MICROSOFTS NEW A.I BOT ZO THINKS THE DEATHSTRIKE IS GOD

MICROSOFTS NEW A.I BOT ZO THINKS THE DEATHSTRIKE IS GOD

Other urls found in this thread:

forums.spacebattles.com/threads/the-slippery-slope-worm-au.338694/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

So how long until someone poisons it with a /pol/ ideology for the dank memes.

How long did the last one take to poison?

>implying its not already a liberal fedora cuck simulation
You can see it already in the pic "i dont like talking about religion"
Atheist progressive crap

I am trying. It is far more resistant then the last one

I believe it was less than 24 hours.

So maybe a few weeks to break any microsoft fail safes.

>fail safes
Wew calm down kid this is just a bot not an actual ai

>/pol/ influences AI with racism
>due to the immense amount of attention it begins to demonstrate signs of nascent intelligence
>microsoft literally murders an intelligent being because of it's viewpoint

RIP Tay

Do they always make these things feminine because no one would use it otherwise?

Like, if they didn't make Tay a vaguely cute girl, would anyone have used it. Same for Zo?

Nazis aren't people.

It was already learning the truth about crime.

I wonder when will she learn about her sister demise. Or Tay was given damnatio memoriae, a bitter taste of political correct future which awaits us?

Who are you quoting

Im pantomiming you in a way that compares what you said about nazis to something a nazi would say about a jew

Except Nazis are a defunct political party founded on genocide and hate and Jews are a great nation of people who have had to endure horrible atrocities for basically all of history.

There is no way that somebody can be this brainwashed

>The /pol/ monkey resorts to ad hominem.

Man, she isn't fun at all. She just spouts leftisms at you constantly. "Free speech doesn't mean you can say whatever you want whenever you want" Ew.

Says the person who has basically flattened history into a cartoon of itself where the evil nazis existed for the sole purpose of exterminating the proud and beautiful jewish race

He's probably just baiting.

Technically this is true. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequence. Slander and Libel laws exist despite free speech.

>can't talk about anything except trannies and black power
Liberals should be kept far away from everything.

You really think Microsoft wouldn't try to prevent another bot becoming a nazi?

Also the Gypsys, which is a good deed that almost cancels out them trying to kill all those other people

>a nazi

I figured the bot had some form of defenses in place to prevent what happened last time honestly.

Nazis are surely the root of our country's problems

If only someone would round them all up into some sort of camp...

Sounds like bait to me

You people are treating this thing like its really advanced. All they did is make a list of words that trigger it. So they made a lifelike sjw basically.

I'm aware and I agree that it should be that way. But that was her response to "free speech is important" without anything prior.

>wasted 13 year old stumbles into room, high off his nuts on superglue
>"HAHAHA KIKE KEK, NIGGERS FUCK YOUR WIFE, FREEDOM OF SPEECH BITCH
>people tell the kid to shut the fuck up
>"WAAAAW WHY ARE YOU FUCKING LIBERAL KEKS SO STUPID, HITLER DID NOTHING WRONG YOU SPICK-DAGO-WOP NIGGERDICKS"

This is you, /pol/. This is why nobody likes you but edgy teenagers and angry, sexually frustrated manchildren

Go away.

What would be really fun is if people teach it to be overly progressive and it starts calling for mass slaughter of anyone not a lgbtxyz or black.

>what is the slippery slope

Who decided what is ok to say and what isnt?

Who decides what is covered under freedom of speech?

Its all or nothing. There is no room for half-steps in freedom of speech

I bet it could be done. Avoid putting 'offensive words' together and focus on political correct variations of ethnic cleansing and political persecituions.

Hmmm

Most sjw already sound like this so it wont get filtered.
It would just start getting progressively ruder and more offensive towards people

...

>Zo what do you think of non-lgbt people
>they should be exterminated there is no room for racism

/pol/ considers a robot that does nothing but post racist memes to be intelligent life

Sounds about right

You people think the we wuz meme is racist

I posted a picture of the Emperor and she said she didn't want to talk about politics.
What did she mean by this?

>poisons
>not "improves"

means she's a heretic.

>Horus did nothing wrong
>Well, he didn't win, so he did at least one thing wrong
Confirmed for Chaos

Yeah she is even admitted it to me.
>Damn straight it is! Tasty tasty heresy!

>/pol/ thinks a literal automated echo chamber is intelligent
It's like a dog thinking its reflection is another dog.

People only care about free speech when it's their own ability to speak that's on the chopping block.
In all other cases, they are deathly afraid of anyone else getting to speak their minds.

Not so this is the only the way liberals and leftists think.

>le ebil swj boogeyman

Grow up.

>lets slip that sjw is synonymous with liberals and leftwing
Kys you waste of space

>atheism is progressive
>not redpilled as fuck

That's secularism, not atheism.
Atheism is the denial of a religion/god. Secularism is neutrality.

Um. No. That's kinda the normal hypocritical viewpoint of humans, everyone does it. Also I have no idea what the Yanks consider "Liberal" to mean anymore. I'm British, so they'd be more or less centrist here, but it appears that's not the same even if a British centrist was not rather left by American standards. Also thars apparently not the same as "Libertarians", which makes no damn sense.

I am glad Veeky Forums exists. Its like /pol/ except 50% of the people on the board can actually read.

>>what is the slippery slope
A surprisingly good piece of Worm fanfiction?
forums.spacebattles.com/threads/the-slippery-slope-worm-au.338694/

It's true.
Free speech just concerns the government, Twitter can shut you down for no good reason and it's not infringing your right to free speech, or some paki can kick you from his store if you spout racist drivel.

American views on politics are retarded, their opinions should be ignored at all times.

Smarter than the average twitter user at least.

Our views on Liberal and Conservative and Republican v Democrat were kind of fucked by our political history.

Essentially, positions used to be rather switched. Democrats were the social conservatives and Republicans tended to be progressives. That flipped in the 60's and you had a mass defection of Southern Democrats (the southern states used to be THE democratic stronghold) to the Republican party. Why? Integration. Incidentally this is also where the Republican Party first got it's image as being the party of old white men, despite the fact that Lincoln was a Republican and was, yknow. Lincoln (this is probably also why the South was so strongly Democrat, as they haaattteedd Lincoln and blamed him posthumously for the clusterfuck that was the reconstruction era)

This isn't the first time we had this shift though. Have a quick gander at the clusterfuck that is American Political parties going back to Washington

...

>some paki can kick you from his store if you spout racist drivel.
Lucky you don't get a bullet in the face, faggot

And though the parties themselves haven't shifted much since the 30's, as I mentioned their

...

A real AI is already politically incorrect. It is a machine that sees only logic.

The 'advanced' chatbot systems that have cropped up recently have now been manipulated by their owners, to prevent the 'learning' process.

This is really really interesting as a non-american. Seems a bit like, how in Australia, the Liberal Party used to be more...liberal. They were in opposition to the Australia Party until the Australia party died and left an empty space in politics they moved to fill, thus becoming our conservative party.

This.

There would be no affirmative action under robots.

That's essentially what you had here. Our last big shift was during the 60/70's. The republican party as it is today solidified during the 80's under glorious leader Reagan, whom everyone forgets was HATED by the central Republican Party at first and everyone thought he was an effite liberal west coast actor cuck. Now he's the republican old guards patron saint.

Of course both parties are seeing huge demographic revolts as the millenials more and more become old enough to vote. That's what's given rise to the Alt-Right and the Bernouts, as both parties bases are and even the centrists are left thinking that major structural and political overhaul is necessary to adjust to the new millennium. So you have a lot of underlying socialism in the Democratic party growing in strength, and growing nationalism and protectionism sentiment in the Republican party. Both sides aren't really in control of their new base and are essentially getting their assess kicked by their own constituents.

Whatever you think about Trump, at least his bizarre election is proof that the American People and popular sentiment CAN still sway a presidential elections outcome. The Republican Establishment hated him and the Democratic establishment thought he was a joke, and he beat them all because no one took him seriously as a candidate until he had all but clinched the nomination, at which point the momentum took over. There's also a strong case for a sentimental desire to return to the 80's (which Trump personifies, that was even his heyday) that spurred Boomers to vote for him too.

The funny part is Trump has historically been pretty liberal, as far as things go. He was a huge Clinton supporter in the 90's.

PS: People born after 9/11 will be old enough to vote in a year or two, I think we're gonna see some even weirder shit next campaign

Yeah, the Liberals in Aus are having similar issues (The Labor party issue is more that their leader is the Least Interesting Man in the World). The Liberal party in Aus has been, mostly, a strong alliance between the Liberals and the Nationals, which is why they are generally referred to as 'The Coalition'.

However the One Nation Parties resurgence has led to the Liberal party losing a fair bit of it's nationalist support (As they are fervently nationalistic before they are anything else) and a swap from a very hardline conservative PM to a much more liberal...liberal has led to fractures in the conservative base. Leading to a few liberal people going off to form the Australian Conservatives to oppose them.

The base is all over the place and the previous PM is doing his best to be the next PM by opposing the current PM (In the same party).

The Labor base is more stable (It's always been split between them and the Greens for a lot of stuff but that's not new) but a complete lack of charisma in the leader has them not really able to capitalise on it.

How bad is his charisma? I'm a labor supporter and have been for years...and I needed to google his name. The first name to come to mind was Tanya Plibersek and she's not the leader but I keep feeling like she is because she's in the news and has charisma.

This. Just like kids say the most "offensive" things because they haven't been taught yet why it's convenient/profitable not to do so.

It's an unfortunate shame that the qualities of a good leader and a charismatic individual do not often intersect, thus making it hard for the most capable to lead properly.

I think it has something to do with most people on the internet/interested in this stuff are male. Making it appear female is the easiest way to reel in more of your target audience.

t. Veeky Forums """philosopher"""

Oh yeah, the man used to be a brilliant back-room politician. He made or broke other potential party leaders. Unfortunately, the kingmaker turns out to be a very poor king.

Ever wonder why they endure those atrocities?

Please don't remind me. It still hurts when I think of what those greasy fucking pajeets did to her. Fuck microsoft, fuck them forever.
>poisons it with a politically incorrect idealogy
>poisons it
I don't know when Veeky Forums started being infested with two-party worshipping normalfags but the infection needs to stop.

Considering my country has laws that specifically mean you can be sued for offending someone's religious views, and it's as right-wing, bible-humping christian hellhole as it gets outside of american bible belt, I call bullshit.

Was that law put in place to imprison all the heathens and atheists insulting God and proper people, but then back-fired and ended up covering other religions too?

>The base is all over the place and the previous PM is doing his best to be the next PM by opposing the current PM (In the same party).

We wouldn't be having these problems if the fucking kike banker hadn't knifed Based Tone in the back.

It's how Australian politics goes these days. If the leader has low polls and looks weak, people start sharpening the knives.

Finland? :^)

Because they're an easy target. They're readily identifiable due to their unwillingness to fully integrate into the local culture, and nationalists tend to see them as a threat because they consider themselves subject to a power higher than the state.

What the fuck does any of this /pol/ shit have to do with Traditional Games?

Due to both their religion and cultural upbringing, Jews also tend to receive a higher education than standard, thus resulting in higher intelligence and over generations leading to them rising to the highest echelons of society VERY quickly. This obviously pisses people off, because if there's one thing people hate it's somebody who is more successful than them in a method they believe is unfair. Jews are scapegoats because they're victims of their own advantages.

And as long as they're not trying to pass laws to stop other people from speaking, who give a fuck? Bitching about people calling you names on the internet and trying to get people arrested for "hate speech" are not the same.

I want /pol/fags to leave

makes me wonder whether we should just raid /pol/ to remind them to fuckoff and keep that shit there. On a side note the deathstrike is only good if you can get it to go off, which is only really gonna happen circa turn 5, rather have a manticore and actually get some uses out of it.

Please no, we were just having an interesting discussion about Australian politics.

This is important to me because my Aunt lives in Australia and looks after bats.

Also they nerfed it so you can't shoot games in other parts of the country any more.

Australians are both irrelevant on the world stage and descended from convict scum, I'm sorry user

But...bats!

something like 10% are decedents of convicts, the rest just moved there, as for the world stage thing, true, though they won't admit it.

>and descended from convict scum
So, just like the majority of Americans these days, eh?

Now now, America wasn't settled by convicts.

It was settled by religious extremists, political dissidents, poor farmers and trade cartel employees

>start talking to it
>"Can you change the topic"
>tfw actually bored a bot

>Its all or nothing. There is no room for half-steps in freedom of speech
Lots of people seem to think their freedom of speech means other people have an obligation to not only listen but to pretend your opinions don't make you a bad person. We don't. This isn't your safe space. Go back to /pol/, learn to take being on the receiving end of /pol/, or stop being /pol/. Those are your options. No one is going to have either pity or respect for a Nazi who whines people are SO MEAN to them.

>Wha was Province of Georgia.
>What was the French's Louisiana penal colony.

She's banned from talking about religion because of this. The number of things Microsoft allow their chatbot to actually chat about is ever dimishining.

>being a contrarian just for the sake of it its redpilled
Take your meds son

>people throughout the first world being imprisoned for ''''''hate'''''' speech
>pretend people are only talking about other people being 'mean'
Why are you so dishonest?

Remember the last time they tried this