1. For oracles, market share is important. Link has no advantage over other solutions (see Oracalize, etc) 2. The team is too small and inexperienced. There are not enough developers. 3. Poor leadership. Sergey won't be able to take this project where it needs to be. 4. Lack of resources. $32M is not enough. 5. Building a product nobody wants. Why does an oracle solution need to be decentralized? It doesn't.
These are valid concerns, but you're retarded if you think this hasn't already been addressed. They have lots of stuff in the works, and huge advantages over oracalize. The team is fine, adding more developers to a project just complicates things. Also, the leadership is excellent. Sergey is a great CEO.
$32m is definitely enough funding. Are you fucking dull? And the entire point of blockchain is decentralization. If there's a central point of failure with oracles, then why bother making a decentralized application at all?
We all know that no tech startup has ever succeeded with less than $1bil start up capital. OP wins
Asher Cruz
Kys, this is not what I mean.
Colton Howard
Looool, what a loser
Angel Ward
dude... SO ARE YOU you are in every fucking thread saying the exact same shit
"the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result"
Luis Scott
Linkies have rebutted so much FUD, that real FUD posters have given up, and autists like OP have resorted to samefagging himself in an attempt to recapture that autistic flare of argumentation again