In a thread about important scientific issues that aren't being worked on...

In a thread about important scientific issues that aren't being worked on, one of the first posters identified 'legit penis enlargement' as such a problem.

In this thread, we discuss how to solve his problem - and how to make a fortune in the process.

> source for pic bjuinternational.com/bjui-blog/normal-review-analyzes-data-flaccid-erect-penis-lengths-men/

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/05/laboratory-penises-test-on-men
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809129
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20868389
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18990153
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Suggestion: lab-grown penises created from the patient's own tissue (no anti-rejection meds needed) theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/05/laboratory-penises-test-on-men

>lab-grown penises created from the patient's own tissue
Why would they be significantly different in size from the original penis?

Because you grew it so you decided the lenght ?

Because you create a scaffold and then cultivate the cells necessary to populate it with tissue; see the link for details.

I refuse to believe that the average is that small.

yeah. im 16.5 cm which is at the top of the fucking chart, and i KNOW im pretty average having been to enough orgies and seen plenty of other non-pornstar guys boning women

I do remember a case where they actually did this for a woman's vagina.

...

the burgers are doing pretty badly.

extenders and pumps actually work though, they're just extremely inconvenient and you risk damaging your dick

>implying that orgies aren't biased towards guys with huge peckers

> citation needed

>extenders
is it the same as jelqing or something like that

yeah pretty much, except there's ones you can wear under your clothes so it's not as time consuming

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809129
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20868389
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18990153

small Ns and modest results - I doubt people would be willing to pay much for an extra cm or two.

Given how many people have very small penises (if the BJUI study is accurate, there are perhaps ~1.44bn men with an erect size of 5" or less - including ~180m with at most around 4") it seems that a method that provides substantial enlargement (multiple inches) is necessary.

source?

>orgies
>self-selected for (at least) average size or above

Maybe some med/bio people can speak up but has the process for natural penis enlargement been explained. At birth penises are small, during puberty they extend in length and girth under the influx of testosterone. However, when a male takes testosterone after puberty similar effects are seen in weight and muscle but not height and growth. What is the missing ingredient?

No homo, but I know a lot about dicks

First, I should mention that the proper measurement (what is done for most studies) is taken standing up, at the top of your dick, with it directed parallel to the floor, and pushing to the bone. A measurement means nothing without a consistent procedure. Doing otherwise is a different measurement. Also, don't trust anyone's numbers; on top of all the bias, *everyone* is notoriously terrible at measuring dicks. That said, the average numbers I see do make me wonder sometimes; but I'd trust the statistics over anyone's cute little hand measurements any day.

Second, length doesn't really matter that much, and can even be a problem (much stimulation just comes from clit stimulation which is harder to do if you're too long to insert all the way and grind pelvises). That said, girth does affect things a fair bit. That sideways stretch feels much better than that cervical punched-in-the-kidneys feel for most girls.

Penis pumps do work to some extent, but the gains are largely temporary. It can be a fun way to mix things up though.

I haven't tried myself, but after poring over the penis enlargement forums for some time - no homo - there seems to be a surprising case for such routines (stretching, "jelqing", and such). That said, it seems there's a lot of work involved (think every day for a year), and you shouldn't expect too much. It might be worth a shot though if you're really below average and *need* that extra little bit.

At any rate, I don't see anything really profitable in this. It's like good nutrition; there's not much room for a middle man. And even if you could come up with some quick effective operation or some "method" to sell, there's a shit ton of inherent liability issues (same reason we don't see many studies about penis enlargement techniques). You could build a thousand thundercocks, but if you fuck one dick, it's over; you'll be known as the guy who fucked that dick.

And finally, to reiterate: no homo.

why not just go vegan so you have less arterial plaque, better bloodflow and therefore firmer, fuller erections.

it's possible to develop plaque in corpus collosum (erectile chambers) through saturated fat and cholestorol intake.

fucking jelqing....

Incidentally, although I'm a bit biased against ethical vegans, I would highly recommend eating more plants and less fatty foods, including meat and dairy (this is coming from a guy who used to drink a liter of milk every day) - not just for vascular health, but one's health in general. Modern nutritional science has come a long way, and if there's one thing we've learned, it's that Mom was definitely right about one thing; you've got to eat your vegetables.

I've tried one of those extenders before. They're pretty uncomfortable. I don't know how you could do that for a whole year or whatever.

>everyone is notoriously terrible at measuring dicks
That's surprising, considering how much we do it.

kek

feels kinda good man

that sounds terrible.