LINK

gonna go ahead and post this again

didn't add request to the picture should I?
I didn't add origami for the same reason I didn't add confido up in there.

got any more basic research I should add?

yesterday I remembered I had to add something but I lost that thought and now I can't remember what it was :/

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/4hR4rDbJPM4
pastebin.com/n8cpQq0z
screenshots.firefox.com/bQDS0sNiNAyczje6/zeppelinos.org
youtu.be/YyeNEiM09ao
torque.vc/portfolio/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Schroepfer
linkedin.com/in/chengevan
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Do you know there are better programs than ms paint?

like... paint.net?

it's just a collage, don't really need fancy edditing
you're free to do it if you want though

What this guy said, but then again mspaint has a certain aproachability and charm. Also you're the one doing this and we're not, so good shit there. Thanks.

The design you've got going on is great. has a similar effect to the stream of headlines they typically show in documentaries or disaster movies to introduce the subject. Makes me want to buy more.

youtu.be/4hR4rDbJPM4

thanks man
still trying to remember that thing

Sure it wasn't something to do with Hyperledger?

YES!
that was it thanks

but that doc was deleted apparently, got a copy?

there was also a collage made with the info from here: pastebin.com/n8cpQq0z

do anyone has that? could add it

Ye, paint.net
Layers themselves make it 100 times better

>tesla dev
>docusign
>swift
>Bletchley Cryptlets
>Rexford Ventures
>IBM reveiw on oracle
>SONY AXA
>REQ
>Nick Szabo Retweet
>PSD2 Regulation
>and a lot more
Did i researched enough biz?

I also have this one from an anonymous MS overlord

Origami is working off of link, there's another i forgot though

here

kek so ill be billionaire in 2023 i somehow doubt that

I'm looking for confirmed, non-speculative research
thanks though

>tesla dev
him working on chainlink dosent mean a collab with TESLA
>docusign
we'll see at the conference I guess
>swift
it's kinda in there, subtly
>Bletchley Cryptlets
ehm, what? don't remember this one
>Rexford Ventures
I'm guessing these are investors in SC?
>IBM reveiw on oracle
that one got deleted :( got any pic?
>SONY AXA
they did test it but they didnt announce anything official
>REQ
that's official, guess I really should add it
>Nick Szabo Retweet
justa retweet, trying not to add retweets or twitter praising
>PSD2 Regulation
this is nice info but not exactly wait I'm aiming at, just BASIC and OFFICIAL announcements
>and a lot more
yup

that's more in depth analysis, just looking for basic research. thanks though

i typically ignore linkies but this swayed me, putting $250 usd in rn.

anyone else think that when sergey answered the question of whether or not node operators would be paid in link and his response was "initially" or "for right now" (i forget how it was worded) was hinting at partnering with req nad their whole automatic payments in whatever you want to be paid in type deal? like yeah youll be paid in link but x is paying in usd type deal. not sure if im articulating the thought in my head correctly but thats what no sleep will do to you

People don't understand the ZeppelinOs one.

Consider adding this image in so they understand zeppelinos is a pretty big deal and is working with many teams whose tokens they may already hold.


screenshots.firefox.com/bQDS0sNiNAyczje6/zeppelinos.org

The LINK tokens are used to transmit data. Whether you are paid in LINK or not you will need to have some for the network to function.

yes, I know what you're saying

he said something along the lines of "currently we're working as stated in the whitepaper" and then said something like "at the moment, yes" when asked if node operators would only get paid in LINK

I don't want to spoonfeed too much, this is like the gate to the info to DYOR, not the research itself

not what i was getting at but thanks

thats it. I think the req partnership would do wonders for the whole payment situation. this is like a pie in the sky type thing but imagine youre a node operator and want payment in monero or whatever but the person on the otherside only has fiat (like a bank) then itll just go through req. this would make adoption way easier for businesses since then they wouldnt have to set up any sort of system to purchase crypto to use link nodes

agree, ironically REQ would use chainlink to know the price of USD/BTC/XMR/LINK etc
talk about feedback...

added a little hint to the req thing, I believe everyone know about it but adding it there cuz it's official and that's the point of this

Request is trash. Sergey doesnt give a fuck bout them

Can barely read it you fuckhead learn to add a stroke or dropshadow and take a better color for contrast.

You should also add that Confido is going to use Chainlink as an oracle provider

it looks better like this

read the OP

In two videos Airswap people have said they're talking to chainlink, and in the second one it definitely sounded like something was happening. Airswap is quite a serious project. No text to go in this image though unfortunately.

Tis is not my creation

However I used to make LINK memes
Here's one for example
youtu.be/YyeNEiM09ao

ooh, I was not aware of that!

wouldn't amaze me that any of those projects would want to work with chainlink, it's the only way to access key API in a decentralized trustless way

This. Don't forget Confido, OP.

>I didn't add origami for the same reason I didn't add confido up in there.

damn then the price will never truly moon if node operators aren’t paid in link smhtbh

they need the LINK for the reputation system anyway
and the fact that I can pay with whatever and then it's automatically converted to LINK and given to the nod eoperator is GREAT
I think that's in part where Zeppelin_OS fits in (and as some user said, REQ)

>I think that's in part where Zeppelin_OS fits in (and as some user said, REQ)
This is not at all what zeppelin is

AFAIK oyu can trade things on the zeppelin platform using only the ZEP token that is then traded for whatever you want to trade
since they use chainlink they wont ask people to pay a fee with LINK but the node operators will get the LINK anyway for their service... (unless they set the price to 0 which makes no sense)

you'll be bale to create any kind of contract without worrying about the different fees or tokens needed for it

torque.vc/portfolio/

thanks for the info m8 but that just means they invested in chainlink, not that they plan to work with them
that would be a bit more advances research, not sure I should add it

this aims to be entry level

[confirmed ]investors is a more advanced level

and then there's the real deep shit and speculation (connecting dots, un-confirmed investors and contributors)

you can add it to your own version though, open source research kek

...

>and then there's the real deep shit and speculation (connecting dots, un-confirmed investors and contributors)

This is false tho

The domain was created then, but sergey only bought the domain much later

prove it faggot

prove it faggot

prove it faggot

prove it faggot

are you thinking of kyber?

Prove it faggot

prove it faggot

Prove it faggot

prove it faggot

>Zuckerberg announced Facebook would be implementing blockchain technology on site
>Facebook's chief tech engineer is an advisor for Chainlink.

Director of engineering for facebook is on board, have a look in the team section of the SC website. Not many people mention this but it is a huge deal.

prove it faggot

>Facebook's chief tech engineer is an advisor for Chainlink.

The CTO of FB is Mike Schroepfer you dull fuck

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Schroepfer

He is not an advisor to ChainLink. Jesus christ you autist scammers.

The advisor to CL is a simply VP-Engineer (middle management) at FB

yeah I was wondering if I should add the advisors too in the end...

added those two as they're the most well known IMO

linkedin.com/in/chengevan

Why did you go through the trouble retard

hes retarded......

prove it faggot

found a screencap of the IBM mail
too bad I couldn't find the headline of that mail :/

prove it faggot

wait that was a thing?

yeah Confido are using link as their oracle provider

Confido claimed Chainlink to be their Oracle provider because it would draw in Veeky Forums like a magnet, seeing as many on Veeky Forums love getting into ICO's early, and love Chainlink. Fish in a barrel. Im just glad Sergey never once acknowledged or endorsed them.

just like many scams use ETH, many scams will use LINK. it's like saying the internet is bad because of nigerian prince emails.

prove it faggot

Confido went 30x. Got 32eth for my 2eth investment. Joost is and will always be /ourguy/

faggot it prove

prove it faggot

Faggot if proof

I was the one guy who told biz bout CFD. Ironically I failed to send my eth in time and both missed this glorious x30 and dodged a bullet

die reddit

nice trips fag

die reddit

die reddit

*autism intensifies*

The most hilarious thing about confido is that AFTER it was confirmed a scam you STILL could've made like a x60 of it.

You can not prove that as you have no idea who had that domain before Sergey purchased it - it was in a business name. Sergey could have been involved in that business.

No way
It had small dead cat bounces at tiny volumes but nothing close to x2 even

>blog chains

Wtf

i can tell that you are of ashkenazi decent

Trips of truth don't lie

He meant blag chains obvi

ah so oragami network

die reddit

blank chains

did you read the OP?

yes. does it mean im forbidden from saying oragami network or confido? let me tell you how youre a liberal

no, it just means you're making a fool out of yourself

oh ok. so when did confido say they were using chainlink?

Subtle, subtle, subtle Steemit shill.

thanks, just got brainwashed into buying LINK, see you in 3 years. look for this pic.

when they came out... what's the point of this question?

you're welcome I guess, keep on digging for more info, so the FUD dosen't get to you m8

how did they say they were going to use chainlink? it sounds a lot like oragami network

that's exactly my point

did you thought I was shilling origami? that shit sounds like confido 2.0. hence why I didn't add it to the collage

why are you talking about confido and oragami? did you even read the op?

Awesome work here - Veeky Forums should pin this to the top of the board and keep it posted. Pretty much everybody is here because of CL and this is valuable info.