B.A., Philosophy and Management

>one github commit

No they're not, /pol/ is 2-5% intelligent bigots and 95% screaming subhuman autists. Most of pol is 90-105 IQ range.
t. 132 brainlet here (by sci standards)

Nah they did a lot of online screening for a year, compilation reported an average around 130-140. Just being realistic.

> Online IQ tests
Opinion discarded, these all have repetitive questions and are easy to study for. I can easily get a 170-180 score on an 'online IQ test'
furthermore all it takes to study for online IQ tests is a basic understanding of matrices and matrix inversion methods and combinatorics.

125 is slightly above the mean IQ of 4-year college graduates, bragging about your IQ on an anonymous board to validate whatever it is you're saying only shows how insecure you are

Yep, this

Maybe even lower, this user doesn't seem to grasp basic statistical concepts

Try out a few IQ tests and humble yourself

This user I meant

That's not true since you can correlate actuary tests and those subjects to how well they perform online tests and then run that analysis w/ a algo to fix any errors. But you're like under 140, so why am I telling you this?

user 132 is 98-99th percentile, my IQ is also under repped as my gifts are in mathematics, where I am studying my PhD in at the moment.
Irregardless, theres no statistical study linking only IQ tests to those done by a psychiatrist as their is no validity to online tests, they all reuse the same questions and don't test the actual categories of a standard IQ test - Working memory, perceptual reasoning, comprehension and processing speed.

>he fell for the online iq tests can't be valid meme

i bet you'd think the sat wouldn't generate a valid score if taken online either, brainlet

here you go

testyourself.psychtests.com/tests/showpdf.php?name=classical_iq_lite/psychtests/classical_iq_lite.pdf

The Sat is utterly pointless, if you dont get within 10 points of a perfect score then you are a brainlet, the SAT isnt valid as a standardised test because it fails to discriminate high achievers who unlike yourself actually study and do well.
> He fell for the online tests that try to get money out of you are valid meme and now calls me a brainlet because he got a higher online score then my real irl score despite my online score being in the 180s

mobius not bag coin stink link shoo am serious would not lie mobius win big try

exactly what I thought until I took a fucking philosophy course as a CS major back in university.
My god that was the most difficult course of all time.

>their is no validity
>failing at 1st grade grammar

and we are supposed to believe your high IQ?

yeah man mobius is the future, like mhy bf told me about it after shitting on the street and i was like omg buy some for me? and he's all like suck me first and I was like...okay ;) so after he came he sent me some and now I have some mobi. That night when he bent over i ripped his pants open and stuck my dick inside him and he was like "wtf i thought you were a girl!" I violently threw my wig off and said "I got my MOBI, now you're about to get yours" just before thrusting my hardest into his pajeet ass.

Sincerely,
Co-founder of Mobius

> Criticizing grammar on a Taiwanese cave fishing board
> Starts sentence with and
> Not capitalised
> your

>intelligent bigots

2/10 made me reply

He already said his intelligence sphere is mathematical so its pointless if he messes up a grammar rule or not. Kind of like how I am imagining you to be really uncoordinated. Did you know that coordination is a type of intelligence?

solve an equation of the same relative complexity as compared with there their they're

4(3x+2)-7=3(x-2)

You can, by taking those people who took the test and having them perform online test and algo it to fix the test. I told you this in my last reply and it's the basis for many online tests.

...

Sergey and rory don't know how to run an operation as they are really micro management heavy. That's why I don't invest in LINK and PHD's also have a self obsession compulsion makes that even more true. Invest in something with an actual team instead of having one "ORACLE" giving pajeets orders for a week and recycling that for a year.

Either your or you're would be acceptable here.

>we believe your high IQ. (the high IQ that you possess).
>we believe that you are of a high IQ.

...

I'm surprised that with all the geniuses we have here nobody seems to have a shred of understanding in statistics. The score only exists as a comparison to others and as you get higher up it means less as there are fewer people with whom you compare.

X= -(7/9)

This and honestly IQ is one of the least determinants for success - wealth and even intellectually. A good work/study ethic is more important, I know many brainlets on paper that have done much more then so called 'geniuses'

>the SAT isnt valid as a standardised test

the sat has relatively low correlation with IQ if that's what you mean (0.50), but it's certainly valid as a test of academic aptitude within a specific curriculum

> He fell for the online tests that try to get money out of you are valid meme and now calls me a brainlet because he got a higher online score then my real irl score
>try to get money out of you

proctored tests are way more expensive than online tests, most of which are free. not sure what your point is

...