What would make a good monster-girl setting to play around in?

character in question is visi from an rpg maker game called fleshchild

It's a monster, and it's a girl. Good enough for me.

By running them like any normal human setting but with monsters instead, like pic related. You just need to add monster parts.

O hey, it's Gegege no Kitaro's mother!

Nothing.

I miss when Veeky Forums hated furries and loved monster girls

the distinction is rather strange.

i like to think that it is the viewpoint of the participant. Furries wish to become furries, whereas monster-girls wish to Cpt Kirk it up.

or the fact that furries tend to use commonplace animals like dogs and cats, whereas MG fans use mythical animals.

To spathi, you're the monster, user.

oh, I still love monstergirls.
I just don't see how a monstergirl setting is any different from a normal setting, which already has tons of monstergirls.

Monsterboys.

I go with
>covered in fur/scales whatever = furry
>inhuman face (outside of shit like monoeyes) = furry

Ryuutama

Imagine the Oregon Trail with a monster like this as a companion

wouldn't it just be a distinction of monstrous vs monstrous?

is risus the best system for this?

What???

Alternatively we can go by "if you get banned for posting porn of it on a red board it's furry"

nonmonstrous*

man spellcheck

i dunno about the mod one, i feel like i'd get banned for posting my eyeball or other more fringe monstergirls.

not on /d/

Unironically Monster Girl Encyclopedia with some good tweaking.

There's already some gray morality to play around with (Zealous Religious Order for Humans worshipping Gods that secretly massacre them with the monsters they fight, and Horde of brainwashing rape-happy monstergirls, and some minor nations trying to find a middle path) just ramp it up for some plot.

Plenty of good settings (standard euro fantasy, gothic mordor, fantasy Japan/china/Egypt), and a ton of interesting races.

And not hard to tweak it to suit all tastes. Hate monster girl waif up culture? Play a Order Paladin seeking to wipe them off the earth.

MGE would be pretty dark if not for the sex-crazed monstergirls undercutting everything.

As it should be. Sexy monsters are superior to shit-tier "monster"-girls in every way, and any monsterfriend you catch who prefers their monstergirls to be either -taurs or women wearing vaguely animal-themed accessories is not your friend at all.

The key difference is that monstergirl settings involve the DM being completely incapable of concealing his throbbing wankboner, while settings with small amounts of monstergirls involve the DM sprinkling a tiny amount of his magical realm into a more presentable, more Frodoproofed setting.

I do believe that inserting your fetishs into world building can make your settings better. It just takes both creativity and fetish, which is a thing many people lack.

For example you can't tell me giger wasn't into aliens, however they come off as freaky and sexy as well as appropriate. Alien wouldn't be as scary if it was a grey, now would it?

You either have to have them both be low key, and appropriate. Or on the really down-low.

Giger inserted large amounts of sexual imagery in his work because the concept of distinctly sexual but industrial and necrotic imagery horrified him, and he had the artistic talent to put that concept to the canvas.

Our friendly DM, however, is NOT horrified by monstergirls and probably does NOT have a setting designed from the bottom up to fit all the necessary biological, psychological, and cultural ramifications a world where dozens of individual species of humanoids separated by entire taxonomic orders has.

Going by most "monstergirl setting" threads, most worldbuilders' ideas start at "this monstergirl type would probably be good at this job, so there will be lots of monstergirls of that type doing this job" and stop at "monstergirls might think differently from humans, so I will take their personalities directly from MGE and Monster Musume and that will be it".

Same here, I just like there aesthetics, so I run both monster girls and monster guys in my games

So...question user, I usually give them some biological qualities that would be most advantageous for creatures that size and then find good environment for them to take over, and then come up with some details for there culture - is this mindset any good?

I seen bits of it and I have to agree, once you lower the power level and take away the over-fetishy part, it's not a terrible set up (even if I myself prefer to make my own monster folk cultures)

I once tried to start putting together a monstergirl setting, working from the base assumptions that:
1: Not all monsters were monstergirls - dire animals, etc, were still around for fighting fodder.
2: Minimize the blatant ERPing; monstergirls have their own unique ways of reproducing, from shortstack dwarves who mold their daughters out of precious minerals to goblins who can get pregnant by eating the right mix of stuff.
3: Humanity is a newcomer here, and whilst the men are "weirdly attractive", the natives aren't just bending over at the sight of dick.

Never did finish developing it... got too distracted...

I once had the idea of a setting where monstergirls weren't really separate from humanity at all. Basically, Echidna equivalent died centuries ago, humans start mining out her grave site for special resources, ambient magical radiation from her corpse starts mutating men and women into having more monstrous features, and their children usually having most of the monster features from one of their parents. Monster-people don't get treated as outsiders or as separate races, but more like cripples or disfigured people, given that all tools and technology are built for human configuration and something like a spiderwoman would have trouble getting into an outhouse. On the other hand, their monster parts give them some advantageous abilities for living on the frontier, with centaurs running faster than a human, harpy flight making them good observers, etc.

fuck off furfag

Is that supposed to be an alien Eva?

I've played Ib, Mad Father, Yume Nikki, and Ao Oni. What is this about?

>small amounts
like half the traditional monsters out there are also hot bitches.

You play as a little flesh person. You are trying to become human. To do this you have to get human body parts. For example, busting into a lab and stealing a brain. Or chopping off a head to wear it.

It's dark and stuck in development hell, but it's enjoyable and the artwork is amazing.

Human-on-furry is incredibly popular, if you read the /trash/ forum. It's overwhelmingly user (as human) schtupping Waifu (as furry).

That said, the overarching themes of the threat are almost identical to its spiritual sister thread "Monster Girls General". Effectively, the only difference is a minor amount of aesthetic.

Like any fetish, though, it is subject to degrees. Some people want to be the furry, some want to be with the furry, some want the woman to just have slightly thicker body hair and sharper teeth.

I do think sprinkling in more gender equity can also help, you could go full 50-50, or just focus on the non 'monster' races, the humans elves Dwarves and the like, maybe the beast races, whoever sides with the 'good' races like angels or golems.

Anyone got pictures of good monstergirls they can post for inspiration.

I guess this does not count?

Or does this work better

I honestly don't care that much.

Pokegirls.

>55775456
>Someone says kawaii uguu~ monstergirl shit that panders to virgins isn't good
>"B-back the fuck off!? You furfag!"
Every fucking time. I will never not love how weebs think they're above furries, when they've long become an even more cancerous fanbase that has pretty much destroyed an entire medium beyond salvation.

Yes yes all sides have idiots.

Your point?

My problem is when anyone posts furshit at all
I don't care if you like monstergirls or not, but monstergirls aren't a bannable offense

>that panders to virgins
You are on the tabletop games section of an anime imageboard

As a man greater than myself put it - the appeal of mostergirls is that the monster is on the outside.

>monstergirl porn panders to virgins but furry porn doesnt
get out

This reminds me of that time user let her sister alone a few feet away because she was bothering him. Who has that screencap?

It seems like monstergirl fans make some great fiction.

I mean undertale is the only good furry creation I know of and it's only good for the skeletons and Jojo's robot.

Monster Girls have
>saya no uta
>MGQ
>monster mesumi
>lady yupiel
>alien

...Alien, as in the horror movie that introduced the xenomorph?

Ah, here it is.

That's depressing as snot.

Have you seen giger's artwork user.

His plan to have them have lips?

fuck.
this is heartwrenching.

Sometimes we have to teach ourselves something the hard way

I have. Tons of it. Which is why I'd recommend you use Species over Alien as your example.

Sorry.

Alien is a little bit broader than the movie.

How joyful I am with the thought of an useless blind girl crying like a child in the middle of nothingness.
I'm broken as fuck.

Lilims and 'fate' is a thing though.

Not op
I kind of want a Monster Musume setting except U.S.
Like what would happen here if it came out that monsters are real...how many zombies would be killed in the first week alone, ogre lives matter protest...all the while the PC's are trying to keep America from destroying itself over this...
Maybe I read to much into Monmusu.,,

The bad news is that xenophobia would rise really high and bullets would be flying like the good ol' days during The Great War. The good news is that Mexicans and Muslims might experience a break from it as they unite against the monsters. The other good news is that some of them may avoid xenophobia if they aren't too dangerous.
But America would definitely experience a massive divide between the naive and the skittish. Expect lots of hate crimes, except they won't be considered hate crimes because monsters aren't considered human.

That's the reason why undertale's pacifist ending is bull crap.

There would be at least one dude ready to end all the monsters. Probably 2 large countries.

>whilst the men are "weirdly attractive", the natives aren't just bending over at the sight of dick
Half the point of monster girls is that they lust for men the way men lust for women.

>Like any fetish, though, it is subject to degrees. Some people want to be the furry, some want to be with the furry, some want the woman to just have slightly thicker body hair and sharper teeth.
Don't forget magic/pheromones. One of the biggest attractions of monster girls is that they tend to have some method of keeping you perpetually hard and giving you endless orgasms that surpass anything you could get from a human woman. Monster girls aren't just aesthetically attractive, they also offer practical benefits.

I mean that they aren't obsessed with sex to the point of it being all they think about. You try to kill a monstergirl, you can be damned sure she'll try to rip your head off first. It just means that if you want to flirt, it won't be tricky to do so.

I would really, really love to sign a contract with a demon like this.

Don't forget all the feminists screeching about how guys who prefer monster girls are a bunch of losers and misogynists who can't handle strong women.

>No dick
>Would not bang/10
>Demons don't exist anyway
>Tip_fedorahed_out_of_existance.jpeg

ERP. There's literally nothing else monstergirls are good for.

Just a minor technicality, but I'd think the complaint would be they couldn't handle INDEPENDENT women, since most sexualized monster girls are far stronger than humans, but are nonetheless dependent on human males (hence the fantasy).

You assume they listen to facts.

That's wrong of you.

But having a vocal group of super powered women who don't hate men would do the feminists some good.

>can't handle strong women
Have you seen half of the monster girls?
There would definitely be some radfems meddling, though, because those types of feminists can't handle the idea of a man being happy without their permission. I think they would try to antagonize men and try to create hostility between the men and monsters somehow, rather than try to antagonize the foreigners because that would get the ire of other people in the social justice community. They would probably be unsuccessful and end up just dragging down social progress further by associating feminism with pointless screeching.

>men being happy EVER
fify

>tfw no Lilim mistress

I know the feel.
>Deeply want to help others; but I rarely end up doing in the end because I've been fucked over by being too kind more times than I care to admit.

I miss when /the/ wasn't just a blue porn board

The correct answer is in the first response. Monstergirl settings should be more Centaur's Worries and less [not at all] Monstergirl Encyclopedia.

That's not how you spell baphomet lab-partner, user.

furfags are so fucking deluded about their horrible fetishes it's embarrassing.

i mean im not going to lie.

the distinction between monstergirl and furry is slight.

However, ants don't have fur, they have setae.

>Furries aren't that different from green women in 1950's scifi
Bullshit the distinction is slight. Hair splitting or setae splitting or whatever other horrendous term you have to appropriate for it just makes it more obvious that furries can't take criticism so they have to pretend that what they do is even remotely normal. Apologetics just make it worse.

Yupiel is a vampire, dumbass. You may as well include elves if you're gonna include fucking vampires. Says no Uta is a stretch, too.

green women in 1950's cartoons aren't monstergirls

they are by definition monstrous, green women aren't.

female tharks are monstergirls, female red martians aren't.

...

>Let's take an exaggerated metaphor literally
Your autism is a choice

shoggoth

not monstergirl and pic related

vampires are monsters.

>loli with the shittiest personality out've all the MGs in the setting
>loli
No

>Lilims
>not Loli

The lolis are the strongest mages and Lilims

>Pic related
Big fucking deal, MGE has both elf and Amazon sections, but you wouldn't see either of those considered monstergirls.

This is tg, friend. We ALL have autism.
If you didn't have autism, you wouldn't be here talking about it.

I think his point was it's hard to draw a distinct dividing line between the two. A regular human with cat ears is pretty clearly a 'monstergirl', but what if you add paws like ? What about an animal head on an otherwise-completely-human body? What about body fur?

Without a firm agreement on the distinction between the two categories, it's pointless to say "this one is fine but that one is not" - and if you ask five anons where they'd draw that line, you're likely to get five different answers

...

This is actually what I was going for.

The distinction is virtuously meaningless.

Virtually, not virtuously.