Your familiar kills you in your sleep

>Your familiar kills you in your sleep

bad end

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52508737/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52221853/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52233079/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51498864/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52490497/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52134966/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/49065366/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/48238857/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/52489007/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/52391974/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/49461742/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/48981289/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/50024227/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/49067864/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

How about no.

Spiderman thread? Spiderman thread.

>a thing happened

But did it happen in a TRADITIONAL GAME?

>The little girl slices you open for your uterus so she can get closer to your motherly love

bad end

But my family already killed me while I was awake.

Babylon 5 helmet guy?

Things that are implied:

>Can a familiar turn against its master in the latest edition of Dungeons and Dragons

>What might bring about this turn of events

>Can it be done in other games?

>I invite you to share related related anecdotes

>If it can be related to Veeky Forums then it's Veeky Forums
So you're saying all those CYOA are on topic because some bullshit relation between Veeky Forums and CYOA?
So you're saying anyone can make a CYOA about literally anything and it will be on topic on Veeky Forums?
Fuck off.

One is clearly magical realm fetish fuel that belongs on /d/, that is the distinction here that matters you autist.

>So you're saying
No, it's OTHER ANONS on Veeky Forums who are saying that.
I would very much want all off-topic threads deleted.

>Can a familiar turn against its master in the latest edition of D&D
If you're a warlock, almost certainly. If you're a wizard or sorc with an imp, quasit, or sprite familiar, probably. Anything else is more likely to just up and split, as familiars can't take the attack action.

Stay salty antiquestfag.

Was this thread fetish bait?
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52508737/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52221853/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52233079/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51498864/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52490497/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/52134966/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/49065366/
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/48238857/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/52489007/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/52391974/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/49461742/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/48981289/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/50024227/
desuarchive.org/tg/thread/49067864/

I could go on. Either fetish bait is RIGHT or it is WRONG.

Tis a fine line at times.
Cast out your autism.

The too does seem like a plausible thing.
Sex for the sake of reproduction in the missionary position carried out by the children of the lord to combat the debauchery of the demons.
The bottom one us stupid, all humans are sluts.

>be wizard
>tell familiar to scout bushes
>DM says familiar doesn't want to
>tell DM familiars are bros, it says so in the book and my backstory
>DM ignores
>cite "Your familiar acts independently of you, but it always obeys your commands."
>DM says familiar doesn't want to
>try to RP "You are in violation of your contract! I am filing a complaint to the outer planes!"
>DM says "they aren't having any of your shit"
>try to tie familiar to stick and poke it into bush, because bushes are fucking dangerous
>familiar teleports away before I can tie it
>think familiar is an imposter
>cast banishment on familiar
>no effect
>DM says "your familiar feels rejected."
>monk thinks I'm chaotic evil now
>paladin smites me
>barbarian doesn't care
>druid is a bro because I saved his animal companion more times than he can count
>DM yells at druid for something I don't know
>familiar steals macguffin and runs away with it
>this is one of the better sessions of D&D I've ever had

I've read this previously. Is this pasta or bait?

ironic.

he could save others from dying

but not himself

I don't even know honestly. Let's go with yes.

>why is there a dicotomy in the representation of male and female orcs?
>is eating a polymorphed human canibalism?
>Have you ever defeated an enemy via baleful polymorph, trap the soul, flesh to stone, temporal stasis, crystallize, microcosm, or so on, and left them in that state indefinitely? (no way to paraphrase this one)
>does polymorph affect fertility and breeding ability?
This one would be magical realm if the player handbook didn't have an entire page dedicated to which species can breed with each other.
>how do you feel about polymorph spells?
>Succubi are a thing, what if there was an angelic version?
>why is there a problem with bikini armour, if mobility>protection?
>why are plate-wearing clerics the standard in western rpgs? I want to play a cloth-wearing cleric
The only real problem here is the use of the word healslut and the OP image, which the first two posts call him out on.
>How do you justify slut clothes?
Girls in slutty clothes are a staple of RPGs, and a hotly debated topic in recent years.
>how do you feel about skimpy armour as an abstraction?
>why can't you wear bikini armour under your regular clothing?
^ None of these are fetish bait.

>your party finds a robe that turns everyone into a sexy girl, what do?
>BBEG gets Polymorph: Slut, what happens?
>you got impregnated by your nemesis and genderbent if necessary, what do?
All fetish fuel, but I don't know what you expect any of us to do about it. Not to mention most of the posts in those threads were nothing but calling out or making fun of the OP for making nothing but a dumb fetish bait thread.
But thanks to you I narrowed down what exactly makes a fetish-bait thread, it's the "What do you do?" or any variation of that, since the OP's intent is to roleplay what people would do in his fetish scenario. It's magical realm-ing without having to gross your friends out in person.

y tho

Meningitis.

>autism: the post

That's a weird fucking rabbit.

i was there for the angel thread

it was an alright thread

>Either fetish bait is RIGHT or it is WRONG.
you're working with a faulty assumption of consistency