Ape-men

>There are only three ways to create an ape-man: 1) Combining Men and Apes, 2) Making Man out of Apes, and 3) Making Apes out of Man.

Is this true?

Other urls found in this thread:

answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/hominids/did-ardi-head-up-human-evolution-before-lucy/
talkorigins.org/
trueorigin.org
johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/phylogeny/taxonomy/humans-arent-apes-2012.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

there's a 4th way
it's called an artist's rendition

What about combining apes with men?

4) have a common ancestor diverge into ape, man and ape-man

Men are already apes.

>he fell for the evolution spook

this is logically equivalent to combining men and apes

Bump

Cherry picking creationist detected

answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/hominids/did-ardi-head-up-human-evolution-before-lucy/

You can make a man out of me any day.

talkorigins.org/

I know you think you had a revelation that evolution turns people away from God, but you're wrong.

trueorigin.org
Then why are the members of denominations who are fine with evolution starting to leave?

Spirals bruh, it'll sort itself out in the end.

Why would you limit God by assuming that the (biological) evolutionary process would be out of sight, even if there's the combination of 'randomness' and selection pressures that can only be estimated in retrospect, sort of.

But men are apes.

There is only one way to create an ape-ape. And that's by smoking that dank Grape Ape kush.

It would mean that He used death, destruction, and disease in order to bring our bodies into existance. Would you call that "very good?"

Is the devil part of gods creation?

can you know what God calls good?

Satan deviated from the norm, and so was cast out along with his army.

As for how I know what He calls good, there a book for that.

There are many books written by many men with many claims.

Ignorant fools, just like the Greeks before them.

Humans belong to the family of apes so I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

According to John Hawks we ain't.
johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/phylogeny/taxonomy/humans-arent-apes-2012.html

yeah whats your fucking question?
take a fucking class on evolution if youre this confused
ie anthropology 101

According to John Hawks most people use the word ape to include humans. Just because he does not want to use the word that way doesn't change the fact that that's what it means.

according to some the earth is a few thousand years old.
whats your point?

Makes sense I guess.

Difference is that he's a paleoanthropologist, while the YECs are composed of everything but paleontologists and paleoanthropologists. He has quite a bit more weight when it comes to claims about our family tree.

okay i read the article linked
hes just arguing semantics with himself

whats the deeper meaning of this thread

Mostly learning more about evolutionaru biology by posing as a clueless layman.

go to a library or college, user

But this is so much more entertaining.

What? I don't have a question

Bump with a false dichotomy.

Aren't humans already apes?

>Creationists believe in evolution as long as people aren't evolving

Pretty much.

Do not realize that humans ARE fucking apes already? Are you retarded or trolling?

This is the worst summer we ever had.

But I was always here.