debate this
Debate this
Daniel Lopez
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Ryan Brooks
I see nothing inherently wrong with that distribution
Lucas Thomas
Investing in cheap foreign labor makes the investor wealthier and leaves less jobs for the plebs in america that become even poorer.
If you're not ok with that leave this investment board immediately.
Ayden Ortiz
Pretty fair distribution tbqh
Henry Davis
>implying the world was just born the way it is and no one had to actually build it
David Myers
>If you're not ok with that leave this investment board immediately.
why?
Josiah Fisher
>2003
How about you post it from 2016 after Obama fixed the wealth disparity that Bush created?
Adrian Hughes
Because that belief is indicative of a more cancerous ideology that espouses equality as a moral good.
Connor Reyes
Because as an investor you have to think about how to invest your money wisely not about gifting money to unproductive leeches
Matthew Walker
Looks pretty natural IMO.
Evan Lee
Care to explain that further rather than relying on assumptions?
Adrian Miller
If people don't have jobs available to pursue, how can they be productive?
Charles Ortiz
Pareto distribution.
en.m.wikipedia.org
It’s how things work.
Asher Reyes
If you start with the assumption that equity & equality of outcome is the ideal and natural economic state, and any deviation from pure equity is unjust, the only conclusion is that anyone with "more" must be immoral and deserves to have their property given to those with "less" until equity is achieved.
Sebastian Hall
Huffpo go
Lucas Baker
You are arguing axiomatics but I don't hold any of those axioms to be true.
I want to know why it is beneficial for society to remove jobs from the economy, eliminating wealth for many men, in favor for the accrual of wealth for one man. I don't care about foreigners. I am talking about domestic.
Matthew Lewis
>I want to know why it is beneficial for society to remove jobs from the economy, eliminating wealth for many men, in favor for the accrual of wealth for one man. I don't care about foreigners. I am talking about domestic.
No one here is arguing that it's beneficial to actively concentrate wealth. I'd argue that the system is rigged for rent-seekers to use legislation to solidify their wealth and make it harder for newcomers to build wealth.
Elijah Nelson
interesting. The 20% richest have 80% of the wealth, and the poorest 20% have the inverse of 80% lol (1.25%)
Aaron Gray
People could have stopped it by fighting immigration and taxing imports
But they were "convinced" not to, so now they get to face the consequences, simple democracy in action
Tyler Wright
>No one here is arguing that it's beneficial to actively concentrate wealth. I'd argue that the system is rigged for rent-seekers to use legislation to solidify their wealth and make it harder for newcomers to build wealth.
literally from >Investing in cheap foreign labor makes the investor wealthier and leaves less jobs for the plebs in america that become even poorer.
Jonathan Sullivan
it reflects percentage of IQ
Jackson Cook
>Don't allow the leeches to legislate theft from property owners
>Don't allow the wealthy to create virtual monopolies through legislation
Pick Both
Luis Murphy
Good luck getting that to happen with 'career' politicians.