We are starting to shoot ourselves in the foot by stopping normies from hearing about LINK. At what point do we switch from hiding it from outside Veeky Forums to shilling it to fuck on reddit?
Done accumulating yet?
Nathan Foster
Other urls found in this thread:
etherscan.io
myredditvideos.com
twitter.com
Robert Sullivan
IF YOU SERIOUSLY BELIEVE IN THIS SIT DOWN AND RECORD YOURSELF SAYING WHY YOU BELIEVE IN CHAINLINK. THEN SEND IT TO A FAMILY MEMBER AND THEY WILL TELL YOU JUST HOW FUCKING DELUSIONAL YOU ALL ARE.
Eli Harris
shit wont hit reddit for months, reddit still thinks blockchain is for currency
Jace Martin
...
Jackson Rogers
Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.
Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.
Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.
The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.
In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team
Christian Gutierrez
They have a subreddit for ChainLink yet that shilling tool shows it's never mentioned on r/cryptocurrency.
Grayson Barnes
Copy paste some more, we're all really enjoying it.
Nathaniel Morgan
We are not a team, do whatever the fuck you want.
Logan James
Funny thing about this copy pasta, i did it and they bought 100k
Brayden Gomez
etherscan.io
less than 20 thousand holders after all this shilling?
only 7 thousand holders with more than $1k of tokens?
60% of all tokens owned by just 6 accounts?
looks like your "accumulating" isnt panning out when nobody even wants any.
Joseph Clark
No one is stopping anybody from shilling LINK on reddit
Alexander Wright
Idk if your post makes sense. Accumulating is for the few on Veeky Forums
Julian Roberts
If LINK is held mainly on exchanges, would that count as many wallets or just one for all of Binance?
Kayden Hall
seriously i dont get why everyone is shilling INSIDE Veeky Forums
1000 EOTY only if you shill outside and spread the word of kek
Eli Turner
...
Xavier Brooks
...
Owen Wright
I have 14k link in an exchange. How fucked am i?
Jaxon Wood
I need to round up my stack to 5k, need 1.5k more linkies
KEEP LAYING DOWN SUPPRESSING FUD
Jaxson Moore
I don't think it needs shilling. Overall the project is fairly solid and has an excellent change of being adopted. I only have one issue with it: I still don't understand why ChainLink will be necessary for Oracles.
Why wouldn't Ethereum build their own on-chain oracles? Why is the ChainLink token necessary at all?
Furthermore, if a bank or an insurance company wanted an oracle for blockchain use, why wouldn't they build one in-house so they know they can trust their data verification and munging processes?
There's literally no reason for ChainLink to exist right now, especially since they don't even have a working product (the chainlink token is literally ERC20 solidity boilerplate code). Correct me if I'm wrong.
Jeremiah Miller
yes, absolutely. but even then, if you look at the exchange addresses, it only accounts for a few % of the supply, and after all, people with link on exchanges are there to trade, they dont give a shit about it long term. its not like it's difficult to store erc-20s yourself.
Noah Martin
your fud desperately needs updating
Connor Powell
This is all actually true, do your research and dont fall for this scam faggots.