>an orphan girl has been placed into the care of your party
An orphan girl has been placed into the care of your party
Other urls found in this thread:
Time to drop her off at the orphanage again
Where can I find a thousand more pictures of monster girl mind flayers? For my campaign setting or whatever.
>tfw
Where did we pick this girl up? In a Eldritch Temple?
Wouldn't a mindflayer that took a female host be similar to a male host due to the loss of unnecessary fat/muscle?
Raise her into a healslut.
I teach her martial art skill.
Kek'd
>be dark elf edgelord riding demonic horse
>see cute loli
>leave it at the next village and move on
>see cute loli
>take it with you and pamper in secret
>deny it when confronted
Someone to clean up my armor and polish my swords and spear.
if my elf took her he'd teach her to be his personal assassin and do his shit for when he got too old to go on about by himself
is that part of
>pamper in secret?
no
Yeah but japan
This happened to me once. It was jet black with red eyes, the rest of the party was all "aww cute baby". I wanted to kill it. They tried to protect It, my gf's PC held It to try and keep It safe, I hit It with a target seeking light beam or some similar power that I don't remember the name of. Killed that baby dead.
By dark elf standards, yes
then dont do that
>that guy
Ya did good. Those pussies clearly didn't understand that you have to smite all the evil.
Good thing the paladin is already running an orphanage full of weird monster kids. We'll just use a couple divination spells and see if she can get along mostly normally, or if she needs to be kept to her own wing of the building like the succubus kids to prevent any incidents with others.
>Monster loli ends up adopted by the semi-godling of orphans, the All-father (Literal translation of characters title)
Time to add another room to the pocket-dimension orphanage.
You sure you didn't get Vulkan?
Give her a poison-tipped needle and have her assassinate the villain.
Daily reminder that anyone who uses the term "loli" is a pedophile.
Careful with that, she might become your next villain before you know it.
Even if they use it referring to themselves?
Did you at least detect evil on it first?
Maybe, but I'll just go insane and walk off into the desert before that happens.
You might be saying that now, but I'll wager a glass of water you're coming back.
And we place it in the care of another party.
Even in the context of being the author writing
>light of my life, fire of my loins
Man, I never knew Vladimir Nabokov was a fiddler
>A glass of water
Look at this baller motherfucker right here. I bet you take baths too don't you?
So was Lewis Carroll.
We're a decent group of people but we don't think we're well-equipped to take care of a child so we seek to find someone else to take care of her.
Trust me, none of us are posting on Veeky Forums
Not proven actually, the only thing that is for sure is he REALLY liked little girls, at least taking pictures of them, but theres no evidence that he laid down with little girls.
Then they're underage and shouldn't be here.
I run away as fast as I can while cursing the GM.
He took pictures of naked little girls, he had several little girl friends that he exchanged letters with (the equivalent of internet grooming), he even said that he loved naked little girls and disliked naked little boys, maybe he didn't diddle any but he certainly was a pedo.
Too late, I've already taught her a balisong trick and determined that she is too cool to grow up a tavern wench or nun. Nobody we find will ever be good enough for her.
>An orphan
Come child, let us teach you the ways of the Social and Physical Infiltrator.
>that orphan
Asense it and try to figure out what the fuck it is. If we can weaponize it we do so and welcome it to the team. If we can't give it to our fixer as a midsummer eve present or something.
I don't think it would end well since my party wanted to commit Genocide on a friendly village because they happened to look like skeletons. My Barbarian would try to take care of the child but I think my party would probably want to ditch it.
>Had a pic with a little girl on a warriors/barbarians shoulder and for the life of me can't find it, so just imagine.
Generally though my big brother instincts set in in these situations unless I'm deliberately playing evil or edgy (which happened like once or twice ony).
A young one eh, well I suppose we can get her to the next town; but we can't afford to waste time. We have apocalypses to stop after all. Here is a sword, use it to defend yourself young one.
Unless it's a mindflayer or other inherently evil race's orphan, in which case that's a slay on sight.
get my new daughter some clothes those aren't practical.
Child nudes were pretty mainstream at the time. He had multiple affairs with adult women (he was boinking Alice Liddell's governess) which were covered up by his family.
>knights in Pendragon
How the fuck did that happen? Is she a peasant or a noble?
That's the definition of pedo. Tough I dare to say he didn't do anything, too much of an autist.
I do buy the theory that he proposed to marry Alice and then the Liddels cut the relationship off, tough.
I'm not sure there's a functional set of parents between the whole party. She'll fit right in.
I'm going to post what I think that image is, and I guarantee you people will start saying strange shit.
Here you go.
Damn, that's good. It's what I'd do.
SIT THE FUCK DOWN, GIRL. I'M GOING TO TEACH YOU HOW TO CLEAN A FISH.
>own wing of the building like the succubus kids to prevent any incidents with others
By putting them together where they can conspire and plan raids on the boys dorms?
Hey, I remember that blacksmith. He sure did like fucking his little girl in front of everyone. Kind of a weirdo, desu.
>Murcielago
That's not wholesome.
That's not wholesome at all.
Is that fucking Sagat?
Two of our party are human x old one hybrid love children so not only does her apperance not bother us, but questions about her parentage will still be asked.
As a team we can't legally take on a child and individually only the water elementalist could but don't knkw if she would.
Likely we would visit the cult that raised our aforementioned old one babies, both being legally qualified and having prior experiance on the subject.
Of if she doesn't require any specialist care, then we'll find someone local to look after her.
>implying
It's wholesome as hell. Just ignore the ulterior motives.
I don't trust my party with orphans and neither should you
Last time the party adopted an orphan, she turned out to be the most ruthless, vicious person in the party by a fair margin. Half the challenge with her was explaining the concepts of "not being a stealing murderhobo and how to function in normal society AND PUT THE GODDAMN KNIFE DOWN RIGHT NOW MISSY"
You're a good parent, user. She's gonna grow up and stab someone from in the chest one day.
Being mainstream doesn't mean its morally acceptable.
Fucking adult women and little girls isn't mutually exclusive.
Pedos deserve the noose.
Why would someone give an orphan to the anthema?
>Being mainstream doesn't mean its morally acceptable.
Yes it does. Sorry moral objectivity fag, there are plenty of things you disagree with that were moral back in the day, and there will be plenty of things you disagree with that will be moral in the future.
Guess lynching niggers and gassing Jews were morally acceptable if you did em in the right time and place too huh?
We already have one and this one looks suspicious, but we take it nevertheless. It probably try to turn against the party only to be killed by the party's Rouge before they can do so.
>stab someone from in the chest
This is why you don't adopt facehuggers
Yes
What part of this don't you understand
Yeah yeah user, all those people who don't like you for generally being an asshole are just tied down by the spooks of morality. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Kek
>Baaaa!
Those are some cute strawmen there, kid. Most people didn't support "lynching niggers", and most of the world didn't support gassing Jews, considering, you know, the nazis got cucked to death. Nice try though.
It’s the problem with subjective morality. Once you use it, morality loses its meaning. Serial Killers could theoretically get together and say it’s our culture to indiscriminately murder and no-ones allowed to complain. You’re better off being a nihilist at that point since the nihilists say we just need standards besides morality for society.
No. I’ve see lunching postcards in my history class. They were widely supported.
If that’s not enough for you consider slavery, practices by centuries by every culture across the globe. It was once seen as completely morally permissible to own a human being. They were still wrong.
Another one for the traveling brothel.
Ah so it's numbers then? So what's the percentage of people who have to feel okay about indiscriminate murder for it to be okay. Because that is the immediate logical conclusion of you're thinking, if the numbers are there it's perfectly permissable
>in my history class
lol
>It was once seen as completely morally permissible to own a human being. They were still wrong
lmao
She becomes scum like the rest of us.
If it's this one... hello EVO acquisitions department, we have something you might be interested in. Yes, we have also made offers to RenRoku and SK, but they were not interested.
Nice ad populum loser
Cool, my very own henchman. How much of my stuff can she carry? She looks magic, is she magic?
Yes, they very well can. The rest of society can also decide to hunt them down and put them in cells for the rest of their lives.
>and no-ones allowed to complain.
This is where you go full retard. What they'd need to do is suitably CONVINCE everyone that it's their culture to indiscriminately murder and if they'd done it well, people would believe they weren't allowed to meddle or complain. This HAS been known to work for really small groups of people.
It's called War and humanity has gotten very very good at it.
yes
I'm dating a woman of jewish heritage and am a positive force in the life of most of the people I regularly come in contact with, due to a combination of my personal moral imperatives to do so and general charisma and competence. Knowing that morality is a societal construct doesn't mean I don't believe in right and wrong, you fucking dumbass, just like me knowing that the universe will eventually die to heat death doesn't stop me from placing value in things within it.
Morality being subjective doesn't mean you shouldn't try to stop things that you think are immoral, just like artistic taste being subjective doesn't mean you can't criticize art. It's just means you have to recognize your cave shadows for what they are and realize that someone may not be evil just because they have different moral standards from yourself.
My party has a caravan of like 12 orphaned monstergirls trailing after them.
You have a completely different definition of morality compared to what real people call morality.
You confuse "is this right or wrong" with "do people think this is right or wrong"
You're arguing with completely different definitions.
It may not stop you from believing in it but it stops it from actually existing, unless you happen to have a way around that is ought gap you want to share
>Morality being subjective doesn't mean you shouldn't try to stop things that you think are immoral, just like artistic taste being subjective doesn't mean you can't criticize art. It's just means you have to recognize your cave shadows for what they are and realize that someone may not be evil just because they have different moral standards from yourself.
Fucking this. The way some go on about objective morality, you'd think they were all blood-thirsty psychopaths only held back by some invisible leash held by some higher being or invisible sky daddy. The fuck has to be wrong with someone to think like that?
Drop her off at the nearest temple. No longer our problem.
I love you Veeky Forums.
Like I said, by that point you are better off being a nihilist than a subjectivist. Because then we can have a discussion like ‘it’s wrong to be a serial killer, since everyone else will hunt you down’ while a subjectivist has to say ‘no, it’s okay for their culture’.
For me being an objectivist just means you have to be super specific with context. So for instance telling women to wear hijabs and stuff? That’s more of a ‘who cares’ kind of thing. But there’s other stuff that we can super condemn, like honor killings. Some subjectivists (like the ones here) use subjective morality as a means simply to shut down the discussion period.
hey user. you uh...you uh still fucking your daughter?
>Did people think this was right or wrong
>Do people think this is right or wrong
>Will people think this is right or wrong
Who the fuck else is gonna decide 'is this right or wrong' if not people? Whether back then, now or in the future, it's just people.
Oh, I’m Athiest. I think it’s just relatively easy for us to figure out logically and objectively what is okay and what’s not. Lying to hurt someone? Always wrong. Lying for someone’s surprise party? Okay. Like I said, you just have to be hyper specific about it.
>stops it from actually existing
Define existing, though.
Fighter:
>Listen, I don't give a fuck whether or not that's a kid or not, fucker has tentacles
>I may be chaotic good, but that does not mean "bring obvious threat into camp" in the middle of the fucking night, that means I sometimes ignore the law to do what's right
>Do you know what's fucking right, right now? Not bringing that shit into camp. Fuck it, let it die of exposure out here. I've got swords to sharpen and and a battle plan to run over.
Rest of Party:
>Aww, look at the little tentacles!
Logic.