If player sends you this as potential character portrait, it's slightly suspect...

If player sends you this as potential character portrait, it's slightly suspect, but he might still be a good roleplayer, so let him play.

If player sends you something like this as potential character portrait, no matter how he insists, don't let him play.

Know the difference. Don't let kemonomimi fags play in your games.

No, because I explicitly gave a list of playable races in this campaign, and Dragonborn, Kobolds, and furfag races in general wern't on that list, which means the player is too retarded to even take the basic steps necessary for entry into the campaign. The chances of them being a good roleplayer is near zero, and even if true, doesn't balance out their sheer lack of mental functionality.

>doesn't have kobolds in his setting

Are you some kind of faggot?

Ban this shithead

If you mean instantly ban him, then sure.

Warning: Cancer: The Post

Seriously, if you don't want to cringe and rage, don't fucking look under the spoiler.

I might, but I'd also remind him draconic races in my setting are Japanese inspired, and Kobolds are basically Jomon and Yayoi era Japanese that got a hold of Meiji era tech. So fur bikinis are kind of a no go.

Dragons themselves are WWII Imperial Japanese right down to one dragon basically doing Unit 731 on a whole bunch of kidnapped people. Dragonborn are Sengoku Jidai Japanese.

Look I want to fuck a kobold as much as the next guy, but everyone knows that a player insisting to play one is nothing short of scum. Having literal furry porn as a character portrait is an instant rejection, too

I once played a Kobold taken straight from Unified Setting and it turned out great. None of that furry shit.

Is that you Derek?

>Bold fetishists
>Knowing shit about Bolds
Furries and Scalies alike have utter shit taste in lore. They're casual scum.

I've always wanted to play a musclebound STR kobold that people would mistake for a short dragonborn

Why does this female lizardfolk have mammaries? It makes no sense

well, that depends on the setting (sorry) but for my own, it depends on if we're talking about actual lizardfolk or not.

Actual lizardfolk and reptilians don't have mammaries.

draconians like kobolds and dragonborn do because dragons are not necessarily mammals or reptiles and it's residual trait from their humanoid ancestors that managed to remain after generations of eugenics, unnecessary gene surgeries, and magical augmentations

No, he's using the unedited version that has the fucked-up anatomy, so he doesn't get to play.

Got the fixed version?

Should I apply some sort of penalty to their character because of her warped spinal column?

It's a kobold. Maybe that's natural for them?

Maybe its maybelline

This. If you're sending the OP pic, you're at least admitting you're a furry. Cancer, but not as much cancer as pretending you're not when you have to put animal parts on someone to get off.

We don't use character portraits. This is a bizarre practice.

That's fine.

>We don't use character portraits. This is a bizarre practice.
This.

Write up a backstory or something. I also view backstory writing as unneeded but at least the GM can do something with it.

No
fetish fags can go find each other and yiff all they like in some other basement that reeks of shame and anxiety

I disallow it for breasts on a reptile. Bow, if he or she uses that one lewd kobold without, I will begrudgingly tolerate it until they start trying to interrupt everything with fucking or memes.