>M&M's might disappear from McFlurrys, Blizzards and sundaes >Mars, the maker of the chocolate candies, promised to publicly limit sugar in its products to match rules set by global health authorities, including the World Health Organization and nutrition committees in the United States and United Kingdom. >Because of that, it's considering taking M&M's out of dessert treats, Reuters reports, citing an unnamed industry source. >In an email with USA TODAY, Jonathan Mudd, a spokesperson for Mars, would not comment on what products will be affected. He did say Mars is dedicated to limiting sugars in its products to less than 10% of total energy/caloric intake based on health recommendations and is working alongside suppliers and customers to "bring this commitment to life."
How to go full retard and tank your company 101. You're a candy company, you're all about sugar.
>Mars is going to limit what other companies do with its products
This "article" (which the OP conveniently forgot to link to) doesn't even pass the test of basic common sense. If McDonalds wants to add M&Ms to McFlurries, they will.
Matthew Gonzalez
No, there are contracts associated with these arrangements. At best McDonalds would be able to do it without identifying the brand, but it might be possible to forbid them from using M&Ms with little Ms on it, and in any case all they have to do is stop supplying the product to McDonalds at all.
Oliver Nelson
How would preventing other companies from using M&M's in their own desserts reduce the sugar in M&M's?
kek
Christopher Wright
Big fuckin loss, oreo topping is better anyway.
BRING BACK ROLLOS AND HEATH
James Hughes
>have to alter your products because fat fucks cant control themselves and eat 5lbs of your candy in one sitting
Colton Thomas
>NTR
Jaxon Bell
We have to protect the fatty fee fees of course. They can never be held liable for their health, it's the evil corporation's fault!
We're fucking doomed as human beings with our lack of self-control. As for the M&Ms, their fucking loss. McD's and everyone else will just use a substitute, just as there's many knock offs of Oreos.
Carson Smith
Getting pretty excited for Smarties McFlurries, to be perfectly frank
Ayden Long
literally kill yourself
Dominic Jackson
>publicly limit sugar
Better do what the label says.
Using less sugar? Substitutes? Fuck that, just shame people consuming less of your product. It'll work great.
Nathan Adams
>stevia-sweetened M&Ms
yuck. just tried stevia and it's horrid. i love splenda, but stevia sucks dick.
Lincoln Cook
>what is branching out
Landon Evans
>limiting sugar in a candy made almost entirely of sugar What?
Asher Lewis
>we are struggling to profit enough to pay our CEO massive bonuses, so he has decided to cut costs and take out what makes us us
Christian Baker
>oreos
GET EM OUT
Brandon Morgan
They're not USING less sugar, they're just trying to shame you into eating less of their products. YOU do all the work for them, you see.
