Rank the arts according to your taste

Rank the arts according to your taste.

Mine:

Literature > Music > Painting > Film > Sculpture > Theatre > Architecture

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Lg98qwI2Mio
twitter.com/AnonBabble

literature > film > theatre > music > sculpture > painting > architecture

where do video games rank?

...

I wouldn't rank artforms, but I do believe that sculpture is the purest form of art because it is completely subtractive from the medium. 100% creation by subtraction, like controlled destruction of the medium.

Most of it*.

Some of modern sculpture wrecks with your Renaissance man ideas.

prose fiction > painting > drama > installation art > theatre > sculpture > film > media art > craft art > music > poetry > architecture > television > non-fiction > performance art > musical theatre

architecture > literature > music > painting > sculpture > film > theatre

You dropped this

Video games are a mix of artforms, they don't really fit into these lists.

Film > Literature > Music > Painting > Architecture > Sculpture > Theathre

>not realizing music is the purest form of art

No photography?

thanks. you were really great in Hairspray, chad.

literature > painting > music > sculpture > film > architecture > theatre

don't know much about photography, actually thought about making a thread asking for recommendations on serious photography last night when I was falling asleep, just remembered
who's the michelangelo of photography?

music > literature > painting > theatre > chess problems > architecture > sculpture > calligraphy > video games > dance > film > photography

I really like toshio shibata, thought about buying one of his prints once, they're like 1000 dollars though
not sure if he's a great artist though

>Sculpture
>Painting
>Architecture
>Literature
>Music
>Theatre
>Film

Todd Hido, Patrick Joust and Wouter Van de Voorde are some of my favorite contemporary photographers.

>who's the michelangelo of photography?
Not qualified enough to answer that question, sorry. Try /p/.

lit > music > architecture > sculpture > theatre > painting > film

I just checked /p/ and none of it seemed related to fine art, also appears to be a slow board

this really doesn't look like great art to me, more as if a teenage mind had produced it and thought it was really important
I don't really have a fixed taste in photos yet but I generally don't like things that are overblown or grainy, probably why I like shibata

cognitive art > visual art > temporal art

>Rank the arts according to your taste.
What did he mean by this?

>I just checked /p/ and none of it seemed related to fine art

I mean't starting a thread on fine art and checking back later.

>more as if a teenage mind had produced it and thought it was really important

youtu.be/Lg98qwI2Mio That's not the case, thought you may interpret it that way.

Perhaps you might enjoy the works of Andreas Gursky. Quite a famous photographer.

t. Schopenhauer

photography
poetry
painting
sculpture
television
theatre
literature
music
video games
film
architecture

yeah gursky is what came to mind for me too

/p/ is not very good

There are a couple of people who are decent. 35mmbandit is quite good.

is there somewhere on the internet where you can look at a lot of high quality art photography?
I have no idea about any of this

Lit>film>theatre>music>painting>sculpture>architecture

I follow photographers mainly on Tumblr, Insta, Facebook and Flickr.

I'm unaware of any website which curate photography, if you are a Tumblr user (I doubt it and expect backlash), you can follow or browse selected works here: input-invalid.tumblr.com/

>if you are a Tumblr user (I doubt it and expect backlash)
I'm not, but I suppose I'll have a look

Visual, auditory and performing

William Broadhurst and Kate Molenkamp produce high quality work. They're both from my home state if you're interested.

janson's history of art includes art photography from its origins to 1980 more or less, you can find a pretty good list of names there.

thanks

again, looks too arranged and overblown, too "scenic"
I think I like photos that are self-aware (lo-fi is terrible, probably), but not highly "aesthetic", as in, the laguna, the hill, the chairs, especially the steam aswell as the light, but I suppose it's an improvement over those art-y houses

>rank your favorite kinds of food
>where does poop rank?
this is you

>architecture this low

Lit > Film > music

>Music
>
>
>powergap
>
>Poetry
>Literature
>Painting
>Sculpture
>Architecture
>Theatre
>
>
>
>turbo-ultra-gap
>
>film

music>literature>architecture>theatre>film>painting>sculpture

what a stupid idea for a thread

Fucking pseuds

Gesamtkunstwerk > poetry > music > architecture > prose > drama > painting > sculpture >>>>> modern ""art"""

Architecture > Film > Music > Literature > Painting > Theater > Sculpture

music>literature>film>painting>theater>sculpture>architecture
Boom, done.

I can't properly evaluate theater because I'm a poorfag, meaning I either a) read a play's manuscript or b) watch the film version.

Novels > animation > live-action film > comics > music > television > paintings > short stories > video games > photography > poetry > sculpture > architecture > pornography

video games is so high not because it's artistically superior but because OP said "according to your tastes" which I interpret as "how much you enjoy it"

I literally can't. I know a few art forms deeply and I see how each of them offers experiences that no other can. They are too different to be compared.

It is, but is purity good?

Music > cinema/theatre > bodybuilding > stand up comedy > fine art > video games > sculpture > literature > architecture > modern art

A straight line is stupid. Let's think of it as an axis of speed in which data is delivered (where visuals is the apex), how much attention it calls to the mind (aural beats the others) and how prompt it is to call for meaning and remembrance (symbolic stuff beats all); lastly a medium also can have a negative value, i.e. which of the aforementioned axises it doesn't deal with.

So for example read literature is almost purely symbolic with a vestige of aural, and usually no visuals; as such it delivers meaning and memory almost perfectly, but slowly, and requires attention. Music calls to attention and emotion by its very nature, and optionally has language in it; like literature though, it has a fixed, set time. Single images are timeless, and can have meaning in various ways, but by their immediate nature they can be disregarded easily and can take a lot of attention to understand and perceive throughly.

vidya (hasn't been done properly yet) > cinema > music > architecture > literature

sculpture and painting are ancillary to architecture

theatre is obsolete

OP I agree entirely with your order. It's unsettling. Do you think we're star crossed lovers?

anyone here who puts architecture anywhere else than the top three has a plebian concept of art

no u

Literature > Music > Film > Painting > Sculpture > Architecture > Theatre

I am a pleb when it comes to theatre, so I don't know where to put it. Maybe it would rank higher if I got into it.

castles of the mind faggot

Music is the highest art, no question.
The tune "moonlight sonata" by Beethoven is my evidence.

Music=Lit=Art>Photography=Sculpture=Architecture>Theater=Film

All are derivative of the top 3 which aren't meaningfully comparable

>theatre
>not heavily related to literature
>all these idiots ranking not directly next to literature
what
I thought this board was Veeky Forums

>architecture first
>sculpture last
nice logic

Literature = Theatre > Music > Painting = Sculpture > Architecture

I left film out because I know too little about film to be honest. I'm sure there's a lot of potential as a medium, but most of what I've seen has been worthless trash IMO.

Literature is the highest art, no question.
The book "Infinite Jest" by David Foster Wallace is my evidence.

Baroque music > Circa WW1 prose > Proto-modernist poetry > Late-imagist painting > Opera > Roman sculpture (imitating Greek originals) > English theatre > Vocal Rromantic music > Gothic revival / Venetian architecture

I probably forgot a few important artforms and eras, and didn't bother to list pleb shit.

Sculpture > sculpture > SCULPTURE? > Farming

memes>everything else

How is film not a mix of artforms?

Music > Painting > Film > Perfumery > Theatre > Sculpture = Design = Fashion = Architecture > Literature > Cuisine

videogames are mix of artistic and non-artistic elements
some games are legitimately artistic tho

They're hardly comparable. Architecture, which is the meeting of art, engineering, and philosophy, affects our lives in more ways than any of the other arts listed. It can in a moment create an atmosphere of romance, wonder, and excitement, and at the other end of the spectrum it can make one depressed and listless. Sculptures, however well done, are typically little more than decorations.

>perfumery > literature
kek

>your taste
>i.e. what you've been exposed to the longest

painting for the information, music for the feeling, literature for the communion

prove me i'm wrong litfag

prove me how you are right, /lgbt/fag