Why do some people stand by the idea that 1+1 makes 1?

>true or true is false

1 + 1 = 1 mod 1

That's zero, user. All integers modulo 1 are zero.
wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(1+1) modulo 1

my mistake desu

We have [math]0 \,(1 \,+\, 1) \,=\, 0[/math] and [math]0 \,\times\, 1 \,=\, 0[/math] then [math]0 \,(1 \,+\, 1) \,=\, 0 \,\times\, 1[/math] then [math]1 \,+\, 1 \,=\, 1[/math], Q.E.D.

I have a Ph.D in economics so you can trust what I say.

Fixed :
>I have a Ph.D in economics so you can trust 99.9% what I say.

Divide by 0 fag

1+1=1
1+0=1
1*0=0
1*1=1

All integers are a representative of the equivalence class of zero modulo one. Don't say stupid things.

1 atom of oxygen + 1 atom of oxygen = 1 molecule of oxygen
1 + 1 = 1 confirmed

>dioxyen

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IUPAC_nomenclature_of_organic_chemistry

>can't tell the difference between boolean algebras and boolean rings

I hereby define addition (+) over the set
[math]S=\{1\}[/math]
to have the property
[math]1+1=1[/math]
It is clearly closed, associative, commutative, etc, etc
Very interesting mathematical system

Over what field are we evaluating 1+1? This is important.

Define two element field of 1 and 0, and it's fine

It's just [math]\mathbb{Z}_1[/math] user.

Just wondering but why does boolean algebra use the operators + and * when it's basically just prepositional logic, so they might as well use the "and" and "or" symbols that look like a roof

It usually doesn't though.

The number 1 is a singularity, and because singularities are infinite, it can be added to another and still be infinite.

Therefore, 1+1=0

not related to the thread but how does (subset of integers (or rationals)) notation work? I need to say [math]\{ 1, 2, \ldots , n \} \subset \mathbb{Z}[/math] but I would like a compact notation (e.g. intervals in the real numbers simply use square brackets and parentheses and everyone can tell immediately what they mean).

Actually, to be more clear, what I really need to say is that [math]X \subseteq \{1,2,\ldots,n\} \subset \mathbb{Z}[/math].

What? No it's not. 1 mod 1 = 0.

okay you autists
nitpick at this and make sure i got it right
i don't care about the quality or anything, i just want to make sure it's correct

i just want something that can shut these threads down immediately

>was planning on going into the construction of the reals via cauchy sequences but got bored

>was planning on going into the construction of the reals via cauchy sequences but got bored

Construction of the what?

it's just a fancy name for what's in the space between the rational numbers

There is no space between rational numbers. Real numbers are a dream, an illusion.

NJ Wildberger, how did you stumble off of youtube?

...

Sorry can you rephrase your question? I couldn't really understand it.

0 = 1 = 2 = 3 = ... mod 1 too

posting in a OnePlus viral marketing thread

1+1= window

Only brainlets won't understand