your short life, because unified actions have unified consequences, and we're all trapped in a nightmare of awareness within existence before we scream and blip out of it for an eternity that promises nothing but entropy anyways if you were immortal, meaning Death Is Certain, Death Is Certain, your only hope, your every obligation, is to help one another so we can all live as long and as comfortably and advanced as possible trying to achieve personal peace before we're blipped out and never get to experience anything ever again. Death is horror. Death is certain. Mercy is the only escape. Suicide is the only answer is you can't even bring yourself to do that. Pride and willing destruction are the hallmarks of a creature who has let fear win.

I guess if you're a fantasy god this doesn't apply though.

Yes, but only through their obligations to their actual creations. So less "These too are my children" and more "Son, are you sure that's how you want to treat your things?"

As an example, suppose the creations' creation is just an object, a city or hammer or something. Does the creator god have a duty to preserve ruins or protect the hammer? Probably not, unless doing so serves its creations in some way. Does it have an obligation to nudge them towards taking care of their heritage/home/tools/legacy? Probably, though exactly how it's going to do that will vary wildly depending on the deity.

>You are obligated in your own power to reduce suffering as much as you feasibly can in yourself and in others in your short life, because unified actions have unified consequences

What you're saying is that it is ultimately advantageous to act a certain way, not that you have an obligation. You're not obliged to do anything, there's no writing in the sky telling you to act a certain way.

But I agree that choosing to reduce suffering when possible is the only 'moral' choice. Morality may be a construct with no basis in the fabric of reality, but our perception of suffering is real enough to matter to us. Creating social compacts and helping to make life tolerable is has worth from our perspective, and our perspective is what matters to us.

Not really, but I guess if the original creations died out, he might see their creation as their legacy and treat them as such.

Which would be kind of cool.

As with anything, you should apply morality to any type of God in an equal fashion as you would apply it to anyone else around you. If you cannot, then your own morals are lacking and require immediate revision.

THE CREATOR OWES NO OBLIGATION TO THE CREATED, NOR ANY DUTY OR ALLOWANCE. THE CREATED ARE INDEBTED BY THEIR MERE EXISTENCE TO ETERNAL SERVITUDE.

SUCH IS THE TRUE LAW.

>same faggot would throw a parent in jail for any form of child abuse he deemed unacceptable

>and NOW this faggot will try to respond with some dipshitted argument about false equivalence or sermonize about putting yourself in god's place, despite doing just that professionally all day every day himself