Me and the whole class ended up in a situation where we had to invent a sum whose result was 1 (it was a small step in...

Me and the whole class ended up in a situation where we had to invent a sum whose result was 1 (it was a small step in a bigger problem)

Every single student used 0+1 except me.
I used 0.7 + 0.3

What does it mean?

>What does it mean?

That your dumb. Your intellectually superior classmates found a way using only natural numbers while your pleb brain needed the fucking rationals to answer properly.

Your IQ is probably 10 points below your classmates. At least.

>0
>natural

This
OP's only hope is to get into CS

you are probably influenced by programming, where sometimes 0 can be a pain in the ass?

2/3+2/9+2/27+.....

It mean you try too hard to feel special.
You aren't special.

How do you know that? Maybe I am.

1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ...
not special snowflake enough famalam

you're right, nobody else can be this retarded.

0.999... + ?

You're all dumb, the answer is 1/2+1/2

Most constructions of the naturals assume that 0 is the first number and not 1.

I mean, without 0 you have no additive identity and that really fucks up when trying to do algebra with the naturals.

0.999... + 0

1+2+3+.... + 13/12

Kek

10/10

OP here, that was my first option

but I didn't like that they were the same number

10/3*3/10=0.99999...=1

but this doesnt sum to 1

Fucking scrub

[eqn]\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{n}[/eqn]

Don't post on this board again please.

...

You know that that sum diverges right?

High tier bait

Retarded

>Retarded

It diverges man. I am not even joking. Look it up, it is quite interesting.

It means that ur a special snowflake OP

7 and 3 are spiritually significant

surprised nobody did 1 = 1

Congrats, you are actually dumber than OP.

>invent a sum
I mean, I'm not quite sure what OP was supposed to do either, but that's not it.

Did you mean this?
[math]\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{x-1}{x^n}[/math]

>i is the subject of the sum
>i is not even a term of the expression

Something doesn't quite ADD UP.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Mate
2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 .........

de-ja vu

Hol' up, guys, I think everyone's ignoring the
>invent
part. This has to be a sum that no one has ever seen before to count; your fancy geometric series won't cut it. I propose:
0.265162962559105821 +
0.462153212528622563 +
-0.132136235632693500 +
0.404820060544965116

Let me know if that looks familiar to anyone.

It reminds me of the hunt.

Enjoy your pointless set [math]\mathbb{W}[/math], stupid American. xD

Nigger, not having 0 in the naturals makes no fucking sense. That's why we have Z+, fucker.

I hate people like you, making things inconsistent for no goddamn reason. Kill yourself!

It's a sum of one number retard

Nope I did that one before