Has he ever been wrong ?

Has he ever been wrong ?

Other urls found in this thread:

lambodreams.com/2018/01/29/charlie-lee-declared-living-saint-vatican/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

no. But if he writes hodl, he mean hodl for more then a decade while watching the price slowly go to sub 100 per btc or sub one dollar for ltc and then see how it swings by 0.02 %

> Living Saint
lambodreams.com/2018/01/29/charlie-lee-declared-living-saint-vatican/

why won't he trade ltc tho

Nigga is woke

he knows it's a dead shitcoin.
he's probably fucking 10/10 escorts while snorting cocaine every day, he doesn't need to trade.

because it's becoming outdated and the meme of it being fast and low fee isn't enough anymore to save it

Why would anyone want to buy the only coin in the top 10 that doesn't deserve its spot?

because he knows its a literal shitcoin tied to bitcoin 1:1

i bought ltc at 240 and i hope you guys aren't right

Don't worry, Charlie is just a bit autistic. LTC will get higher than 240 eventually, but there are a lot of better coins to choose from.

yeah it will go up there again if market is stable again

the most loss in my portfolio is in litecoin lel

I will be honest with you, but I'm just an speculator.
I think LTC will go up this year, but in the long-run I don't see it lasting too much.
At the same time there are better investments in this market.

what better coins

Is it possible to short usdt/usd

this guy is literally a chad

> sells all of his holdings of the project he works on/created RIGHT AT THE VERY FUCKING TOP OF THE BULL MARKET

> accurately predicts the day that bitcoin would crash due to futures contracts closing

...

He felt he was too big of a deciding factor on its price fluctuations, so he announced he was selling all of it (donating some as well, no idea about the ratio), which hurt its price. This has made a lot of people really angry, because they claim he was manipulating its price because technically he could sell, cause drop in price, then buy even more. Whether that's true or not (I personally don't think that was his intent) he would be a complete jackass if he was now announcing he's buying it again and if he's an actual player the only logical thing is to do it privately.

Charlie is right, like always. A lot of people are mixing up the two separate conspiracies when it comes to Tether. One that is plausible, and one that is pants on head retarded.

>Conspiracy theory 1:
>Tether is not backed by USD on a 1:1 ratio
>If proven to be true, Tether becomes worthless as it fails to deliver on its only function
>This conspiracy is somewhat plausible, considering Tethers unwillingness to allow an audit

>Conspiracy theory 2:
>Bitfinex used Tether to prop up the BTC price as a form of Tether distribution
>Rather than distribute the Tether to exchanges through ordinary means
>This conspiracy is pants on head retarded

And for the absolute retards who fails to see the consequences of each theory:

If conspiracy 1 proves to be true, BTC and alts shouldn't be affected at all, except for the way Charlie puts it. Unless a crash becomes self-fulfilling prophecy as hordes of absolute retards cashes out expecting a crash.

If conspiracy 2 proves to be true, there would be a BTC crash. But that shit is tinfoil tier beyong imagination.

Tether doesn't need to be backed 1:1 though. It just needs to be backed enough that anyone who wants to get a dollar from Bitfinex can. Of course, Bitfinex's clause that they don't have to buy back any tether kind of makes that a moot point since there is no expectation that you can get tether back on a macro level, so you'd basically need an exchange with millions in tether asking for their dollars back, at which point said exchange is probably going to have to pull an exit scam anyway.