Prove this redpilled assertion wrong:
>only white heterosexual property-owning males have written literary masterpieces
Find me any work of literary 'art' written by nonwhites, women or degenerates (gays and poor people etc) that doesn't rely on muh fag identity, muh white oppressors, or muh patriarchy
Do this and I will never post here again.
Protoplasm: you can't find any
Virginia Woolf
Hart Crane
Yukio Mishima
All I got right now
I would say Wuthering Heights is a masterpiece. Ludovici, for example, who was very misogynistic himself said it was the greatest piece of literature ever produced in Europe.
Well memed fellow shitposter
I said masterpieces, not literal trash.
Try again
The Picture of Dorian Grey
Mrs Dalloway
The Count of Monte Cristo
I'll play along. Define masterpiece.
I doubt you'll find any that will meet your criteria. Because of the way you're thinking now.
>only white heterosexual property-owning males have written literary works that appeal to me, a white heterosexual property-owning male
Well no shit son, you're pretty much rigging the whole thing to turn out that way
Do the Japanese and Chinese count as non-white? Because if you actually say there are no literary masterpieces from East Asia then you are beyond plebeian.
>Do this and I will never post here again.
you lie and you're dirt, pill pooper
Reminder
Just imagine how dead this place would be if people stopped replying to bait... Who knows, maybe it's just a samefag in this particular thread, but it seems like a huge percentage of discussion on this website is just obvious bait that somehow still gets tons of replies. I really wish this wasn't the only decent literature board in existence.
This redpill bluepill shit is so fucking retarded. Grow the fuck up people.
I imagine you'd like to think of Mediterranean and East European people as white in this context, esteemed baitposter, while swearing the opposite elsewhere? And maybe ascribe Aquinas or Anselm to that category, even if they were monks, sworn to poverty (in theory, yes, praxis may differ)? And for that matter, should we include all Ancient Greek works in the discussion because their creators' bisexuality had different roots, aims and justifications than that of our present day?
I mean, I know it's bait and you'll shit on me, if you'll even bother. I just wanted to masturbate mentally a bit.
Take the redpill sheeple.
Deus vult
OP has no definition of masterpiece, that's the entire point of this thread. All he has to do when you show him one is tell you it's not a masterpiece. He doesn't have to give you a reason. He doesn't even have to have read the author you're talking about. Are you catching on yet? You're being meme'd, son. OP is either a stubborn autist or he's baiting you. Either way, whatever you show him isn't going to change his mind.
This is how these threads work. Even after saying this, this thread is probably going to have a couple hundred replies in less than an hour because Veeky Forums can't stand not to lose an internet debate.
>all this confirmation bias
Reminder: don't forget to sage when replying in troll threads like this one.
The Greeks
I'm pretty sure sage doesn't work anymore.
It does and also helps to identify trash replies meant only to bump the thread.
Weird, I distinctly remember reading something about sage being removed a few years back.
you can still sage threads, it's just not visible anymore
you used to be able to see when people saged
> degenerates
> poor people
How do they breed you in that /pol/ place?
>Weird, I distinctly remember reading something about...
Don't believe everything you read, friend.
I was just misremembering, was right
Offended? Triggered? Butthurt? Hurt feels?
I don't give a single fuck. You can't censor me. This ain't your safe space. Go choke to death on nigger cocks.
/pol/ is so sad, full of manchildren who are convinced they see the 'truth' yet in reality just acting like mindless drones, parroting the same garbage over and over again. Most /pol/ posts look randomly generated by a computer, always using the same words, always saying the same things, using the same images.
Sage this this thread, don't bump /pol/ shitposting. Let them circlejerk on their containment board only.
>Phew! I hope mom didn't see me make that post!
it's just stupid
just say what you mean like a normal fucking person
>you're not my mom
Grandpa, take your meds, you're rambling again.
Top kek
>people think this isn't a false flag shitpost
cmon lads
Average /pol/ post. So rebellious !
This post is required reading for anyone entering this thread btw
The difference here is negligible.
>using exclamation marks
LMAO
>Trash comment meant only to bump the thread
He's not derailing some random thread, he made his own thread for this exact discussion.
Now fuck off and go suck an egg.
see
see
You're describing /lefty/ pol dude.
Learn your board culture instead of blindly hating it because normies told you to.
It's not falseflagging, it's just baiting - every political position or idea on this site, whatever the topic, is hypertrofied to utter ridicolousness in order for it to be ridiculed. Apolitical, idiotic.
You want me to see that user thinks I'm butthurt? Gee, thanks!
Right wing be like: *uses Facts, Logic and Science*
Leftist be like: ur a white male! I'm so offended! Baaawww I'm triggered! Ur Hitler! Racest! Nazi! Muh Feels! Go back too /pol/ white prividelfe! Baa www I'm a big baby who hates facts and logic! Baaaawwwww
ur a white male! I'm so offended! Baaawww I'm triggered! Ur Hitler! Racest! Nazi! Muh Feels! Go back too /pol/ white prividelfe! Baa www I'm a big baby who hates facts and logic! Baaaawwwww
um, excuse me, but, um, ... no.
More like
leftist: *rational, scientific discussion, cites sources"
right winger: REEEEEEEEE GIMME TENDIES,FUCK IMMIGRANTS, I AHTE THEM BECAUSE IM INSECURE REEEEE
Flannery o'conners short stories
>your description just so happens to apply exclusively to the parts of /pol/ I disagree with
Gee whiz, what a co-incidence, huh sport?
give it a rest bud, nobody's interested
/pol/ could literally be cured over night if they all stopped shamefully jacking it to cuck porn.
It's interesting that you say that
...
LGBT Authors:
Auden
Bentham
Balzac
Barthes
Byron
Capote
Cixous
Dickinson
T.S. Eliot
Foucault
Kerouac
Lawrence
Melville
Proust
Rimbaud
Stein
Walker
Whitman
W.C. Williams
T. Williams
Woolfe
Other women:
Angelou
Austen
Brontë x3
H. Lee
Plath
Rand
Shelley
Z. Smith
Black/Latino:
L. Hughes
F. Douglas
T. Morrison
W.E.B. DuBois
G.G. Marquez
Poor:
E.A. Poe
Kafka
BONUS: Gay Composers
Schubert
Tchaikovsky
F. Poulenc
S. Barber
B. Britten
J. Cage
A. Copland
H. Henze
M. Tippett
H. Partch
T. Adés
DOUBLE BONUS:
DaVinci
Michelangelo
Keith Haring
Andy Warhal
Proust was a jew_____
I didn't read your post but it's complete shit
Thomas Mann had a wife and kids but fantasised about young boys.
Proof: Death in Venice was based on his own experiences.
BTFO
ITT one guy who got so triggered by /pol/ decided a few weeks ago to shitpost "really funny" and "satiric" rants impersonating /pol/
Imagine the butthurt. Just imagine it.
Obviously you didn't read it, you're an idiot.
>lol i'm not mad ur the mad one
SJW please
Literally who?
How does it feel to be an actual cuck and being so buttflustered to the point you need to impersonate those who insulted you?
It's simply absurd that Veeky Forums is giving this unoriginal nonsense so many replies. I guess it's a way for you sorry virgins to prove you're not a bigot by namedropping a bunch of minority authors and poets, but surely there are better ways to do so. Even you are better than this, Veeky Forums.
Comes out Veeky Forums is bluepilled to the bone.
Not surprised.
>ctrl+f oscar
>ctrl+f wilde
>no results
baka
It's multi-level irony dude