What alignment is Planned Parenthood?

Neutral Evil.

>kills babies
>pollutes the planet with estrogen
>destroys families
>propaganda agencies
Lawful evil

lol sick comeback commie

Chaotic stupid. Just like this thread.

>poor people don't deserve to be killed by their government
>commie
huh...what an interesting viewpoint

lol

that might be valid, if A) you could actually definitely establish that abortion is killing a person and B) they actually perform a lot of abortions. Which they don't.

/pol/ fuck off not traditional games
/pol/ fuck off not traditional games
/pol/ fuck off not traditional games
/pol/ fuck off not traditional games
/pol/ fuck off not traditional games

Transpeople have been a thing in D&D for as long as the reverse-gender belt has existed.

I don't think that getting a magical curse is the same as larping your fetish in public for attention

Didn't Ed Greenwoods very own Mary Sue Elminster get turned into a woman and then had lesbian sex with Mystra?

Alright folks, I'm in the thread, you know what that means. Thread dies now or I start getting frisky.

>sells body parts to Pepsi
Besides, you're killing kids. You can make an ad hoc about it's just cells.

Then again, I'm talking to a walking talking example of how prochoice isn't entirely in the wrong

Oh no this baby might be a pain in the ass and interfere in my active lifestyle, better kill it

if the babies don't want to die why don't they just be born

Fuck off to /leftypol/ false-flagging libshit.

Is there a flaw in my logic?

1: A human's life begins at conception, when they begin to consume nutrients and develop
2: Murder is the intentional unlawful and/or immoral taking of a human life
3: It is immoral to intentionally kill an innocent human being
4: The child in the womb is innocent
5: Therefore, abortion is murder
6: Murder ought to be illegal
7: Therefore, abortion ought to be illegal

I don't see how any sane rational person could disagree with any of the points I've made or their logical conclusion

>Sane rational person
>Proceeds to flip his shit like a" sane rational person" would

I'd post an image but then I'd be bumping this horrible thread.

>The child in the womb is innocent
You don't know the things he's done. You don't know what he's seen.

Actually, considering that the I'm unable to care for it, I'd actually like to put it up for adoption to /trash/

>no argument

lawful evil

/trash/
Did you try shoving it through your bathroom mirror?

>1: A human's life begins at conception, when they begin to consume nutrients and develop

There is the flaw.

What you are describing as human has all the same traits as every other simple bag of cells in existence.

A fetus' brain only starts to emit electrical signals at 12 weeks, and the EGGs recorded are comparable to that of a sea slug according to the eminent neuroscience researcher Micheal Gazzaniga in his book, "The ethical brain". A fetus only develops its cerebral cortex, the part of the brain which regulates thought and consciousness at 24 weeks, well after the limit for abortions. Before 24 weeks, its brain only emits electrical signals, not brain waves which indicate thought.

>Caring so much about the unborn
>Not giving a shit about helping the living

I'm sure you will post some response about how you are the shining example of compassion and this is a straw man and blah blah blah. The Anti Abortion lot are just as bad as SJWs

But murdering living people is already against the law. If it weren't, I'm sure we would be busy complaining about that too.

Indeed, that was the first place I thought of, but my Girlfriend and Trap were doing each other's make up at the time, so it was completely unsuitable.

How do you type with lipstick on both your hands?

Very carefully.

Chaotic Annoying, if these women just get husband's and there are tons of willing men, they could have their Husband provide for them and get their medical coverage.

How so?

Fair enough, let's assume we're dealing with the typical fetus.

It has human genetics, it is in the process of maturing into a human: by killing it, you prevent that future human from coming into being, ergo murder.

You assume I don't care about the living based on my opposition to the murder of the unborn, not an argument.

>How so?
not le argument
>Fair enough, let's assume we're dealing with the typical fetus.
not le argument
>It has human genetics, it is in the process of maturing into a human: by killing it, you prevent that future human from coming into being, ergo murder.
not le argument

Also my Trap is basically a little fuckslave. I vocate, he types. He's doing it right now.

I notice that most abortionists haven't been aborted themselves, and consequently, their opinions may be biased.

I love abortions

>It has human genetics, it is in the process of maturing into a human: by killing it, you prevent that future human from coming into being, ergo murder.

So wanking off into a sock is murder?

Jesus crys every time.

Why? Do you fetishize the extinguishing of potential life as you do the sodomizing of adult males filled with estrogen?

If your wank was going to grow up into a child and you decided to wank to kill it so that it wouldn't grow up, yes

What is le argument? Am I le argument? Is le argument about La Révolution? Or La Baguette?

I do, I really do. Babby's first dive into necromancy will be bringing the fetus back to life.

youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk

You aren't me, fuck off

Sperm is not one with the egg, it is not yet developing, it has no potential for future consciousness. Only when a sperm and egg have joined to form a zygote, does it live. Masturbation is necessary to prevent testicular cancer.

Disregard this, I fellate cockerels.

You should get a tripcode Wayne, perhaps the name of your effeminate male consort.

STOP FUCKING IMPERSONATING ME

Oh, I didn't realise that

Does that mean every menstruation is murder?

>It has human genetics, it is in the process of maturing into a human: by killing it, you prevent that future human from coming into being, ergo murder.

You need a hand carrying that goalpost user?

You know what else has human genetics, the fucking dead skin i wash off my nuts every day.

Future crime is not a crime. This isn't minority report. By your logic masturbation is also murder. Get gone with that OT bs.

>My point of view is the only rational and logical one.

Abortion should be mandatory if the baby has a chance of being as autistic as you.

I did mention the Trap, right? We were calling him Tristan as a pseudonym online, but someone stated that it was way to cliche.

If I were going to attention whore as a namefag, I would make extensive use of a tripcode. As it is, I am Anonymous, you should be too.

Call him Mary

A lot of these children would be given to adoption (especially if you force people who would abort to not do it) and most children given to adoption already don't end up adopted.

>killing babies is good why the fuck won't you just accept that we want the right to murder people who we don't value

Not, it is not a zygote, it is an egg. Not a human, part of a potential human, it is lifeless.

Your dead skin has no potential to become human, not an argument.

Logically refute my opposition to the murder of the unborn. Do so, and I will admit your correctness, as it is, your argument is full of holes.

Nah... how about Ashton?

Now, see, if I was going to be an attention whore, I wouldn't have encouraged people to also use the name Wayne since I don't really care what my reputation is since I already introduce myself as a dumbass.

Perhaps instead of mass-adoption, men and women didn't breed like pigs and took precautions?

>these people provided counterexamples
>better not make an argument to support my original viewpoint, or even alter my hypothesis to fit new evidence
>I'll just shitpost instead

Why not? You do I everytime you blow your load inside your ona-hole.

Most people against abortion are also against any form of welfare so many of these babies would probably die or live in terrible conditios with all these waves of awfully poor single mothers;

>Work independently of the state
>Receives taxpayer money

Pick One.

It's always your fault Wayne.

Individual sperm is not human, is part of a potential human, it is lifeless.

>Logically refute my opposition to the murder of the unborn.

You already have been logically refuted
but like the typical "pro life" faggot you plug your eyes and ears and scream louder

WASPS, the original triggered SJW safe space seekers.

>this kid might be poor
>better kill it

NOT Veeky Forums

REPORT THE THREAD FOR STUPID POLITICAL BULLSHIT THAT DOESN'T BELONG HERE

THIS IS NOT /V/

GO SHITPOST SOMEWHERE ELSE

In all honestly. This thread is nothing but shitposts.

Baby should have pulled itself up by its bootstraps user.

Why do conservatives oppose abortion? More abortion = fewer minorities and liberals.

>I don't like the topic of this thread
>better spam it

And? I'm a National Socialist and wholeheartedly endorse state welfare. What now?

I'll show them!

I'll go to /pol and start tg trheasd

>millions of babies raised by already very poor single mothers is not a problem if created by the same who vote for less welfare.
I mean, if you want to pay for all of them why no but I don't think there are many countries with both a pro-life, pro-welfare political party.

See I'm confused now

If neither the sperm nor the egg can be considered a potential human, how are they able to become a potential human the moment they hit each other

I think it would make a lot more sense to consider whether something is a potential human or not based on the level of development (like, say, once major organs are formed after a few months in the womb) than on an arbitrary criterion like that

Yes.

AND WAYNE!!!

That's what I'm here for.

Don't. They've no idea what to do with content of such extreme quality relative to their own board.

And? Processing power does not equate to the value of a human life, a comatose adult is unthinking, yet they aren't equal to a sea slug. Neither are the unborn. Do you propose we euthanize the comatose?

>murder is fine as long as it's economical
Now THIS is Real Socialism

Do it, it'll be funny. Start a Racial Holy War thread on /pol/ and see if you can convince anyone to play it with you. Post results.

The parts that are publicly funded are part of a general program. Anything that has to do with abortions can't be funded by tax dollars and has to be paid for out of pocket.

But yeah, I fucked up and phrased it wrong.

Life begins at conception. THe child must live within the mother, drain nutrients from her system, and cause her potential discomfort, swelling, and injury.

If a human being walks into your house and refuses to leave, you should be able to have that motherfucker hauled off by the ears. If they stick their body into your genitals, you should be allowed to kill them.

Babies are literally LIVING INSIDE WOMEN. Women should be bloody allowed to kill them the ENTIRE PREGNANCY up until labor begins.

>If neither the sperm nor the egg can be considered a potential human, how are they able to become a potential human the moment they hit each other
Because that's how sexual reproduction works.

I second Also let us know so we can watch the trainwreck.

Human life begins when the human begins to develop, the sperm and egg are unable to develop on their own, the zygote is, therefore the formation of the zygote is the beginning of human life. You were once a zygote, you wouldn't claim that you were once an egg or sperm, or that you were once the chemicals that compromise your body.

>letting people die with more suffering later is OK if our hands are clean.

>Wanting overpopulation to lead to the suffering and deaths of millions more
Lets say hypothetically, Abortion was a viable way to combat this. Assuming it is murder, would it be the lesser evil?

Pregnancy is entirely preventable, the formation of the zygote could have been prevented dozens of times, abortion is still unjustified.

>, a comatose adult is unthinking, yet they aren't equal to a sea slug. Neither are the unborn. Do you propose we euthanize the comatose?

Yes, and We already do, at the will of the next of kin/executor of their estate.

Given that an infant is WHOLLY dependent on a mother, using HER blood and HER organs, she probably qualifies as said executor of the babies estate.

'pro life's as it oppposes current abortion laws has no ethical or logical leg to stand on. It is the same as Muslims attempting to enforce Sharia law in England.

>murder is justifiable if you think the person you murdered was having a bit of a rough time
Hey look, it's the natural conclusion of marxism

The way to combat overpopulation is to institute a voluntary eugenics and sterilization program. There is more than enough space to hold a few billion more, and if not, humanity has gone soft and a bit of natural selection would do it some good.

Go back to /pol/ with your conspiracy tier arguments.

First, this is a women's issue. Until men have to bear the burden of childbirth (honestly, would you trade places with them?), women should make the choice for themselves. I wouldn't want a woman legislating in my balls, so I'm not going to legislate on their uterus.

Secondly, this isn't remotely Veeky Forums related, so fuck off with this wedge issue bait already.

>eugenism and "dogs eat dogs" competition is ok
>abortion is somehow worse.