>The same way any government does. Laws are discussed and voted on. Unanimous vote is only needed for the Loom itself, not everything they discuss.
So what. 51% of the votes are needed to pass a normal law? 2/3? 3/4?
Every government does it vastly differently. It's like you have absolutely no idea of how a government actually works.
Also, how do you modify that Constitution? All Constitutions in the world have a clause about modifying it, because of course you'll need that sometime in the future, it's common sense.
>The rest is decided by the appropriate committee, a group chosen to oversee that aspect of society as needed
Who choose the committees, and how? What's the maximal size of a committee? What are the limits of committees?
>yet still subject to scrutiny by the Council if something goes wrong.
Alright, you're beginning to think correctly about the whole thing. See it as an exercise in cheating and counter-cheating. If there is the smallest way to abuse your system, it will be abused, again and again and again in the future.
>If something happens that needs to be handled immediately, like a 3CD, then Exalts in the area will handle it themselves.
So the Council confirms the jurisdiction of local Exalts in case of crisis? That's good to know. It really should have been in the draft, because, you know, it's really fucking important.
>"Bitchfests" would be handled by the chairmen, it's their job to moderate the Council.
What sanctions? By whom? How?
>When something happens that the Council a a whole has to discuss, a session of the Deliberative is held.
Who decide? Do you need a certain percentage of the deliberative to agree that something is worth discussing before a session is held? Do you need only 1 deliberative? What happens if that motherfucka decides to call a session every monday because he likes to piss everyone off?
Also, that disenfranchising criminal thing reads like 15 years old politics.