When you write (fiction), to what degree do you articulate the inner psychological life of your character? Or do you prefer to do as McCarthy tends to, and show the character's mind through their hands?
There's probably a balance to be struck. Or instead an intentional imbalance that provides consistency of diction, tone, mood, etc.
Provide good examples of either extreme if you can.
It's a massive shame she was blacked, now she's ruined forever.
name?
The problem is you're a beta faggot and don't self insert as the black dude. There's literally nothing wrong with interracial porn.
Remy LaCroix.
i find the hole in her stocking quite annoying
>Go to Veeky Forums they said.
>they'll respond properly to the thread they said.
I went overboard with the eye-catching webm.
>Remy LaCroix.
i thought that was her, never saw the appeal desu. basic white bitch yall.
Very dark skin looks bad from a purely aestethic viewpoint,
blacks are also very different from others. Practically another species, they're also dumb and violent and it is extremely common for them to have std's. Plus how can I self-insert as a black man, when Negros looks so different and so much uglier than other people? I couldn't self insert as a dog or an octopus.
After having done something as dirty as having sex with negro men, it is impossible to be attracted to a woman.
In any case the way the modern incarnation of bm_w/a_f is done puts a lot of emphasis on the special prowess of negro males, to be able as a non-black man to enjoy that entails humiliating yourself.
Also I dont mind IR porn, only the type that involves dark skinned males.
>It's a massive shame she was blacked, now she's ruined forever.
Better than getting Turked
That gave me a boner. Source?
>After having done something as dirty as having sex with negro men, it is impossible to be attracted to a woman.
So the problem is you went black and can never go back?
You sound like you have autism.
Said the unironically marxist tripfag bitch who comes to a literature board to only talk about politics.
>literature board to only talk about politics.
Look at this thread, apologize to me right now immediately.
I'm hoping once the brexit vote has been decided the political memeing will die down a little bit but I have a feeling it wont.
I didn't come here to talk about pornography, and I dont trip and routinely talk about things other than literature.
In any case a certain amount of off-topic posting doesn't to any harm to a board, and is in fact inevitable.
Apologize
Op here, yeah alright. A little doesn't hurt, but does it all have to be localized in this thread?
You sound like you enjoy contributing properly. So do it.
A 'sorry' would suffice.
This is the cover image of her upcoming autobiography.
Dubs decides the first line.
A spectre is haunting pornography. A spectre of BBC.
boobas
Corncob Ye Tortilla a shit
you watch your mouth.
Reflections on Race and Race Realism
My body and my will are one.
You still haven't told us you're not autistic.
Are you upset that the average fit black dude properly pounds more pussy in a month than you do in a lifetime? Does that not make you feel a little threatened, user, insecure even?
I think body language is best for building tension, like sexual or violence tension. Rather than just thinking "I could kill the bitch", you could build it up much more subtly, with a tight jaw or quick speaking manner. Internal monologues are great for hamming a philosophical point, or extrapolating on an emotional fact or background you particularly want to bring out. It's capable of telling a more complex story, but not necessarily a more powerful one. Proper use of both is of course needed OP.
Came back to find one decent post.Thank you. Expand on this if you can. I tend to overdo descriptions of my characters' thinking/mentality/attitudes. So it's not so much inner monologue I'm thinking of, but third person (omnipotent) narration that details a character's psychology in conjunction with their actions.
I want the rationale behind the action to be more significant than the action itself. I know that I will run into lots of problems trying to achieve this.
I only brought up corncob because he seems to because he's a useful example of a writing does not "psychologize" its characters.
I think the issue can be boiled down to a question of what sort of description reveals enough to be effective in a manner comparable to action. Maybe it's impossible.
Sorry for sperging out. Just pleased to get a real response
>Does that not make you feel a little threatened
no, because human sexuality isn't a zero sum game.