In what kind of society would power be given to the youngest instead of the oldest?

In what kind of society would power be given to the youngest instead of the oldest?

Aw hell I got excited for a second but I think oglaf does everything under the sun except loli

Also, check your history books. There's quite a few of them.

Mongols did this to ensure the parents and other family members were looked after.

Democracy where the majority of the population are young people

One in which mental faculties of their race begin unusually strong but rapidly deteriorates.

Olympian society.

Let's be honest here. Young people are shitheads. I'm expecting full on feudalism; with wars popping up everywhere.

A society that is undergoing a radical counterculture/revolution against old conservatives.

>I'm expecting full on feudalism
Yet in the aftermath of Brexit we see mostly young people complaining about how old folks "screwed them over". Young people are easily tricked by socialism, which is the ideology of an ever expanding state to the brink of totalitarianism. Let's also not forget that in Russia socialism was spearheaded by students.

The quality of the young is always the same as the quality of the old plus the material conditions of their societies.

Children maintain a connection to the spirit realm benefiting from pre natural wisdom and lose it as they age

>Young people are easily tricked by socialism, which is the ideology of an ever expanding state to the brink of totalitarianism.
What it has to do with brexit?

That makes her great in my book.
A gift from sexy heaven she is.

Aswell as the values placed upon them my media.

Well, Arabic culture eventually went from voting for a new caliph the same way turkish tribe voted for tribal leaders to a system of inheritance wherein the youngest surviving member of the family earned everything.

I guess the desire to give away more and more power to a large bureaucratic body at the expense of personal liberty because that'll solve all problems. A lot of youngsters like the EU because the ideal of all people in Europe coming together and dividing their wealth and unity in diversity and all that other progressive claptrap.

Some kind of supernatural corruption sets in as one gets old. Not enough to break society, but enough to compromise decision making.

This.
Many people geniuses by 8, everyone crippling Alzheimer’s at 18

>Intelligent enough to realize that they'll spend most of their lives hopelessly demented
Why isn't mass suicide more common among children then?

The kind that falls apart in less than 100 years as educated adults conspire against their helpless juvenile siblings, resources are spread thin as every successive child has to be educated to the same standard, and noble houses are constantly thrown into disarray as their elderly patron has his 11th child at the age of 80.

Nehekhara gave the firstborn to the gods, so secondborn inherited.

Oglaf would make it funny, and the best lewd is the kind that makes your dick laugh. See: grandma's kitten.

>I think oglaf does everything under the sun except loli
Good.

I think that's covered by the quality of the old

A fucking stupid society

>EU blocked UK state surveillance programs
>UK introduced bans on real knives
Sure, the EU is to blame for your nanny state.

A society where everyone ages backwards, like Resurreccion from Vampire Knight Requiem.

You have to go back

Well, on Naboo they elect 14 year old girls Queen by tradition. Although how that isn’t a terrible idea I don’t know.

A society that is ruled by warriors. Like how ancient city states required their King to run a gauntlet like marathon on a regular basis to prove he still has what it takes to be an able warrior.

As such, without all of the advantages of RL modern day medicine, the young and very healthy possess the vast majority of power. As well as the fact that once you hit thirty or so you lose your edge and are quickly killed off by younger men and women in either outright warfare or ritualized combat to see who inherits the throne.

Requiem vampire knight seems like the obvious answer.

A lot of Grimm’s fairy tales had the youngest prince end up with the happy ending, and the princess’s hand. Maybe some group that took those values to heart, but blew it way outta proportion?

...

A society of robots, where all citizens come off the assembly line with all the knowledge they need to do their jobs, and robot design keeps improving so newer is generally better.

An ultimogeniture of course!

What seems odd to me is that why not just have nonlethal combat as a competition for the position? Actually killing people seems unnecessary.

A society of Benjamin Buttons

1000 year old Vampire Loli who can't get laid because of her looks seems like it would be right up the comic's ally.

Sparta did this and Agesilaus II still managed to be king into his late 60's.

Oglaf artist is Australian, she'd be lynched in public for loli.

Not so sure about crippling alzheimer's, but still- some kind of mental defect where your willpower or consciousness- or even your status as a sophont just degrades, where you lose self-awareness.

Probably because they're a different race with a different culture. The 'mindless' are your slaves and servants, while it's everyone's duty to eventually become a mindless. This society has no need for hunting, gathering, or farming- the mindless does it all, while it's up to you and the fellow 'wise' to teach your young, keep the country going, and so on. Then during the twilight of your life, when you start to approach 17, you make preparations for becoming mindless and live out the last few sentient days as a hedonist. Then you become another mindless.

Thing is, if this is a racial thing, a biological thing, then it's not 'spending most of their lives hopelessly demented'. It's been normalized enough that it's more like having an 18-year-long life and your body's still useful after you go.

HAHAHAHAHAAA....I remind you Britain, not the EU, banned fucking female ejaculation from porn.

WE

country is ruled from it's capitol, and capitol of Britain is Pakistan 2.0

More power would be unearned, and those in power would have spent no time working for others, so they would be less empathetic to those working for them. Meritocracy would be impossible because there would be less time (or none at all) to sort out who's competent, so the most important jobs would be determined through nepotism.

>seems unnecessary
Seems downright wasteful is what it seems. Killing your foremost military advisers, with plenty of experience in combat, tactics, strategy, and statesmanship during war just to prove you're a gud fighter is a great way to destroy all advancement.

Well it also prevents them from rivaling you again, and by making fights to the death, it meant they shouldn't be taken lightly. Plus, who wants to let the guy you just overthrew to control anything in the state? They are liable to betray you in order to retake the throne, and then all your hard work would be for naught, and if you won you might have to execute more supporters lest they rise up again. Easier just to settle it once and for all.

The nation's blacksmiths would make a killing off forging chastity belts.

A very short-lived one.

Indian kingdoms of the Dharmic faiths where you con't have high enough crown authority to institute primogeniture so you install ultimogeniture because otherwise you're stuck with gavelkind and that shit sucks.

Mongols and Ottomans and other eurasian steppe people also kind of had sons and fathers fighting and murdering each other in power struggles nonstop.

Just like japanese, europeans and pretty much every single civilization in the world, user.

Because it was thought up by a little girl who wandered into the session early on and broke the DM's carefully planned setting like a brick through wet tissue paper.

Those considered it a great sin and a crime comparable to trying to ventilate a king while steppe cultures considered it business as usual.

Yet it kept happening all the same.
Some cultures simply were more honest about it.