Why does she abhor poor people? No memes, please

Why does she abhor poor people? No memes, please.

Other urls found in this thread:

jacobinmag.com/2015/02/sweden-welfare-social-democracy-socialism/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The part in the fountainhead where public housing and social welfare is posed as a crutch keeping mankind from its true potential is pretty damning. Also, she didnt really address where her "no charity for anyone" system fits in with the millions upon millions of mentally ill, orphans, individuals with crippling degenerative illnesses, and the infirm aged.

This point is where 20 year old me lost my edge and realized Scandinavian Social Democracy was the best of all worlds.

Way to completely avoid answering the question.

>This point is where 20 year old me lost my edge and realized Scandinavian Social Democracy was the best of all worlds.

>she

read this
jacobinmag.com/2015/02/sweden-welfare-social-democracy-socialism/
get with real socialism you cuck

She hates poor people that do not attempt to better their station or work hard to subsist on what they can bring home by themselves. The second someone goes on welfare, he becomes a leech.

>Sweden

Please

gale wynand was broke, but he was never "bad" until after he got rich and turned into a pussy

Rentier Capitalism is so Brave

>she

do you prefer norwegian social democracy funded by random luck? that's not viable either

>sweden

>random luck

That said, they at least make sure the populace benefit from said luck

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?

so you just like homogeneous white countries? racist

As any mentally healthy, rational person who isn't spooked to death would know by now, the best form of government is equal parts racism, fascism and libertarianism

Nah, its anarchy

Newsflash: Anarchy don't work when you are being invaded by violent low IQ mud peoples who only care about Rape, Looting and Gibsmedats. It's a Dog eat Dog world... As soon as the cops are off the streets they'll come for all that the white man has built and destroy it

who gave hobbes an internet connection?

She was just a mentally ill.

It's that simple.

>literal Jacobins

It's nice to see people use that image that I made on /pol/ awhile back.

Personally, I don't think it's what she's said that people abhor, but people who have claimed to used her philosophy and have her as their inspiration that people find abhorrent.

Ayn Rand also didn't believe in anarchy either.

>Anarchy, as a political concept, is a naive floating abstraction: . . . a society without an organized government would be at the mercy of the first criminal who came along and who would precipitate it into the chaos of gang warfare. But the possibility of human immorality is not the only objection to anarchy: even a society whose every member were fully rational and faultlessly moral, could not function in a state of anarchy

That sounds like an ad hominem.

Objectivism's central tenets are that reality exists independently of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception, that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness (rational self-interest), that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism, and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally. Morals are derived by the fact that we only have one life to live and that we should live it to the fullest. And as such, the standard of value is derived from their own individual lives.

Denmark's beautiful privatised fire service.
Scandinavia truly is a capitalists paradise.
Who cares if taxes are high when public services are good?

Denmark's welfare state is funded by free markets

Judaism

Norweigan democracy is by far the best

imprecise use of language is a tool of the "left"


rand while being a bad novelist did not hate "poor people", at least not the 'poor people' in the same sense you're using.

wanton welfare persuades people to become dependent, the same way if parents do everything for their child the child will not strive to do anything for itself

>she

Wasn't university free for a long time?

has no style

kek

Wealthy people are better. The poor are parasites that enjoy the benefits of technology and innovation and contribute nothing.
Helping others is Class Treason. The free market is the fairest measure of worth and intelligence.

Ayn Rand was the rich girl daughter of some pharmacist who was constantly told she was smarter and worked harder than everyone else. When little Ayn Rand made a macaroni picture daddy didn't just hang it up on the fridge he paid for it to be displayed in a museum. She then went on to assume that anyone in poor conditions just didn't work as hard and smart as her. If she were born today she would have an episode of My Super Sweet Sixteen.

Would watch desu.

She was talking about mediocrity in specific. But i suppose it's not their fault if they're poor. Some of them, maybe; so fuck them!

You are right familia

Dude, nice trips, but that doesn't excuse how fluffy that was. Could have condensed that to a few lines and not have sounded beat-around-the-bush redundant.