Can players play as fairies and still be productive member of the party...

Can players play as fairies and still be productive member of the party, or does it break most adventures to have a tiny 1' tall being flying around everywhere?

Attached: 1518677401150.jpg (997x1600, 434K)

Other urls found in this thread:

soundgasm.net/u/alwaysslightlysleepy/F4MScript-Fill-Fairy-Girlfriend-is-ReadyFantasySize-Difference
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Stop trying to justify your fetishes. If it's not a PHB race, leave it to NPCs.

It was a stock race in Tunnels and Trolls, though I don't know anyone who played one. They also had Centaurs and Minotaurs and stuff.

If they can cast spells, sure. They should be very hard to hit and have like 1/4 the hit points of the other members.

I remember having a blast playing a pixie barbarian that focused on hamstringing anyone larger than her.

Attached: MadeSawPlayed PixieBarbarian.png (1200x634, 1.02M)

Susan Sarandon?

This is a shitty attitude, monstrous races are not just fetish fuel and I’ve seen them played very well. However I do have to admit that pixies are indeed my magical realm so I couldn’t play one well myself. Good thing I don’t plan to. But that doesn’t preclude OP or anyone else from playing one.

Depends on the power creep and how the player participates. Its not different from a Dragon player character... you need the PC to not try to dominate with their gimmicks, to lead and expect the human-ish folk to take the lead in human-ish engagements.

Sure, magic exists, and if they can’t cast spells, their size and flight makes them ideal infiltration experts.

Attached: 27FDDBD9-721A-4748-A1A5-EDABA6EEC175.jpg (800x600, 49K)

It's not my fetish. I'm the GM and the question is: "would it break the game to have a tiny creature flying around?"

I want to know whether I should allow it in my game.

>what I played
>not Tonya Harding

It'd add an extra layer of complication to the DM's planning but if they're okay with that it should be fine

Pretty sure this is a cover to a Well of Souls book, which by god were the fetish fuel that got me through puberty.

Ironically, Susan Sarandon at the age depicted had bigger boobs. Check out her performance in The Hunger

Yeah, tiny balls of rage can be fun to play

depends on the setting :^)
fairies are rare => why are you letting a player be a possibly overpowered snowflake?
fairies are common => people have ways to deal with them and balance things out, blame the DM/setting otherwise

Sounds fun!

Attached: angery.jpg (396x350, 169K)

Can't participate in conventional combat or use ordinary weapons. There you go, "balanced." 1HD

I want to cum inside a fairy

Surely it'd completely depend on the game and even the nature of the campaign? They'd be extremely game breaking in a lot of Shadowrun campaigns, but not exactly overpowered in... Golden Sky Stories.

>monstrous races are not just fetish fuel

Found the fetishist.

Fuck off.
There's literally no reason to play monster races other than fetish.

Hey!
There's also powergaming.

how about comic relief?

Attached: smol moka.png (190x238, 42K)

Kindly fuck off to whatever abyss spawned you.

Easiest way to handle it is that they size-shift; they turn into Small-sized beings for doing most combat-related stuff, and can revert to Tiny form to do utility stuff like fly or scout.

read the justicar series (starting with White Plume Mountain).

It hadn't even occurred to me that playing a standard fairy could be a fetish thing.

Looks like Veeky Forums has taught me another thing I never wanted to know.

I dunno, I've always thought it would be fun to play a hydra; it'd be worth it for the regenerating heads alone.

If you can think of it, it is someone's fetish.
even tiles

cut the head off, grows back hard

Attached: Alive12.jpg (398x600, 48K)

It can be done, they used to be playable through older AD&D/D&D rules.

Just don't trust the DM when he tells you about a nearby faerie ring. Or at least don't be an idiot and set up camp there.

>he doesn't know about bondage fairies

Attached: teehee.png (175x230, 45K)

If a hydra gets their original heads cut off do the replacements have the same memories?

Nah
I don't want to have sex with minotaurs or ghouls or ogre magi, I just think they're cool

same
soundgasm.net/u/alwaysslightlysleepy/F4MScript-Fill-Fairy-Girlfriend-is-ReadyFantasySize-Difference

Whatever you do DON'T EAT THE FOOD THEY OFFER

Pixie Adepts in Shadowrun are baller as fuck. The impact of a professional MMA fighter concentrated to an area ~1cm squared goes a long way.

Now I'm picturing an enraged Tinkerbell with a pair of scissors.

Attached: Scaredx2combobob.jpg (847x487, 66K)

>voice filter trash made by a neckbeard

Found the closet furry.
I can think of any reason to play monstrous races aside from fetish shit.
Porn has ruined your mind.

Played a Pixie in 4e. Wasn't an issue in any way because the rules prevented the dumbest exploits like just flying high enough that nothing can hit you.

>voice filter
but that's wrong and there's visual proof

>struggling to lift shoes

CUTE!

could do with some better SFX and mixing though

Attached: stop_penis_erect_archer.gif (500x281, 901K)

My nigga.

Attached: made saw played.jpg (1200x533, 367K)

4e Pixies do have some minor exploitable things. Mostly the fact that they can defend from inside someone else's square which among other things means that enemies can't just shift away from you (since they'd still be adjacent after shifting away from you), making you better at locking down a single enemy than almost any other race.

But yeah the rules do a good job of preventing them from being as broken as they could be with their innate flight.

No, fetishists play play human male fighters with tsundere monstergirl sidekicks that appeal to their fetish, you myopic doofus.

I really wanted to play this, but my DM didn't allow me to use the Fairy rules, due to their easy breakability in D&D 4E.

Cute faeries or scary faeries?

Attached: 9200000015329930.jpg (715x1200, 151K)

Why not both?

Just to know if we're talking more about the "bake cookies in a tree" faeries or "ride a spectral elk through the sky and look for people to kill" faeries

maybe there's the nice fairies and the nasty fae in the same setting

There's no reason those two can't be the same creature just under different circumstances. That's like a core concept in many fairy myths. They can go from cute and helpful to mischievous pranksters to murderous little psychopaths depending on how and when you meet them. If you're kind and humble they'll cobble your shoes and protect you from spirits, if you try to fuck them over they'll curse your cows and eat your children.

>Well I dont play them, so anyobe that does must have some closet fetish for them
Jesus Christ user, how long has it been since your group kicked you out and why havent you tried to find another?

fetish or no, there comes a point in size difference where the two characters can no longer be called peers. and magical realm or no, an adventuring party should be a group of peers.

unless she casts normal-sized magic and can use said magic to project a normal sized voice, but at that point unless its some damn good RP you have just another shitty reskin of a humanoid mage.

Attached: 1516595197238.jpg (720x960, 242K)

>she casts normal-sized magic
Nothing in the rules causes magic effects to scale to a caster's size

You're retarded.

Being peers doesn't mean the party has to be completely homogeneous. That's like saying you can't play a Rogue because the party already has a Wizard, it makes no sense at all. There are plenty of roles a Fairy could fill in a party even being tiny. Casting a spell doesn't change depending on how tall you are, and for some roles (like stealth and recon) a Fairy would actually be better than most other races due to their small size and ability to fly. Imagine having a Rogue small enough to crawl through the small gap beneath the door and the floor and scout out a locked room before the party breaks in. It doesn't take a whole lot of imagination to come up with plenty of situations where a small character would be useful.

I mean sure, it won't make sense to have a tiny Fairy in steel plate armor wielding a greatsword and standing shoulder to shoulder with the party's Half-Orc Fighter, but that doesn't mean there can be no purpose for a Fairy character.

>there comes a point in size difference where the two characters can no longer be called peers
thats pretty dumb user

Use Eladrin for playable Fey. done.

nae king, nae queen, nae laird. We willna be fool'd again!

I... I don’t know. Maybe that’s a character concept? Amnesiac hydra out for revenge on the person who cut off all its heads?

Depends on the players, the system, the setting, and the campaign. It could work. Or it could fail. Give more information and I'll provide a better answer.

Or The Hydra That Knew Too Much.

Learned too much— which is easy when you’re nosy with a dozen noses. Seen things he wasn’t meant to see, put together facts he wasn’t meant to know— which is part of the job, when you’re a private eye. So they came for him, and they lopped off his heads, and they put one on ice. Memories like a rare book, being sold like a rare drug.

But when you go to kill a hydra, you’d better finish the job. Now there’s twelve brand new brains bent on tracking down the thugs who mutilated him, and they’re just as sharp as the last batch.

Everything is a fetish. Yes, even normal humans.

Doesn't the term "fetish" specifically apply to something abnormal?

Nope, merely abnormal sexual fondness for something, if you're abnormally aroused by normal people that's a fetish

>fetishists play play human male fighters with tsundere monstergirl sidekicks that appeal to their fetish
Well, I suppose you're not wrong there... idiot

Attached: monmusu_by_wizard898-d4vihrp.jpg (700x700, 196K)

>fetish for normalcy
I am almost hesitant to ask what that looks like

As long as you take steps to account for it, I don't see the issue

HEY! LISTEN!

NO