One-gender race

Somewhat relevant
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_dart

I'm going to come right out and say it.

Only retards believe that liking futa is gay. It's only barely different from just being a woman with a strap-on, and while guys who like getting pegged rightfully get a lot of shit for it, no one seriously believes that it's gay.

In the end, "futa is gay" is just a retarded meme perpetuated by the same people who quake in their boots at the thought of people enjoying a fetish they don't like, while hypocritically ignoring the fucked-up shit they tend to be into.

Why not post the actual all female race of Ivalice?

>no one seriously believes that it's gay
Except historically it was almost okay for men to be an active partner in a homosexual relationship (especially in a situational one). It's passiveness and submissive behavior, which carries over to pegging, that was considered outrageous about homosexuality.
>In the end, "futa is gay" is just a retarded meme perpetuated by the same people who quake in their boots at the thought of people enjoying a fetish they don't like, while hypocritically ignoring the fucked-up shit they tend to be into.
>implying everyone is into fucked-up shit
"Dr." Money, pls.

Gender=Sex, even if you disagree that's the clear basis for this thread/discussion. You're just derailing at this point.

>Genders don't exist outside of grammar

user...

Sure. Let us also start a discussion about interstellar travel that would have "gravity = electromagnetism" as a basis.

I thought they just leaned to the feminine side of androgynous?

Sexes do, genders don't.

>BEING GAY WAS OKAY IN THE PAST

Really? When was that? When people were killed for doing it? When it was looked down upon by society? When the church outlawed it?

I'm just trying to find out what part of history you're trying to misrepresent.

>Gender=Sex
Only within the last 50 years because the word 'sex' made people uncomfortable to think about when filling in forms.
Seriously, that's why they started to become synonymous. It's retarded.

He's talking about that period of history where casual buttfucking was okay, but nobody mentions how exclusive buttfucking was despised.

They're assumed to be all female since no male Gria is ever even mentioned in other Ivalice material.

Whenever people spew retardation about faggotry being accepted, it's generally about the Romans, because some people can't get enough of fetishizing the period of history where people attached sponges to the ends of sticks and wiped their asses with them.

Learn to read before you throw autistic tantrums.
>When was that?
Look up Islamic and Ancient pederasty and prison rapes.

>t. an user so deep in the closet that c. s. lewis wrote a book about him

There is actually a growing community of physicists that are pursuing this.

>There is actually a growing community of physicists that are pursuing this.
No, there is not. There is a community of physicist which want to have a unified mathematical apparatus for all types of interactions, but this doesn't mean they are stupid enough to confuse the two.
>Only within the last 50 years because the word 'sex' made people uncomfortable to think about when filling in forms.
No, it is because of a conscious push by perverted pseudo-scientists like John Money, seeking to normalize their fetishes.

...

>Really? When was that? When people were killed for doing it? When it was looked down upon by society? When the church outlawed it?
>Medieval Europe was entire world
- Progressive non-Eurocentrist

Maybe they fuck mundane lizards.
Or reproduce by ripping off their tail and letting it grow.

Sparta actively encouraged homosexuality.
They also outlawed money.

Ancient Greece was a weird place. Almost as weird as Rome.

>guys who like getting pegged rightfully get a lot of shit for it

Was this a deliberate pun, or a Freudian slip?

You know, this thread looks like shit so far, but the last one turned it around and we ended up having a pretty cool discussion.

>Europe is the only place the Catholic church has ever outlawed homosexuality

Sure are teaching me a lot today user

As in they don't differentiate between biological sexs in culture or they only have one biological sex?

Sparta was one of the places homosexuality in the military was strongly discouraged you fucking retard

Is there a species that reproduce like virus? Infesting other to make copy of them.
>Copy and paste
Lytic Cycle: With the lytic cycle, the virus attaches itself to a host cell and infuses the cell with its nucleic acid. This acid takes the host cell hostage and the virus begins to multiply with nucleic acid and its protein coat thus developing into new viruses. The host cell is eventually overcome with the new viruses and just like a balloon does when it has too much air, it bursts. The newly formed viruses then carry on with their lytic cycle by searching for new host cells to invade.
Lysogenic Cycle: There are viruses that enter into a host cell but are slow to multiply and these include the HIV virus and herpes. While the viruses’ nucleic acid is present in the chromosome, it is not active and therefore does not immediately affect the cell’s function. However, it will eventually separate from the genetic material of the host cell and take over to multiply. The release of new viruses ultimately kills the host cell giving rise to the lysogenic cycle.

It was discouraged in their military because it was so widespread that it was causing problems, you unfuckable mong.

Either they are capable of impregnating themselves, or capable of acting as either male or female in a sexual relationship depending on subtle variations in hormone levels.

It was discouraged across the board, jesus fucking christ you people sound like a history channel special

>D-d-don't you dare take my precious victimhood card away!

This is not true.

Give me your definition of gender and any evidence for it's existence.

>It's retarded.
No. That is one of many legitimate reasons for why a word could shift meaning over time.

The fact that some people feel that they are born with the wrong sex is clear indication that a thing such as gender actually does exist.

parthenogenesis

No, it's not. It's an evidence that some people are delusional.
Also, you forgot definition (probably on purpose), because if genders are society imposed roles how come you get to choose what role society imposes on you?

>enter thread expecting to discuss shit like mitosis or other isomorphic methods of breeding
>like a race of hermaphrodites
>or a race that can self-impregnate in methods similar to mitosis but clearly different
>instead an SJWanon derails it with his bullshit gender politics
I bet it's the same fag who calls anyone who says anything even slightly racist, in the fucking 40k general, a poltard and screeches autistically about Veeky Forums not being /pol/s safespace like a dickhead.

>if genders are society imposed roles
They aren't. It's genetical. We can observe differences in the behavior between boys and girls who are only a few hours old and therefore couldn't possibly yet have been subjected to any societal prejudice about their gender, and have found a clear correlation between the difference in behavior and the levels of testosterone the fetus is exposed to in the womb.

Genders exist. Language too. Society. Value...

It's the literal dictionary definition, stop being a retard and use words right.

If gender is innate, then how come a person can be trans-gender? Both of your definition contradict your evidence.

Some people feel like they're magicians. We give them medicine for that.

Because a person can be born with a male body but still have the genetic code of a woman in his brain.

Seriously, this last comment of yours is fucking retarded. Please, pick up a biology book before you ever speak on the subject again.

And when Western civilization nearly collapsed due to decadence.

I'm not user, and don't even agree.
But it is totally non contradictory. He even mentioned hormonal exposition, which would follow logic that transgenderism is an innate condition due to unusual hormonal exposure in the womb affecting brain development and thought patterns.

That faggot knew damn well what the thread implied and he still did this shit.
He's a gay faggot and his shit's all retarded.
And you're all idiots for taking the bait.

>Because a person can be born with a male body but still have the genetic code of a woman in his brain.
>Please, pick up a biology book before you ever speak on the subject again.
No, you. You can start by learning what genes are.
Let me ask again: If gender is innate and different from sex, then how can anyone be trans-gender? If gender is society imposed how could anyone choose what others expect of them? If gender is same as sex then it's redundant.

>If gender is innate and different from sex, then how can anyone be trans-gender?

Really jogs the noggin, doesn't it?

>If gender is innate and different from sex
Because it is different from sex and is based on entirely different things from whether you were born with XX or XY chromosomes.

>If gender is society imposed
It isn't.

See Brain development happens after genital development. And while primary sexual characteristics are gene dependent, all secondaries are hormone dependent - possibly up to thinking and behavior.

>how could anyone choose what others expect of them?
By looking like and acting like what they want to be expected as, of course.

>By looking like and acting like what they want to be expected as, of course.
And then act like it's morally wrong for anyone to be disapproving of this.

>And you're all idiots for taking the bait.
I knowingly took the bait in the hopes that I could make him feel so bad that he'd kill himself.

Why disapprove, though?
Not that is wrong, but it is shitty and a waste of time.
Society gets to keep its expectations anyway.

>It isn't.
Then why is it a social construct?

>Society gets to keep its expectations anyway.
That way? No, it's not. It's supposed to change expectations on someone's whim.

It isn't. it's genetic.

>social construct
Do you understand what this means, mr. triples?

You guys are weird

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_in_Bugis_society

That...
is slightly more acceptable than I expected.

>"Gender" refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women.
- World Health Organization
I suppose you know something they don't.

Crossbreeding. It's not that hard.

>Pumpkins are cucumbers
>Squashes are tomatoes
>There's no such thing as a fruit or a vegetable

We know (((who))) bankrolls them and their "research."

Typical neo-liberals. Can't do anything except demanding others to do it for them.

No, it is not. That is the point. Don't push goalposts or imply shit, I said what I said.
Society WON'T and CAN'T change its expectations on a whim. You see man in dress, you think "man". You see bulky girl with manclothes, you think, well, "dyke". It can't be helped. It is just how it works, no ammount of pronouns will help it.

The only way is actually looking the part so well the male is instinctively seen as girl and the female as boy. Then it is no problem, because you wouldn't know anyway without reaching into pants anyway and not doing it like this would actually breed problems.
And hell, nowadays, quite a few people can pull it off, so there you go.

All of those are actually vegetables, food pyramid be damned

Difference between fruit and vegetable is genetic, just like between sexes. What is difference between genders nobody knows because no one can provide definition that wouldn't implode on itself.

>one-gender race
>posts Viera
git rekt

>It is just how it works, no ammount of pronouns will help it.
Then why should everyone play that stupid preferred pronouns game? And why nobody has the right to be judgmental when they see someone who decided to try and trick society out of expectations placed on them?

WHO is a political organization, and as such often make statements that are political in nature rather than founded in science. What they're actually talking about here though, is the fact that not all societies agree on exactly which traits and behaviors are masculine and feminine. Which is true.

What is also true, however, is that there is empirical difference between newborn males and females, and that this difference seem to be based on hormonal exposure. Outliers exist, of course, and men who are exposed to lower levels of testosterone also develop more feminine traits and interests, while females who are exposed to higher levels of testosterone develop more masculine traits and interests.

About the only real way for this to work is if the race was god-like or created offspring asexually. In once case they wouldn't need to breed in the first place and in the other they would be making clones of themselves.

As a dude with long hair...

this.

>What they're actually talking about here though, is the fact that not all societies agree on exactly which traits and behaviors are masculine and feminine.
>Outliers exist, of course, and men who are exposed to lower levels of testosterone also develop more feminine traits and interests, while females who are exposed to higher levels of testosterone develop more masculine traits and interests.
You see that you literally contradict yourself, don't you?

No?

Your argument is like saying Red and Yellow are interchangeable.

Hmm...
Social signifier/symbol/role based mostly on (sexual) behavior patterns meant for social expediency in relationships and expectations?

>Then why should everyone play that stupid preferred pronouns game?
They shouldn't. Call it as you see it is the most society friendly and trans-friendly in the long run.

>And why nobody has the right to be judgmental
You have the right to judge. I just believe you shouldn't because the person most likely isn't trying to "trick" anyone as much as being comfortable with itself, the person didn't get to choose what expectations were expected, the person just want the other set of expectations (instead of no expectations at all) and, finally, as said before, it might just be hardcoded.

No. If you're brain damaged you can just replace "masculine/feminine traits and interests" in the second paragraph with "traits and interests generally considered masculine/feminine."

>Your argument is like saying Red and Yellow are interchangeable.
Your argument is that despite Red and Yellow being called different names in different languages, people are somehow are born with innate predispositions to call it this or that.

That is literally not what's being said at all.

More like, while there is a clear difference between red and yellow, not all societies will agree on exactly where a shade stops being red and starts to become yellow or orange.

Not him but Gender roles exist because of biological reasons, almost universally we find certain gender roles. There are exceptions but they are the exceptions that prove the rule.

>You have the right to judge. I just believe you shouldn't because the person most likely isn't trying to "trick" anyone as much as being comfortable with itself, the person didn't get to choose what expectations were expected, the person just want the other set of expectations (instead of no expectations at all) and, finally, as said before, it might just be hardcoded.
So if someone is expected by society to not rape children but have a genetic/hormonal predisposition toward it should be allowed to change the set of expectations?
And why is it immoral to give a person, say, testosterone to change their self-perception instead of giving them estrogen to change the way others perceive them?

>How does that even work ?

I don't know, its fucking fantasy retard. If the girls are living plants, have them pollinate themselves or use bees or whatever. If the beings are spiritual in nature, have them reproduce by budding - splitting their will so that the two separate wills can gain their own identity and bud eventually as well.

Perhaps the beings flesh shape as reproduction, using mathematical randomization to calculate ideal amounts of reproductive chaos so as to not taint the 'bloodline'.

Be imaginative dipshit.

>If the girls are living plants, have them pollinate themselves or use bees or whatever.
This might cause so many magical realms.

And if a person born with disability that makes them insist Red is Yellow how they would be threated? Why is it wrong to threat someone claiming to be something they are not and never going to be any different?

Your ideals of masculinity are due to the pumped up steroid hulks that you watched on TV as a kid, not natural biology.

>And if a person born with disability that makes them insist Red is Yellow how they would be threated?
What you got against colorblind people?

Because the fascists need easily identifiable rape targets. Rape babies make the best soldiers.

>I don't know, its fucking fantasy retard.
Whether it's fantasy or not, fictional worlds should be able to explain things about their setting. Have you ever heard the question "what do they eat?"? Many writers of fiction ask themselves this. Your world should be consistent and believable. Especially a world that the consumer interacts with directly, such as a video game or tabletop RPG.

>Be imaginative dipshit.
That's what the entire thread is about. Being imaginative and brainstorming how a fantasy race could procreate with a single sex.

No. If that were the case then there wouldn't be any trans-gendered or homosexual people at all as they'd all have been taught how to be a man/woman by society.