How do I keep furfags out of my games?

He's the GM, he can do what he wants. That isn't very restrictive, to be honest. There are still plenty of non-furfag races his players could choose.

What are the furfag races that you banned?

I can't tell if this is bait or if you're just dumb, but in case it's the latter: just having/playing animal races isn't furry, it's only furry if you want to fuck them.

Honestly, the fact that his players are complaining about furfags being banned without specifying what he's running makes it sound like he's just making shit up. If he wants actual advice he shouldn't make a ME UNGA THEM BUNGA post, but here we are.

What exactly do you count as "furfag races"? Can we get a list? Assuming you're talking some variety of D&D, the only one I could see labeling such off the top of my head is the recent Dragonborn, and even that's a scaly. I vaguely remember a more overt anthropomorphic animal race, but I can't recall its name off the top of my head, so it's likely fairly obscure.

>What do I do about lycanthropes
Werewolves are not furries. I don't know what definition you're using here. Werewolves tend to oscillate between "normal if somewhat hairy human", "literally a wolf" and "giant wolf-monster". None of those are really anthropomorphic animals, with the last one getting close but being too busy with the whole giant-murder-monster thing.

Do you have a problem with any race that has any tiny animal trait? If so, why?

Not that guy, but OP is a retard not for restricting races, but for his reasons behind doing so. If you don't think something fits your setting, it doesn't fit you setting, and that's fine. If you ban anything animal-related because you're worried about furries you're a moron.

Kobolds
Catfolk
Goblins
Kitsune
Dwarves
Dragonborn

his definition is "anything my paranoid subconscious can turn into a reason to be afraid"

Culturally significant animal races aren't furry. What are you afraid of, that your party might fuck a sahagin?

if you're that fucking concerned, just force asexuality on your players. PG-13 game.

You have some strange kinks. Goblin and dwarves? A PF player too.
>kitsune

Your game, your rules. Let them complain, and if they want something different, they can GM.

Also don't get paranoid about furfags.

You banned Dragonborn? Wtf
Dwarves and Goblins aren't even furries! Why not just say
"No fun allowed"

2/10 you're trying too hard.

Fuck off furfag

So they like, don't exist on the setting or you are just not letting the players pick them?

Agree with:
>Catfolk

I can kind of understand, but still disagree with:
>Kobolds, Dragonborn
They'd be scalies instead of furries, but generally have enough of their own shtick to be distinct from generic animal-people.

I just disagree with:
>Kitsunes
They have a fluffy tail. That's it. Having a single animal feature does not a furry make. You don't call demons furries for having animal horns sometimes.

What?
>Dwarves, Goblins
I have no clue how you got this.

Also, seconding . If you don't think they fit your world, fine. Say that. However, banning them based on some pathological fear of something maybe possibly being considered a furry is stupid.

>kobolds
do you call people gay for owning reptiles?

>dwarves
since when are rocks faggots

>goblins
it isn't gay if its an elf, or a goth elf, which is basically what goblins are

at least I can understand your fucked up logic when it comes to dragonborn and catfolk but Veeky Forums fucking loves dwarves and if your paranoia has caused you to ban them you are not welcome here

both

My game, my rules. I'm not going to cater to furfags. End of discussion.

You're a moron. Dragonborn make excellent tanks. Our group has had 2 Red DBs (not at the same time).
Are you going to ban Vryloka next?

They can still be druid and shape shift into a horse and give piecing damage?

>kobolds, goblins and dwarves don't exist on the setting
What kind of heresy-purged world are you running, geez

OP confirmed bait, no need to keep posting, folks.

"I'm banning vampers and vamper-related things because vampers are dumb" -this DM, probably

>you are not welcome here

Whoa, okay Veeky Forums police. Sorry I didn't put enough snaketits or dragon-fucking in my game to meet your approval.

what is with you and accusing everyone you don't like of being a furry

now explain to Veeky Forums which loves dwarves how dwarves are furry, other than in a literal sense due to their beards

>all these furfag apologists

Something you'd like to share Veeky Forums?

This has been stated. Literally no one is arguing that it isn't your game or that you should do stuff that you don't want to. See . As you say, it's your game and your rules. If that's the way you want your world, just say so. That said, your reasoning is still stupid. If you think one or more of your players are furfags, and you have this pathological fear of them, why haven't you just booted them from your game? If they're furfags, isn't providing them a game that they enjoy (even if they enjoy it less due to the lack of certain races) still catering to them? You wouldn't want to cater to furfags, would you, user?

Hi Mozu

>My game, my rules. I'm not going to cater to furfags. End of discussion.
>Dwarves
I cannot for the life of me decide if your mother hit you too much or too little

Stop posting in this bait thread you retards. Let it die.

No surprise, OP is a faggot. Someone wanting to play a kitsune doesn't mean that the guy is a furry. Banning a race because you are literally obsessed that someone might be a furry is the same thing as banning shotas because you are afraid to discover you are gay.

Just a thought
>Not everything is sexual.
>some people can have fun without sexualizing their own characters
>maybe the problem is OP is sexualizing his playerbase, and not that the actual players want to be a race other than human

bingo

I'm fixing them bro. I'm purging the fur out of their systems.

...

The problem is that this is all bait. OP's scenario isn't real. He's just trying to start a troll thread about nonhuman races in D&D.

>I'm fixing them bro
What if they go home from every session and masturbate, imagining all your NPCs are furries? Can you be sure they don't do that?

...

...

>furfag apologists cry bait to avoid the truth

nah they don't
and if they did, I'd know and kick their ass

In what possible world are goblins and dwarves furry?

>They have a fluffy tail. That's it.

Depends on the setting. Pic related, for example, is the Pathfinder version of them (although I'll grant they're shapeshifters there that can look like humans if they want). And of course the Magic: the Gathering kitsune are pretty different looking, too.

Which one is worst, barded, knot or twin?

Can you be 100% sure, though? If so, I'm pretty sure you should be using your omniscience for better things than policing furfags.

You could use it to win the lottery and hire a bunch of people to police furfags

Spiked Cat Dick

>Depends on setting
Huh, you're right. Description backs this up, where they have a normal human form, and an anthro fox form. So that would make them OP's worst nightmares, furries that walk among us. They could be anyone.

Geez OP, don't be so paranoid.

>that exists for smut purposes
big emphasis on that point.
You can have excellent games of Ironclaw, Usagi Yojimbo or Albedo, as long as no retard decides to be a creep and describes how he fucks the barmaid in explicit detail.

On the internet nobody knows you OwO

OP's actual worst nightmare is nobody replying to these threads.

got you to, it seems

>Huh, you're right

I try not to post "depends on the setting" unless it actually meaningfully adds information to the discussion; in this case, the user I was referring to was under the impression that kitsune are exclusively humans with furry fox tails.

The kitsune in Magic: the Gathering's Kamigawa, though, are actually incredibly inhuman in appearance. They don't even have mouths. They look like Protoss with big ears.

...

There's still one important question that hasn't been answered. How are dwarves furry-fetish material?

OP probably hates hair or hairy stuff because he has a receding hairline. Dwarves have a lot of hair and beards

3/10
Try harder next time user

I would only ban shotas so they don't get raped by enemy witches and amazons.

>he says sixty-two replies later

What about naked-mole-rat-people, then? Would that work?

Such furry, oh no

But why?

In a modern historical campaign I could understand, but in a high fantasy game with a multiverse why tho?

Long story short, you are free to do whatever you want op, but I suggest stop kinkshaming your players if you want to keep them.

Well, here's the first bunch of images that comes up from a Google image search of "furry dwarf".

Does user think that dwarves are rabbits?

I decided I don't mind if I reveal my power level a bit.

Do they live by equal measure innawoods and unnaground?

>Kobolds, Catfolk, Kitsune, Dragonborn
I can see this. Some iterations of kobolds are ratfolk, dogfolk, or dragonfolk

>Goblins and Dwarves
Pic related.

OwO

Oh my what salacious attatchment

Lol fag

the next logical step is banning humans, because A LOT of people sexually them

but to truly be safe from furries you have to not play TTRPGs, because people COULD play furries in them

just don't play games, because then, no one can imagine anything sexual

ban games, ban sex, only allow children to play, then ban them for being sexualized by kevin spacey

OP, I see you forgot to ban gnolls.

Rookie mistake.

Only allow human, dwarf, elf, hobbit, half-elf and half-orc

Possibly some more exotic races but nothing with tails, fur, scales or horns

I like my sex between humans and orcs, the way god intended, not between humans and demons, that's just gross

I'm going to preface this by saying that I've never found dwarves attractive. Having said that, is it weird if I prefer female dwarves as having beards? Not necessarily to the same degree a men-dwarves, but at the very least mutton chops and maybe a bit of a goatee. And of course to go along with this, hair all over their bodies, although again somewhat sparser than on the men.

I like reminders that the non-human races are, in fact, non-human.

relax, this dwarf is only -wearing- fur, like a coat, like a well-rounded, law-abiding American

Living in a sexually repressed country like america must be suffering.
>can't show boobs or dicks on TV
>games with nudity are +18 and have porn scenes patched out of the game
>meanwhile TV shows and games where the head gets blown out are 14+

>allow crappy races like elves, orks, and their mutt kids
>not allowing horns

Lol fag

>I like reminders that the non-human races are, in fact, non-human.
Same. Non-duergar dwarfs are so human-like in Discworld genetics and height have nothing to do with being a dwarf.

Marriage as god intended is between a man and a woman not a man and an elf!

Every damn day.

Is this bait? Kitsune are obviously monster girls.

>posts weebshit
>hates furries
I mean, I know that’s the whole bait angle OP is going for, but it still bares mentioning how hilariously common this combination is. Why are weebs so fucking insecure about how much the world hates them that they have to try and lash out at another shitty internet subculture just to feel validated? When can we start persecuting weebs with the same level of intensity
>inb4 Mesopotamian divining forum

Monster Girl faggots are the worse, I wish nothing but pain and suffering on you.

Goblins
Kitsune
Dwarves
>Furry races

/pol/ DMs are like FURRIES BAD, MONSTERGIRLS GOOD

FURRIES ARE BAD 'CAUSE SOMEONE MIGHT FAP TO THEM

MONSTERGIRLS WHICH EXIST ONLY TO BE DATED BY SOME BORING CIS HET WHITE GUY ARE FINE

>weebs
You know where you are, right?

Ryona fetish is the worst. I am ashamed that it sometime turn me on.

I approve of your bookmarks. Excellent taste.

What the meaning of this, ?

Monster girls is probably the worst thing that ever spawned in the internet. Not only it ruined a lot of stuff because it gets associated with Monster Girls, like kitsunes and centaurs but it also is disgusting.

You are a degenerated for liking it and the only way to redeem yourself is by ending your life.

>ryona
I'd much rather you stare despondently at your shameboner than ban violence in D&D because someone somewhere faps to ryona, which is basically the philosophy of the OP.

>so sayeth man posting futanari

I can smell the tumblr furry. Kill yourself.

I removed one bookmark before posting that. I did say revealing my power level *a bit*. I'm still holding back my final form, although there is a hint of it in the YouTube tab.

What is a ryona?

When you realize that humans can ruin everything, and humans sexualize everything, you're going to ban the entire universe and all of reality from your games.