Is the player who loses a game intentionally a better player than one who loses unintentionally?

Is the player who loses a game intentionally a better player than one who loses unintentionally?

Is that supposed to be Samus and Little Mac?

That's actually a very good question

Are they a more skilled player? Yes, absoulutely.

Are they a better player? That depends a lot on what you personally consider to be the key tenets of sportsmanship.
Is playing softball going easy on your opponent a kind gesture, or severe disrespect?

depends on whether they end up in the same place as in the OP picture

Depends on the goal. If you're attempting to show off how things work, it's reasonable to play it out to show off mechanics.

So the correct answer to OP's question is, "it depends on the circumstances."

Why do people always ask vague shit like this as though there aren't just going to be a thousand people with their own idea?

Like, who the fuck knows which player is better, is the player losing intentionally to goad his opponent into a false sense of security? Clearly he's better.

Is he losing intentionally because hes mad that he couldn't play the game he wanted? No, he's probably worse than the player who plays a game he doesn't want to play and loses unintentionally, because at least he was trying, maybe not his best but if it wasn't his intention to lose at least he was making some kind of effort.

I could make up reasons that go in the favor of either player all day, which in my opinion renders the question moot.

Unless you're just trying to start a bunch of people talking about one thing, and in that case, who the fuck wants to spend 250 posts talking about such a vague topic

The real question is does the blonde have a penis

Fuck off faggot

In OP's picture, it is highly possible that loosing would be more fun than winning.

There is nothing wrong with this, Pin me down harder mommy

No, he does not.

>Is the player who loses a game intentionally a better player than one who loses unintentionally?
Neither of those situations tells us which player is better. It is possible for a better player to lose intentionally, or lose unintentionally, or for a worse player to lose intentionally or unintentionally.

"Being a better player" doesn't fall on this axis - it's tangential.

Trying and failing is always superior sportsmanship to throwing a game.

Of course. control is always a mark of competence

It serves as a springboard for people more interesting than OP to start a discussion, leading to fun times.

...

>Have to intentional play gimps not to alienate other players
>End up overstacking bonuses anyway

the head is ridiculously large in that picture.

Just make your PC the wise mentor that has to keep/train a group of new adventurers

What about player that loses The Game

...

Is she being "ironic?"

And I'm sure your fetishes are sooo much less "degenerate." /s

...

It serves as an excuse for OP to post his fetish art, hoping others will do the same.

Like with furries, the worst kind of degenerate autist isn't the one with the weirdest fetish (femdom is vanilla as fuck after all). The worst kind is the guy who just HAS to sperg about it in completely unrelated spaces, because it titillates his exhibitionist streak or something.

Close your browser and fap before you open up Veeky Forums again, OP.

OP was clearly alluding to Plato's Hippias Minor.

You're all fools for not immediately detecting this.

Yeah. It's actually a pretty common ship for fans of Smash, apparently. The gag being Samus teases Mac over his shortness, a thing he's insecure about.

I thought it was because Nintendo released something that had her teasing him a bit because of his height

Who is the worse shitposter?

One who shitposts voluntarily, trolling for replies, or one who shitposts ironically?

Aren't they the same?

worse than that, she's being tsundere

The ironic shitposter is not aware that he is cancer. There lies the problem.

One shits in the middle of the room because he wants you to get angry and clean it up, the other does it to mock the previous guy.

>Little Mac
>""""""""LITTLE"""""""" MAC
Wanna bet he'll OH-KO Samus while inserting?

In fact, I'm fairly sure that Samus would faint when Little Mac would insert his Glass Joe.
His speed and endurance means he'd probably Piston her Honda for hours, his Great Tiger going in and out at outrageous rate, hammering her with his Bald Bull while grabbing her King Hippo, while she moans for him to plunge his Great Tiger deeper into her.

>She calls him Big Mac
>Nobody else knows why

No. I've seen this artist before, it's random girl and random guy.

What if I just want a girl to sit on my face and jack me off while I suck on her tits?

If she can put her tits under her ass for you to suck while she sits on your face, then I guess you found the randiest grandma of them all.

Someone needs to draw this.

Obviously I was saying that those are things that I want to happen at different times not simultaneously.

Dr. Kochin plz go and stay go.

You may need to take an English class then, user.

Femdom doesn't have to involve a girl beating the shit out of me or spitting in my mouth, I'd be happy with being tied up and suffocated by her ass

>What if I just want a girl to sit on my face, and to jack me off while I suck on her tits?
Is that better?

Amen, I personally hate all the stuff femdom usually comes packaged with, like ridicule,neotare,foot fetishism or violence.
The way I see it the appeal of femdom for me is a chick being the chaser, being the sexually aggressive one because I appreciate seeing a woman showing that kind of enthusiasm for sex, having her hate the guy or threaten to cheat on him undermines that.
In real life if a girl wanted to fuck you so bad that she was willing to wrap her legs around your head and shove your head into her crotch you would know she's a keeper.

Not necessarily. I don't have to know how to play skillfully to lose a game of chess. Losing intentionally does not mean the same as losing with the appearance of wanting to win.

That's a category error.
You cannot compare the two because one is not competing and therefore not racing. The one running slowly on purpose could have an objective speed slower than the slowest runner, but we wouldn't know because they refuse to race.

Ergo, the only man running is the best and worst runner.

No, the "and/while" still implies that the two actions are occurring simultaneously.

Saying "What if I just want a girl to sit on my face, *or* to jack me off while I suck on her tits?" separates the two actions.

fuck you too

He's actually correct in There are two separate clauses: First he wants someone to sit on his face. He also wants her to jack him off while he sucks on her tits.

That doesn't imply all three at once, just the last two simultaneously.

You. I remember you, you piece of shit. I'll find you, one of these days. I'll find you.

>Your face is flushed from the exertion, your arms shaking as you strain with all your might, yet despite your best efforts you're unable to stop her as she slowly forces you down inch by inch
>As you slowly sink inch by inch you're reminded just how big everything is about her
>Not just her height or the size of her muscles, but her powerful thighs, thick hips, and impressive breasts, the latter of which is currently pressing into you as she slowly leans forward, putting more and more of her weight on you, leaving you struggling just to slow her down
>You're down on your knees, near face to face with her glistening, sweat soaked abs when you finally manage to halt her advance, but as you glance up past her chest, some part of you notes how she barely seems winded and you're fighting just to hold your ground
>It seems she's been waiting for this and your only warning is an eager, vicious grin, before she hauls her bust up and plants it right on your face, the soft, heavy flesh leaving you struggling just to breath as it suddenly engulfs your world
>You fight against it, but between her strength and your exhausted state you're unable to lift her breasts and without air, your consciousness quickly begins to fade
>To make matters worse, your arms finally give out, leaving her free to pull you into a big bear hug, pinning you against her, forcing your face deep between her smothering cleavage, and squeezing the last bit of oxygen out of your lungs, leaving the scent of her body the last thing you know before you pass out
>When you come to the crowd is cheering and she's holding up the trophy with one hand, and you're limp, defeated body is thrown over her other shoulder
>When she realizes you're awake she enjoys one last cheer from the crowd before heading back to her room, whispering to you how she's going to enjoy both her prizes on the way there and punctuating it with a quick smack on your ass she warns you she's a lot rougher out of the ring than in

Hope you enjoy user, thought of it last night but only just now had a chance to write it

Yeah, I like femdom to be a bit rough but I don't like how half the time it's about the woman hating the man, is a rough, dominant, sexually aggressive, but not hateful girl too much to ask for in porn?

Depends on too many factors to be possible to answer with a single solution correct for all possible situations.

#
I'd say it would really come down to why the one who intentionally lost lost the game, don't really see why there needs to be more questions than that

In Mac's reveal trailer Samus measures his height, and then he punches her in the kidney.

It also helps that most western players think of Samus as a 6'8 musclebound amazon thanks to that one Nintendo Power magazine that gave her stats back in the day. Zero Suit has retconned her to a muscle-free 5'6 waif, but that hasn't proven as popular in the west as it has in east.

Pretty sure other m was the retcon and her cannon height is 6'3"

She's definitely not 6'3 in Smash, comparing her to other human/oid characters.

gelbooru
nursing_handjob
no need to thank me

Honestly, 2D does the entire range of femdom much better than (Western) 3D. From humiliation to bullying to husband(female), it has the works.

>that one Nintendo Power magazine that gave her stats
The nintendo power stats were literally just the stats from the Metroid II booklet. However the Metroid II booklet was talking about the height and weight of her -in the power suit-.

The zero suit didn't retcon anything. You can even see the difference in super's endings. Nintendo power was just latched onto by fetishists. (which is why you hardly hear anything about Captain N's samus, despite it being from around the same time and about as accurate)

>However the Metroid II booklet was talking about the height and weight of her -in the power suit-.
Even assuming the thick is universally 2.5cm thick (which would be incredibly fucking thick), that would still make her 1.85m. Even for a man that's pretty tall, for a woman that's still gargantuan.

I thought it was just because nobody read the Captain N comics.

Ah, I see we've found an Other M apologist.

So any use of the word "While" demands that every event described in the sentence happen simultaneously?
So in the sentence "The earth cooled, and then billions of years later the dinosaurs ruled the planet while at the same time the first mammals were evolving." According to you this means the sentence is saying that the dinosaurs and first mammals existed at the same time that the earth was cooling?
exactly

The space boots are probably more than 2.5cm, but 6' is hardly gargantuan.

That too. They were terrible. But so were the nintendo power comics.

curse you, smug lolidom is my only weakness

Wait the new chapter's translated? Where is it at?

>Honestly, 2D does the entire range of femdom much better than (Western) 3D. From humiliation to bullying to husband(female), it has the works.
Yeah, I've pretty much given up on any sort of 3D femdom stuff, plus 2D has potential to include my more out there kinks

Where could it possibly be?

dam it

>"it depends on the circumstances."

...

I doubt that. 90kg in the suit would be utterly fucking insane, there's no way that thing is that light.

Nope. It's a proper manga now, so it's not on the panda.

It's strange, recently a lot of H-manga have gotten mainstream, SFW adaptations. It does make me happy to see that even perverted basement dwellers can make it big in the manga business though.

well, that's the norm for Japanese artists.

The real oddity is a publisher actually picking up the work as sfw. I assume that this can only be done if the works are self published and not on any magazines.

Someone who dies because the encounter and conditions did not go their way is not a worse player than someone who suicides their shitty character

You wanna fuck a pretzel?

>Honestly, 2D does the entire range of femdom much better than (Western) 3D. From humiliation to bullying to husband(female), it has the works.
There's a lot of physical limitation for actual BDSM works in general in real life. Suspension for example is just fucking horrible for the body and should and cannot be maintained for prolonged time.

The body also can't handle surprise buttsex kind of stuff at all. it takes a lot of effort and time for anything to get done.

>The body also can't handle surprise buttsex kind of stuff at all.
What about surprise headpats?

There was no surprise there and you fucking know it

>There was no surprise there
You like the element of surprise, huh? Catching a woman off-guard and weakening her defenses before she has time to resist?

eh. depends on how healthy you are.

it doesn't make a big difference. Hard bondage still is taxing to the body since it's body's mass being manipulated by comparably small points. It's a lot of pressure and human body doesn't handle concentrated pressure well for a long time.

I think the better roleplayer, and by extension a more fun player to play with, would not always take the most optimal course of action to reach their goals. Intentionally losing makes them better? No, never. Intentionally prolonging the fight? Perhaps, to what extent and what could be gained from it.

okay, i gotta admit thats kinda hot.

That's a pretty even-tempered analysis, Satan.

wat dis?

>I doubt that
of all the things the chozo have done, making superlight alloys is the one you don't believe?

The original Nagatoro wasn't exactly hentai either - I mean there was no nudity or sex or anything.

Your a punk. You took a hardcore feminist rolemodel who was stacked and turned her into a fucking bimbo.

A heartwrenching tale of a woman held hostage by a man's patience.

Samus weights like 50 kilos, 60 tops, she has hollow bones.

the amount of projection, i swear.
men are the fucking poonhounds, you eunich.

>90kg
is that thing made of bread

yeah, and her belly is filled with butterflies and her intestines with rainbows. We get it. Your embarressed your culture fetishized strong, independant american women in the 80's and now your trying to backpedal cause you realize how fucking rare they are. Just get on with conforming to your cultural norms and leave our perfect warrior woman amazon alone, capiche'?

yeah, anal is fucking exhausting and takes a good 15-20 minutes of prep.

I assure you the thing her belly is filled with in our fetishizing portrayals isn't butterflies.

>a hardcore feminist rolemodel
nigga you're retarded