What are some good leftist books, fiction or nonfiction, that will make me react like this?

What are some good leftist books, fiction or nonfiction, that will make me react like this?

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/
libcom.org/library/economic-crisis-and-crisis-theory-mattick
youtube.com/watch?v=3SUWK_pWrbw
monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

The Complete Manual of Suicide
Book by Wataru Tsurumi

None if your IQ is over 100, desu

Introduction to Cuckolding: The Thinking Man's Fetish

Is that supposed to be Marx? He looks bourgeoisie as fuck there, like he's describing the opera he just attended or something.

tumblr

Michael Parenti

It's reworked from a meme reaction image

lol, newsflash, comrade, Marx WAS a bourgeois and never worked a day in his life

>on Veeky Forums
> implying writing isn't work

and he got all his neetbux from engels cause his dad owned a bunch of factories

Writing isn't work in the way hard labor is work. You can't just group two entirely different activities together and call them the same thing

Do not mix modern "leftits" with marxism please. It's two completelydifferent things

this to be honest

Writing especially isn't work in the sense that Marx was talking about.

Marx lived off of exploitation of workers via Engels and since he was a delinquent debtor he also fucked over people who loaned him money or provided him with services.

he was a journalist before even knowing Engels, the fuck you talking about

marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/

The Choice is yours my friends:
>Leftism: Dildos, sharia, degeneracy, white genocide, Transgenderism, Gays, rap music, censorship, tyranny, AIDS, low culture,feminism, SJWs, Islam, political correctness, communism,Cuckoldry
>Right-Wing: Freedom, health, EVROPA, honor, faith, family, tradition, high culture, classical music, heterosexuality, free speech, the market

libcom.org/library/economic-crisis-and-crisis-theory-mattick

Writing for profit would most definitely be considered abstract labour. Capitalists are not morally guilty of anything, they're simply functionaries of society. Also don't fall for some form of idiotic moralism, literally everyone today lives off the collective labour of the industrial process, no one exists outside of it or is it desirable to try to do so.

> In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely relations of production appropriate to a given stage in the development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or – this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms – with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead sooner or later to the transformation of the whole immense superstructure.
>In studying such transformations it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic or philosophic – in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out. Just as one does not judge an individual by what he thinks about himself, so one cannot judge such a period of transformation by its consciousness, but, on the contrary, this consciousness must be explained from the contradictions of material life, from the conflict existing between the social forces of production and the relations of production. No social order is ever destroyed before all the productive forces for which it is sufficient have been developed, and new superior relations of production never replace older ones before the material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society.

>Leftism
This is not how you spell the liberalism

How would leftism stop any of those things, then? And leftists have always been for muh equality, 'progress' and sex perversion

Insult me more baby, that turns my on sexually which is completely normal.

If you're gonna be specific like that, I'm sad to say most philosphers (and a lot of writers) from the middle ages onwards never worked either.

A lot of roman ones too, and pretty much every greek

...

They call the right the right because they are right.

We sure know which side will be doing the cucking.

Liberalism - freedom, markets, free speech, feminism (the proper kind).
Out off all the things he listed these are the explicitly liberal ones.
>Sharia
>Left wing
Pick one

I dunno man, reading Marx and Engels the amount of Jew bashing is real. You really have to ignore a lot of what they said and not judge them as people, rather look at their ideas on their own.

Like they were racist as fuck. Nietzsche's anti racism was conspicuous.

Max Stirner criticized Marx and Engel's Jew bashing but even then he couldn't help himself from using the word "Jew" about 30 times in his book.

71 times.

Actually, was there some kind of resurgence of Hess in the 60s/70s in the US? Like Manson and his helter skelter shit and some of the black panther/Islam biz

Based Stirner.

Pick up the Marx-Engles Reader edited by Tucker

The Political Unconscious, Fred Jameson

>good
>leftist

>2016
>ad hominem

wew

oh what a funny meme its not like hundreds of millions of people died and underwent unimaginable suffering over your fucking champagne socialist stupidity.
But I'm sure this is an ad hominem.

Kill yourself, moron.

All leftist economy books are fiction

Oh yup. The sheer power of your vitriol and insecurity just reversed the millions of dead from communism and altered the laws of economics.

redpill me on literature /pol/

You are clueless beyond words.

your an gug

The Truth hurts senpai.

youtube.com/watch?v=3SUWK_pWrbw

What about the millions that continue to die for capitalism? The frequent famines in Ireland and the British Raj where often directly caused by free market ideology, for example. That's not so different from what happened in Stalinist Russia or China during the Great Leap Forward. The market can be just as undemocratic and dehumanizing as totalitarian socialist regimes.

see

they just dont understand right? urgh i mean can they just not??

Are you kidding me! You are a straight white male! You rapists cis scum!

>The market can be just as undemocratic and dehumanizing as totalitarian socialist regimes.

Even if that was true, the opposite cannot be said. The best Totalitarian socialist regimes would never trump (no pun intended) the best freemarket society. Zero desire=zero growth. Just be lucky you live in a place like today where people like you can shitpost about ideas freely while the same ideologies would never grant you the luxuries to do the same.

>Zero desire=zero growth
You are implying implications right there.

An awful lot of game changing tech and ideas happened because of really quite shitty and crazy totalitarian socialist regimes (arguably still is), but in your interpretation/worldview they should have been too busy in a bread line to do anything else.

No, they would have no reason to really push their limits any further. If everything they need to sustain is given, then why push farther then you need. 90% of the shit you are using right now to post on this Mongolian basket weaving chinese image board comes from a mixture of individual groups going against eachother to build/design the next best thing and collaboration to solve issues.

Death and suffering is not a prerogative of leftists ideology, my brainwashed friend.

Why you not count how many death and suffering was bring to the world by glourious USA politics

>my brainwashed friend.
Irony.jpg

Don't get blinded by your "super competitive protestant work ethic honest I am not just fucking lazy" ideology. As an example: if the USSR hadn't have gone into space, there wouldn't be a NASA now. The reverse isn't true.

Seriously if someone has to starve you to do something you're a fucking pleb.

I don't support totalitarian state socialism. Left-Anarchism is probably the position that would make most sense from a radical individualist perspective. Capitalism as it exists today depends on manipulating and creating artificial desires, which is hardly liberating, logical or sustainable.

>Seriously if someone has to starve you to do something you're a fucking pleb.
>Defending Communism

You cant make this shit up!

He got paid to be a journalist retard

Sure buddy.

lmao bookfags blown the btfo out

it's a plot by the Rothschilds to keep people from fucking

Said by a man who hasn't read any economic book and no, road to serfdom doesn't count

You know what. Do you live in any current countries that share you ideals? If not, move there. Goto Laos, Vietnam, China, North Korea. I'm sure intellectuals like you would be warmly wakened wit your enlightened brotheren.

>fuck you faggot i bet you read Hayek and wear a funny looking hat

> people not starving is Communism
We gots one o dem 1950s time travellers.

First time on Veeky Forums, why don't u cucks have flags? fucking nu-males

I think because you have actually drunk the free market kool aid you think everyone else has drunk the communist кyл aид. So move to a country that supports your free market buffoonery.

>Giant Douche
>Turd Sandwich

The worst thing about the Enlightenment was to steer Human discourse so overwhelmingly unto something so petty as fucking money/economics.

"That dismal science" indeed, Carlyle.

>Carlyle
Capitalist Whig shill who took a vacation to Ireland at the height of the famine just so he could laugh at the starving micks. Neoreactionaries are pretty much libertarians who realized their arbitrary morality particles didn't make sense only to fall back on old spooks like aristocracy and the monarchy.

Carlyle rightly recognized the sheer stupidity of the Irish in general.

>Using 'Capitalist' derisively
>Using 'spooks' insincerely

You're the equivalent of some guy applying for a patent who, upon discovering someone beat him to it, complains and whines that he discovered the thing being patented first.

The point being that you Marxists pretend you're the first people in history to care about anything beyond the monetary. Those of us who know better however, see that Marx and Co. actually achieved and created just that; a world view, and one that tries to encompass the whole of Human history no less, that cheapens the entirety of Human existence to mere monetary/material terms.

>Shitting on aristocracy and monarchy

Keep thinking the truth can be found in a ballot box, idiot. Alternatively, you can likewise continue to maintain the delusion that revolutions can have any positive aftermath.

Some nice discussion going on here.
Veeky Forums is such a smart board.

Over the last few months, we've been overrun by idiotic /pol/lacks. Proves them right in a way though, you do need immigration control to prevent your nation from going to absolute shit.

You = clueless idiot.

>North Korea
Totally isolated country is managed to have the nuclear weapon and space program. Is this not a sufficient proof of superiority of socialism for you?

>$0.05 has been credited to your account by PYONGYANG, DPRK.

Excellent rebuttal, friendo.

>He believes the stories
>He doesn't find it suspicious that one of their most recent 'tests' (See: Utter Failures) was soon followed by an 'earthquake'
>He doesn't find it suspicious that a country awash with old Soviet junk, which it has never used, manages to conjure up all these 'nuclear' missiles to throw in the air

you are completely misunderstanding NRx
it has nothing to do with monarchy

I went to Yoshinoya a while ago; you know, Yoshinoya?
Well anyways there was an insane number of people there, and I couldn't get in.
Then, I looked at the banner hanging from the ceiling, and it had "150 yen off" written on it.
Oh, the stupidity. Those idiots.
You, don't come to Yoshinoya just because it's 150 yen off, fool.
It's only 150 yen, 1-5-0 YEN for crying out loud.
There're even entire families here. Family of 4, all out for some Yoshinoya, huh? How fucking nice.
"Alright, daddy's gonna order the extra-large." God I can't bear to watch.
You people, I'll give you 150 yen if you get out of those seats.
Yosinoya should be a bloody place.
That tense atmosphere, where two guys on opposite sides of the U-shaped table can start a fight at any time, the stab-or-be-stabbed
mentality, that's what's great about this place.
Women and children should screw off and stay home.
Anyways, I was about to start eating, and then the bastard beside me goes "extra-large, with extra sauce."
Who in the world orders extra sauce nowadays, you moron?
I want to ask him, "do you REALLY want to eat it with extra sauce?"
I want to interrogate him. I want to interrogate him for roughly an hour.
Are you sure you don't just want to try saying "extra sauce"?
Coming from a Yoshinoya veteran such as myself, the latest trend among us vets is this, extra green onion.
That's right, extra green onion. This is the vet's way of eating.
Extra green onion means more green onion than sauce. But on the other hand the price is a tad higher. This is the key.
And then, it's delicious. This is unbeatable.
However, if you order this then there is danger that you'll be marked by the employees from next time on; it's a double-edged sword.
I can't recommend it to amateurs.`

From what I can tell it is a very diverse umbrella encompassing a bunch of autistic ideologies. from Californian technofetishists to Libertarians who realized they don't care for other people's freedom, mouth breathing monarchist LARPers to White Nationalist PUAs and transgender corporocratic shills. It's like we are living in the lamest possible cyberpunk dystopia

it's pretty noisy right now but both Nick Land and Mencius Moldbug advocate for small nation states that are free to run themselves however they want, both have also said they don't believe in monarchy, fascism or ethno-nationalism (though they are not opposed to them on moral grounds, they just think they're less than ideal)
NRx is more of an analytical tool than anything else

Give me a work by Trotsky to go get today

monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

Obviously, the logical solution is handing over the reins to the inbreed descendants of dark ages warlords

No shit. You can't do Veeky Forums unless you have free time, and you don't have free time if you're getting shat on in the factories.

blast from the past

>it's pretty noisy right now but both Nick Land and Mencius Moldbug advocate for small nation states that are free to run themselves however they want
exactly
Secession and dissolution of polities into their smallest possible counterparts are kind of the fundamental tenets that Land and Moldbug defend.
For some reason, Moldbug in particular has been memed to death as being in support of monarchy/fascism and being a racist or whatever

your a dorable

This meme is stale. It was the prevailing thought at the time, and now, that intellectuals would be at the cutting edge in calls to reorganize society.

Everyone believes this, the left is just accused of hypocrisy for it. But the left, more than anyone, recognizes that the average worker does not have the time to ponder new systems of organization.

The Cultural Revolution was an attempt to do the opposite. We know how that went.

youtube.com/watch?v=3SUWK_pWrbw

>>Shitting on aristocracy and monarchy
>Keep thinking the truth can be found in a ballot box, idiot. Alternatively, you can likewise continue to maintain the delusion that revolutions can have any positive aftermath.
M80 B80 I'll bite because I can genuinely believe you to be retarded. Monarchy and aristocracy is not some natural order, they came to and continued to hold onto their power through the bloodiest of means. Revolutions all over

still looking for best Trotsky recommendations

evola confirmed for never having read a single thing marx wrote

Engels looks like a fat fedora in this pic

Mein Kampf

Ask me how I know you've never read Marx
What you incorrectly call "leftism" is a diversionary tactic of class rule. Its rank and file support is largely a reaction to the perceived "end of history" as outlined by Fukuyama. That is, crusades against imaginary problems and emergence of victimhood cultures come from a desire for relevance and disaffection with a nation in which all serious institutionalized social problems appear solved

>Capitalists are not morally guilty of anything
That's the true beauty of the materialist dialectic. Those who come into capital are coerced into leveraging it lest they become proles themselves and be coerced into underselling their labor for survival. It all comes from material conditions. Just as feudal lords were coerced into supporting the monarchist system because it was the only thing keeping them from working the fields themselves, with their opposition again explained materialistically (the magna carta and parliament cucking Charles I for two)

LeGuin's The Disposessed is good reading for any leftist. There are types of coercion which cannot be overcome by even the freest sort of social organization.
North's The Frankfurt School, Postmodernism and the Politics of the Pseudo-Left: A Marxist Critique is a good hard look at the intellectual foundations and forebears of SJWism

Especially during the past decade, the connection has become much clearer between the reactionary pseudo-left politics of the middle class and the theories of Nietzsche, Brzozowski, Sorel, De Man, the Frankfurt School and the many forms of extreme philosophical subjectivism and irrationalism propagated by postmodernists (Foucault, Laclau, Badiou et al.). Pseudo-left politics—centered on race, nationality, ethnicity, gender, and sexual preference—has come to play a critical role in suppressing opposition to capitalism, by rejecting class as the essential social category and emphasizing, instead, personal “identity” and “lifestyle,” and by legitimizing imperialist interventions and wars in the name of “human rights.”

These developments are a product of the social, intellectual, and political evolution of a generation of student youth that were radicalized during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Like many of that generation, they were drawn, at a certain point, to Marxism, which provided a theoretical foundation for a critique of capitalist society. But the nature of middle-class student “anti-capitalism”—which, in the final analysis, sought nothing more than limited democratic reforms of the existing society—required Marxism only in a highly diluted form. The Frankfurt School distilled and distributed, through the medium of universities throughout Europe and the United States, an extremely low-proof product. Herbert Marcuse, whose theoretical work bore the ineradicable imprint of his training under Heidegger, achieved great popularity by infusing Marxism with a heavy dose of existentialist psychology. The issues of alienation, repression and sexuality found a deeper response among middle-class students than those related to the economic exploitation of the working class and its struggle for power.

Holy fuck, are you me?
but stronger?

Permanent Revolution
The Revolution Betrayed

Because nobody ever died and suffered under feudalism, capitalism, colonialism or imperialism.

Hierarchy is inherent in Nature and in our very genes. Only someone thoroughly spooked by progressive ideology would dare deny there is a natural order. It is self evident Some men are cleverer and more hardworking than others, some are born to lead, either as kings or capitains of the Industry. Much like the Alpha ape founds a genetic lineage by mating with the best available females, so does the Human alpha male. A great dynasty is a self-optimizing vector of alpha traits. Progressives, being envious beta males, try hold down their Alpha betters. But in the process they hold down the whole species. And that's a shame.

Shut up, beta ape, only alpha apes are allowed to write in this subreddit.
How do I know you're a beta? Because I am an alpha.