Why does Veeky Forums allow and never delete threads about obvious left wing philosophers and writers...

Why does Veeky Forums allow and never delete threads about obvious left wing philosophers and writers, but immediately tanks and deletes anything remotely right wing?

I don't want serious conservative thinkers to be refered to the /pol/ echochamber of alt right buzzwords who reduce everythin to silly (((zion))) conspiracy theories.

Other urls found in this thread:

warosu.org/lit/
youtube.com/watch?v=0hq2rOEwnIU
youtu.be/KBjblKtj1ag
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because allowing those things immediately turns Veeky Forums into an echochamber of alt right buzzwords who reduce everythin to silly (((zion))) conspiracy theories.

Neither belongs here honestly

Why do right wingers have a persecution complex?

Everyone has a persecution complex.

This. Fuck off to you fags asked for a humanities board, fucking use it.

Care to back that statement up?

Because if any political wing is seriously persecuted it's the right.

Try voicing anti-immigration or anti-gay beliefs in the public sector and try holding a job there.

Veeky Forums is like China: If I ban the threads, the opinions won't be there.
But in every non-right wing thread you see /pol/ popping up and then the left wingers go "omg go to ur containment board!!!"
So obviously censoring the threads doesn't contain /pol/ at all.

all literature is in some way, shape or form political

You have to understand because leftists have been given free reign in academia they've gotten away with censoring anything they don't like and pushing their dogma until it's become too divorced from the normal crowd to make sense.

They claim denying opportunity to someone due to the color of their skin isn't racism. They claim any religion that denies science is barbaric and stupid, yet attack and pressure any research that threatens their worldview, to the point a Nobel winner sold his award because of blacklisting. They've plateaued at a permanent victim status despite their stranglehold on institutions in the media, academia and lip-service politics. Anyone who deviates from the mob rule must be called a bigot and silenced. They hate discourse and intellectual challenge.

Tl;dr they're stunted children in a safe space brainwashed by propaganda, all they can do is spout a slur or strawman and block you.

Leftism is literally "delet this: the movement".

Source: warosu.org/lit/

>You will not post any of the following outside of /b/: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases, macro image replies, indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?"), anthropomorphic ("furry") or grotesque ("guro") images, post number GETs ("dubs"), or loli/shota pornography.

99% of such threads are just trolling

I didn't know Veeky Forums bans racism.

Thanks for ruining everything.

Officially it does, it's not like those rules are applied

nigger

Because you don't post conservative/traditionalist philosophers.
The only thing is that they don't get too many replies, but I've never seen an Aquinas, Augustine, Feser, Kirk, Hayek, Belloc, Chesterton, Burke or any other type of thread deleted.
If you mean Ayn Rand, they also get to stay, unfortunately. Burning books is completely understandable when she's in question.

/thread

...

philosophy is a literary genre

For people who call lefties crybabies the alt-right sure do love whining.

those aren't political positions. they're pseudo-ideas

Wah wah wah ya big baby.

Belloc literally has a book called The Jews, but polfags are too retarded to even pick that up.
It has no meme value like Rand, Milo or Trump, it's just a discussion of what will happen with the Jews and why everyone hates them.
He was right, the holocaust happened. Man his historical dialectic was amazing.

My faction isn't the one asking for safe space ideological plan pens.

>pseudo-ideas

I'm sorry but you can't assume people know your dumbass neologisms, you postmodern fuckwit.

>My faction isn't the one asking for safe space ideological plan pens.
Just because you dont call them safe spaces doesn't mean they aren't. What are college republican clubs if not safe spaces for conservatives who dont want the mean old wiberals to call them wacist? What is /pol/ if not a right wing echochamber. You guys don't even make an effort to understand the opposition point of view beyond conspiracy image macros on /pol/.

you're whining right now

Everything is whining

Fuck off I'm serious.
Where is the proof that by allowing right wing thoughts, Veeky Forums will become an alt right echochamber?

If anything, Veeky Forums is becoming an echo directly because it censors right wing philosophy, thus stagnating into left wing ideologies.

I knew Veeky Forums was cucked ju-males when I saw they had removed flags, and after reading a few threads I want to know what Hiro was thinking adding this blue-pill shithole onto Veeky Forums

I get to "assume" whatever I like about you, faggot. But I was clearly mistaken in assuming your literacy. "Pseudo-idea" isn't a neologism, it's just a fake idea, empty of political content, the result of your own narcissistic projections of your failures onto minorities who are finally getting privileges you've squandered. I get that it's hard to think about the meaning of words in context, though, especially when they have non-Saxonaye etymology and so perfectly describe a complex of feelings you would like to forget.

Has anyone seen the front page of Twitter? They're lambasting Trump for using a news bubble shaped like what they claim is a "Star of David" and this somehow indicates antisemitism. It's ridiculous even by /pol/ standards.

There are plenty of right wingers here. See: this thread

Go join ISIS if you want to meet more right winger who hate gays and women.

>this post
wew lad

>Has anyone seen the front page of Twitter
No, back to facebook fag

>especially when they have non-Saxonaye etymology and so perfectly describe a complex of feelings you would like to forget.

Top kek gj user

Anti-immigration isn't a fake idea.
Homophobia isn't a fake idea.

But it is according to your standards? How cute. You're really cutting edge current year, aren't you, you big Spanish Civil War rebel. No pasaran!

People who share the same set of ideas get together more often than they engage with the opposition? Well, I never...

No dude, there's a difference between people of the same leanings getting together and a fucking safe space where people get together in order to not have PTSD-flashes from whatever trauma they invented for themselves.
Your ideology basically admits it attracts the mentally ill.
And reading Deleuze who glorifies the cognitive qualities of schizophrenia, it's not a surprise.

are you really defending those "lefties" who cry when they get "microaggressed"?

>it's a fake idea because you must blame capitalism and never ever brown people

Ok kid. I'm sure college is a blast.

I don't get involved with idpol shit so its up to them.

You went almost a 100 words without using the "neoliberalism" boogeyman?
I'm impressed.

Just saying that if the normies become crazy (which it seems like they have) then what happens to the weirdos on Veeky Forums? Do they become normies?

I thought you people hated it when right wingers say "learn english"?

i would ask you what connection skin color and economic privilege could possibly have outside of racist conditions enforced by the owners of the means of production, but frankly I'm not interested in seeing phrenology charts.

>someone talked mean about my opinions
grow a thicker skin faggot

/pol/ is actually proof of this phenomenon tho

>owners of le means of broduction :DDDD

As a sentiment existed before capitalism. It existed before feudalism. It was there from the very start.

And apparantly it can exist among communists as well since your dear Che didn't hold blacks in the highest regard.

Are you seriously comparing meetings for people with similar interests to public areas where speech is curtailed for the sake that someone might feel uncomfortable? There's a huge difference in finding a space where you can express your ideas, and demanding that others make a space cater to you.

If you say so

You just proved the point.

>burn Ayn Rand books
Boy she really got under your thin skin, didn't she?

>enforced

Not today, kid.
You guys are really stuck in the 30's and 60's still.

If anything capitalists today want a diverse city. They support the brown rainbow. They're supporting mass immigration. They benefit from it. It's cheap labour for them. The changing demographics do not affect them as much.
That fallout is for poor white working class people who see themselves pushed out of their neighbourhoods by culturally non-relatable non-whites.. And if not them, by gentrifying yuppies like yourself who on top of that kill their career prospects because they don't agree with your Newspeak.

You're acting as capitalism's enablers by focussing on the white working class its intolerance and combatting them, instead of addressing how mass immigration does not in the least damage capitalism as it is.

She's quite frankly embarrassing to read.
It's so unsystematic, filled by out of nowhere claims based on incoherent axioms and just all around awful prose.
It's also incredibly annoying how a person whose works doesn't even approach the conservative ideals of mentioned authors is said to be conservative.

Give me examples of how the owners of production 'enforce' racism.

Its a star of david on a background of dollar bills, the Daily Stormer were writing about it

Well the administration treats them as both cheap labor (mexicans and muslims in us and europe both) and as being incapable of intellectual work and generally being human.
That's why you have all the social support for blacks who refuse to work and making them into artificial invalids.

Wah wah wah ya big baby.

Who cares what the Daily Stormer wrote about?

Because most republicans are belligerent children and dipshit hicks.

That's not enforcing racism. That's exploiting a group of people. It does not 'enforce' any racist ideas. Enforcing happens directly. Indirect consequences can hardly be called 'enforcements'.

No mercy for white trash.
They're also the proletariat.
But no mercy.
We don't need them in our revolt. We alienate them further.

And that is why you fail.

The "poor white working class" are just those that benefited from the keynesian military-welfare state apparatus and imperialist looting of the third world. Most of them worked in jobs that are no longer necessary and which were artificially stimulated by government policies after WWII.
The authentic working class is in Asia today.

youtube.com/watch?v=0hq2rOEwnIU

>filled by out of nowhere claims based on incoherent axioms

Such as?

I know it's taken you the whole of this decade to discover multiculturalism is instrumental, but im afraid you're the one stuck in the past: Marxists have been dealing with this exact aporia since the 80s, probably earlier. Class is certainly the dominant political category of politics; I'm against racism because it's a distraction in the same way multiculturalism is.

Leftist never seem to have met a working class man.
As soon as you can't talk proper English or don't display much (general) knowledge on a particular subject they start the namecalling.

Protip: when online talking to someone that disagrees with you, you're most likely not talking to a monocle wearing capitalist with a beaver hat

And most liberals are cowards, life failures and cuckhold fetishists.

>political category of politics

I'm an idiot

Productivity in itself being some kind of a goal for man.

I know you never leave campus, but poor working class whites still exist despite most of their jobs being shipped overseas. They struggle to find/keep a job and when they do, it's a shitty wage.

But I guess because their masters were colonialists and they themselves just happen to live in close proximity to them, and got paid wages from the loot, they can now get their teeth stomped or at least suffer even greater displacement.

Is that incoherent or out of nowhere?

>meme merchant rubbing his hands.jpg

Both.

Your dummie tier "owners of production" explanations and now your shitty sophomoric elucidations with the sneers are actually triggering.

lel, it's a why is Veeky Forums better read on rightists than people who think they're right aligned thread.

i love these, some idiot comes on claiming threads get deleted and fails to realise we scared the mods away, so they won't be deleted.

so yes, OP, the reason why all those Voltaire, Burke, Keruoac, etc threads get deleted is because you're a raving loony who hallucinates things. enjoy the credibility that brings you under TS Eliot's idea of permanent things, like the eternal need of society to stigmatise weaklings like you for its own survival.

because socialist > liberal > conservative
conservative is shit tier

Unruhe pls go.

I think he's mocking that fat fuck from Maoist Rebel News

You could make a point that Ayn Rand has a lack of metaphysics in her works. You could even make the point that she's long-winded, and you just don't like her style. But your criticism is far more incoherent than the "incoherent axiom" you just posted.

There is no working class in America. People are either on welfare and purely profiting from corporate taxation and the third world labour force or those that "work" have massively inflated wages over any other global worker because of government regulations to pay them off from rebelling.

That's why it's absolutely crucial to spread cuckolding porn to prepare the worthless decadent first world male so he's ready to prep the revolutionary forces of the third world

is it triggering to think about how I'm a black college graduate from a working class household pursuing his master's in English literature and who won his scholarship over more deserving white people? and also I sell weed and write people's papers for money.

youtu.be/KBjblKtj1ag

>pursuing his master's in English literature

Oh I'm burning with envy... The heights you will soar.

A little bit.

that's actually the only thing about my post that's true. I just love fucking with working class white dipshits like you

>mfw

Enjoy your job at Starbucks, darkie.

wow, this thread has been an unproductive shitshow. This is why these threads are deleted.

Go back to /pol/.

That's very revolutionary of you.

DELET THIS

doing my part comrade

>Try voicing anti-immigration or anti-gay beliefs in the public sector and try holding a job there.

That has nothing to do with the fact that those ideas are politically conservative. It's because they are xenophobic and homophobic, respectively. Are you thick?

All you did was give two other terms for anti-immigration and anti-gay... It explained shit.

Nice buzzwords, you faggot nigger.

Nah I just don't care enough to post more about her.
She's similar to Voltaire and Rousseau, she said what people wanted to her, not a coherent and well thought out philosophy.
Those ideas are something which you cannot do without as a conservative.
Xphobia is a dumb concept for disregarding whatever you disagree with by playing the emotion card.

>he thinks we delete threads about right wingers
Did you mistake fan fiction for right wing philosophy? They're very different things, apart from maybe Carlyle and Dante.

I've never seen someone drink this much Kool-Aid.

What's wrong with xenophobia and homophobia despite it being 2016?

I've never seen a thread deleted for being about Samuel Johnson (or Boswell). Do Tories not count as right wing any more? I figured shitting on Milton would have given him at least some right wing points.

I wish polfags actually started reading conservative philosophy, there's a lot of it and its great.
Shame we have Milo instead of Chesterton nowadays.