*sips tea*

*sips tea*

daily reminder

>Physical Sciences
>Life sciences
>Natural sciences-Other

What are the other natural sciences?

>Math being so low
3 0 0 k s t a r t i n g

>engineers
>pure

top lmao

>IQ estimates

Literally retarded.

well, pure in their own field i guess is what he means.

at some point, money matters more than iq. i know this is the wrong board to state this, but when you eventually have a family, at least then you will value the feeling of having enough money to pay for the house, the cars, the schools, the vacations, the things that enable you and the ones you love to have a nice life.
hence, unless you're a total brainlet, money > iq.

There's a correlation between IQ scores and SAT scores.

Engineers are basically the janitors of STEM

Seriously, it's like they think you can't go do just about anything you want with a math major. I went into investment banking, not something people tend to associate with mathematics.

>pure in their own field
what

...

engineers engineer. the discipline itself might not be very narrow, involving all kinds of bullshit from economic to scientific to all kinds of decisions, but it's all engineering. i think this is what he means, although i don't necessarily agree with it.

*sucks cock*

but by that definition, everything is pure in its own field

jesus christ is posting porn allowed on Veeky Forums now ?

>imagine being so mad at engineers that you have to search, save and post this shit in a chinese pictogram forum
>and they're the fag ones

Engineers wouldn't consider that porn.

For engineers a picture of young boys sucking cock is like seeing a picture of a guy eating dinner for me. It is a daily part of their life.

Non engineers do not see it as porn because we are not gay and do not find it arousing and engineers do not see it as porn because they are all probably not capable of getting horny from all the pounding Tyrone gave them a couple hours ago. At least not for the next 5 hours.

If no one pops a boner from it then it isn't porn. Don't tell me user. did you pop a boner?

I did

Then I'd recommend switching majors. There is always a spot open for men in engineering.

I am an engineer tho

I popped one too. Not that you asked.

Your local engineering department has their doors (and asses) open for you.

Y'know, like fossils n shit.

What's your average work week and pay like? Getting a math major with the intent to go into actuarial science, but I have 14 years of fucking around to make up for, so I need to follow the money.

The most accurate post in the thread.

Fake Evy detected.

/thread

/thread

Is your name really Anonymous?

Funnily enough, there is a penis growing out of the ground, next to the engineer.

History IQ > Psychology IQ
Nice sampling, they should probably retry this experiment.

>IQ Estimates
>Estimates
>Estimates based on SAT score

intothetrashitgoes.jpg

SAT scores correlate 0.88 with IQ

+135 iq = neet

Psychology IQ is way overestimated in that pic m8

citation needed

>pseudoscience
>burger grades

Such wow, much retard.

>correlation cannot possibly equal causation at all ever

are you really trying to say that SAT scores and a metric for intelligence are as unrelated as US spending and suicide

>science spending goes up, because more population, more taxes, more opportunity
>population goes up, more depressed neets
whats next
the food consumption-science chart?

>biology iq and average sat higher than those who are placed above
>just because biologists are aspergers and have bad verbals they are down

>correlation cannot possibly equal causation at all ever
And you're wrong again, wow.

>pseudoscientific psychology
>american grades
You tell me.

lel

>hurr correlation NEVER means causation

sociology and space launches are unrelated, also the sample is ridiculously small

IQ and SAT are highly related, and highly correlated, across dozens of studies with big sample sizes

You missed the point, brainlet.
Go circlejerk about your polar ideologies.

>dozens of pseudoscience studies
Fixed that for you.

What "pseudoscience studies"?

see

Let's see
>empiric measurement
>highly reproducible with a high success rate
>makes accurate predictions
yup, that's science

>makes accurate predictions
No, you can't accurately predict a single person's IQ using only his/her SAT score.

I'm studying for a B.S. in statistics right now.
How fucked am I?

but you can, with 88% precision

you can, with 88% accurate

>citation needed
Also
>accurate
>88% precision
Pick one.

Knowing the margin of error makes it even more scientific

Every set in a topological space is closed with respect to itself

I wonder who thought of the mem that chemical engineering have more esteem than chemistry

Chemists take quantum mechanics
Chemical engineers design "reactors", which is elementary math + menial labor

Are you here to inform us of your beverage consuming habits? Thanks, I couldn't have lived without it. You are truly a blessing.

Purity how?

it's the inverse of how much application it has