(I) My body functions as a pure mechanism according to the Laws of Nature.
(II) Yet I know, by incontrovertible direct experience, that I am directing its motions, of which I foresee the effects, that may be fateful and all-important, in which case I feel and take full responsibility for them.
Zachary Reed
>I know, by incontrovertible direct experience illusion
Nathaniel Russell
>my body works with the laws of nature But your body violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics It keeps its order by using more energy
Henry Taylor
wrong
living beings cause more disorder in the universe
Grayson Sullivan
Locally. The 2nd Law describes entropy universally.
Brayden Myers
Locally user not completely wrong, nor completely right either, my bad
John Wilson
>The 2nd Law describes entropy universally. lol no it doesn't. Have you read any of the statements of the second law?
Brandon Miller
What is the evolutionary advantage of free will?
Dylan Hall
Wait, i reread my facts, I was right after all, entropy is about systems, not the universe.
Hudson Kelly
you can shitpost on Veeky Forums
Kevin Turner
What is the evolutionary advantage of Veeky Forums?
Joshua Scott
You can gorillapost and talk with people about some matters, which can be a form of recreation i guess? I mean, I don't go to streets telling people how much i love Ema or show pictures of gorillas to them, but it is normal here.
Brody Young
underrated
Non-formalists got a taste of their own medicine.
Logan Hernandez
>that I am directing its motions >I Error: Undefined
Josiah Brown
>I am directing its motions define 'I'
Cameron Morales
>pure mechanism fgt pls
Bentley King
Memes
Jason Lopez
> I nope
>know nope
>incontrovertible nope
>direct experience nope
>directing its motions nope
>I foresee so inductive egotism?
>may be fateful and all-important lawls
>I feel oh come on!
>full responsibility this stopped being funny >nah its still funny
Adam Stewart
>mobileposter >bad thread pottery
Nicholas Ortiz
the autism rises
Asher Scott
/thread.
Noah Martin
It's not wrong. Every single word in that "argument" is loaded with unproven assumptions. No solid conclusion can be built on a shaky premise. Basically, every argument in philosophy has to be primarily concerned with issues of language, and many do not even acknowledge that fact.