Is a female-only race of animal eared girls that age at 1/6th the rate of humans magical realm...

Is a female-only race of animal eared girls that age at 1/6th the rate of humans magical realm? Even if they only make up 1% of the population of my setting?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number
archive.is/20130128131847/http://sfaa.metapress.com/link.asp
stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuff_for_blog/estimatingdegree24_unblinded-1.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hair)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albinism)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Making them rare and special actually makes them more magical realm than making them common and ordinary. So yes, good job.

even just a female only race is magical realm, so yes.

>Is a female-only race
Yes.

Female-only races do always sound a bit questionable.

You already know the answer and the only reason you even ask is because you hope the tangential conversation that might sprout from this may give you something to jerk off to.

>Is a race of super-rare literal catgirls
need you even ask?

Final fantasy tactics did it, and it didn't bother me.

Although drop the 1% thing, just have them be one of the worlds races.

It's cringey bullshit, kys.

Veeky Forums this is obvious satire. Cmon, we know better than this.

thats like getting 3 baconators, a bucket if frings, and a diet coke

>female only

Yeah. A race with a odd gender ratio would be tolerable enough to fake the funk (albeit probably unstable in the long-term, hard science sense). At 4:1 female to male, we have enough women that wombs don't need to be hoarded. So female adventurers, women in traditional male jobs, etc are common. The men get to be virile patriarchs assembling harems, but they're rare enough to stay firmly in the background when your PC's eyes turn to lewd. It's win/win/win.

I disagree with people that say the all female part pushes it over the edge. An amazon-like race can be perfectly fine. Everything else about it is shit though

Who cares?

No, it's not and all the user's in this thread don't know what they're talking about.

I'm kidding, it's magical realm.

Yes. If you have to ask, then the answer is yes. The moment you make a race, and you think 'is this magical realm?' it's time to switch gears.

Stop trying to make it not-MR, but instead focus on making the setting and their backstory so interesting no one cares they are MR. A very good example of this in Yinglets: pretty fucking obviously MR, but the world they are part of got people so interested they don't care at all.

You tell us, OP. "Magical realm" isn't an inherent quality of a setting piece, it's decided by your motivations.

I don't know what a yinglet is, but that's obviously furry bullshit

Autists can't comprehend linguistic and social nuance. That's why 99% of Veeky Forums will always fall for bait.

Yes, but who cares. More important thing is that whether you can make your magical realm interesting, so far it doesn't sound good.

Something that could be sexy =/= magical realm

Come on Veeky Forums I know you're better than this

Not anymore. Those days are long dead.

>obviously furry bullshit
It is but, again people don't care. They came to shit all over it, but instead they got interested in the comic.

Again, don't bother saying it's not a fetish, it's not magical realm. It is.

Don't bother fixing it. Own up to it and sell it even harder. Do that, and no one will care you masturbate to it when no one is around.

Depends if they're all hot and slutty.

Actually there are examples in vertebrates, like the alligator, in which there are more females (tough interestingly enough the ratio depends on external factors)

>Is
yes.

Nah, that shit's been around for millennia. Sex with weird shit is an integral part of multiple mythologies. It's only magical realm if it's obnoxious to individual players subjective preferences. Ask your group.

An important caveat to this is that you should also not, like, masturbate to it while other people are around.

d20 your class, TG.

How do they reproduce without males?

Well then it's not the magical realm that's the problem, it's your dick hanging out so it should go without saying.

user...

Rolled 1 (1d20)

BLM get

I think vierra which are basically what the OP describes (only swap animal ears for rabbit ears) pop out of trees or some shit

Those comics felt like beating a dead horse when they were new

I love subverting things. Lately I've been pondering how to do a female only race right. So far I've been thinking some sort of native american goblin witch people who use magic to pull spirits into their wombs as a form of unholy reincarnation.

Do you have any other ideas?

Was this your best shot?

Magical Realm is based on intentions, not content. If OP is creating the race specifically to titillate himself during the game, then it's magical realm. Otherwise, it's not.

Rolled 14 (1d20)

Rolled 18 (1d20)

Hoping for some magic user, especially Red Mage or White Mage

Absolutely.

...

I agree with this more or less. I believe that anything added to the game that exists purely to satisfy a sexual itch can be considered magical realm. In response to OP's question, no, I don't think having a purely female race in the game is inherently magical realm. No, I don't think making that female-only race a special snowflake race makes it magical realm either. However, adding such a race into the setting might make some players uncomfortable and they might question your motives if you force it too hard onto them.

What will make it magical realm, however, is if you exploit their gender to create sexually uncomfortable situations for the players. For example, you could write-in that these girls walk around barefoot and it wouldn't be magical realm - it's just something they do. However, if you wrote-in that they walk around barefoot and highlight this feature, then some will start to wonder if you're a footfag. The same goes for their culture. If you make them very sexual beings as a result of their female-only society, then yeah, that could be considered magical realm. If you state the fact that they are always an active race always on the lookout for mates but keep it in the background, then it's just a quirk of their society and leave it at that.

tl;dr: You can make them exist, just don't push their existence.

>female-only
Not magical realm enough, honestly.

They’re female only but half of them have male genitalia.

There is no difference otherwise in physique, culture or behavior otherwise

Godtier game

Rolled 15 (1d20)

so elves

Well, basically this all boiled downs to> "I'm putting this in, but WHY?"
Does this race ads something to the game? What do they have to entice player experience?
Is the uniqueness of their culture and way of life something that enhances the plot? Maybe their strange practices are frowned upon by the nearest kingdoms, maybe they think their way is superior and want to affect the status quo putting others (or themselves) in danger.
Are their practices a way for players to re think how strange are social costumes and how different will they be with only an slight change in biology?
If your initial answer is, "but well, they are hot" then is magical realm all the way, if you are adding ANYTHING to your stetting you better make it worthy of exploring.
Otherwise just fap to porn and be done with it in private.

Is "Paladin with High Magic, Duel Wield, and Bonecrusher" an option? Because that's how I built my Luso.

More like a race where all members are visibly female to a human in all respects and it’s considered extremely rude to ask whether they have man or woman parts unless you know them very well.

More opportunity for comedy than anything

elves

In my spelljammer like space fantasy game, I added a race called Llu-Khans. They were all small, prepubescent monstergirls, and live in a disc that is an parody of korean styled mmorpgs. The mages school sell the junk items their students make (like bunnygirl outfits that are enchanted to protect against fire) while maintaning the entire border of the disc closed inn a cartel situation. Also the little animal girls tend to be very friendly and willing to go with other spcies. Every Lolu-Khan child is another Lolu-khan, but with stats and special abilities reflecting their 'father'. They dont need to actually reproduce, only be together with someone for a long while, wich means undeads, aberrations and constructs can make working offspring in them because magic.
The wizards are doing their best to maintain then a not space faring race, for they know the little pests would soon swarm the galaxy and try to assimilate every single living being into their cute little girl fold. The players were trying to break the wizard border due to a mix of freemarket ideals and waifuing.

Does adding what you said is magical realmy? Maybe. Do you care so much about it? Will the players start staring angrily at you for adding it? Mine were not angry, and one wants to play a Lolu-khan later (They still haven't got the spoiler). It is obviously magical realmy, but it all ends in what you and the players will like to do.

>but well, they are hot

Fuck's sake, that is not magical realm at all.

If you only putting them there because you consider them hot, it is.

Rolled 20 (1d20)

Come on best class...

Rolled 16 (1d20)

God damn it.

I said, come on, best class...

No it isn't you thrice-cursed faglord. The female gnomes in my setting are busty and and flirty and always wear tight leather bodices. But I've never gated a quest or area behind a standing blowjob from one. Learn the difference or fuck off.

Is there a reason you are so assblasted about this or are you just pretending to be retarded?
You are magical realming, just accept it and be done with it, you don't need to be ashamed but you do need to face reality.

Depends on if they're reptilian or not. If you got some gay ass mammal bitches with big mammal organs that do it like mammals do, then you might be magical realming it. If not, we can talk.

I just don't like when retards muddy clear concepts. A [thing] being attractive does not a magical realm make.

You're using an outdated definition of magical realm. Nowadays it's just used as "unnecessary fetish shit", and you'll really have trouble explaining how half a race of flirtatious shortstacks in tight leather does not fit that definition

Rolled 16 (1d20)

5 is acutally cute outfit

...Magical Realm means putting something in your game because is sexually enticing to you and no because of world building or plot use.

An NPC can be sexy, but it needs to be a character first (serving, again, world building or plot necessities) and a fap fetish second.

Now, stop being retarded.

Not a bad loadout. Bonecrusher is rather situational, but humes don't get the unbelievably OP Evade Magick so they have to make due. High Magick and Dual Wield is a great combo but usually I run them with Ninja as primary -- Paladin's took a huge nerf from FFTA, katanas are as good as knightswords for the most part (especially since element: holy + enhance: holy was removed, rip excalibur and savethequeen), and Ninja stats are way better than Paladin's, especially with regards to speed and magick.

You ass gobbler that is not what magical realm means. Magical realm is a GM forcing fetish shit on their players' characters. You would argue that a busty NPC is magical realm, even if she's just some one-off mention in a description of a city street.

>Red Mage or White Mage
>gets Scholar

best of both worlds

it's no parivir, but hunters are p good

No if you are mentioning that npc for ambient, a busty female would be something the bard or the fighter would take notice. An attractive female can signify a brothel, or a high class lady (if she has a healthy body, and money for fancy clothes) maybe the daughter of a noble or a rich merchant. Maybe they adventured so much they have forgotten the touch of a woman (but wait! she might be an assassin in disguise).
See, plot reasons.

>Gm is forcing his busty barwench fetish on players during a completely normal cityscape scene
Sounds magical realm to me

m8

Fine then, the walking paizuri station is cursed to present her udders to the adventurers and can only be free of this hellish hex by repeated and thorough groping. This curse was actually placed on her by the bbeg's jealous flatty lieutenant via a macgiffin that is coincidentally keeping the dorf forest barrier'd off from the other realms. Said cowtitted slut is also connected to a wealthy family and can make this problem quite worth the party's while.

attractive women isn't exactly a "fetish". okay, yeah, it technically is, but you're deliberately being obtuse.

You seem to be trying to frame this as "look I can add plot t the fetish, me clever boy".
You seem to forget that sexual curses have being an staple of ancient lore (I happen to be an ethnologist son, ancient cursed are so full of dicks you wouldn't believe it) and the way you present them can be quite the great world building.
Yet again, it would demand hard work, thinking and, of course, moral honesty ("this is actually better for the narrative, not just me exposing my players to my fap folder").
Why did he chose that curse? Was it ironic (a prudish lady being forced in a position of sluttines because she reject him?) or was it because this foe's magic is all body related? Is there a magic school that specializes in body parts? What other enchantments do they have?

Everything is an opportunity to enrich your world, do it right and it'll be marvelous. Do it wrong (like you seem to be doing, but who knows) and I just hope you don't masturbate under the table,.

Rolled 16 (1d20)

GO GO GO

If you have to ask, the answer is yes.

Don't let that stop you though.

You are seriously gonna stand there and tell me it could be hunky-dory-not-magical-realmy to have a an overtly slutty npc assault the party with her assets if I put an honest effort into fleshing out the reasons and plot implications? Jesus dick, man, I could slide anything from the puffiest, procreation-obsessed lolis to futas with horseballs into the game with logic like that.

Would you really give the whizzard a free pass if his watersports bonanza was second fiddle to his actually relatively deep, complex character?

yes it is.

but, to make it interesting, you could say that ANY race can give birth to this race. like, 2 orcs could give birth(low chance) to an animal eared girl.

Just do amazons. They fuck other races, but only produce amazons. It might be someone's fapping material, but it's not all that in your face about it, and doesn't really stray that far from traditional fantasy archetypes

Yes, as always the answer is DEPENDS ON THE SETTING, and in this case, how it's presented.

Here's the thing, you can do anything if it is appropriated for the table, the players are in for it and enhances the experience.

Sure, piss wizard sounds awful, but what about native american penis demon?Kokopelli is totally real lore, so is Fascinus on the Mediterranean side.

Sex is a real part of human culture, you can explore it and be mature about it.

You can even magical realm with you players if they're okay with it, just be honest and accept that's what your doing ("I'm including this because i find it hot, you guys enjoy it? Yes? Fine, let's keep going")

But now, you either put something in your game to use it and explore or you put it as fetish fodder. Ask yourself what reason you did it and be honest with the answer, the result might surprise you.

Hello operator I'm being trolled

You are right, no one can expect anyone on Veeky Forums to be mature about sex

Rolled 17 (1d20)

He's kind of right in that myths that often have at least some of the basis for fantasy RPG conventions don't really stray away from sex. It's a pretty major theme to ignore because it's icky or you're afraid you'll give someone a boner or whatever and you can pretty much declare anything a "magical realm" if all it takes is being a porn tag. I mean there's still a line that should clearly not be crossed, but there's a lot of things that are acceptable before it turns into a piss forest

>Is a female-only race of animal eared girls that age at 1/6th the rate of humans magical realm?
Yes.
> Even if they only make up 1% of the population of my setting?
Especially then, that just makes them snowflakes.

not him, but off the top of my head a logical explanation for a custom setting.
>Gnome females are typically larger than males and are thus more often the dominant ones.
>The cultural relevance of leather stems from old customs where a girl wouldn't be recognized as a woman until she had hunted big game on her own, thus wearing the results of the hunt showed everyone around her that she was self-sufficient and a real woman.

Leather is a strange choice of trophy. You'd think it would be a pelt or something a little more suited to showing off the kill

A bodice is a poor choice of fashion for anyone accustomed to to being physically active

...

she's already proven her worth, she needn't do so again, unless challenged.

that's just the everyday wear, she's got the head mounted to a wall back home. plus, pelt/fur could be too warm for year-round wear.

Rolled 16 (1d20)

Hmmm. Get.

>female-only

Yes. You know it is OP.

Matriarchal? Females being the caste of warriors/explorers/diplomats you meet/would play? Just being a female member of this race? Go nuts, no magical realm at all.

Having some convoluted societal quirk that doesn't seem like it would happen naturally doesn't really seem any better than an all female race. Just don't make them extremely rare and immortal catgirls for fucks sake

>>Even if they only make up 1% of the population of my setting?
>Especially then, that just makes them snowflakes.
I'm surprised there's a bunch of people here who think ~1% is special snowflake territory.

How rare a group needs to be in order to be snowflakes is obviously both subjective and context-dependant, but I think it's pretty safe to draw the line somewhere between "most people haven't directly seen one" and "people are surprised / unsure if they exist". That's at least 1 in 4000.

To put this one way, it seems that most people maintain relationships with several hundred other people:
148 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number
291 - archive.is/20130128131847/http://sfaa.metapress.com/link.asp
472 - stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuff_for_blog/estimatingdegree24_unblinded-1.pdf
So unless they're pretty isolated, most people are going to going to personally know someone from a 1% occurrence group. Someone who has never seen one would is likely to be VERY sheltered.

This checks out with actual groups:
Red hair has an occurrence rate of 1% to 2%, most people know at least one, and a red-haired character isn't snowflaky at all. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hair)
Similarly, roughly 1% of the world population is a native French speaker. Knowing French isn't considered unusual, and wouldn't raise suspicion at a table-top. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers)
By contrast, Albinism has an occurrence rate of 1 in 17000, Most of us probably don't know anyone with albinism, and it would definitely be a warning sign if someone made a character with it (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albinism)

Sauce.

I just wanna be a fly White Mage.

Rolled 18 (1d20)

The hell happened to my dice?

Alright, that's what I'm talking about.

Rolled 10 (1d20)

Come on Ronin or Paladin

Depends on how you use these characters. Are they all going to be beautiful creatures that men will do anything to bed? Seductive assassins cosplaying as geishas? All female 1% makes them very snowflake, but it's really how you use them.

Do you find dryads questionable too?

/thread

RAHL

How do vera reproduce? Do they have sex with rabbits?

I thought dryads mated with ents. Didn't Oglaf do a comic about that?

I don't know if I'm doing this right.