Why are all the chicks that read left-leaning?

Why are all the chicks that read left-leaning?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom
qz.com/672396/people-are-now-more-likely-to-identify-as-global-citizens-than-national-citizens/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_II_of_Belgium
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>women """""reading"""""

Because intelligent people tend to be leftists?`

Did she really expect that to go unnoticed?

only when leftist meant liberal

Modern right wing thought is pleb AF and mostly amounts to pseudo Protestant muh market morality and an obsessive fear of da niggers

And the most intelligent of them all stand above the mandarin-tier scholastics and develop their own systems beyond left and right.

nice work spookbuster

>5 thousand instagram comments saying "damn you fine girl"
>a couple stray comments pointing out the obvious are met with deletion or "you just hatin"

It is the current year user.

If you want to correct this, you must take up the path of the Iron and of bronze age pastoralism/perennial PIE ur-religion and use your strength to tame them.

>not being afraid of niggers
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom

this

Only intelligent people possess the faculties to convince themselves untruths.

That's why you see intelligent people often times toy with nutty ideas and believe the strangest shit.

...

This. Everybody rationalizes things after they've already made up their minds to. Intelligent people are the best at rationalizing, and so if somebody convinces them that it's in their best interests to be one thing or another they can defend that position with much more vigor than your average tard.

Does anybody have a link to that article that listed a whole number of geniuses over the last couple of centuries and the crazy shit they believed?

I hate those lists, there is literally nothing crazy about for example alchemy.

Because you have to be stupid to be "left-leaning".

Well no, it wasn't "alchemy", but literal flat earthers and gnome hunters even among well-established names.

Read what?
How many girls (or people in general) do you know that read literature that you'd deem relevant?

PS: I can assure you there are many jock gf chicks who are racist and love twilight.

Are you saying gnomes aren't real?

the leftist tradition suits the maternal instinct of care and nurturing

It's a sad thing that it's mostly dumb people who are willing to preserve the white race while all the others go "lol who cares?"

>>>>>>>>>

This statement is so idiotic and I'm not even right wing myself

I don't get this preserve the white race meme
The people who are in charge of everything are white

Am I missing something?

Gee I wonder why?

It's true. There's a pretty strong correlation between education level and how liberal a person is, though that tends to be more because teachers and professors tend to be very left leaning.

People tend to 'grow out of' liberalism as the older you get, the redder you get.

You can pick any time period and replace "leftist" with some other fad at the time and you'd have a discussion about why intelligent people are consistently on the wrong end of things.

>hahaha, bolsjewism will probably last a couple of more centuries. an imminent collapse? oh boy.
>holy fuck are you retarded... the french revolution is but a hic-up, man cannot enjoy freedom, he needs a strong hand
>by the logos, why would anyone believe a myth of a man rising from the dead? what a silly idea...

The fact you refer to liberalism as inherently left wing shows your lack of education on political ideologies
The united states is an incredibly liberal country

It's not so much about being in charge as it is about continuing in existence. I am by no means a stormweenie but you can clearly see that white populations all over the globe are in demographic decline while non-white population skyrocket and enter white 'homelands' in increasing numbers.

>>by the logos, why would anyone believe a myth of a man rising from the dead? what a silly idea...

Education =/= Broad knowledge

Education is much more cultivation/socialization than having a huge reservoir of fact-based knowledge. Being intelligent, if anything, makes you a much more functional tool than a misfit against it.

Honestly, I dont care if my grandchildren end up being gender neutral light brown ppl living in peace and harmony in a global communist utopia.

Gotta love people who cannot distinguish facts from personal opinion. As pointed out, it's a simple observation of reality.

>omg ur all dumb I mean, like use ur eyes and u'll agree with me

Have fun at the Bernie rally later this week.

"lol I don't care" is nothing more than applied fedora tipper ethics. Here you go, famiglia.

Your argument is invalid. I am a right-winger myself.

>education
>intelligence

Well I guess now we know why America's a country of liberal elite geniuses. It's cause we all get 12 years of compulsory schooling.

Koreans would care. In fact, most non-Western parts of the world care.

It's only whites who are this suicidal.

East Asians are a bad example as they are the only ppl with lower birthrates than whites. The percentage of humans who identify with global citizenship rather than nationality is already past 50% and growing everywhere.

You mean a wartorn sharia hellhole right?

kill yourself

>The percentage of humans who identify with global citizenship rather than nationality is already past 50% and growing everywhere.
Talking out of our arse, are we? I'd like to see some data that backs that up.

>high school
>educated
that aside...

A: if you count White American as a nationality, it ranks very well for education and intelligence and is quite liberal

B: Areas of extremely high education and average intelligence (if you go by what kind of work people do) are also extremely liberal. Cambridge, MA; San Francisco, CA; even in Alabama the only pocket of white people voting D is in Huntsville, the tech center town.

>hehe yeah I mean sure immigrants can rape my sister
>yeah... cuz like nothing really matters, right guys? aha

>East Asians are a bad example

They're never a bad example.
Plus, the planet can do with fewer people.

Go away weeb.

Which is why it's retarded to support the demographics that historically out breed their resources and demand more for nothing.

>the planet can do with fewer people
>let's breed less
>oh fug, da economy isn't growing anymore
>time to import people who hate us!
And then all you have are the people who hate those people who imported them and wish to outbreed them, defeating the experiment

>but just don't import third-worlders and let the economy shrink or stagnate
This would be viable if bankers didn't control policy.

>The Japanese, Africans, Thai, or Indian wouldn't be up in arms if mixed blacks or whites started to outnumber them in their country

because that is the current trend

>oh fug, da economy isn't growing anymore

Why should we keep on growing? How about zero growth?
You do know we live on a finite world?

Women are just walking memes.

"All great deeds and all great thoughts have ridiculous beginnings"

You missed the point. If everyone globally agreed to stop growing their population, it would work and that's exactly what we need to do in the next fifty years. However, if you try to stop growing while others are still growing, your corporations will be at a disadvantage and the people with power will freak out and reverse the trend. This is why Europe is taking in so many refugees and is part of why there are such things as "sanctuary cities" in the USA.

You either need global cooperation or a population including your business leaders that's fine with losing profit to decrease population.

> bolsjewism
opinion disregarded

Can't stop the Incoming Global Lovefest
>qz.com/672396/people-are-now-more-likely-to-identify-as-global-citizens-than-national-citizens/

>the Bolshevik leaders weren't Jews
user, I...

The only reason Western countries don't have a birth rate like East Asia is because we import baby bustin populations from the third world.

I assume you mean those who read literature and not YA and romance. It has probably a lot to do with the fact that a whole lot of so called right leaning ideologies (rather than just conservatism) actively hate women, deem them inferior or have roles and values assigned to them that conflict with everything these women want. As evident by the fact that they read literature rather than say eat bbq with their husband and five children. You'd need to be a special brand of masochist, have extremely low confidence, be able to block out a lot of unwanted apects or somehow find a loop hole that allows you to believe all those things about other women but not yourself.

>stormweenie

Yes, that's exactly the point. White Americans decided that there were better things to do than flood the world with their spawn, and so business interests import third worlders to keep the infinite growth meme going. Most white Americans would agree that the world doesn't need more humans in it, but without the cooperation of their government and business leaders, their own low fertility only results in their displacement.

>you need refugees for growth
>2150: "If only we'd Islamized more, and cut 1SD off our average IQ" will say no Japanese ever

You're assuming human beings are purely reducible to identical economic units of production and consumption without any arbitrary cultural affects which should also be taken into consideration when planning demographic changes.

yeah... right
i'm sure you don't even believe it yourself

>GlobeScan reported the opposite trend, however, in wealthier countries. Since the financial crisis in 2009, GlobeScan has noted a decline in people who identify as global citizens in seven countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Canada, Chile, Mexico, Germany, Spain, the UK, and the US. Over the same period, it saw a rise in identification with global citizenship in seven non-OECD countries—Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, and Russia. Before the financial crisis, the OECD countries actually reported higher levels of global citizenship than the non-OECD ones.

That was all I needed to read. Opinion discarded.

Kek
>(These averages weren’t weighted for population size, however, so the 51% figure in itself is largely meaningless.)
>It’s worth noting that when the questions in the survey were asked a different way, the results lean more toward national identification.
>GlobeScan reported the opposite trend, however, in wealthier countries. Since the financial crisis in 2009, GlobeScan has noted a decline in people who identify as global citizens in seven countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Canada, Chile, Mexico, Germany, Spain, the UK, and the US.

Did you even read that article?

I'm saying that it's close enough for greedy bankers and corporate interests and that if you don't keep them in check, a low native fertility rate just results in them importing third-worlders. What matters is that there are consumers, and they can even go so far as to take money out of your pocket to subsidize consumption by the underclass.

>haha, u think ur smart, but ur not, ur all alone, and guess what fella, i make 40k a year, i have a gf, have a condo and 3 cars, and am having kids soon, so what do you say to this achievement list of burns ;) u shud kill yourself. t. a well adjusted succesful fellow citizen

...

>empty left/right political discourse

I'M SICK OF THIS BULLSHIT

>they are never a bad example
Srs? You are talking about the race that's so obsessed with cartoon porn and mmorpgs they don't even reproduce anymore

I don't give a shit about the white race, I just don't like terminally lame people on Veeky Forums who can't bring themselves to call people faggots.

Really? Your fucking problem is semantics? I guess I should have expected that from a board full of masturbatory pseuds.

Such things can be easily resolved = insert penis into a vagina

Try salvaging an entire part of the western world from a brooding civil war.

>this triggers the cum trumpster

The West needs a good culling. I don't care if we end up with the 4th reich the caliphate or something yet more glorious and terrible... Just end all this bullshit

I don't really know if that's true, nor do I really care.

You're an idiot, throughout history most intellectuals have been more left-leaning than their forgettable contemporaries.

Is this your first day on Veeky Forums or something? There are countless shibboleths that act like a big, blinking light over your head telling the rest of us that you belong on a different site.

>not being afraid of whites

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_II_of_Belgium

The left-right dichotomy didn't even exist "throughout" history you fucking dunce.

Correct. Everyone should stay in their own lanes.

Except Japanese girls with large breasts. They can come over to my lane every now and then.

>antisemitism

>points out the Jewish men were, in fact, Jewish
>REEEE NAZIS GET OUT

East Asians are Schrodinger's Minority. Their relationship to race and whiteness/non-whiteness is whatever currently fits your narrative.

Outperforming whites? They're white.

Underperforming? Poor mistreated minorities.

Yet they can retroactively be labeled left due to their progressive beliefs.
Most intellectuals broke the mold of whatever their specialized field was, to do so they couldn't be more by sticking to the status quo or just copying the past.

No, you're pointing out that they're Jewish when it's irrelevant.

...

You mean anachronistically.

Plus

>rebels are automatically leftists

Get the fuck outta here.

If by progressive = leftist, which seems to be an opinion held by most ITT, then yes.

>$0.02 has been deposited in your JIDF account

most people in this topic hopefully aren't so obtuse as to categorize the world in such broad terms as "leftist", "conservative" etc.

> he doesn't know that the west has been under the clutches of far left cultural Marxist academics since the late 60s

This.

>the few represent all
This meme needs to die.
In fact it needs to be considered a logical fallacy along with strawman and ad hominem.

You'd be surprised.

We need to seriously disentangle leftism from progressivism. They're not synonymous, at all.

Leftists ( the socialist party ) in Belgium opposed women's suffrage because they feared they'd all vote catholic.
A progressive cause if any.

I'm sure you walk through O-block in Chicago every day with your head held high and greet everyone you pass. After all, most of the residents aren't criminals.

Leftism= Jews, no free speech, dildoes, feminism, Marxism, sharia, degeneracy, transgender, white genocide, cucking, SJWs, AIDS.... Do you really want that?

I mean is it any different from walking through a trailer park doing the same?