Remember to ignore all pseudo-intellectual rhetoricians!
To be updated soon!
:)
Remember to ignore all pseudo-intellectual rhetoricians!
To be updated soon!
:)
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>Chomsky
>Coloured science man
>Bill Nye
Why?
>Filthy
>Frances
Wtf am I reading?
great image
who is the guy to the left of owen 'the cuck' jones, looks familiar but can't place the face to the name
Chomsky isn't pseudo
>Peter Hitchens
Let me guess, you're a weed smoker?
Or just some sort of general bourgeois bohemian/hedonistic libertine?
>Chomsky
>Anything but pseudo
>Tfw you can't into generative grammar
>Probably don't know shit about linguistics or cognitive science
Keep up the retarded work user, you're doing a good job.
Dawkins isn't pseudo in regard to his biology work, but he and many others are presumably on the list because their public recognition is very far removed their areas of expertise. It's the same with Chosmky.
>Chomsky backs up his political observations with decades of research and information
>Contributed to linquistics all the way back in the 60's
>pseud
Ok, assuming you aren't stupid, why any of the others I mentioned?
Great chart. Who's the prick between the two great cucklords Tyson and Hitchens?
...
Paul Joseph Watson.
This board is fucking shit
hey
joe rogan is a national treasure
Yes, because there are no liberals on that chart, right? Fucking idiot.
>Sam Hyde
Yer lookin' to get er ed smacked ins wot you are
love those sort of things
they really trigger the reactionary reddit
Looks like /b/ has managed to evade its handlers again.
>Stirner
Do you guys ever get tired of making the same jokes over and over again?
aww I love every frame a picture :(
>Chomsky
>Le capitalism is evil man
At least his linguistics is meant to be top tier.
>16
>Stirner
>chinese cartoon imageboard
>intellectual
a-addiction isnĀ“t real!
Bill Nye is an actor, he's read a lot but he's not areal authority.
>Stirner
>16
You're assuming a 16 year old could read "The Ego And His Own"
>He knows what hes talking about
>Hes not an authority
Pick one.
>snowden
explain
A 16 year old who unironically watches the Amazing Atheist on youtube would not ever read it.
"Books are for old people, video games are cool and intellectual. People who play videogames have higher IQs"
They're spooked as fuck and retarded.
youtube.com
Stirner is at odds with everyone on that chart.
"I have done everything in my power to retain the attitude of a 15 year old, because that's the only attitude worth respecting "
~Literally and unironically the amazing atheist
>2016
>Claiming Chomsky is politically competent in the least
This is the same guy who played dumb with Communist China's crimes, right?
>Sam Hyde
>Even trying to convince people of anything let alone convince them he's an intellectual
He tries very hard to convince people he's funny.
Our only hope against the coyote menace
He succeeds, unless you're a faggot.
Shouldn't clueless morons like yourself refrain from commenting?
You're right, I'm mistaken.
He flat-out lied about them.
>memethony memtano
Wtf
Everyone in OPs pick could die and I'd be ok
your irony seems to have gone over the redditors heads
That's exactly right. Though I'd say Dawkins is more pseud in the field of religion/theology (like, holy shit) than Chomsky is in politics/ethics (where I disagree with him a lot, but all his opinions are pretty well-founded and his knowledge is wide and deep). Still kinda pseudy, but not nearly as bad as most of the others on the list.
Literally none of those things are reactionary, though then again, neither is Reddit, so it's cool.
Shut up Sam
I would be happy.
kill yourself.
>reactionary
I want pseuds to fuck off
fuck off sam
They're pseudo-intellectual because part of their job is interacting with the public?
I thought G. H. Hardy was dead.
That's it boys, keeping sucking the zippy juice out of my spicy hot pepperino.
>gadsden flag on there
>implying libertarianism/free-market capitalism/individualism is reactionary
Kill yourself statist scum
I don't think franku tries to appear as any kind of intellectual.
youtu.be
go fuck yourself, he is my waifu
What no Molyneux?
>calling out statists
>is a statist, muh wage labor, muh alienation, muh human nature
>not being a hedonistic libertine
>2016
Shiggy
You need Milo Yiannopoulos and Stephen Crowder on there.
>Capitalism isn't reactionary
>Capitalism is reactionary
You do understand that reactionary isn't just a term for anything conservatives like which you don't, correct?
Yiannopoulos is on there
Post a better youtube video
youtube.com
Protip: It's impossible
its already been finished months ago
>Sam Harris
>pseudo-intellectual
He is smarter than all of Veeky Forums combined, he's a neuroscientist, philosopher, and a rational, classical liberal who doesn't go by extremist politics like communist fascist statism.
That one's my dad.
he's an islamophobic bigot
>Classing reasonable fears as phobias
>2016
I don't think you know what philosophy is
Mediocre
Fuck off
>classical liberal
Alex Jones is literally a genius.
Notice how he acts slightly differently for all the different guests and how he slips in quick little conspiracy theory remarks when talking to people who don't watch his show.
Sometimes the acting is atrocious, but that only adds to the genius. Think about how much he says "that's all be declassified" or "And they'll admit this off camera."
His show is literally a joke. He was probably a average libertarian radio show host and then found that people responded way more when he started to act insane. Now he is still a comedian, but also a opportunist business man.
He sells basic vitamins for 5 times the price you see at Walmart, but if you buy his your "helping to fight the NEW WORLD ORDER."
The man he pretends to be would not believe anything he says on the show. That guy would rigorously search for the evidence for everything he says and would find that it's 70% BS with the other 30% being conventional right wing stuff to help people feel more at home.
That guy would probably make a video exposing infowars for their BS; anyone who actually does that though can be dismissed as "part of the conspiracy." It's pure genius and hilarious; I love his show.
Where is Elliot Hulse?
Where is Frank Yang?
Where is Duncan Trussell?
Where is Malcolm Gladwell?
Where is Stephen Dubner?
>Tim Berners-Lee
What?
Oh yeah and in one video he said "If you can't tell if this is a joke or not then you're already too far gone."
He is a master. You almost wonder how he can keep it all up but he doesn't; the fake crying and getting angry and some of the ridicules things he says are so insane. He's pushing the boundaries so far while making it so obvious that that's what he's doing.
Pure genius.
fuck...
We all know that Cal Cuchesta is the real intellectual genius here. Don't pretend.
>Still no huge Veeky Forums banner on that picture.
Disregarded immediately!
>finished
See
B O R D I G A
>implying classical liberalism isn't the most god-tier political ideology
Go read an economics book you dumb collectivist
^ Triggered the autist!
We can do this all day
I don't understand why Peter is on that list either. He is the first to admit he is not an intellectual, and he also admits to his biases (e.g. christian bias) when commentating on social and political issues. I suppose he is a bit of a sophist, but he's more honest than most of them.
Would it be hard to add their names to the image? I don't know who any of these people are.
No, it's better that you don't know any of their names.
>including Bloom and Buckley as pseudo intellectuals
Can someone even exist that is less pseudo intellectual than Bloom? Dude knows Paradise Lost word for word by heart and is probably the most well-read man in the entire world right now.
>Austrian School economics is the only kind of economics
The look on Hegel's face is great.
>"Am I part of the club now? Guys?
How can you tell when someone is a true intelectual?
Wait for someone on Veeky Forums to make a true intellectual chart.
Literally the only way.
Please stop posting this, the OP one is much better
they enslave women, bomb stadiums, throw gays off roofs, burn down villages etc. etc.
Needs more Foucault/Derrida/SJW types.
Chomsky because his politics are intellectual disingenuous
Tyson because he is not really anything but a celebrity astrophysicist
Bill Nye same reason.
Do people really look to YouTube memers for their politics?
How many times do we have to tell you to get Filthy Frank off of there? Until then, we can't take this chart seriously.
If you think (they) are gonna permit access to some source that threatens (their) interests you deserve to be duped. Literally worse than Snowdenfags who praise their leader for leaking secrets while he's on the cover of Time.
Sure if you like treating depressions with crippling austerity. I'm tired of this meme. No one takes that shit seriously, not even the Austrians.
why is antwon fantwon on there
He has some pretty dopey ideas however well he articulates them. I mean he thinks Freud was the most insightful thinker of the 20th century.