How many non-human characters can I play consecutively before my group accuses me of being a furry?

Two. First is out of curiosity, the second sets a trend.

If you ever thought of playing as anything other than human, you're a lame millenial faggot. Since in your case it involved obvious furshit, you're also a furry.

If you add dragonborn and tiefling into the mix doubt there would be a problem... Spamming tabaxi? (Cat race from volos?)

They all already know you're a furry, but don't want to mention it because they aren't sure if you're "out" yet.

about 2
Also why does jerking it to elf porn make you a furry, they're just super twinks

So long as you're not being weird about it, I don't see why anyone should care.

GM here: if you specifically ask for a beast race, I'll peg you as furry. Long as you don't do any weird shit I don't care. I've had one too many players give overly long descriptions of their beast character's bathing habits.

If you only play furries, you're a furry.
If you only play elves, you're gay.
If you only play dwarves, you're a neckbeard.
If you only play halflings, you're a pedo.
If you only play humans, you're a nazi.

Or maybe you should just play whatever the fuck you want and let everyone else do the same. Don't bother yourself with what Veeky Forums thinks of any of it.

Do you mention their pseudopenis?

If you are asking those, you are already furry and I don't give a fuck. As long as you don't bring porn or your fetishes (especially the furry ones) to the table, it's fine and dandy.

>descriptions of their beast character's bathing habits
Did they include the sandpaper-like tiny tongues sensually rubbing the fur?

I feel the Tabaxi is a feline race made to be as non-furry as posible though. Its just alien enoigh to be more monsterous and escape that uncanny valley feeling. So I don't really mind them so much.

>literally anthro cats

user, please. Please.

>gnoll pic
You already are one.

Anthro, not even once.

>tfw based half-orc
Most fun race coming through

My group had run a Changing Breeds game from the nWoD books. Everyone was basically forced to play furries. Except me, I played the one changing breed with no anthro form. Hellcats ftw.

Orks is da best race!
We wuz made fa fight'n an we wuz made fa winin!

If you only play orcs, you're a 40k meme faggot.

If you spell orks with a C your a git.

40k Orks are a walking meme. The entire race is a one-note personality.
>lol wargh!

D&D half-orcs have a lot going on and make for fun characters to roleplay as

Half-orcs are pretty great but I personally lean towards kobolds.

Half-orcs need to prove themselves and that they're better than their evil heritage. Full orcs very likely -are- evil, or at least start as such, and need to go through a full character arc to grow into better people. That's always fun.

Kobolds share that, but they also have the halfling angle of being really small and weak, constantly being kicked around, the underdogs nobody cares about. And I can't help but be the fan of the underdog.

>Raperaperaperape
>A lot going on

Yea, in their mother's cunt. By several orc dicks.

>If you only play half-orcs, you're a cuck

>If you only play kobolds, you're a scalie

We can do this all day.

It depends if you're playing furry type characters. A goblin is not going to trigger furry alarms, but a gnoll/lizardmen mike, and a lupin/werewolf is going to take some effort to avoid being labelled.

If you only play goblins, you're a shortstack fetishist.

I'm okay with that.

Not a thing wrong with that

How's it any better than being a furry? How can you set your own degeneracy above that of another? Are you saying it's only good because it gets your dick hard, while someone else's fetish is a horror to the land? Are you just a hypocrite?

No, I'm just not a furry. I realize it might be hard for some people to understand, but furries are shit-tier, lowest of the low scum. Even someone as scummy as I can be smug knowing I'm not as bad as them.

Buzzwords, irrational hatred, not a single sound argument to why exactly their fetish is worse than yours.

You're a hypocrite.

I never said there was anything wrong with being a furry. It's just not my thing.
You shouldn't make assumptions, your bad at it.

I don't have the time or inclination to post the evidence of furfags being terribad. Frankly, I'm lazy. Just take a stroll through e621 or deviantart or something. I'm sure you'll find more than enough evidence there.

I also dislike furfags, but I dislike you more. Your reddit is showing.

...

I will say if you compare Goblin r34 to furry r34 the furries have way more degeneracy. Inflation, cubs, and animal cocks being examples.

"Furry" is a blanket fetish: anything involving animal people counts as such.

It's like saying hentai is terrible because it has loli or NTR in it.

Oh who gives a shit. Just do it.

Well only a pleb would say hentai was bad because of loli, loli is patrician.

And furry is not a blanket, it's rather specifically anthro animals.

Hey your the one who wanted to compare goblins to furries. If you're now saying apples and oranges then we wouldn't be hypocrites as you accused, now would we?

>And furry is not a blanket, it's rather specifically anthro animals.

And hentai is rather specifically mongolian woodwork art.

The comparison is till shit though. Kemono is a type of hentai just like lolicon is a type of hentai.

"not a single sound argument" -Your words

You may eat them now.

People like you is the reason furries have such a bad reputation.

And inflation is a type of furry just as hyper or cubs are.

You can't apply all of the worst shit of furry into the same thing without doing the same to hentai.

>"Furry" is a blanket fetish: anything involving animal people counts as such.

Haha no it's not

We're comparing Goblins and Furries remember? That thing you were calling use hypocrites over? I can apply all the worst shit to furries, because goblins don't have that.

I try to make sense out of things and see why you think "furry" and "hentai" are different. I get nothing, just more shit thrown at me. Like this one for instance: >No it's not.
Baseless contradiction, that's all.

Why?

I dunno, I'll admit it's not such a huge or varied fetish, but I've seen some pretty terrible art of goblins as well.

user there seems to be a disconnect here. Porn = hentai. Furry is a type of porn, kemono is a type of hentai. That furry (a type of porn) intersects with other types of porn is logically not analogous to porn in general.

>Baseless contradiction
Just because I tell you you're wrong doesn't mean that is baseless.

You're the one making a claim, now go ahead and prove it.

Usually when you say "hentai" you mean specifically the vietnamese macaroni pictures, but even if you took it to the definition of porn, it still wouldn't narrow down the definition of "furry" all that much: as far as porn types go, it's still a pretty broad statement.

699 here
I never said Furry and Hentai were different. In fact I've seen furry34 from japan, so both furry and hentai at the same time.

724 isn't me.

719 was me, it's because your a prick.

741 was me, pics or it didn't happen.

No, the problem is user believes that "furry" is a substitute word for "anthropomorphic"

When your group accuses you of being a furfag there is two options:
If it's in real life, you bring your fursuit next game.
If not, you do it too and also link them your FA page.

I'll admit that hentai is a moon-style porn but it is still porn in general, and a particular type of porn does not compare in the way that was stated.

Hang on. I say anything involving animal people counts as "furry". You say it does not.

I think you are the one with the burden of proof here, not me: can you show me porn involving animal people that isn't furry?

>it's because your a prick.
I'm trying to figure things out. You insult me. How am I the prick?
>pics or it didn't happen.
Not on a blue board, user.

Well, it is. Furry is a quick way to describe "anthropomorphic animal"

812 here.
You started by accusing me of hypocrisy when I said I was okay with Goblins. That was your opening line to me. That's called you being a prick.

No pics, so didn't happen then and you admit your full of shit.

>I say anything involving animal people counts as "furry".
I only answer, so no, you have to prove. Prove to me that this taxonomically qualifies as "furry".

>can you show me porn involving animal people that isn't furry?
...All porn that isn't made by furries. Do you know what anthro means?

>anthropomorphic
>anθrəpəˈmɔːfJk/Submit
>adjective
>adjective: anthropomorphic
>1.relating to or characterized by anthropomorphism.
>"explanations of animal behaviour in anthropomorphic terms"
>2.having human characteristics.
>"anthropomorphic bears and monkeys"

Gnolls are an anthro race.

Inflation, cub, and hyper were brought up as deviancy. I can't find anything remotely worksafe of the latter two, but there is this.

Does this placate you or would you like to move the goalposts?

Fair enough. But how do you prove a piece of anthro art is not made by a furry? How can you tell someone is or is not a furry?

Not 807 but humans are in fact animals. So any porn involving humans=animal people porn that isn't furry.

I'd much rather have a furry at my table than a minmaxer that only plays humans.
In close to 100% of all cases, people play humans exclusively for the bonus feat.

Yeah no. The quick way is "anthro". Or you're saying this

d.facdn.net/art/ben-ben/1421403199/1421403199.ben-ben_leviathant_3.jpg

Equals this

pre05.deviantart.net/88b3/th/pre/f/2011/117/6/0/602bfcae82e5e148a2e6b67e107909c2-d3f17mn.jpg

Not r34.

It does, though.

So you want me to post actual porn here or else I can't win this argument? Is that it?

You can search them yourself. Go to e621 and type in "goblin inflation" or "goblin cub" or whatever else you associate with furries.

...

They're both anthro, they're both furry. It checks out user.

It's useless to split hairs over something like this, really. What's the point?

See furfag? This user understands pics or it didn't happen.

None of your bullshit blue board excuses.

Goblins with animal cocks.

*drops mic*

Too add, furry is actually more specific than just anthro, as anthro often refers to anthropomorphic inanimate objects as well.

"goblin" plus "animal_genitalia" gets you a whole page of results.

Pick up your mic, we're not done.

Sometimes it's a ambiguous but the difference in essence is one of connotation. Later, you find it in the character design, as connotation, and meaning, translates visually such as here.

Anthro character design is driven by the humanization of animals / animal creatures, often for story - aesthetical reasons or meanings pertaining to human culture and perception (such as a fox anthro to show cunning)
Furry character design is driven by the animalization of humans... And thinking with your dick.

My poor insane sons

Yeah and everytime there's hetero porn you're supposed to call it hentai? Boy I imagine how they did it in the 18th century when they didn't even know the word.

That probably means you call every little girl a "loli".

This too.

That's a fair point.
And not all animals have fur anyway, and he was saying all animal people are furry. So it's not a good term at all.

How about AnZoo?
Short for Anthropomorphic Zoophilia.

Every fictional/drawn little girl, yes.

The thing is, user: nobody sane of mind wants to be associated with furfags. It's obviously not the smae mindset, and when you say furry, you do mean them, specifically them. If you're not in the whole "fandom" cult you should never call yourself one.

It doesn't matter what you call it. Post anything anthro, play anything anthro, you get called a furry.

How about eat a dick

Veeky Forums is really happy to lump you right into that group whether you want it or not.

Oh boy.

Why bother.

I'm outski, I got shit to do, while you're stuck arguing semantics, I'm gonna draw anthros, I don't care how you call them, and I don't care how you call me.

Quit pussyfooting and play only whatever you want. You're an adult, no? If you don't want to play a human like ever nobody gives a shit. It's even more interesting RP-wise.

Be more assertive.

It is a rather insane cult, yes.

I have a friend who does commissioned "art" for them. The amount of cash they shell out for wank material is fucking bananas.

Still I think the label AnZoo has potential. It's a much more accurate term.

Sometimes people forget that you cannot change the outside perception of others, and therefore running after external validation does not matter.

You say things with your own mouth; they hear it with their own ears.

>I'm outski, I got shit to do, while you're stuck arguing semantics, I'm gonna draw anthros, I don't care how you call them, and I don't care how you call me.

Well, you may not care, but you're a furry.

How about knot.

Get it furfag?

I feel like a lot of anons are forgetting all the sergal spam and shit we used to go through. Furries deserve the hate they get.

>literally a furfag

Sergal was smalltime. What about Flare and Cinder?

Liberally filed under 'and shit'

this is a really bad thread

even furries hate sergals