check out this github issue:
github.com
TRON is a bit liberal when it comes to "borrowing" code from other projects
Michael Allen
Isaiah Stewart
A literal scam coin jesus christ these are the inept chinks people trust their money with.
This isn't even FUD anyone from /g/ can see the issue here
Jace Peterson
So? Litecoin began as a 100% copy of Bitcoin code and wasn't even hiding it. Still has an mcap higher than tron.
Crypto doesn't care about your autism.
Jace Long
Hahahahah fucking 'devs' these days. 95% just copy code from github and call it their own. Tron is just hacking together shitcoin with stolen code hahaha.
Jaxson Garcia
You're fucking retarded. The license of the Bitcoin codebase(and the Ethereum license, too) allows redistribution with attribution. The problem here is wrong attribution/licensing of works belonging to the Ethereum project.
>people as dumb as this are in crypto
I guess the bubble pop is incoming.
Michael Morgan
Checked.
And this.
People literally act like everything HAS TO ABSOLUTELY be original, just to satisfy a bunch of fat faggot autists.
I ask all of the faggots this question:
When you go to the store to buy simple things, do you go full sperglord to the store manager for having both store brand and name brand?
Ayden Phillips
I think they're just trying to get this shit done as fast as possible so the whole "they don't even have a product" FUD can be nixed
Easton Smith
>still holding it despite tron get 50 sats lower every day
It's like people have massive brain problems
Charles King
This. Op BTFO
Michael Perry
...
Nolan Morales
wooops
Carter Wright
And still nigger on twitter tweet like they know shit and étron is better than bitcoin
>my when face
Ayden Perry
>autism
Lincoln Young
Kek this commit is just changing variable names
Jose Harris
That will teach you all to only trust honest white men next time.
Brody Garcia
...
Xavier Cooper
Not in the eyes of a normie or a nigger
Brody Young
when you work at a reputable company, you regularly get a CR with a lot of syntax/naming recommendations. It's so the entire project has the same voice.
>t. software engineer at big 4
Samuel Garcia
That's not an accurate comparison you inept fucktard. They copied source code with a LGPL license and neglected to state it was derived from that project which is a condition of the license. It also looks like they have copied other libraries and tried to make it seem like they were their own(copied files instead of using dependencies). When they were pulled up on it in the github issue all they did was change around the names of a few files and variables:
Jeremiah Robinson
when you work at a reputable company you don't plagiarize other people's work
those guys are a big joke, period
I like seeing normies get burn tho so good on them
Connor Perez
They just changed it because someone pulled them up on copying in an issue. It has nothing to do with syntax/naming recommendations.
Colton Ortiz
i've read the sourcecode, there's no plagiarism at all. it's a dump n' dump coin that should be at 300 sats, but the code is fine.
there's literally no problems with that at all
Jeremiah Gonzalez
I was talking about their whitepaper but now that you mention it, OP's just provided a source showing that they did
Just fucking sell already and jump in a serious project
There is no shame in doing that afte you got scammed
Lucas Peterson
You didn't read anything man let's be honest here
Jace Green
A CHINAMAN IS APPROPRIATING A WORKING PRODUCT???? OH THE HORROR!!!
Seriously, fuck off. This nonsense is almost as bad as the whitepaper FUD.
Sell if you want tho. IDC if you stay poor.