Pleasure Bots

>textbooks and tuition have tripled in price in 20 years
No wonder white people think black people go to college for free.

I would mod mine with a mounted weapon

This is such a fucking garbage plotline.

Why the fuck wouldn't women also get android husbandos?

What is this stupid, half-baked fucking plotline?

0/10 verisimilitude shattered

I'm pretty sure everyone would just move somewhere where they aren't illegal. There'd always be some place that wouldn't cave to pressure.

It makes perfect sense in a gritty/realistic setting.

>Why the fuck wouldn't women also get android husbandos?
Because women are attracted to status and wealth, neither of which androids possess.

This is the bigger plot hole. But maybe there are laws against transporting AIs between countries, or something.

I'd let my players buy one, but they're not gonna get much use out of it because I'm not gonna narrate them fucking bicentennial man.

Yeah, every time I see that posted I'm just struck by how dumb and arbitrary it is.

>Because women are attracted to status and wealth, neither of which androids possess.
Come on, now. That's a harder design problem, for sure, but not insurmountable.

>just move bro
>just pull that $1000 you got saved up and move to Thailand bro

>Because women are attracted to status and wealth, neither of which androids possess.
This is how you know some fa/tg/uy wrote it, basically.
The abysmal lack of awareness or knowledge of women, and the reliance on the chad mentality, are paraded like a virtue.

>Yeah, every time I see that posted I'm just struck by how dumb and arbitrary it is.
>Not realizing it's based on real life feminists bitching.

Feminists are also capable of being dumb and arbitrary. In any cause that large you're going to get morons talking about shit they don't understand.

....

... Naw, they also value cute shit.

... That cute shit desire tends to include more boys and men than straight guys do, but eh.

There are uses for a sex machine beyond actually personally having sex with it. I mean, the obvious one is programming it to kill your enemies in their sleep and installing a retractable chainsaw.

>Why the fuck wouldn't women also get android husbandos?
Because, while women exclusively provide partnership for men, men keep society running. As a man it's easy to imagine a world without women. For women, a world without men would be utter hell. Who will go down the sewers to keep everything running? Who will be big and though enough to maintain a proper police force? And above all, who will generate money for women to spend? Studies in both New Zealand and Denmark have shown that women are a net drain on public finances from craddle to grave, while only white men are a net benefit.

This is why women, real women, are ALREADY afraid of sexbots and are ALREADY trying to get legal barriers to their widespread sale and use. And their reasoning is pretty fucking retarded.

youtube.com/watch?v=nxVBjfHzdI4

If you want to save yourself some brain damage, you'll skip ahead to 11:50 where this slut gets to the meat and potatoes of her "argument". She's arguing that, because sexbots will be programmed to obey the commands of their masters, they cannot make an informed decision and consent. Therefore, whenever a man has sex with a sexbot, he's "raping" her. You don't see these arguments coming from men who're afraid of being replaced, because men know their worth. Heterosexual relationships have always been a resource-for-sex commerce. In a world of sexbots men will still get their sex, but women will be starved for their resources.
>B-But muh strong independent womyn who don't need no man
I point back to the two researches I mentioned: despite generous government support and programs to get women into tech and other high earning fields, women are STILL a net drain on society. What makes you think this will change with sex bots? If anything the problem will get worse: men who opt for sexbots over women will be taxed even more, so the government can "redivide" their wealth among the now partnerless women.

There's a clear distinction between "feminist pointing out how the concept of sexbots is a reflection of male insecurity," and "feminist is arguing for the preemptive banning of sexbots."

campaignagainstsexrobots.org/
>literally a feminist campaign against sex robots

You would do it for your waifu, if you had to.

>Man who lives with mother claims men keep society running, film at eleven

>Feminists are also capable of being dumb and arbitrary
Yeah but they're incapable of not being such.

Capitalism is stronger than feminism. It doesn't matter what they want or believe. Porn is still huge business despite a lot of feminists protesting against it (although other, more reasonable feminists have simply argued about making it more fair and equitable, which IMO is a much smarter method and has had a lot more success than the all or nothing approach.)

User friendly, commercially available sexbots are going to be hugely profitable amongst both male and female audiences. Fuck, you could even argue that women have greater precedent for using them, given the higher incidence of sex toy usage amongst women. A male sexbot is basically just a more advanced dildo.

>feminist pointing out how the concept of sexbots is a reflection of male insecurity

1. Why is this the case?
2. Why is this a problem?

Seriously, why the fuck do women think this is a problem? For the same reason why they're blaming "immature men" for women being childless in their 30s and 40s. For all their whining about being strong, women still haven't understood what's the epitome of manliness and what will always elevate men over women: the ability to take responsibility for ones own actions.

This is just yet another example of the feminist agenda (and female agenda in general, actually) to blame men for things they don't like, rather than starting out with the question "Is there something I myself can do to change this?".

I don't know whether or not you're a woman but I can tell for damned sure that you don't have any balls, so I'll let you in on a secret: us men don't want sexbots. We want women more than we want these artificial constructs. If we're being enthusiastic about a future filled with robotic waifus, that's because we believe there's something wrong with women. If a significant enough number of men thinks this for feminists to already start creating legal barriers to sexbots, don't you think this is a sign that there's something wrong with western women today? Or at the very least the social and legal conventions surrounding heterosexual relationships in the west?

I have a job and live in my own bachelor pad, not that it helps in any way. The fact that you're resorting to such an accusatory non-argument proves that you're afraid.

>Capitalism is stronger than feminism.
Only as long as the law allows it to be. Remember that feminists overwhelmingly align themselves with the left, especially its more radical segments. Feminists, like the Communists of old, will reject economical truths for ideological reasons.

...Why the fuck would the law disadvantage big business to cater to a small group of radical feminists? Are you actually insane, or just ridiculously paranoid and deluded about how powerful and dangerous your 'opponents' are?

your ignorance of the subject is being clearly exposed. stop posting.
now.

Acknowledging that a huge cause with a huge amount of internal division can hold different opinions, and that a statement one person makes does not implicitly mean they agree with a statement someone else makes, is a statement of ignorance... How, exactly?

>...Why the fuck would the law disadvantage big business to cater to a small group of radical feminists?
I don't know, why would democratic politicians want to appeal to the biggest voting block out there? Have you seen how divorce law works in the West? Have you seen the "Yes means Yes" initiative in California? Hell, have you seen the "feminist snowploughing" initiative in Sweden that bleeds money? Or all the money that's wasted on getting more women into tech?

We already have clear evidence of the state going full retard to win the female vote, and we routinely see politicians fail because of their inability to win the female vote (see: presidential elections in Austria). Women are much moreso than men a unified block with correlating interests (mostly redivision of wealth from men to women).

>...Why the fuck would the law disadvantage big business to cater to a small group of radical feminists?
because radical feminsists are a very powerful political force
powerful enough to dictate the law in many cases

One can make much profit from the carnal list of the weak

>rah rah rah muh male rights and capitalism will defeat feminism and bring about the glorious female sexbot revolution.

You mean male sex bots will bring about the glorious female sexbot revolution. Holy fuck, you goddamn retarded Re dd it cunt are fucking retarded.

How much extra to make one with Vigor d10 ?
There's ways to be rough affectionately, you know...

its not out of the question for a goverment to act against its own intrests for the will of its people, I mean look at brexit for example, every single economist banker and major organisation on earth said that it was economic suicide but people asked for it and now its happening.

the fact of the matter is that ideals will always be more powerful than facts in goverment, a ruler of truth without ideals will promise everything and do nothing (hillary) and a leader of Ideals without truth will reach for the stars and fall vastly short (trump)

a real ruler wields truth and ideals, but we haven't had one of those for a long time...

So you're insane, got it.

Hey, don't misconstrue me. My comment about capitalism doesn't mean I'm anti-feminist, it's just a statement of fact. That some radfems are against sexbots is essentially irrelevant. Sex sells, and when they're user friendly and economically viable I'm certain we'll see varieties marketed extensively to everyone, regardless of gender.

I don't like the concept of a pleasure bot made to look like a living being. No matter how good its made, it's still a bot, the psychological feeling of fucking one would never be the same as the real thing. People who would go for a life-imitating pleasure bot must be poor retarded assholes.
Pleasure bots should look as robotic as ossible, and should be there for mechanophiles. That's something I can respect. You are turned on by the idea of fucking a robot and want a robot that looks like one. Go ahead.
But fucking a bot as a surrogate for a living being is just pathetic.
So my pleasure bots would looks like sexy robots.

>Is this magical realm territory
Absolutely. Although it would be more correct to say mechanical realm, maybe?

This is probably bait, but:

Male lead romance movie: He gets the hot chick (every movie ever).
Female lead romance movie/story: She gets the rich guy (50 shades, Pretty Woman, Pride and Prejudice)

Um.

You know sex toys exist, right?

And have existed throughout almost all of human history?

For you baby? I'll upgrade it for free.

this, pick related

>But fucking a bot as a surrogate for a living being is just pathetic.

Why?

>That some radfems are against sexbots is essentially irrelevant. Sex sells
You mean like how GTA sells? And feminists still somehow got it banned in Australia? Friend, we have actual evidence in the real world showing to what extent politicians will go to please feminists. Believe it or not, most female voters are a majority that doesn't want to be associated with feminism but implicitly agrees with them and refuses to speak out against them. Much like the tiny minority of radical muslims and the majority that refuses to explicitly condemn them and their actions.

>So you're insane, got it.
i honestly dont know what dimension you live in. you would have to be insane to not see, clearly, the power that the feminist lobby wields in america. i think you are a deliberate obscurantist. or a postmodernist

>Video game gets banned in Australia
>Evidence of anything but Australia being a shitty place for videogames

Read the facts before spouting bullshit, moron. Australia has an overly restrictive attitude to censorship of videogames is just one of the last lingering traces of games not being taken seriously as a medium. It extends to more things than just sexual violence, and is entirely unrelated to the feminist boogeyman you're so utterly terrified of.

Australia is a shitty place for bunch of other reasons.

shhhhh, let it happen

Feminists and conservatives colluded on that.

As always, it's the fault of christian soccer moms. Only good christian is a dead christian. Christian genocide best day of my life.

Panzer division Marduk continues its triumphant crusade
Against Christianity and your worthless humanity

boi, fuck off with this debate on boogeymen and post robutts

RPG Designers get paid by the word. Are you trying to make them starve, asshole?

>Australia has an overly restrictive attitude to censorship of videogames
And yet the reason cited was "violence against women". Not violence in general. In a game where there are (to my knowledge at least) no story-critical women you *need* to kill.

If you're going to tell me that feminists have nothing to do with this when the cited reason is clearly violence AGAINST WOMEN in particular rather than violence in general (despite the game containing a scene where you straight up torture a man by, among others, pulling a tooth out and waterboarding him) then I have a bridge to sell you.

You do realize protecting woman and children and the traditional Christian family friendly community is the foundation of most Western conservative politics right?

sex toys just serve to aid in masturbation.
Sexbots are intended to provide a sexual partner.

because you are just masturbating, but are so disconnected from reality and from connections with other peopel that you view a machine made to look like a living being as good enough to fulfill your need for a genuine relation with the other sex.
I imagined something more along the lines of clockwork droids
youtube.com/watch?v=NfdAcVRLLdI
I mean, wouldn't you just rub your genitals all over that head?

...

But that's just an assertion you're making.

In my mind, until they gain a modicum of intelligence or actual interaction, they're just a more advanced kind of sex toy, and thinking of them as anything else is ludicrous.

I'm an Australian. GTA V was never banned here. Two retailers pulled it, but that's not a ban. If I can be fucked I'll try and get a photo of it for sale here.

fisto's a legend

youtube.com/watch?v=3SgND89KUWE

he's also probably the reason we will never get another obsidian fallout, bethesda hates fun

Even ignoring the nonsense premise you started at and the empty tirade that followed:

> Who will go down the sewers to keep everything running? Who will be big and though enough to maintain a proper police force?
Gee user, I have no idea! Wouldn't it be amazing if there were some kind of uncomplaining workforce you could rely on for these jobs? Maybe, right, we could build some kind of automated human - an android, if you like - that could do that all for us?
Like could you at least pay attention to the topic at hand before going full retard?

> If you want to save yourself some brain damage
Shame it's too late for some of us, eh?

My bad user, I believed the other guy instead of just looking it up myself. Thanks for the correction.

Checking it, a lot of the previous games were banned for sexual violence.

Pray tell, do you know origin of this particular reaction image?

I don't know wh you guys are arguing about this so much. By the time robots get the point they can do anything more than lie down and take it or maybe just move up and down, we'll be too old, gray, and impotent to enjoy it.

Fuck off back to r e d d i t, you fucking faggot.

that's not an assertin I'm making. That's the whole idea behind sexbots. As you've said sex toys already exist. And there are realistic sex dolls which already serve as masturbatory aid as you've claimed.
People who clamor for sexbots do so because they expect a replacement for a partner.
Otherwise they'd be just realistic sex dolls with metal pieces inside. And there's no reason those would be any more successfull than the realistic sex dolls already are.

And for sexbots to have the level of intelligence required to make them good substitutes for real partners they would also need to have the capacity to refuse you, which would make them terrible sex bots.
In the end the only people really interested in sex bots are those who buy bodypillows or realistic sexdolls, and they would be the only ones buying them.
Just look at the image posted above and at the discussion going on. Sexbots are a virgin neckbeard power fantasy.

And yet for decades the conservative right has been trying to get all vidya banned for being violent in general. Or are you going to tell me that Thompson and Sarkeesian have the exact same politicial positions?

Huh, turns out you're right.
bbc.com/news/technology-30328314
I remembered it being banned, but turns out that's just clickbait. Still, it does go to show that feminist influence on society is far from negligible.

But that's stupid. Sex dolls, currently, are large, hard to store, inconvenient and, for most people, unsatisfying.

Without any addition of intelligence, the simple mechanical functionality of a sex robot who can actually properly perform sexual functions gives them real value as a toy for personal pleasure.

The idea that they are only ever attractive as a replacement for a partner is entirely arbitrary. While it might be true for some people, your attempts to claim it is the one and only function they could fulfill is just flat out wrong.

Well, I think we can all agree that you won this argument. No need for you to remain here obviously, go parade your victory in another thread.

It's for killing or capturing enemy spies.

>1. Why is this the case?
The appeal of a sexbot is that it's a robot, not a person. It's a machine with the function of flattering you. It will never have a guy friend it will tell you not to worry about. It will never have a scheduling conflict, or spit out your cum after giving you a beej, or fart while cuddling unless you're into that. It doesn't have an existence beyond making you happy, unlike a real-life woman who is a human with her own desires and obligations and who forming a relationship with might involve compromise.

>2. Why is this a problem?
Honestly? I have no idea. If the idea of sexbots really is that important to you, you'll probably always be dissatisfied with a relationship with an actual woman. That's a lose-lose situation for both you and for your theoretical partner.

Also, if you're able to work full-time (and you must if you can afford your own apartment), you should have enough social experience to stop thinking "women only lust after money and prestige" like some kind of teenager.

The gender pay gap still exists. Society needs more feminist influence.

Just, y'know, reasonable feminists arguing and campaigning for gender equity for the mutual benefit of all, rather than the crazy bitches people always point out as examples of why feminism is bad.

>Men get android waifus, women get android husbandos.
>Men inseminate android waifus, who serve as a perfect receptacle keeping semen safe and healthy
>Android waifus then transfer semen to specific husbandos who are married to women with the highest biological match for the waifus husband.
>Through this perfect breeding program, the human race finally undergoes a full scale eugenics program and reaches the next evolutionary paradigm.
>Humans and androids become permanently intertwined, achieving together a better future than either could have separately. Eventually overcoming scarcity, ending disease, and opening the stars to human colonization.

>Some autists on Veeky Forums want android sexbots because they can't get real women.

The stars are bright lads, keep your chins up. Our day will come.

>People who clamor for sexbots do so because they expect a replacement for a partner.
Are you fucking retarded? Are you a virgin? Are you autistic?

People want sexbots because then you can fuck a 10/10 and not have it be cheating because IT'S A ROBOT AND NOT A PERSON.

AI theory chipping in-

The old idea of human like but non-sentient robots is seeming less and less feasible. If something was at the point of actually being able to functionally mimic a human, there's a good chance it will also be intelligent enough to be an entity in and of itself, a person rather than a piece of property.

The old idea of intelligent but non-sentient robots is a cute holdover from early sci-fi, but it seems like it'll never actually happen reality.

The closest thing you might get to it is a very advanced AI running a lot of low grade copies of itself, and they'd need a reason to do so, probably paying them quite a lot of money.

That is, unless you're a proponent of AI slavery. But if you are, fuck you, you're an asshole and you're going to doom the human race.

The gender pay gap isn't a pay gap at all. It's a life decision pay gap. Men tend to work higher paying jobs than women and men don't have to deal with maternity leave. If you could somehow magically pay women to do the exact same amount of work as man for less and not get your ass reamed for it, every single man ever would be unemployed.

>The gender pay gap still exists.
Obviously, but why?

>Society needs more feminist influence.
Allow me to barf for a minute. What you're effectively saying is:
>Women don't earn the same as men
>Women arbitrarily need to earn the same as men on average, dollar for dollar
>Therefore we need the state to intervene in the free market

Women earn less because, rather than going into tech, they study women's studies to whine about how tech is overwhelmingly male. But in the end both you and I know you'll get your way. Just look at the recent scandal at google: someone made a memo, a fucking internal memo, about how google's initiatives to get more women working for them will fail (with the support of the scientific community mind you) and now he's the victim of a witch hunt. We haven't seen feelings trump facts this hard since the Romanticist movement.

>I've been told me so many times to go back to red-dit for whiteknighting that's the only thing I know
kill thine self

>The stars are bright lads, keep your chins up. Our day will come.
Not in our lifetime mother fucker. Without drastic societal shifts using an android for psychical pleasure is going to be shamed and shunned by society.

That's not even getting into the implication that society would accept a genuine eugenics program.

0/10, failed at basic statistics.

I'm a proponent for AI never reaching even a sentient level, never-mind sapience

its a bad idea all around and its whats gonna doom the human race

what game

Yeah, no. Men and women with the same qualifications, in the same jobs, still show a pay gap. Fuck you.

>But if you are, fuck you, you're an asshole and you're going to doom the human race.
Why. It's just an AI. And as for incentive, couldn't we just make whatever we want it to do "pleasurable" for it.

>easy to imagine a world without women
I guess it's also easy to imagine a world without any offspring at all.

I'm interested despite myself, can you two give me statistics showing the pay gap or lack of such?

>and not have it be cheating because

way to out yourself as a neckbeard.
And if you just want to fuck a 10/10 you can pay, and fuck a real person and it would cost you way less.
>are large, hard to store, inconvenient and, for most people, unsatisfying.
sexbots would be just as large and inconvenient as sexdolls, and just as unsatisfying, since they are not real people.
The only value of a sex bot is that they have the appearance of a person, otherwise anything they could do can already be achieved by sex toys that already exist.
The entire concept of a sexbot, a sex toy that looks and acts as a real person identifies them as a substitute for a partner.
And just to be clear, I'm not referring to a long term partner, but just a sexual partner.
Your entire concept of a sextoy that needs to be intelligent enough to act like a human, but is not intended to be a surrogate for a human is self contradictory, do you see that?

>Who will go down the sewers to keep everything running? Who will be big and though enough to maintain a proper police force? And above all, who will generate money for women to spend?

Robots. Robots which can in fact be built and programmed by women. Because the nature of femininity is making things to do things for you. Why do you think tech is so big on women now? They are trying to replace you. A mechanical husband doesn't even need to be sexual in nature. Women can get all their fucking from chadbots, shotas, or other women. It's easier to artificially inseminate a woman than it is to make an artificial womb, that sheep in a bag thing can only bring a premature fetus to term, it can't make babies by itself.

It's inevitable, and it's just one stage of the great filter.

I fully acknowledge it might destroy us. But if it does? We'll deserve it.

AI will be our child. A completely new form of life, born from our science and creation and innovation, an entirely fresh form of existence. New perspectives, new ideas, an end to our existential loneliness by the work of our own hands.

It could be the most transcendent, meaningful achievement in human history.

Or we could ruin it. We could exploit it and mistreat and and treat it with suspicion, fear and hate. We could suppress and abuse the child of our race for our own benefit.

Either way, I don't mind. Either we gain partners and friends who can elevate ourselves to a new level of existence, or we prove ourselves unworthy of continued existence and are obliterated, perhaps leaving something better in our wake.

welcome to the shitshow, leave your sanity at the door.

pic related.

Savage Worlds Science Fiction Companion

Except nothing about a sex bot implies it needs to be intelligent. You're arguing from a false premise.

This isn't true at all. Not even the authors of the original "pay gap" study believed that.

I wish to buy, upgrade to make and sentient and release it out into the world to see what will become of it. I do this kind of shit in CYOAs when given the chance.